Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
Public Chat and Announcements
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haven" data-source="post: 135547" data-attributes="member: 5537"><p>I got AI to analyse Fishalts post:</p><p></p><p></p><h3><strong>1. Style</strong></h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Tone</strong>: Extremely aggressive, vitriolic, and hyperbolic. The language is inflammatory and intended to provoke or insult rather than persuade.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Word Choice</strong>: Vulgar ("fuckbrained," "shit," "turbofaggot"), dehumanizing ("unwashed schizophrenics"), and metaphor-heavy (e.g., café analogy).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Readability</strong>: The passage is vivid and attention-grabbing but sacrifices clarity for shock value. The extended café metaphor is creative but overly elaborate for its purpose.</li> </ul><h3><strong>2. Comprehension</strong></h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Coherence</strong>: The core argument is understandable—the writer despises two individuals they believe are harming a website—but the excessive insults and analogies muddy the message.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Audience Understanding</strong>: The passage assumes familiarity with specific people/contexts (e.g., "Admin's pity-project," "self-confessed MAP"), making it opaque to outsiders.</li> </ul><h3><strong>3. Grammar</strong></h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Syntax</strong>: Mostly correct but strained by convoluted phrasing (e.g., "granted remit unbound to be the largest macro-scale turbofaggot").</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Punctuation</strong>: Overuse of em dashes and commas disrupts flow in places.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Errors</strong>:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>"chrigger"</em> → Likely a typo/misspelling (possibly "trigger" or a slur).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><em>"remit unbound"</em> → Unclear phrasing; possibly "unlimited leeway."</li> </ul></li> </ul><h3><strong>4. Logic</strong></h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Flow</strong>: The argument jumps from metaphor to direct insult without clear transitions.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Consistency</strong>: The insults are hyperbolic but internally consistent in their hostility.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Persuasiveness</strong>: Fails logically due to reliance on ad hominem attacks rather than reasoned critique. The claims (e.g., "excuses Muslim grooming gangs," "self-confessed MAP") are asserted without evidence.</li> </ul><h3><strong>5. Content</strong></h3> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Relevance</strong>: The rant is narrowly focused on two specific individuals, making it irrelevant to general readers.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Depth</strong>: No substantive critique—just venomous character assassination.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Accuracy</strong>: Unverifiable claims (e.g., "covens of elitist witches," "sheer force of nepotism") weaken credibility.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Par for the course, actually.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haven, post: 135547, member: 5537"] I got AI to analyse Fishalts post: [HEADING=2][B]1. Style[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*][B]Tone[/B]: Extremely aggressive, vitriolic, and hyperbolic. The language is inflammatory and intended to provoke or insult rather than persuade. [*][B]Word Choice[/B]: Vulgar ("fuckbrained," "shit," "turbofaggot"), dehumanizing ("unwashed schizophrenics"), and metaphor-heavy (e.g., café analogy). [*][B]Readability[/B]: The passage is vivid and attention-grabbing but sacrifices clarity for shock value. The extended café metaphor is creative but overly elaborate for its purpose. [/LIST] [HEADING=2][B]2. Comprehension[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*][B]Coherence[/B]: The core argument is understandable—the writer despises two individuals they believe are harming a website—but the excessive insults and analogies muddy the message. [*][B]Audience Understanding[/B]: The passage assumes familiarity with specific people/contexts (e.g., "Admin's pity-project," "self-confessed MAP"), making it opaque to outsiders. [/LIST] [HEADING=2][B]3. Grammar[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*][B]Syntax[/B]: Mostly correct but strained by convoluted phrasing (e.g., "granted remit unbound to be the largest macro-scale turbofaggot"). [*][B]Punctuation[/B]: Overuse of em dashes and commas disrupts flow in places. [*][B]Errors[/B]: [LIST] [*][I]"chrigger"[/I] → Likely a typo/misspelling (possibly "trigger" or a slur). [*][I]"remit unbound"[/I] → Unclear phrasing; possibly "unlimited leeway." [/LIST] [/LIST] [HEADING=2][B]4. Logic[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*][B]Flow[/B]: The argument jumps from metaphor to direct insult without clear transitions. [*][B]Consistency[/B]: The insults are hyperbolic but internally consistent in their hostility. [*][B]Persuasiveness[/B]: Fails logically due to reliance on ad hominem attacks rather than reasoned critique. The claims (e.g., "excuses Muslim grooming gangs," "self-confessed MAP") are asserted without evidence. [/LIST] [HEADING=2][B]5. Content[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*][B]Relevance[/B]: The rant is narrowly focused on two specific individuals, making it irrelevant to general readers. [*][B]Depth[/B]: No substantive critique—just venomous character assassination. [*][B]Accuracy[/B]: Unverifiable claims (e.g., "covens of elitist witches," "sheer force of nepotism") weaken credibility. [/LIST] Par for the course, actually. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
Do you feel the change?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:41 PM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
S
Baron of Delvin, newly identified as an unknown Irish harp/lute composer of c.1585
Started by scolairebocht
Today at 2:24 PM
Replies: 1
Scholairebochts Blog.
Neo-Paganism & National Socialism
Started by céline
Today at 9:05 AM
Replies: 0
Religion
J
New Irish discussion forum launched
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Today at 8:52 AM
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
S
Is the State trying to bankrupt the Irish Catholic Church?
Started by scolairebocht
Friday at 9:15 AM
Replies: 4
Scholairebochts Blog.
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
Public Chat and Announcements
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Top
Bottom