Interesting video on eight schools in the contemporary UK Dissident Right.

SwordOfStZip

Moderator
Staff member
Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2024
Messages
1,579
Reaction score
872
Dissident Right here is used to describe everything that is Right wing and well outside of the mainstream.

"Academic Agent" is an Iranian Paleo-Libertarian of some description who "Hope Not Hate" have surreally labeled a British ethno-nationalist (the non-Muslim Iranian Right wing is often even generally kinda racist so maybe he is into racial stuff but I would not trust "Hope Not Hate" on anyone, and of course being into racial stuff still would not make him a British ethno-nationalist) who professionally has done great scholarly work on Shakespeare.

By his measurements I would either be a "Trad" minoring in "Doom" or a "Doomer" minoring in "Trad". Interestingly he puts the disciples of Guenon and Evola into a totally different category (what he calls "Woo") to "Christian Conservatives" (who he files as under "Trad").


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6OnwKECWzo
 
Dissident Right here is used to describe everything that is Right wing and well outside of the mainstream.

"Academic Agent" is an Iranian Paleo-Libertarian of some description who "Hope Not Hate" have surreally labeled a British ethno-nationalist (the non-Muslim Iranian Right wing is often even generally kinda racist so maybe he is into racial stuff but I would not trust "Hope Not Hate" on anyone, and of course being into racial stuff still would not make him a British ethno-nationalist) who professionally has done great scholarly work on Shakespeare.
Well I think he's half Iranian (father Iranian, mother presumed British (Welsh))

By his measurements I would either be a "Trad" minoring in "Doom" or a "Doomer" minoring in "Trad". Interestingly he puts the disciples of Guenon and Evola into a totally different category (what he calls "Woo") to "Christian Conservatives" (who he files as under "Trad").


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6OnwKECWzo

I think School of Schizo might offend a few people here :)

I think I'm possibly, major School of Tribe, minor School of Race
 
By the way, my schools would surely put me in the crosshairs of HNH more than anyone else

As a right-winger, I'm basically an antisemitic racist :)
 
By the way, my schools would surely put me in the crosshairs of HNH more than anyone else

As a right-winger, I'm basically an antisemitic racist :)

Who is HNH?

I thought as you as basically in the racial category rather than in the "anti-tribe" one.
 
Hope Not Hate


I'm not a IQ nationalist or IQ fethishist, as you call it. But I am a race realist

I should have guessed!

I am not sure at all if I would count as a Rightist but I believe in the "Iron Law of Oligarchy" which is basically the idea that when you have a mass society one way or the other you are always going to have rule by an elite (and maybe that is not a bad thing necessarily) and the limits of reason and hence the necessity of Revelation which because I am neither a Black Nationalist or an Islamist would have me classified as Right wing by a lot of people.
 
I should have guessed!

I am not sure at all if I would count as a Rightist but I believe in the "Iron Law of Oligarchy" which is basically the idea that when you have a mass society one way or the other you are always going to have rule by an elite (and maybe that is not a bad thing necessarily) and the limits of reason and hence the necessity of Revelation which because I am neither a Black Nationalist or an Islamist would have me classified as Right wing by a lot of people.
Well a lot of the people who would classify you that way are, as I think you might agree, anti-Christian

I wouldn't really consider you a rightist
 
Did anyone watch the documentary Undercover: Exposing the Far Right on C4 last night?

I didn't (hate watch it) because I don't have television.

Apparently some HNH bedwetter went undercover to infiltrate the far-right in the UK.

Here he is being interviewed by the odious anti-white James O'Brien -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=feZfKt5PI_s
 
Did anyone watch the documentary Undercover: Exposing the Far Right on C4 last night?

I didn't (hate watch it) because I don't have television.

Apparently some HNH bedwetter went undercover to infiltrate the far-right in the UK.

Here he is being interviewed by the odious anti-white James O'Brien -

Two interesting enough things- during the 19 th and 20 th centuries the two main radical threats the UK State were concerned about were revolutionary Socialism and militant Irish Republicanism, now "Prevent" their "de-radicalization" has three main categories that it deals which are besides the nebulous categories of "Far Right" and "Islamic Extremism" animal liberation and deep ecological stuff. He also said the majority of the referrals to "Prevent" involved people labeled as "Far Right" but not the majority of cases they actually take on- an important difference. I can well imagine Lib Dem types reporting people to "Prevent" as "Far Right" on the slightest pretext. A Conservative Party Minister actually said that he wanted "Prevent" to only take on "Far Right" cases if they involved what he called "Antisemitism"- I was actually slightly taken aback that he phrased it roughly like that.

The main things about the program from that inteview seem to be that Paul Golding is quietly a bit of an accelerationist which I already knew, people in "Britain First" have made anti-Jewish anti-Semitic jokes which I didn't know about but am hardly shocked by and that the Pioneer Fund still exists which I again knew about (I think I might even have a few back issues of "Mankind Quarterly" up in the attic).

