Origins (Uncensored) Reprise

Do you believe in evolution?


  • Total voters
    11

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
LOL @

Post in thread 'Origins Thread' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/origins-thread.639/post-125306

Not for the post itself really but the reply

tumbleweed-highway.gif


@Mad as Fish doesn't seem to understand that for IDiots like @Tiger Darwin is the Devil 😆
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491

it_is_what_it_is

Member
New
Joined
Dec 12, 2024
Messages
61
Reaction score
35
Okey doke

Where did you stop reading, was it here -

Post in thread 'Origins (Uncensored) Reprise' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/origins-uncensored-reprise.1050/post-118531

I notice that you haven't cast your vote yet
Again, I have not the full thread, when I get a head space for it I might.

I am not wrong on the issues of theory, just like the big bang theory that was brought about by a Catholic Priest, it is a theory, and not a great one.

The baby and a bath water thing is again not a response I even thought was warranted, as I do not think you understood the heart of I am saying here regards where we are in the reality of the now, where I made more then a few points. The reality of medical science today as example, and many others that are not at least of the hardest of sciences that ye can spoof for now, is if the medical practice you are going under today, is based on 1990's scientific papers, where it is increasingly at the bottom of the hard sciences, the replication rate of said science was 90 percent, where you can expect that there would be some gibberish in the science, that would be wayladed under a healthy science of the time.

Over the last 25 years the replication rate, the procedure to verify a science, of medicine is now near 10 percent. So if you are being treated today under a published paper of today regards medicine for supposed X issue, it does not matter what the past Y years of science ever came about regards said science, it is being based on garbage driven by other means. Where it is not like this has not happened before in history, the fact that it is happening today is why the "Science" of today regards that which has the money behind it, due in many ways to a majority of a governments budget as example, health and education, being driving such corruption, is why the "Science" that has the most money behind it, is in a very bad way.

It is the similar when someone comes on to you about climate change, lots of money to be made here, and has been made there, which is like saying water is wet, as change is inherent in the word climate regards its meaning, double speak, where you would ask them first, do you know who Milankovic is, and they would not have a clue. How can ye talk about such a topic without knowing basics, or even the last two thousand years that we know of.

What is happening now is that the latest of a lot of science is a "Science", it is a belief system, throwing away all past knowledge or potential validations of where you came to be regards such ideas. That which has the most money behind it, is has been corrupted due to such.
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
I will just say that the theory of evolution is just that, a theory. The idea that people believe in an theory is a religion, it is a faith based argument. Theory is just that if you believe in such.
I'm sorry but you are hopelessly wrong.

Religion is certainly (a leap of) faith but a scientific theory is not -

You are using, shall we say, a layman's term of 'theory'. Our stupidest poster @Mods vs Roc_ers did this when he imagined replacement theory (which refers to a conspiracy theory) in the same layman's term
I am not wrong on the issues of theory
Are you hard of hearing?

See above
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
So have we all realised by now that "irreducible complexity" (a cornerstone of ID) coined by the IDiot Michael Behe is bunkum, shall we move on to another ID proof argument (I don't think there's that many of them) 🤔
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
Btw to the other IDers who have not commented so far in this thread, @scolairebocht and @Mad as Fish, please don't be scared (it's only Tiger who's chicken, Bawk! Bawk!1), don't make do with giving your head honcho a pat on the bum in his own thread, debate me bro
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
What is your point, exactly?
Which one?

I made two points;

We didn't evolve from primates, or, does evolving from primates.. to.. primates make sense to you? 🤔

I don't think that you would view humans as part of the animal kingdom - which is a theistic point of view
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
So now that we're done with the mousetrap guy, I thought I might have a go at another ID sproof, this time in my own words (Prof. Dave seems to trigger the f*ck out of them 😆)

I mean, ID is a bit like flat-earth, I'm learning as I go along but it goes something like this..

Genetic code is like [non-binary] computer code..

Wait, isn't computer code written by yoomans (a lot of it's probably written by AI nowadays but nonetheless)..

And aren't humans conscious/intelligent..

Et voila, intelligent design, it's God whatdunnit, evolution is a load of BOLLLLIX!

Is that about right, @Tiger? 🤔
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
So now that we're done with the mousetrap guy, I thought I might have a go at another ID sproof, this time in my own words (Prof. Dave seems to trigger the f*ck out of them 😆)

I mean, ID is a bit like flat-earth, I'm learning as I go along but it goes something like this..

Genetic code is like [non-binary] computer code..

Wait, isn't computer code written by yoomans (a lot of it's probably written by AI nowadays but nonetheless)..

And aren't humans conscious/intelligent..

Et voila, intelligent design, it's God whatdunnit, evolution is a load of BOLLLLIX!

Is that about right, @Tiger? 🤔
I believe this feller is the main proponent of the above sproof, Stephen C. Meyer -

n5pK6wtm_400x400.jpg


Somewhat of a Godfather of the pseudoscientific Christian ID movement.

One of the first things that strikes me about the sproof, is that hoomans don't code in binary
 

AN2

Well-known member
Member
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Oct 16, 2024
Messages
1,354
Reaction score
491
I believe this feller is the main proponent of the above sproof, Stephen C. Meyer -

n5pK6wtm_400x400.jpg


Somewhat of a Godfather of the pseudoscientific Christian ID movement.

One of the first things that strikes me about the sproof, is that hoomans don't code in binary
So like, show this to the most proficient programmer in the world..

10010011011011

.. and it won't mean a goddamn fucking thing 😆
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Top Bottom