Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
Conflicts, and potential conflicts, that could explode into WWIII
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A Man Called Charolais" data-source="post: 88990"><p>Such a long video that it deserves the tldr treatment. sorry Myles.</p><p></p><p>I know it's April 1st, and this has such <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity" target="_blank">synchronicity</a> that it seems like the machinations of someone in <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-49249575" target="_blank">8chan</a>, but I have spent hours listening to this because I cannot see lying in her and I've been sticking around to catch some. Don't let the wimmin see it, it'd be too convincing for them - they'd be better off watching to <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0noqCwVG6g" target="_blank">The View</a>.. There are a lot of bizarre phenomena that have emerged over the past couple of decades that seem to have been pre-figured in this interview.</p><p></p><p>This appears to be pre-AI, it just goes to show how complicating AI will be for online content once it exceeds human cognitive recognition. I don't think that it is AI generated, and if it is a plant then it's Mozartian in accomplishment. Very heavy on the Kabbalahist references to be comfortable to watch though. Remember, it's from 1998, so pre WoT and back when Star Trek TNG felt like the most likely prospect for humanity.</p><p></p><p>I actually saw a black helicopter buzz treetops height down the country well over a decade ago and took it to be an invitation to get submerged in the conspiracy theory zeitgeist in order to turn me a bit mad. So, I'm wary about all that sort of thing as it can very easily become confusing and debilitating. AI will be an excellent tool to exacerbate this and fabulate what is common criminal activity. My other reaction to this flyby was the same as one would have to vermin on one's land - as long as the vermin stays in the ditch at the back of the field then there's not much reward in pursuing them but if they start invading the sheds or garden then a determined effort has to be made. Since this type of vermin is 80% psychological then the principal countermeasures are in whitehat counter-coding, thus the engagement with internet fora, and putting oneself into lonesome scenarios so one can tell them to bring it or shut up.</p><p></p><p>Griggs' account aligns with what Alex Jones has been saying. Jones was also apparently from one of these families - though from line rather than staff. It's very gossipy and she's clearly a bright woman with the recall of a thinking person whose mind isn't addled by drink or drugs. That said, she is not without bourgeois airs.</p><p></p><p>Griggs hasn't been inconsistent over the course of multiple interviews and she's an example of the wives club that used to be available to females before they became "hegemonic" and normalised to pre-maritial sex work. </p><p></p><p>Very much the sort of old services family member that would have belonged to the class of "Roman Citizen Women" in classical times. This would explain her access - she's from inside the walls.</p><p></p><p>You might recognise her as an Old Tory Local Committee Member when the Conservative Party of P. Hitchens' lore was current, if you were British. There's certainly more than a pinch of the Ye Olde Virginian Antebellum Stalwart about her.</p><p></p><p>Now, the reason why she's giving this interview is <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS4-aEYhLd8&t=19104s" target="_blank">for protection</a> - first unload all the information she has so there's nothing left to incentivise dramatic action against her and make her known so her disappearance would arise suspicion and confirm her otherwise rather alarming (to the point of being incredible) account. </p><p></p><p>There's a guy called <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c73QolyR0xc" target="_blank">Steven Fishman</a> that gave a similar inside account of Scientology (in this case) that is of the same sort, although he would have been of her husband's type. He is still in prison for wire fraud but seemed to be honest enough in this interview (if you want to hear more pre-internet whistleblowing). </p><p></p><p>Griggs was going through a nasty divorce and recounts battery by her alcholic husband so that's a caution. She also enjoys the attention - note her delight when she's corrected on a Tolstoy-Trotsky confusion (it meant they were listening to her). </p><p></p><p>Still, there are plenty of moments when she adds details that seem extraneous to someone unfamiliar with the situation (such as an inability for "them" to understand her value system) that are very convincing. The interivewer also seems to be a capable type. If you want to get some background on the Alex Jones scene (and you have a lot of time) then this is something to watch. There's no other information on her that I can find - for example did she have a heart attack like <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9TviIuXPSE" target="_blank">Bezmenov</a> or only pass away during COVID? It could be all a fabrication by the industrial conspiracy industry but it is interesting and beyond my power to detect dishonesty in.</p><p></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">[MEDIA=youtube]mS4-aEYhLd8[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Been looking up bits that I didn't know to see if they checked out. Here's one, Louisiana doesn't use Common Law for its state courts.</p><p></p><p></p><p>'Napoleon. The legal system in Louisiana—unlike that of any other state—derives from the Civil Code established by the French emperor in 1804. Four years before Louisiana became a state in 1812, the former French and Spanish colony adopted a version of the Napoleonic Code. (Some people say it’s wrong to call Louisiana’s legal system “Napoleonic,” since the state Civil Code was also influenced by Spanish law. Historians still argue over the extent of this Spanish influence.) The resulting system of “civil law” in the state differs from the other 49 states’ “common-law” traditions in terms of methodology. Rulings in the French-influenced system derive from direct interpretation of the law; rulings in the common-law system give greater authority to legal precedent.</p><p></p><p>In theory, a judge in Louisiana decides a case based on her own interpretation of the code, not those of prior courts. In the other states, judges are supposed to make decisions based exclusively on previous rulings. But in practice, the two systems often work the same. Louisiana judges have the benefit of 200 years of case history, even if case law isn’t used as the fundamental basis for their rulings. And judges in other states can stray from a legal precedent if they deem it grossly unjust.'</p><p></p><p><a href="https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2005/09/is-louisiana-under-napoleonic-law.html" target="_blank">Louisiana’s Napoleon Complex - Slate Magazine</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>Aaaaah, so that's where the conflict about originalist and activist interpretations of the US Constitution comes from - Napleonism and Parliamentarianism.</p><p></p><p>Something else, and maybe the most important point. Do you see how important intimacy with women is for men? The idea that they are breeding drudges is a gross fallacy. Place a woman in a man's bed and she will have access to his deepest thoughts. Have to be careful about the woman you chose. Faithfulness is not only about sexual exclusivity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A Man Called Charolais, post: 88990"] Such a long video that it deserves the tldr treatment. sorry Myles. I know it's April 1st, and this has such [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity']synchronicity[/URL] that it seems like the machinations of someone in [URL='https://www.bbc.com/news/av/technology-49249575']8chan[/URL], but I have spent hours listening to this because I cannot see lying in her and I've been sticking around to catch some. Don't let the wimmin see it, it'd be too convincing for them - they'd be better off watching to [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0noqCwVG6g']The View[/URL].. There are a lot of bizarre phenomena that have emerged over the past couple of decades that seem to have been pre-figured in this interview. This appears to be pre-AI, it just goes to show how complicating AI will be for online content once it exceeds human cognitive recognition. I don't think that it is AI generated, and if it is a plant then it's Mozartian in accomplishment. Very heavy on the Kabbalahist references to be comfortable to watch though. Remember, it's from 1998, so pre WoT and back when Star Trek TNG felt like the most likely prospect for humanity. I actually saw a black helicopter buzz treetops height down the country well over a decade ago and took it to be an invitation to get submerged in the conspiracy theory zeitgeist in order to turn me a bit mad. So, I'm wary about all that sort of thing as it can very easily become confusing and debilitating. AI will be an excellent tool to exacerbate this and fabulate what is common criminal activity. My other reaction to this flyby was the same as one would have to vermin on one's land - as long as the vermin stays in the ditch at the back of the field then there's not much reward in pursuing them but if they start invading the sheds or garden then a determined effort has to be made. Since this type of vermin is 80% psychological then the principal countermeasures are in whitehat counter-coding, thus the engagement with internet fora, and putting oneself into lonesome scenarios so one can tell them to bring it or shut up. Griggs' account aligns with what Alex Jones has been saying. Jones was also apparently from one of these families - though from line rather than staff. It's very gossipy and she's clearly a bright woman with the recall of a thinking person whose mind isn't addled by drink or drugs. That said, she is not without bourgeois airs. Griggs hasn't been inconsistent over the course of multiple interviews and she's an example of the wives club that used to be available to females before they became "hegemonic" and normalised to pre-maritial sex work. Very much the sort of old services family member that would have belonged to the class of "Roman Citizen Women" in classical times. This would explain her access - she's from inside the walls. You might recognise her as an Old Tory Local Committee Member when the Conservative Party of P. Hitchens' lore was current, if you were British. There's certainly more than a pinch of the Ye Olde Virginian Antebellum Stalwart about her. Now, the reason why she's giving this interview is [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS4-aEYhLd8&t=19104s']for protection[/URL] - first unload all the information she has so there's nothing left to incentivise dramatic action against her and make her known so her disappearance would arise suspicion and confirm her otherwise rather alarming (to the point of being incredible) account. There's a guy called [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c73QolyR0xc']Steven Fishman[/URL] that gave a similar inside account of Scientology (in this case) that is of the same sort, although he would have been of her husband's type. He is still in prison for wire fraud but seemed to be honest enough in this interview (if you want to hear more pre-internet whistleblowing). Griggs was going through a nasty divorce and recounts battery by her alcholic husband so that's a caution. She also enjoys the attention - note her delight when she's corrected on a Tolstoy-Trotsky confusion (it meant they were listening to her). Still, there are plenty of moments when she adds details that seem extraneous to someone unfamiliar with the situation (such as an inability for "them" to understand her value system) that are very convincing. The interivewer also seems to be a capable type. If you want to get some background on the Alex Jones scene (and you have a lot of time) then this is something to watch. There's no other information on her that I can find - for example did she have a heart attack like [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9TviIuXPSE']Bezmenov[/URL] or only pass away during COVID? It could be all a fabrication by the industrial conspiracy industry but it is interesting and beyond my power to detect dishonesty in. [CENTER][MEDIA=youtube]mS4-aEYhLd8[/MEDIA][/CENTER] Been looking up bits that I didn't know to see if they checked out. Here's one, Louisiana doesn't use Common Law for its state courts. 'Napoleon. The legal system in Louisiana—unlike that of any other state—derives from the Civil Code established by the French emperor in 1804. Four years before Louisiana became a state in 1812, the former French and Spanish colony adopted a version of the Napoleonic Code. (Some people say it’s wrong to call Louisiana’s legal system “Napoleonic,” since the state Civil Code was also influenced by Spanish law. Historians still argue over the extent of this Spanish influence.) The resulting system of “civil law” in the state differs from the other 49 states’ “common-law” traditions in terms of methodology. Rulings in the French-influenced system derive from direct interpretation of the law; rulings in the common-law system give greater authority to legal precedent. In theory, a judge in Louisiana decides a case based on her own interpretation of the code, not those of prior courts. In the other states, judges are supposed to make decisions based exclusively on previous rulings. But in practice, the two systems often work the same. Louisiana judges have the benefit of 200 years of case history, even if case law isn’t used as the fundamental basis for their rulings. And judges in other states can stray from a legal precedent if they deem it grossly unjust.' [URL='https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2005/09/is-louisiana-under-napoleonic-law.html']Louisiana’s Napoleon Complex - Slate Magazine[/URL] Aaaaah, so that's where the conflict about originalist and activist interpretations of the US Constitution comes from - Napleonism and Parliamentarianism. Something else, and maybe the most important point. Do you see how important intimacy with women is for men? The idea that they are breeding drudges is a gross fallacy. Place a woman in a man's bed and she will have access to his deepest thoughts. Have to be careful about the woman you chose. Faithfulness is not only about sexual exclusivity. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
Charlie Kirk Shot (dead?)
Started by Anderson
32 minutes ago
Replies: 12
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Today at 12:30 PM
Replies: 3
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
S
Deirdre Manifold and her book Towards World Government, New World Order
Started by scolairebocht
Sep 3, 2025
Replies: 44
Scholairebochts Blog.
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
Conflicts, and potential conflicts, that could explode into WWIII
Top
Bottom