Around the seven minute mark James O'Brien implies that he would like to see conspiracy theorists and people who believe in eugenices in prison.
 
Two interesting enough things- during the 19 th and 20 th centuries the two main radical threats the UK State were concerned about were revolutionary Socialism and militant Irish Republicanism, now "Prevent" their "de-radicalization" has three main categories that it deals which are besides the nebulous categories of "Far Right" and "Islamic Extremism" animal liberation and deep ecological stuff. He also said the majority of the referrals to "Prevent" involved people labeled as "Far Right" but not the majority of cases they actually take on- an important difference.
Lies, damned lies, and statistics

The anti-white left are inveterate liars, twas always thus

I can well imagine Lib Dem types reporting people to "Prevent" as "Far Right" on the slightest pretext. A Conservative Party Minister actually said that he wanted "Prevent" to only take on "Far Right" cases if they involved what he called "Antisemitism"- I was actually slightly taken aback that he phrased it roughly like that.
lol

The main things about the program from that inteview seem to be that Paul Golding is quietly a bit of an accelerationist which I already knew, people in "Britain First" have made anti-Jewish anti-Semitic jokes which I didn't know about but am hardly shocked by and that the Pioneer Fund still exists which I again knew about (I think I might even have a few back issues of "Mankind Quarterly" up in the attic).
I think the whole taboo about eugenics boils down to the fact thou shalt not speak - whites have a higher average IQ than blacks. No one much cares that East Asians have a higher average IQ than whites

Around the seven minute mark James O'Brien implies that he would like to see conspiracy theorists and people who believe in eugenices in prison.
I would like to see James O'Brien tarred and feathered
 
The anti-white left are inveterate liars, twas always thus

I think the whole taboo about eugenics boils down to the fact thou shalt not speak - whites have a higher average IQ than blacks. No one much cares that East Asians have a higher average IQ than whites

I would not consider Hope Not Hate to be on the Left, I would consider them to rather of the Authoritarian Centre and ironically that is how a lot of actual Fascists identified themselves. And no I am not saying that they are "Fascist" but I do consider them to be very similar to "Tommy Inc"- they both play a very similar role in the Political Ontology of the UK. Even if they are though on the Left I cannot see them not having all sorts of major problems with the likes of Houria Bouteldja and Noel Ignatiev no mind characters like Malik Zulu Shabazz so I think it would be inaccurate to call them part of the "anti-White Left". There is a sliminess and an effete nihilism about them which is hard to communicate.

I think the taboo is much more to do with a certain 20 th century Central European regime which modern Occidental Elites still like to define themselves against.
 
I would not consider Hope Not Hate to be on the Left, I would consider them to rather of the Authoritarian Centre and ironically that is how a lot of actual Fascists identified themselves. And no I am not saying that they are "Fascist" but I do consider them to be very similar to "Tommy Inc"- they both play a very similar role in the Political Ontology of the UK. Even if they are though on the Left I cannot see them not having all sorts of major problems with the likes of Houria Bouteldja and Noel Ignatiev no mind characters like Malik Zulu Shabazz so I think it would be inaccurate to call them part of the "anti-White Left". There is a sliminess and an effete nihilism about them which is hard to communicate.
Well I know that you're rather anal meticulous about these classifications :) but broadly speaking, they're left (and I'm right).

And how are they not anti-white?

When will their next undercover expose be on, I dunno, 'radical' Muslims? Never. Or when will they stop lying about the far right being the biggest (terroristic) threat?

I think the taboo is much more to do with a certain 20 th century Central European regime which modern Occidental Elites still like to define themselves against.
They obviously make comparisons to the Nazis, as you see with O'Brien, but they also call it 'scientific racism', something that's been "debunked", as the HNH bedwetter said. It hasn't been debunked at all. The 'left' are inveterate liars
 
Dissident Right here is used to describe everything that is Right wing and well outside of the mainstream.

"Academic Agent" is an Iranian Paleo-Libertarian of some description who "Hope Not Hate" have surreally labeled a British ethno-nationalist (the non-Muslim Iranian Right wing is often even generally kinda racist so maybe he is into racial stuff but I would not trust "Hope Not Hate" on anyone, and of course being into racial stuff still would not make him a British ethno-nationalist) who professionally has done great scholarly work on Shakespeare.

By his measurements I would either be a "Trad" minoring in "Doom" or a "Doomer" minoring in "Trad". Interestingly he puts the disciples of Guenon and Evola into a totally different category (what he calls "Woo") to "Christian Conservatives" (who he files as under "Trad").


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6OnwKECWzo


It is interesting that he does not include at all the Tommy fans and the general movement around him as part of what he sees as the authentic Right.
 
It is interesting that he does not include at all the Tommy fans and the general movement around him as part of what he sees as the authentic Right.
I don't think that there's a civic "nationalist", Zionist, Islamophobic liberal category on the authentic right
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom