- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Messages
- 1,340
- Reaction score
- 1,696
Many is the discussion to be had about the Globalist influence over the power structure in Ireland, but a lot of the time, it seems to this observer, they get where they want to go by simply twisting peoples sense of right and wrong, their value systems, to their direction, and then encouraging people to 'do the right thing.' Maybe we should begin with a huge value system in the Irish Third Level Colleges, and from that the most powerful political philosophy in modern Ireland, feminism.
Feminism
Over the last few years many heated discussions have been had as regards the impossibility of women athletes winning anything, if men are competing in their sports. Nearly every sport and game in Ireland, not excluding Irish dancing, has been affected by this issue but surely it begs the obvious question. If women cannot be expected, almost ever, to be the best in any field if they have to compete with men, then why is it we structure society in modern times to constantly promote women in every walk of life and position? Does it not follow that in doing so we are likely to be getting second best service in all the various areas?
The objection feminists will make to that, I guess, is maybe on one basic ground, but which can be replied to by two answers I think. They will say that in regard to sports we are only talking about the narrow question of some physical attributes which naturally favour men, its not something inherent to every job or position, or even most of them. True, but it is important in many jobs. In Ireland for example we have now a huge push to promote women in the military and yet surely by nature they are not as equipped for that job as men, as, just one example, the female police officers showed during the Bondi Beach shooting? The second answer I would give to that objection is that the superior attributes found in men are not just physical, the top chess players, mathematicians, philosophers, physicists etc etc in history and now, and in the objective setting of modern competitions, are nearly always men, because maybe the male of the species just seems to be better at these things than females?
Yet we have turned society upside down to aggressively promote women at every juncture. For example in Irish politics women have voted, and being represented in the Dail and the Cabinet, entirely on the same basis as men from the very foundation of the state. There is no such thing as women denied the vote or in any way discriminated against in Irish politics during that entire history. But yet we now have quotas which systematically discriminate against men in running for election in modern Ireland.
On this subject look across the Irish Sea for example, where there have now an abundance of female ministers, for example you have the first female Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves. She is also the only Chancellor to ever break out crying while questioned in the House of Commons and one political commentator notes that: "You can see the fear in her eyes and hear it in her voice."(1) Is it such a strange idea to say that maybe Irish politics in developing with fewer women than men, but with virtually always some women TDs and Ministers, is simply promotion by merit and by choice, because maybe many women didn't particularly want that job and similar ones? Rather than some grand discrimination conspiracy that we are told happened?
In any case this is obviously a very big issue but certainly what cannot be denied is that in every walk of life in modern Ireland, men are systematically discriminated against. Not just in Ireland obviously, but in say the US and the UK etc, generations of men have begun and ended their working lives systemically under promoted because of these DEI type policies.
I submit that this feminism, which is incredibly strong in Irish Universities for example, is being promoted by the Globalists/Occultists because from this they get: marriage breakdown (it always used to be said that the great aim of Occultists was to destroy 'the throne, altar and hearth'); abortion (largely pushed by feminists, and an end in itself for the Occult); lower birth rates in Western Societies (the Occultists tend to be obsessed by demographics); and the promotion to senior positions of people that are more prone to absorbing their values from the media and international norms, I think.
Law
The law is the big area that they try to implant in you as the correct standard of right and wrong, yet the process of creating law, and the actual practice of its implementation, as opposed to the fictional fantasy so many have in their heads about this, is far from a process that should garner the almost worship that many people have for the law in modern times.
While there are obviously different branches of the law, nonetheless generally in England and Ireland at least, the ancient idea is that you gather together representatives of the people and get their consent to tax and spend money and other rules that are laid down and then become the law.
But in reality the vast vast majority of modern Irish law is legislation originating in Globalist institutions like the EU and UN and nodded through in Ireland with no modification and sometimes against the clear wishes of the electorate (e.g. the signing up of the Irish state to the recent mass immigration measures of the EU, despite overwhelming opposition in the electorate). And thats before you talk about vote fraud, which clearly torpedoes any credibility in the whole process.(2) Meanwhile the idea that every penny spent by the state, and raised in taxation, is debated and passed by the people's representatives, is not even remotely true in modern times. A while ago a query arose as to who signed the contracts leading to the expenditure of untold billions on the Children's Hospital, for example, nobody seemed to know and certainly there is no accountability for it, and the Irish Taoiseach has recently signed up to spend vast sums of money on the Ukraine War, entirely without reference to the Irish legislature.
As regards the real practice of the law, consider the UK Post Office scandal across the water, where about 900 post masters and mistresses were convicted of fraud based on the corrupt evidence of the IT system used by the Post Office, while many more were pursued in the Civil Courts for vast amounts of money and virtually all caught up in the scandal were sacked and otherwise harassed, about 2,000 people in all. Pretty much all of these people were pillars of their community, as post masters usually are, and, generally, with enough money to employ legal counsel, which is often not true for ordinary people, and of course they were all innocent and yet were prosecuted and convicted anyway. The fact is that the court system is, mostly, just a mechanical process whereby the state locks up people they dislike, people who in practice have almost no legal safeguards.
The US is obviously another country with a similar system to here, but again in practice it doesn't work at all like the, many, movies on same. Conrad Black is a billionaire whose vast financial resources allowed him to take major cases, including Supreme Court ones in both the US and Canada, and yet even he found it working as he describes here:
Getting back home, what about the much vaunted legal safeguards of the Irish constitution then? There your right to worship, assemble, travel etc etc, and, implied anyway, the right to refuse medical intervention, including say masks and vaccines (this right is enshrined in what is known as the Nuremburg Code, recognised worldwide after the horrors of Nazi Germany where they did impose collective medical tyranny like this, including in Ireland although not formally part of the constitution) right to work and run businesses etc etc, but all these rights went up in smoke instantly under Covid in Ireland, and remained so for many years. When this was pursued in the courts, by Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters, they were refused leave to even take such a case, and when that was queried as far as the Supreme Court the latter was happy with an affidavit from a Principal Officer in the Department of Health who explained that they did all this at the behest of the WHO and other international and transnational bodies.(4) They provided no evidence at all that these measures were necessary, except the instructions they received from these globalist institutions. Hence your rights mean absolutely nothing when set against the powers that be, meaning the Globalists working through their WHO and numerous other similar bodies.
Ok so what, I hear you ask, it is what it is, its not as if the Globalists/Occultists are brainwashing us on this or something? Are they not, now ask yourself how many times you have been in a court, via films, TV programs, the televising of the OJ Simpson trial and the hype surrounding countless other legal cases. Do you think thats an accident? They are trying to suck you in here, to embrace the law as the only standard of right and wrong in your mind, and are hyping it up and creating a mystique about it to attract you in, a mystique that is very far from the practical reality, as outlined above. Obviously what they get out of it is that you are elevating their instructions, the law, and punishment of those who don't follow their instructions, courts, to the rank of a religion, people almost worship this process and obviously this is of great advantage then to the Globalists who are in charge of it all.
Feminism
Over the last few years many heated discussions have been had as regards the impossibility of women athletes winning anything, if men are competing in their sports. Nearly every sport and game in Ireland, not excluding Irish dancing, has been affected by this issue but surely it begs the obvious question. If women cannot be expected, almost ever, to be the best in any field if they have to compete with men, then why is it we structure society in modern times to constantly promote women in every walk of life and position? Does it not follow that in doing so we are likely to be getting second best service in all the various areas?
The objection feminists will make to that, I guess, is maybe on one basic ground, but which can be replied to by two answers I think. They will say that in regard to sports we are only talking about the narrow question of some physical attributes which naturally favour men, its not something inherent to every job or position, or even most of them. True, but it is important in many jobs. In Ireland for example we have now a huge push to promote women in the military and yet surely by nature they are not as equipped for that job as men, as, just one example, the female police officers showed during the Bondi Beach shooting? The second answer I would give to that objection is that the superior attributes found in men are not just physical, the top chess players, mathematicians, philosophers, physicists etc etc in history and now, and in the objective setting of modern competitions, are nearly always men, because maybe the male of the species just seems to be better at these things than females?
Yet we have turned society upside down to aggressively promote women at every juncture. For example in Irish politics women have voted, and being represented in the Dail and the Cabinet, entirely on the same basis as men from the very foundation of the state. There is no such thing as women denied the vote or in any way discriminated against in Irish politics during that entire history. But yet we now have quotas which systematically discriminate against men in running for election in modern Ireland.
On this subject look across the Irish Sea for example, where there have now an abundance of female ministers, for example you have the first female Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves. She is also the only Chancellor to ever break out crying while questioned in the House of Commons and one political commentator notes that: "You can see the fear in her eyes and hear it in her voice."(1) Is it such a strange idea to say that maybe Irish politics in developing with fewer women than men, but with virtually always some women TDs and Ministers, is simply promotion by merit and by choice, because maybe many women didn't particularly want that job and similar ones? Rather than some grand discrimination conspiracy that we are told happened?
In any case this is obviously a very big issue but certainly what cannot be denied is that in every walk of life in modern Ireland, men are systematically discriminated against. Not just in Ireland obviously, but in say the US and the UK etc, generations of men have begun and ended their working lives systemically under promoted because of these DEI type policies.
