Search results for query: Lennox

Crap and incorrect deflection. The question had nothing to do with Lennox’s views. Someone with a 3rd level education, would have read the question and understood stood it. Zero points. Let’s try that again… If the totality of physical reality — including time, space, matter, and energy —...

Okay, we’re done here. This is beyond hopeless.

...lying and then form a proper detailed argument to prove their point. You are incapable of this. If you're going to accuse someone like John Lennox of “lying,” the burden is on you to show not only that his claim is false, but that he knows it’s false and is willfully distorting it. Let’s...

...backtrack and disown it. Secondly, what we are talking about here today is your claim that some YouTube videos that you posted have “exposed” Lennox’s position. Now you are backing away from that. You haven’t identified a single demonstrable falsehood from John Lennox—only interpretations...

...Dave's video that you posted - Fake Dave's video (as always) misrepresents scientific nuance, there's literally no specific refutation of John Lennox as you claim. No false claims are cited or corrected from Lennox’s work. Fake Dave’s criticisms are broad and dismissive, not targeted or...

This is a textbook example of intellectual evasion. I asked for a single, specific example—in writing—where Professor John Lennox is shown to be objectively wrong in his reasoning or facts. Instead, you gave a lazy sneer: "Lennox doesn’t have any facts, he’s a creationist carnie." That’s not...

...refers to academic ability, the other to religious belief. There’s no reason to link the two. Also, I didn’t and wouldn’t refer to Professor Lennox a heretic. That term probably speaking refers to someone who was Catholic and then rejects Church teaching. Lennox is a Protestant, so from a...

...he’s not qualified in, and produces videos dripping with sarcasm and hostility toward anyone who challenges his worldview. Meanwhile, John Lennox is an emeritus professor of mathematics at Oxford with a doctorate in the philosophy of science and decades of formal academic engagement. He has...

...Dave,” an immature YouTube personality pretending to speak with academic authority while slandering actual scholars like Professor John Lennox of Oxford. That’s what’s being exposed—his lack of credentials, his mockery of reasoned argument, and his evangelical zeal for scientistic dogma...

Nobody has exposed Lennox you utter pillock.

James, how is your training going towards the most boring man in Ireland competition ?

You have no idea what I was considering. Nor has it any relevance. You’re deflecting from the poverty of your explanation of the universe’s origins and how you think Penrose solved the problem when he did no such thing. You’re lazily trying the old bait-and-switch—pretending that acknowledging...

Nothing says ‘defeat’ more than James pathetically replying to his own inane posts with weak, cheaply put together - biased YouTube videos. He never responds to arguments directly. An unfortunate bi-product of not knowing what the fuck is going on.

...why consciousness and objective morality exist, and why the universe is ordered and mathematically describable. These are philosophical questions, not empirical gaps. And the most intellectually honest minds — from Gödel and Penrose to Lennox and Plantinga — have consistently acknowledged this.

...rarely offers engagement with the big questions — only with easy ridicule and shallow cynicism. The real intellectuals — men like John Lennox — ask: Why is the universe intelligible? Why do mathematical laws govern the cosmos? Why does DNA contain coded instructions? These are not...

...And when pressed to actually define the roots of their own metaphysics—cosmology, morality, epistemology—they scoff, stall, or mock. John Lennox, in his Oxfordian clarity, often reminds us that “atheism is a faith position too—one that asserts a great deal, including the belief that the...

Yeah, a 500c Carl Zeiss. I haven’t used it for years. I used to go to a place on Lennox street called Photolabs that developed 120 film. They’d provide a contact sheet relatively cheaply and then I’d select the images that I wanted to print.

...of hand, and circular reasoning. This is not an exploration of truth; it is a defence of dogma, dressed in the language of science. As John Lennox has aptly observed, such critiques betray an underlying fear: a refusal to acknowledge that the universe may be more than just the product of...

...experience, highlighting the limitations of materialism, determinatism, and scientism in providing satisfactory explanations. To quote John Lennox… “If the atheists are right, the mind that does the science is the product of a mindless unguided process. Now, if you knew that your computer...

The title of this video speaks for itself Lennox has a great mind