General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.

Nyob said:
I think invoking Hitler as the epitome of evil is retarded, if you're a nationalist. And you?
Click to expand...
Actually, no—I don’t think Hitler is a good figure for nationalists at all. If you're serious about real nationalism—defending your people, your traditions, and your sovereignty—then Hitler is the last person to idolise.

He destroyed Germany, slaughtered millions of Europeans and gave globalists the perfect pretext to re-engineer the world. Before World War II, there was only one communist country: Bolshevik Russia. After World War II, there were dozens—half of Europe fell to Marxism. So much for 'fighting communism.'

He handed global finance and Zionism the perfect pretext to expand. Hitler was financed by Wall Street. with the likes of Union Banking Corporation, Prescott Bush, and firms like IG Farben—funded and protected by Anglo-American capital.

He didn’t defeat globalism; he handed it the keys to the 20th century. Real nationalists don’t glorify useful idiots or controlled demolitions.
 
Last edited:
Tiger said:
Actually, no—I don’t think Hitler is a good figure for nationalists at all. If you're serious about real nationalism—defending your people, your traditions, and your sovereignty—then Hitler is the last person to idolise.
Click to expand...
Looks like I'm in another "one-way discussion" with you, again 🙄

I said that vilifying Hitler (or the Nazis) as the epitome of evil, if you're a nationalist, is retarded

The person who liked your post stands out to me for doing that all the time but of course, like you, he isn't a nationalist

Tiger said:
He destroyed Germany, slaughtered millions of Europeans and gave globalists the perfect pretext to re-engineer the world. Before World War I, there was only one communist country: Bolshevik Russia. After World War II, there were dozens—half of Europe fell to Marxism. So much for 'fighting communism.'

He handed global finance and Zionism the perfect pretext to expand. Hitler was financed by Wall Street. with the likes of Union Banking Corporation, Prescott Bush, and firms like IG Farben—funded and protected by Anglo-American capital.

He didn’t defeat globalism; he handed it the keys to the 20th century. Real nationalists don’t glorify useful idiots or controlled demolitions.
Click to expand...
You are aware who won WW2? 🤔
 
Tiger said:
Ah, the predictable retreat. First James, now Fishalt — two men with two things in common: when confronted with arguments they couldn’t answer, both tried to flee to the safety of another thread. A self-fashioned echo chamber, away from the discomfort of being made to think. It doesn’t exactly scream confidence — more like ideological triage.

Fishalt’s theatrical exit speech is particularly rich. He declares himself too enlightened to argue with “zealots,” which in modern atheistic code means “anyone who challenges my assumptions.” This is the rhetorical move of someone who has mistaken derision for debate and arrogance for argument. He finds it “boring,” but what he really finds intolerable is a worldview that doesn’t flatter his nihilism or offer the easy answers of scientistic dogma.

What is the other thing they have in common…oh yes….a predilection for underage girls. James, who is drunk this Friday night is already making posts in this regard about a creepy video he posted the other night. For the record this is the one area despite their differences that he and James agree. Underage, illegal girls are attractive. Why people engage with them as normal people is their own business, but it’s not for me. Why anyone would choose to handcuff themselves to James is their business, however it seems a particularly stupid manoeuvre on Fishy’s part. “Stoopid is as stoopid does”.

Then the sermon continues: “Tiger knows he’s wormfood like the rest of us.” No, sir. That’s your creed, not mine. You want the cosmos to be dead and cold so you can call it rational. You mistake despair for depth.

Your aesthetic nod to Catholicism — “I’d rather live in a world shaped by it” — is telling. You enjoy the fruit while spitting on the root. Your admiration is for stained glass, not truth; liturgy, not Logos.

And the trope that believers only behave because of hellfire — well, history begs to differ. The bloodiest hands of the last century weren’t religious fanatics but atheistic materialists: Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot. Your worldview has already had its test run. It ended in mass graves.

You say I’m a demagogue. But I’m not the one running away. You and James share more than disdain for dissent — you share a need to escape scrutiny. That’s not intellectual maturity. That’s Walter Mitty in a lab coat.
Click to expand...
I've repeatedly said that I don't care, especially what you believe, what anybody believes generally, and that I have no issue with anyone having faith. I created a separate thread in response to you deleting posts in Origins--i.e, turning it into an echo chamber. You'[re the one who popped the lid on that.

Again, I've heard it all before. It's all just the same tired theological tropes and talking points. I'm sure it's all interesting to you, having just discovered it all--but some of us have already had to sit through it all before Tiger. It's also the same MO, which always reduces to: "You can't demonstrably prove everything that is hypothesized in evolutionary biology, therefore my belief consisting of nothing more than totally unverifiable magical explanations of existence and consciousness is entirely valid". Mud men, rib women. Talking snakes. The apple of power. What can the Bible, or any holy text, actually explain about the mechanics of life on a technical level? Absolutely nothing. Nothing at all.
 
Catholics of Sarsfields, I ask you this: Does this person strike you as somebody worthy of entering the kingdom of heaven? How in sync with the teaching of Jesus Christ is whatever this is?

Totally unprompted, I might add. Apropos of nothing,


1746296167841.png
 
Nyob said:
Looks like I'm in another "one-way discussion" with you, again 🙄

I said that vilifying Hitler (or the Nazis) as the epitome of evil, if you're a nationalist, is retarded

The person who liked your post stands out to me for doing that all the time but of course, like you, he isn't a nationalist
Click to expand...
If you listen closely, you can actually hear James backtracking

Take It Back Fran Healy GIF by Travis


Do you think that your nationalist champion Justin is aware of who financed Hitler or does he think it came from the sales of Mein Kampf?
 
Fishalt said:
Catholics of Sarsfields, I ask you this: Does this person strike you as somebody worthy of entering the kingdom of heaven? How in sync with the teaching of Jesus Christ is whatever this is?

Totally unprompted, I might add. Apropos of nothing,


View attachment 7555
Click to expand...
There’s nothing there that I don’t say to you all the time.

Why the faggotry?

Hurt feelings
 
Time for James to set up an account under James Dawson or whatever because I just delete enmass a lot of guest attempts at posting. It just takes a couple of seconds
 
Declan said:
Time for James to set up an account under James Dawson or whatever because I just delete enmass a lot of guest attempts at posting. It just takes a couple of seconds
Click to expand...
Tell the clown what his password is, FFS....😂 😂 😂
 
I asked him to post an email
 
Tiger said:
There’s nothing there that I don’t say to you all the time.

Why the faggotry?

Hurt feelings
Click to expand...
It's an insane thing to do, Tiger. That's the overarching point here. PM'ing me with some pathetically petty, butthurt, sabre-rattling message totally out-of-the-blue is about the gayest, bitch-blood thing that's ever happened on Sarsfields.
 
Fishalt said:
I've repeatedly said that I don't care, especially what you believe, what anybody believes generally, and that I have no issue with anyone having faith. I created a separate thread in response to you deleting posts in Origins--i.e, turning it into an echo chamber. You'[re the one who popped the lid on that.
Click to expand...
Nope, you set up your own thread because you and James were failing miserably in our discussion and you needed a safe haven. Which is why you banned me from it.

The only posts I ever removed were mindless abuse from James, nothing to do with any debate. James was drunk and spamming
Fishalt said:
Again, I've heard it all before. It's all just the same tired theological tropes and talking points. I'm sure it's all interesting to you, having just discovered it all--but some of us have already had to sit through it all before Tiger. It's also the same MO, which always reduces to: "You can't demonstrably prove everything that is hypothesized in evolutionary biology, therefore my belief consisting of nothing more than totally unverifiable magical explanations of existence and consciousness is entirely valid". Mud men, rib women. Talking snakes. The apple of power. What can the Bible, or any holy text, actually explain about the mechanics of life on a technical level? Absolutely nothing. Nothing at all.
Click to expand...
Your dismissal, laced with weary condescension, is less an argument and more a defense mechanism. Saying “I’ve heard it all before” isn’t a rebuttal—it’s a way of shielding yourself from engagement. And yet, ironically, your complete inability to answer even basic challenges shows you clearly haven’t heard it before—or at least, never understood it. What you have “heard” are caricatures filtered through the echo chamber of materialist apologetics, not serious arguments demanding serious response.