I submit that this feminism, which is incredibly strong in Irish Universities for example, is being promoted by the Globalists/Occultists because from this they get: marriage breakdown (it always used to be said that the great aim of Occultists was to destroy 'the throne, altar and hearth'); abortion (largely pushed by feminists, and an end in itself for the Occult); lower birth rates in Western Societies (the Occultists tend to be obsessed by demographics); and the promotion to senior positions of people that are more prone to absorbing their values from the media and international norms, I think.
Law
The law is the big area that they try to implant in you as the correct standard of right and wrong, yet the process of creating law, and the actual practice of its implementation, as opposed to the fictional fantasy so many have in their heads about this, is far from a process that should garner the almost worship that many people have for the law in modern times.
While there are obviously different branches of the law, nonetheless generally in England and Ireland at least, the ancient idea is that you gather together representatives of the people and get their consent to tax and spend money and other rules that are laid down and then become the law.
But in reality the vast vast majority of modern Irish law is legislation originating in Globalist institutions like the EU and UN and nodded through in Ireland with no modification and sometimes against the clear wishes of the electorate (e.g. the signing up of the Irish state to the recent mass immigration measures of the EU, despite overwhelming opposition in the electorate). And thats before you talk about vote fraud, which clearly torpedoes any credibility in the whole process.(2) Meanwhile the idea that every penny spent by the state, and raised in taxation, is debated and passed by the people's representatives, is not even remotely true in modern times. A while ago a query arose as to who signed the contracts leading to the expenditure of untold billions on the Children's Hospital, for example, nobody seemed to know and certainly there is no accountability for it, and the Irish Taoiseach has recently signed up to spend vast sums of money on the Ukraine War, entirely without reference to the Irish legislature.
As regards the real practice of the law, consider the UK Post Office scandal across the water, where about 900 post masters and mistresses were convicted of fraud based on the corrupt evidence of the IT system used by the Post Office, while many more were pursued in the Civil Courts for vast amounts of money and virtually all caught up in the scandal were sacked and otherwise harassed, about 2,000 people in all. Pretty much all of these people were pillars of their community, as post masters usually are, and, generally, with enough money to employ legal counsel, which is often not true for ordinary people, and of course they were all innocent and yet were prosecuted and convicted anyway. The fact is that the court system is, mostly, just a mechanical process whereby the state locks up people they dislike, people who in practice have almost no legal safeguards.
The US is obviously another country with a similar system to here, but again in practice it doesn't work at all like the, many, movies on same. Conrad Black is a billionaire whose vast financial resources allowed him to take major cases, including Supreme Court ones in both the US and Canada, and yet even he found it working as he describes here:
"The tenacity with which Americans persist in regarding themselves as a society of laws is disgustingly complacent, when 99 per cent of Americans accused of crimes are convicted, 97 per cent without a trial, and carceral conditions are frequently abominable by the standards of advanced countries." (3)
Getting back home, what about the much vaunted legal safeguards of the Irish constitution then? There your right to worship, assemble, travel etc etc, and, implied anyway, the right to refuse medical intervention, including say masks and vaccines (this right is enshrined in what is known as the Nuremburg Code, recognised worldwide after the horrors of Nazi Germany where they did impose collective medical tyranny like this, including in Ireland although not formally part of the constitution) right to work and run businesses etc etc, but all these rights went up in smoke instantly under Covid in Ireland, and remained so for many years. When this was pursued in the courts, by Gemma O'Doherty and John Waters, they were refused leave to even take such a case, and when that was queried as far as the Supreme Court the latter was happy with an affidavit from a Principal Officer in the Department of Health who explained that they did all this at the behest of the WHO and other international and transnational bodies.(4) They provided no evidence at all that these measures were necessary, except the instructions they received from these globalist institutions. Hence your rights mean absolutely nothing when set against the powers that be, meaning the Globalists working through their WHO and numerous other similar bodies.
Ok so what, I hear you ask, it is what it is, its not as if the Globalists/Occultists are brainwashing us on this or something? Are they not, now ask yourself how many times you have been in a court, via films, TV programs, the televising of the OJ Simpson trial and the hype surrounding countless other legal cases. Do you think thats an accident? They are trying to suck you in here, to embrace the law as the only standard of right and wrong in your mind, and are hyping it up and creating a mystique about it to attract you in, a mystique that is very far from the practical reality, as outlined above. Obviously what they get out of it is that you are elevating their instructions, the law, and punishment of those who don't follow their instructions, courts, to the rank of a religion, people almost worship this process and obviously this is of great advantage then to the Globalists who are in charge of it all.
Last edited: