Origins (Uncensored) Reprise

[PlunkettsGhost]

Uh, no, I didn't


I should just ignore who Vox Day is (and isn't)

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

I should just ignore who Vox Day is (and isn't)

we can ignore Darwin so, the failed theology student with no biology credentials. Grand so. Case closed

 

[AN2]

we can ignore Darwin so, the failed theology student with no biology credentials. Grand so. Case closed

It's just a few bullet points written by a (fundamentalist) Christian who doesn't believe in evolution (I think you missed that part)

 

[SwordOfStZip]

What type of Christian is Vox Day?

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

It's just a few bullet points

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

The case is CLOSED James. By your own logic, we no longer have to listen to anything about the failed theology student and his pet ideas. You can put a bow on this thread now, ask for it to be locked. It is done.

 

[AN2]

View attachment 7014

Uh, yeah, that's what it is. But in your mind it transforms into a mathematical proof (that no actual biologist can say because, you know, the ice wall or something)

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

LOCK THIS THREAD PLEASE. It's done. The appeal to authority is victorious.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

What type of Christian is Vox Day?

non denominational I believe

 

[AN2]

Fail is Fail

I read today one of the funniest things I've read in the ID thread, written by @Tiger, he said -

"One of the smarter utterances from him."

Referring to Dawkins when he said that sex is binary.

If Tiger considers that to be one of the smarter utterances Dawkins has made.. how much do you think he understands about anything he (Dawkins) has ever said

 

[clarke-connolly]

Fail is Fail

I read today one of the funniest things I've read in the ID thread, written by @Tiger, he said -

"One of the smarter utterances from him."

Referring to Dawkins when he said that sex is binary.

If Tiger considers that to be one of the smarter utterances Dawkins has made.. how much do you think he understands about anything he (Dawkins) has ever said

Is Dawkins all that smart really ? !

Didn't Darwin already do the heavy lifting in Dawkins speciality ? !

 

[AN2]

Is Dawkins all that smart really ? !

Didn't Darwin already do the heavy lifting in Dawkins speciality ? !

I think he could lay claim to having a few ideas of his own

I would certainly think that he is an intelligent man and I would think that I'd be quite familiar with how he thinks (and how he's misunderstood by people less intelligent than him)

I've said before that I don't necessarily agree with his atheistic arguments. I couldn't place myself on his 1-7 probabilistic scale (I'm more of a 50-50 guy ) and his appeal to rationality doesn't make that much sense to me. So when he implores Medhi Hasan that he's - a man of the 21st century..



..that wouldn't be an approach that I would take. Obviously there isn't any eh, fossil record of winged horses and indeed it may be a biological ludicrousy that they would exist but there's not much point in using science as an argument regarding that stuff. I would say the same about Christianity regarding say the Virgin Birth or the Resurrection. Religious belief isn't scientific

 

[clarke-connolly]

If Dawkins thinks Medhi Hasan is a Sophisticated Respected Journalist ~ Then I respectively suggest that Richard Dawkins failed ~ The Intelligence Test right there !

 

[AN2]

If Dawkins thinks Medhi Hasan is a Sophisticated Respected Journalist ~ Then I respectively suggest that Richard Dawkins failed ~ The Intelligence Test right there !

I'm not sure that he always tells the truth about what he really thinks of a journalist.

Here he is denying that he thinks Piers Morgan is a fool (one of Drooper's favourite philosophers ) and I doubt anything changed after the interview -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pA4Hx-dJAn4&t=58

 

[AN2]

What is Intelligent Design?

For anyone who wants to know what @Tiger's ID thread (which he calls Origins) is all about.. Please watch this summary -

 

[Clean and free]

I'm not sure that he always tells the truth about what he really thinks of a journalist.

Here he is denying that he thinks Piers Morgan is a fool (one of Drooper's favourite philosophers ) and I doubt anything changed after the interview -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pA4Hx-dJAn4&t=58

Dawkins was definitely trying to cover himself there . Obvious he doesn't like Morgan - who proceeded to repeatedly interrupt him throughout that interview as well!

 

[clarke-connolly]

Dawkins was definitely trying to cover himself there . Obvious he doesn't like Morgan - who proceeded to repeatedly interrupt him throughout that interview as well!

Piers Morgan is very Shallow just like Meghan Markle which is why they don't like one another ~ ~ Not enough shallow water for both together ! !

 

[SwordOfStZip]

What is Intelligent Design?

For anyone who wants to know what @Tiger's ID thread (which he calls Origins) is all about.. Please watch this summary -

Most Normie Catholics in Ireland and Anglicans in England understand the phrase "Intelligent Design" to mean Theistic Evolution (which I believe to be fundamentally rationally incompatible with any type of really meaningful Christian Faith). The idea of Theistic Evolution has been held by Western non-Christians since at least the 19 th century (I think before even- remember the Pre-Socratic Greek Philosopher Anaximander held to ideas close to what we call Evolution- but I cannot remember the details just now).

Louis Agassiz - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[AN2]

Most Normie Catholics in Ireland and Anglicans in England understand the phrase "Intelligent Design" to mean Theistic Evolution (which I believe to be fundamentally rationally incompatible with any type of really meaningful Christian Faith). The idea of Theistic Evolution has been held by Western non-Christians since at least the 19 th century (I think before even- remember the Pre-Socratic Greek Philosopher Anaximander held to ideas close to what we call Evolution- but I cannot remember the details just now).

Louis Agassiz - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

ID dresses itself up as science, the problem is - there isn't any (science)

 

[AN2]

lol How fragile is @Tiger that he has to reply to me in his crank ID thread here instead of here.

Oh yeah..