Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
Health
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Professor" data-source="post: 42920" data-attributes="member: 202"><p><h3>Why misinterpretation of electron micrographs in SARS-CoV-2-infected tissue goes viral</h3><p><em> . . . ultrastructural details in autopsy tissues have been <strong>misinterpreted as coronavirus particles</strong> in recent papers. Bradley and colleagues<strong> described “coronavirus-like particles”</strong> in autopsy specimens of the “respiratory system, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract”, and in a case report Dolhnikoff and colleagues described <strong>“viral particles”</strong> in “different cell types of cardiac tissue” of a deceased child. However, the images in these publications show putative virus particles that<strong> lack sufficient ultrastructure</strong> for an unambiguous identification as virus.</em> - Hoax, they're not viruses at all<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite10" alt=":oops:" title="Oops! :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /></p><p></p><p><em> . . . findings, described by Tavazzi and colleagues,of “viral particles” in interstitial cells, <strong>which are clearly non-viral structures</strong>, such as coated vesicles. Furthermore, Bradley and colleagues quoted publications as a reference for their virus particle identification, which, in our opinion, </em><strong><em>both identified non-coronavirus structures as coronavirus particles,<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite10" alt=":oops:" title="Oops! :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /></em></strong></p><p></p><p><em>With interest we follow the publications that show the presence of putative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by</em><strong><em> electron microscopy (EM) in patient tissues and the debate about these results, </em></strong>- Good, let's see<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🧐" title="Face with monocle :face_with_monocle:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.5/png/unicode/64/1f9d0.png" data-shortname=":face_with_monocle:" /><strong><em> . . .</em></strong></p><p>[ATTACH=full]2099[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Now, the following is the kicker in regard to the <em>blinding science</em> sourced by twits as evidence . . .</p><p></p><p><em> . . . As diagnostic EM requires both specialised staff and expensive equipment, and has been replaced by other methods (eg, immunohistochemistry) in several fields of application,<strong> its use has been in decline in the past decades, resulting in irreversible loss of expertise that now becomes dramatically overt during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</strong> This dilemma of diagnostic EM<strong> should alarm us all,</strong> as<strong> misleading information</strong> on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tissue has<strong> already made its way into the scientific literature and seems to be perpetuated. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😲" title="Astonished face :astonished:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.5/png/unicode/64/1f632.png" data-shortname=":astonished:" /></strong></em></p><p><em>We declare no competing interests. </em></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32079-1/fulltext[/URL]</p><p></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Professor, post: 42920, member: 202"] [HEADING=2]Why misinterpretation of electron micrographs in SARS-CoV-2-infected tissue goes viral[/HEADING] [I] . . . ultrastructural details in autopsy tissues have been [B]misinterpreted as coronavirus particles[/B] in recent papers. Bradley and colleagues[B] described “coronavirus-like particles”[/B] in autopsy specimens of the “respiratory system, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract”, and in a case report Dolhnikoff and colleagues described [B]“viral particles”[/B] in “different cell types of cardiac tissue” of a deceased child. However, the images in these publications show putative virus particles that[B] lack sufficient ultrastructure[/B] for an unambiguous identification as virus.[/I] - Hoax, they're not viruses at all:oops: [I] . . . findings, described by Tavazzi and colleagues,of “viral particles” in interstitial cells, [B]which are clearly non-viral structures[/B], such as coated vesicles.[B][I] [/I][/B]Furthermore, Bradley and colleagues quoted publications as a reference for their virus particle identification, which, in our opinion, [/I][B][I]both identified non-coronavirus structures as coronavirus particles,:oops:[/I][/B] [I]With interest we follow the publications that show the presence of putative severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by[/I][B][I] electron microscopy (EM) in patient tissues and the debate about these results, [/I][/B]- Good, let's see🧐[B][I] . . .[/I][/B] [ATTACH type="full"]2099[/ATTACH] Now, the following is the kicker in regard to the [I]blinding science[/I] sourced by twits as evidence . . . [I] . . . As diagnostic EM requires both specialised staff and expensive equipment, and has been replaced by other methods (eg, immunohistochemistry) in several fields of application,[B] its use has been in decline in the past decades, resulting in irreversible loss of expertise that now becomes dramatically overt during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.[/B] This dilemma of diagnostic EM[B] should alarm us all,[/B] as[B] misleading information[/B] on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in tissue has[B] already made its way into the scientific literature and seems to be perpetuated. 😲[/B] We declare no competing interests. [/I] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)32079-1/fulltext[/URL] [B][I][/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
S
Is the State trying to bankrupt the Irish Catholic Church?
Started by scolairebocht
Friday at 9:15 AM
Replies: 4
Scholairebochts Blog.
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Thursday at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Wednesday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 212
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Wednesday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Sep 6, 2025
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
Health
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Top
Bottom