Okay, that article had to be checked so I went to the UK dataset and downloaded the Excel file (which is probably hatespeech and a year in prison in the near future).
I had a look through it. There is a big difference in the mortality rates between the unvaccinated and the vaccinated (though those with only one or two shots have trailed off now). But are these explained by different age cohorts?
There's a column for standardised mortality rates (which is the difference in what is expected adjusting for age cohort). 10 is the expected norm, below 10 is lower than normal, and above 10 is higher than normal. I divided by 100 as this seemed appropriate. The rates in vaccinated accelerated after 21 days. The vaccinated are at about 10 or 11 while the figure is 13 or higher for the vaccinated. There's quite a disparity in numbers of deaths between the two.
Somebody official needs to explain these figures. These appear to bear
Kirsch's calculations out. Didn't Channel Four News relish a story like this a couple of decades ago?