- Joined
- Jul 7, 2024
- Messages
- 750
- Reaction score
- 520
Of course this does not prove that he was however it is interesting.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elk3pWec8h0
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elk3pWec8h0
Western security services run the political content of Wikipedia, hence the above can quite rightly be dismissed as propaganda.So what is stuff like this an illustration of? What is its object? What is it trying to do?
The Grayzone - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
"... Grayzone (thegrayzone.com) is a one-stop propaganda shop, devoted largely to pushing a pro-Assad line on Syria, a pro-regime line on Venezuela, a pro-Putin line on Russia, and a pro-Hamas line on Israel and Palestine.
Coverage of The Grayzone has focused on its misleading and false reporting, its criticism of American foreign policy, and its sympathetic coverage of the Russian, Chinese and Syrian governments.
The Grayzone has downplayed or denied the persecution of Uyghurs in China, and been accused of publishing conspiracy theories about Xinjiang, Syria and other regions, and publishing disinformation about Ukraine during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which some have described as pro-Russian propaganda
The Grayzone's news content is generally considered to be fringe,and the website maintains a pro-Kremlin editorial line, centred around an opposition to the foreign policy of the United States..."
DISINFORMATION | A history of a still-hidden part of the Cold War
All you online little coteries of "useful fools" are really starting to get up my wick. I just can't work out if you're all just as horribly dumb as a bag of bricks, or is it something else even more insidious.
You quote the Washington Post, a 'news' paper in cahoots with the CIA, as evidence that the Grayzone is dishonest in its reporting?Oh, ffs.
Well you can't argue with dogma, or ideologues.
Anything that undermines their idiocy is simply put down to some conspiracy of the "deep state" or some moronic shit like that.
Well one more recent article for further illustrstion (not to convince this site's idiots and "useful fools", but for posterity, for those in the future reviewing what was known and what was unknown at the current juncture:
"... A top editor at an online news site aimed at Americans who has worked extensively for Russia’s Sputnik also has taken money from Iranian government-owned media, according to newly unearthed documents — a sign of how widening geopolitical alliances are making it harder to identify and trace foreign influence operations.
Hacked emails and other documents from the Iranian government-funded Press TV show payments of thousands of dollars to Wyatt Reed, a writer who is now a Washington-based editor for the online publication Grayzone. In addition, the site’s founder, Max Blumenthal, regularly appears on Russian television and once accepted a trip to Moscow for a celebration of Russian state-controlled video network RT that featured Vladimir Putin..."
Etc. It's obvious what is going on.
So what is stuff like this an illustration of? What is its object? What is it trying to do?
DISINFORMATION | A history of a still-hidden part of the Cold War
All you online little coteries of "useful fools" are really starting to get up my wick. I just can't work out if you're all just as horribly dumb as a bag of bricks, or is it something else even more insidious.
Of course this does not prove that he was however it is interesting.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elk3pWec8h0
Interesting take here on Starmer's utility to the UK Permanent state
The Magical Blair Machine
Imagine a magnificent and magical machine that has been custom-built for a single purpose.forbiddentexts.substack.com
Projection!Well you can't argue with dogma, or ideologues.
Interesting piece here on who Starmer's alleged master, Blair works for:Interesting take here on Starmer's utility to the UK Permanent state
The Magical Blair Machine
Imagine a magnificent and magical machine that has been custom-built for a single purpose.forbiddentexts.substack.com
Their dogma is 'do as thou wilt' and their faith in their barmy worldview is as ingrained and unshakeable as any Mohammeden'sI don't think he is a dogmatic or ideological thinker as such- he is guided by a will to power as opposed to belief in a set of propositions.