You mock “mud men” and “rib women” while faithfully adhering to your own creation myth: that a cosmos burst from nothing without cause, that inorganic matter sprang to life without intention, and that consciousness is a biochemical accident. You accuse others of magical thinking while invoking a liturgy of unobservable, unrepeatable events you accept on institutional authority. That’s not science—it’s scientism. And your “technical explanations” never seem to touch the core: why anything exists, why order emerges, or why truth matters at all.

You reject metaphysics and then smuggle it in through the back door under names like “emergence” or “natural selection.” The Bible speaks in symbols of eternal truths you cannot measure but which govern all that is—meanwhile, your worldview is a ghost town of unaccountable abstractions.

When pressed, you return to sneers, not substance. Because at bottom, this isn’t about evidence. It’s about allegiance—to a system that cannot tolerate contradiction, and to a narrative that needs the protection of scorn to survive scrutiny.
 
Fishalt said:
It's an insane thing to do, Tiger. That's the overarching point here. PM'ing me with some pathetically petty, butthurt, sabre-rattling message totally out-of-the-blue is about the gayest, bitch-blood thing that's ever happened on Sarsfields.
Click to expand...
Says the guy who posted that he’s a man in his fifties that’s attracted to underage girls.

We know you’re ok with girls of 14 and 15, but tell us all how low the number goes? 9, 10?
 
Tiger said:
Says the guy who posted that he’s a man in his fifties that’s attracted to underage girls.

We know you’re ok with girls of 14 and 15, but tell us all how low the number goes? 9, 10?
Click to expand...
Not 50, nor close to it, never said any such thing. Specifically, what I said is that I've probably unwittingly checked out an underage girl walking down the road when driving. So have you.

Then Myles lifted his head out a puddle of Guiness-hork and totally misrepresented what was said.
 
Declan said:
I asked him to post an email
Click to expand...
I couldn't find any throwaway email of mine

I have just registered a new account (imaginatively named) AN3

Can you send by PM a password for AN2 to that account? (after that you can just delete AN3)
 
Tiger said:
If you listen closely, you can actually hear James backtracking

Take It Back Fran Healy GIF by Travis


Do you think that your nationalist champion Justin is aware of who financed Hitler or does he think it came from the sales of Mein Kampf?
Click to expand...
lol What am I backtracking about?

You don't seem to understand that I don't suffer deluded, narcissistic fools like you
 
Fishalt said:
Not 50, nor close to it, never said any such thing. Specifically, what I said is that I've probably unwittingly checked out an underage girl walking down the road when driving. So have you.
Click to expand...
What's unwitting about it? 🤔

The fact is, an older man, could find an "underage" girl physically attractive

And anyone who says that they couldn't possibly is either a homosexual or a liar
 
Nyob said:
lol What am I backtracking about?

You don't seem to understand that I don't suffer deluded, narcissistic fools like you
Click to expand...
Narcissistic????

This coming from you, Jimmy????:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Wolf said:
Narcissistic????

This coming from you, Jimmy????:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
Yes, Tiger is clearly a narcissist (along with his other faults)

I've said before, although a lot of people do do it, I don't allow an interlocutor of mine to essentially change the subject.. and carry on

I listen to what someone says before I reply (responsively), a narcissist doesn't
 
Nyob said:
What's unwitting about it? 🤔

The fact is, an older man, could find an "underage" girl physically attractive

And anyone who says that they couldn't possibly is either a homosexual or a liar
Click to expand...
Here, WankTank is back as 'Haven', go and discuss your fantasies about pre-pubescent girls and underage kids in general with him.
 
Fishalt said:
Then Myles lifted his head out a puddle of Guiness-hork and totally misrepresented what was said.
Click to expand...
I've been trying to rebuild relations since that time Sir. I feel they've been slowly thawing and I'd like it to continue in that vein (y)
 
I see, The Rugby Choke-ers, Choked again !

What a soft under-belly the Irish Rugby Players have !

Or are some of the opposition teams ~ Performance Drugged Up ( not saying Northampton ) but some of the others i.e, South Africa / maybe some New Zealanders ( especially in the past )
 
Fishalt said:
Catholics of Sarsfields, I ask you this: Does this person strike you as somebody worthy of entering the kingdom of heaven? How in sync with the teaching of Jesus Christ is whatever this is?

Totally unprompted, I might add. Apropos of nothing,


View attachment 7555
Click to expand...
You guys are hilarious but I'm somewhat intrigued with this part -

It's bizarre, even if I was to to take a pretend basic interest in the evolutionary position, I could argue against my own points better than he does. Sometimes I actually hint at where his argument is but he's too retarded to understand

Could you unpack that for me @Tiger? 🤔

My position is that evolution is a scientific theory so well established that it's basically fact

You've never posted anything in your dumb Intelligent Design thread other than by creationist crackpots and (semi) credible biologists who, nonetheless, believe in evolution
 

View: https://t.me/lauratowler/7200

The reason why Shiloh Hendrix happened is because for years now White people have been backed up against a wall with all our avenues of action and communication cut off. As we face a future that we don’t want, we are not allowed to resist it or advocate for ourselves in any way. It feels impossible to make any change at the ballot box, either because politicians betray us or we can’t advance ourselves. If we communicate our concerns, we are censored from the debate or sent to prison. Crimes against us are covered up. Our history is rewritten and insulted. White advocates are lied about, misrepresented and attacked to encourage others not to do the same. Well, as I’ve said for many years, none of these attacks are going to change how we feel and make us love multiculturalism, they just change how many of us choose to operate. The system has left us restrained but still defiant and asked us to pick a side. Well, we have just picked our side.
 
Did you write that? You haven't attributed it to anyone.

Shiloh? Sounds like a Jewess who planned it all to rake in the Shekels.
 
Myles O'Reilly said:
Did you write that? You haven't attributed it to anyone.
Click to expand...
I did, Saar (Laura Towler)

Myles O'Reilly said:
Shiloh? Sounds like a Jewess who planned it all to rake in the Shekels.
Click to expand...
What does it matter if her name is Neptune Shibboleth

A bigger point is being made. Do you want to confirm that your stupidity is just an act, or shall we decide that you're actually stupid? 🤔
 
AN2 said:
You guys are hilarious but I'm somewhat intrigued with this part -

It's bizarre, even if I was to to take a pretend basic interest in the evolutionary position, I could argue against my own points better than he does. Sometimes I actually hint at where his argument is but he's too retarded to understand

Could you unpack that for me @Tiger? 🤔

My position is that evolution is a scientific theory so well established that it's basically fact

You've never posted anything in your dumb Intelligent Design thread other than by creationist crackpots and (semi) credible biologists who, nonetheless, believe in evolution
Click to expand...
I know your position—mechanistic materialism cloaked in the borrowed prestige of "science." And it's not the authenticicity of your belief that damns it—it's your inability to defend it without collapsing into juvenile sneers and second-hand quips. You don't debate; you react. Predictably. Shallowly. Like every other product of the post-Enlightenment re-education camp that calls itself modernity.

You mistake repetition for understanding. You parrot the usual dogmas with the confidence of someone who's never had to think beyond Wikipedia footnotes. I knew what you would say about Hitler before you said it—because men like you are not thinkers, you’re ideological automatons. You repeat the script because it’s safe. Because you haven’t read enough to know how flimsy it is.

Your worldview is a cardboard idol of progress built on sand. And when questioned, you do not respond with substance but with invective—because that’s all your catechism has taught you. Read something. Anything. Dostoevsky. Solzhenitsyn. But until then, your mockery is a confession—of your ignorance and your fear of light.

You are not contending with me—you are contending with reality. And that is a battle your worldview cannot win.
 
  • Facepalm
Reactions: AN2
@Declan Tiger has banned me from the Origins thread, the thread in which you merged his Intelligent Design thread with my Origins Uncensored thread. Can you move it out of Tiger's blog?
 
AN2 said:
@Declan Tiger has banned me from the Origins thread, the thread in which you merged his Intelligent Design thread with my Origins Uncensored thread. Can you move it out of Tiger's blog?
Click to expand...
That’s the old ban. I’ll unban you.

The public humiliation must continue
 
Tiger said:
That’s the old ban. I’ll unban you.
Click to expand...
@Declan FYI he hasn't done that ^

It was a terrible decision to merge Tiger's ID thread into my Origins Uncensored thread and put it in his blog but surely you can go some way to rectifying?
 
Tiger said:
I know your position—mechanistic materialism cloaked in the borrowed prestige of "science."
Click to expand...
In the stolen Origins Uncensored thread you wrote;

Any attempt to fully account for reality — including the Earth’s origins — from within a purely materialist framework will always be incomplete.

When are you going to realise that your God magic isn't and never will be science?

Tiger said:
And it's not the authenticicity of your belief that damns it—it's your inability to defend it without collapsing into juvenile sneers and second-hand quips. You don't debate; you react. Predictably. Shallowly. Like every other product of the post-Enlightenment re-education camp that calls itself modernity.

You mistake repetition for understanding. You parrot the usual dogmas with the confidence of someone who's never had to think beyond Wikipedia footnotes. I knew what you would say about Hitler before you said it—because men like you are not thinkers, you’re ideological automatons. You repeat the script because it’s safe. Because you haven’t read enough to know how flimsy it is.

Your worldview is a cardboard idol of progress built on sand. And when questioned, you do not respond with substance but with invective—because that’s all your catechism has taught you. Read something. Anything. Dostoevsky. Solzhenitsyn. But until then, your mockery is a confession—of your ignorance and your fear of light.

You are not contending with me—you are contending with reality. And that is a battle your worldview cannot win.
Click to expand...
 
AN2 said:
In the stolen Origins Uncensored thread you wrote;

Any attempt to fully account for reality — including the Earth’s origins — from within a purely materialist framework will always be incomplete.

When are you going to realise that your God magic isn't and never will be science?
Click to expand...
This is great example of the shallow and predictable response that I mentioned above. No brain cells were exhausted in it's formation.

How telling — that when faced with the crumbling edifice of materialist pretensions, the best rebuttal you can muster is the childish pejorative: “God magic.” This is the language of those who haven’t read, who haven’t studied, and who believe history began with Neil deGrasse Tyson and ends with Reddit.

You parade science like a golden calf, unaware that the very discipline you idolise was birthed in the cradle of Christian metaphysics — men like Grosseteste, Bacon, and Newton sought to understand the cosmos precisely because they believed in a rational Creator. Remove that foundation, and you’re left with intellectual fragments masquerading as certainties — a mechanical cosmos with no mechanic, laws with no lawgiver, reason in a universe allegedly born of chaos.

Your “materialism” cannot account for logic, for being, for beauty, for justice, or even for the consciousness you mock others with. It is a philosophy of subtraction: subtract the soul, subtract meaning, subtract purpose, and call the vacancy “truth.” And yet, when challenged to explain why anything exists rather than nothing — or why the cosmos obeys laws intelligible to the human mind — you shuffle your feet and retreat to memes.

It’s not God that requires “magic” — it’s your worldview. Ex nihilo nihil fit — from nothing, nothing comes. And yet you want us to believe everything came from nothing... for no reason... and that this is somehow “science.”
 
AN2 said:
@Declan Tiger has banned me from the Origins thread, the thread in which you merged his Intelligent Design thread with my Origins Uncensored thread. Can you move it out of Tiger's blog?
Click to expand...
I tried to remove your ban there. See if it works.

Also, a gentle reminder that there is a separate Flat Earth thread, so try to stay on topic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom