Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
World at War
Ukraine.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fishalt" data-source="post: 43175" data-attributes="member: 228"><p>You're not very good at this, are you?</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how why (or how) you think randomly bolding a snippet of text which does not to refute the ultimate point of contention--and is merely tangential to it at best--is some kind of win, or invalidates it. Did you not read the first quarter? On top of that, you can't process basic logical syntax in a time-relative way. Let's assume that the highlighted text is not misrepresented; what would that even mean? Why would assume that it is therefore implicitly true that the US has not/is not funding bioresearch for weaponized purposes in Ukraine? Are we meant to just take this on faith? Certainly Russia alleges differently. Why is Nuland--an infamous psychopath, spook and warhawk, so concerned with these supposedly innocuous labs falling into Russian hands? What's the problem?</p><p></p><p>The scope of the work undertaken is broad. It includes the safe and secure transportation of weaponry etc. How do we know that the bioresearch component of those process wasn't a feature of these programs Russia was involved with, and that the language of this text hasn't simply cleverly parsed or failed to parse this out?</p><p></p><p>Here's what we know:</p><p></p><p>A) The US funded Biolabs in Ukraine, and continues to.</p><p>B) Nuland doesn't like that whatever they were doing in these labs might fall into Russian hands.</p><p></p><p>So the claim made by myself and Declan that the US was and is funding labs in Ukraine is true. It is a fact. Is it not? Regardless of whether Russia is lying about the intentions and of, and form of research being done in these labs notwithstanding, that fact remains true. Maybe that research is and was benign. Maybe not.</p><p></p><p>You'd have never made a Lawyer, MIA2.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fishalt, post: 43175, member: 228"] You're not very good at this, are you? I'm not sure how why (or how) you think randomly bolding a snippet of text which does not to refute the ultimate point of contention--and is merely tangential to it at best--is some kind of win, or invalidates it. Did you not read the first quarter? On top of that, you can't process basic logical syntax in a time-relative way. Let's assume that the highlighted text is not misrepresented; what would that even mean? Why would assume that it is therefore implicitly true that the US has not/is not funding bioresearch for weaponized purposes in Ukraine? Are we meant to just take this on faith? Certainly Russia alleges differently. Why is Nuland--an infamous psychopath, spook and warhawk, so concerned with these supposedly innocuous labs falling into Russian hands? What's the problem? The scope of the work undertaken is broad. It includes the safe and secure transportation of weaponry etc. How do we know that the bioresearch component of those process wasn't a feature of these programs Russia was involved with, and that the language of this text hasn't simply cleverly parsed or failed to parse this out? Here's what we know: A) The US funded Biolabs in Ukraine, and continues to. B) Nuland doesn't like that whatever they were doing in these labs might fall into Russian hands. So the claim made by myself and Declan that the US was and is funding labs in Ukraine is true. It is a fact. Is it not? Regardless of whether Russia is lying about the intentions and of, and form of research being done in these labs notwithstanding, that fact remains true. Maybe that research is and was benign. Maybe not. You'd have never made a Lawyer, MIA2. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
S
The Anti-Mass Migration movement has to be at least partly about race, it is indeed Ireland for the Irish
Started by scolairebocht
Today at 9:10 AM
Replies: 11
Scholairebochts Blog.
A Million Views.
Started by Declan
Saturday at 10:54 PM
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
An Open Letter to SwordOfStZip
Started by AN2
Oct 11, 2025
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
C
athletics
Started by céline
Oct 8, 2025
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
S
The real agenda in this Presidential Election?
Started by scolairebocht
Oct 6, 2025
Replies: 11
Scholairebochts Blog.
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
World at War
Ukraine.
Top
Bottom