I wonder what effects that the Female Ego has on our Societies ?

[clarke-connolly]

I wonder what effects that the Female Ego has on our Societies ?

It just sort of cropped up in my mind ~ I wonder what effects that the Female Ego has on our Societies ?

" " Impact on "Female Ego"
If women are competing for a small pool of high-status men, it could foster:

• Inflated Ego: Some women might overestimate their "market value" due to social media validation (likes, followers) or cultural empowerment messages, leading to unrealistic expectations. A 2022 study in Social Media + Society linked heavy social media use to inflated self-perception in young women.
• Entitlement: The belief that one deserves a top-tier partner can strain relationships or lead to dissatisfaction. X posts often highlight frustration from men who feel "average" women overlook them, which could reflect this dynamic.
• Social Pressure: Women face pressure to secure high-status partners as a marker of success, which can amplify ego-driven behaviors like status-seeking or dismissing "lower-tier" men. " "

I am just curios as to what affects that, The Female Ego, has on Western Societies, On Women and on Men ?

 

[AN2]

 

[jpc]

Pretty fair to say it's not been transformative in any positive fashion that I have noticed.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

View attachment 7649

Why did the French Republic- long after the Irish Free State- give women the vote back in the late 40s or early 50s?

I remember listening to an interview with the former lead singer of Radio Werewolf and he made an interesting point that a massive difference between "White Nationalism 1.0" back in the 1980s and 1990s and the "Alt Right" was that the former was generally women friendly while as the latter is often even outright hostile towards women. It would be interesting to find if this reflects wider sociological shifts.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

• Social Pressure: Women face pressure to secure high-status partners as a marker of success, which can amplify ego-driven behaviors like status-seeking or dismissing "lower-tier" men. " "

A big part of marriage- what has often been considered it's main raison d'etre- is having kids. Kids can sometimes be rather expensive in the contemporary West. I think wanting a man who has basic career stability and who is genuinely God fearing is not asking to much at all. Anyway are you not some type of Social Darwinist so why all this concern about what you call low tier reproducing? It is interesting to me that Jordan Peterson who otherwise is very much the Capitalist gets all Social Democratic or even Socialist when it comes to women and dating.

 

[willows68]

The female ego has been tickled by the honeyed words of social engineers - same as it was back in the Garden. To engineer the type of societal collapse we witness these days the family unit had to be broken. What better way to achieve this than enticing women out of the home, and make them dissatisfied with their old lives through advertising. DeBernays has a whole book about it.
They killed several birds with the one stone: now they had control over young children, men's roles were diminuished and women were overstretched trying 'to have it all'.
One has to hand it to the social engineers: genius level long term planning.

 

[Fishalt]

The female ego has been tickled by the honeyed words of social engineers - same as it was back in the Garden. To engineer the type of societal collapse we witness these days the family unit had to be broken. What better way to achieve this than enticing women out of the home, and make them dissatisfied with their old lives through advertising. DeBernays has a whole book about it.
They killed several birds with the one stone: now they had control over young children, men's roles were diminuished and women were overstretched trying 'to have it all'.
One has to hand it to the social engineers: genius level long term planning.

 

[AN2]

Why did the French Republic- long after the Irish Free State- give women the vote back in the late 40s or early 50s?

A mistake?

I see that it was granted in 1945. A lot of bad things have happened to the West since it lost WW2. And we've kinda gone from Weimar to Weimar

I remember listening to an interview with the former lead singer of Radio Werewolf and he made an interesting point that a massive difference between "White Nationalism 1.0" back in the 1980s and 1990s and the "Alt Right" was that the former was generally women friendly while as the latter is often even outright hostile towards women. It would be interesting to find if this reflects wider sociological shifts.

I don't know if that's the case. 2.0 might be a bit more edgelordy, or whatever

 

[Fishalt]

The female ego has been tickled by the honeyed words of social engineers - same as it was back in the Garden. To engineer the type of societal collapse we witness these days the family unit had to be broken. What better way to achieve this than enticing women out of the home, and make them dissatisfied with their old lives through advertising. DeBernays has a whole book about it.
They killed several birds with the one stone: now they had control over young children, men's roles were diminuished and women were overstretched trying 'to have it all'.
One has to hand it to the social engineers: genius level long term planning.

The female ego is a curious beast and must be carefully negotiated. I've become better at this with age, but definitely wouldn't consider myself an expert. Does any such man truly exist? Here's a couple of things I know for sure:

A) Beware women approaching, or over the age of forty who wear very large, heavy necklaces, especially those fashioned from sterling silver and ovoid or teardrop semiprecious stones. Double points if said stones are amethysts. This is the female equivalent of a string of ears strung around an amazonian warrior's neck; a kind of death-totem or forewarning, as reliable as the bright, vivid colouration of a toxic frog.

B) I know the fast-track to making your girl incredibly pissed off, and it is amazing and surprisingly simple. All one need do is compare something she does negatively to something your former girl did, and the more drudgerous or mundane the task being contrasted, the shorter the path to wrath, and the longer the wrath will persist. I didn't set out on this voyage of discovery, you understand. I arrived at shit-town via unhappy accident, through a throwaway remark. She'd ironed a shirt of mine and there were kinds of creases around the top button area. I complained about this, and she replied that it just happens sometimes. I said I never noticed this happen when my former partner did it. Now, I saw her darken at this, and tried to correct course by quickly adding that it didn't matter and that some people are just better than other people at some things. Not only did this not help, it made it even worse.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

A mistake?

I see that it was granted in 1945. A lot of bad things have happened to the West since it lost WW2. And we've kinda gone from Weimar to Weimar


I don't know if that's the case. 2.0 might be a bit more edgelordy, or whatever

De Gaulle brought it in to prevent the PCF becoming the largest Party in the French Parliament. Actually Edith Nesbit the brilliant English children's writer and Socialist was strongly opposed to women's sufferage in England because women would tend to vote for the Conservatives- actually she was right in that for the second half of the 20 th in the UK you would have had solid Labour governments if there had not been women's sufferage. Now though there is data that we have seen a shift where women now tend to the Left- or if not the Left as such Kamala Harris type characters-more than men do.

No I think it most definitely is the case. Remember the hounding that your one Tara McCarty got? A lot of these lads see White women as as much more their enemies than they do Blacks or Jews. Also you did not have any "White Nationalism 1.0" versions of Andrew Anglin did you? Just like you do not have any "White Nationalism 2.O" versions of Katja Lane. This though seems to be more of a North American phenomena though- it does not seem effect the National Party and CnE or Patriotic Alternative in all justice.

Possibly though the types of break down in the good relations between the genders that you see in the American occupied part of Korea is indeed Ireland's future.

 

[jpc]

The female ego is a curious beast and must be carefully negotiated. I've become better at this with age, but definitely wouldn't consider myself an expert. Does any such man truly exist? Here's a couple of things I know for sure:

A) Beware women approaching, or over the age of forty who wear very large, heavy necklaces, especially those fashioned from sterling silver and ovoid or teardrop semiprecious stones. Double points if said stones are amethysts. This is the female equivalent of a string of ears strung around an amazonian warrior's neck; a kind of death-totem or forewarning, as reliable as the bright, vivid colouration of a toxic frog.

B) I know the fast-track to making your girl incredibly pissed off, and it is amazing and surprisingly simple. All one need do is compare something she does negatively to something your former girl did, and the more drudgerous or mundane the task being contrasted, the shorter the path to wrath, and the longer the wrath will persist. I didn't set out on this voyage of discovery, you understand. I arrived at shit-town via unhappy accident, through a throwaway remark. She'd ironed a shirt of mine and there were kinds of creases around the top button area. I complained about this, and she replied that it just happens sometimes. I said I never noticed this happen when my former partner did it. Now, I saw her darken at this, and tried to correct course by quickly adding that it didn't matter and that some people are just better than other people at some things. Not only did this not help, it made it even worse.

Hey you're still alive to tell the tale.
That's as good as I can say!

 

[willows68]

The female ego is a curious beast and must be carefully negotiated. I've become better at this with age, but definitely wouldn't consider myself an expert. Does any such man truly exist? Here's a couple of things I know for sure:

A) Beware women approaching, or over the age of forty who wear very large, heavy necklaces, especially those fashioned from sterling silver and ovoid or teardrop semiprecious stones. Double points if said stones are amethysts. This is the female equivalent of a string of ears strung around an amazonian warrior's neck; a kind of death-totem or forewarning, as reliable as the bright, vivid colouration of a toxic frog.

B) I know the fast-track to making your girl incredibly pissed off, and it is amazing and surprisingly simple. All one need do is compare something she does negatively to something your former girl did, and the more drudgerous or mundane the task being contrasted, the shorter the path to wrath, and the longer the wrath will persist. I didn't set out on this voyage of discovery, you understand. I arrived at shit-town via unhappy accident, through a throwaway remark. She'd ironed a shirt of mine and there were kinds of creases around the top button area. I complained about this, and she replied that it just happens sometimes. I said I never noticed this happen when my former partner did it. Now, I saw her darken at this, and tried to correct course by quickly adding that it didn't matter and that some people are just better than other people at some things. Not only did this not help, it made it even worse.

Definitely guilty of the second charge even after 30 years
The first one now that I'm just barely over 40....maybe unconsciously so. Large necklaces also hide the dreaded turkey wattle. String of ears would be also fun

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Its called hoeflation

Is the woman in the picture supposed to be the desirable Granny or the modern Hoe?

 

[willows68]

Is the woman in the picture supposed to be the desirable Granny or the modern Hoe?

My still beautiful Granny (98) wouldn't have been caught dead in that gettup. It was aprons or pinafores as she was never idle. Garden, kitchen, stable and ofc children. ...It must be the modern hoe? Thot? Idk.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

I'm just barely over 40

I thought you were near pension age???

 

[willows68]

I thought you were near pension age???

Och come on. The line before I mention my 30 years of marriage.
A joke.
But I'd get away with 45. Just saying.
I wasn't 10 when I got hitched. We are after all good Christian folk.
Sorry for messing.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

It must be the modern hoe? Thot? Idk.

I don't know M'Lady. With the type of women ( or children) the lads on here say they're attracted to I wouldn't be surprised if that's the desirable one.

Sometimes I feel like I'm living in a parallel Universe.

 

[willows68]

I don't know M'Lady. With the type of women ( or children) the lads on here say they're attracted to I wouldn't be surprised if that's the desirable one.

Sometimes I feel like I'm living in a parallel Universe.

You and me both, Sir. Doesn't mean we are necessarily wrong though. As some man over in 'murica says: Prep. Pray. And stay outta the way... Good advice in my books.

 

[Mad as Fish]

I thought you were near pension age???

I'm guessing the clue is in her name, but being a gent I'm far too polite to ask.

 

[willows68]

I'm guessing the clue is in her name, but being a gent I'm far too polite to ask.

Wise, my friend, wise

 

[Mad as Fish]

The female ego is a curious beast and must be carefully negotiated. I've become better at this with age, but definitely wouldn't consider myself an expert. Does any such man truly exist? Here's a couple of things I know for sure:

A) Beware women approaching, or over the age of forty who wear very large, heavy necklaces, especially those fashioned from sterling silver and ovoid or teardrop semiprecious stones. Double points if said stones are amethysts. This is the female equivalent of a string of ears strung around an amazonian warrior's neck; a kind of death-totem or forewarning, as reliable as the bright, vivid colouration of a toxic frog.

B) I know the fast-track to making your girl incredibly pissed off, and it is amazing and surprisingly simple. All one need do is compare something she does negatively to something your former girl did, and the more drudgerous or mundane the task being contrasted, the shorter the path to wrath, and the longer the wrath will persist. I didn't set out on this voyage of discovery, you understand. I arrived at shit-town via unhappy accident, through a throwaway remark. She'd ironed a shirt of mine and there were kinds of creases around the top button area. I complained about this, and she replied that it just happens sometimes. I said I never noticed this happen when my former partner did it. Now, I saw her darken at this, and tried to correct course by quickly adding that it didn't matter and that some people are just better than other people at some things. Not only did this not help, it made it even worse.

Having been through the big D and back on the market a couple of times I can empathise, deeply!

One thing you cotton on to quick enough is that what attracts women of a certain age to men is their enthusiasm for taking her bloody mutt walkies! As for cosy nights in front of the telly that will be her gossiping away when there's a good documentary on but woe betide you should you utter a single syllable during a soppy 'romantic comedy', the plot of which is virtually identical to the other billion and one romantic comedies.

And whatever you do never rush into a garage to pick up a bunch of flowers only to grab the plastic ones by mistake......

Got lucky in the end though!

 

[Mad as Fish]

Wise, my friend, wise

I have many scars already....

 

[willows68]

Having been through the big D and back on the market a couple of times I can empathise, deeply!

One thing you cotton on to quick enough is that what attracts women of a certain age to men is their enthusiasm for taking her bloody mutt walkies! As for cosy nights in front of the telly that will be her gossiping away when there's a good documentary on but woe betide you should you utter a single syllable during a soppy 'romantic comedy', the plot of which is virtually identical to the other billion and one romantic comedies.

And whatever you do never rush into a garage to pick up a bunch of flowers only to grab the plastic ones by mistake......

Got lucky in the end though!

I find men way more yappy. Ok the one I watch movies with. Especially in movies you actually want to watch....
S'wy with skyboxes and tech I always watch ahead. Don't want to hurt his feelings getting annoyed with the yap. I'm unusual in that way. I'm quiet. Minimal words.

 

[Fishalt]

Having been through the big D and back on the market a couple of times I can empathise, deeply!

One thing you cotton on to quick enough is that what attracts women of a certain age to men is their enthusiasm for taking her bloody mutt walkies! As for cosy nights in front of the telly that will be her gossiping away when there's a good documentary on but woe betide you should you utter a single syllable during a soppy 'romantic comedy', the plot of which is virtually identical to the other billion and one romantic comedies.

And whatever you do never rush into a garage to pick up a bunch of flowers only to grab the plastic ones by mistake......

Got lucky in the end though!

I don't know what the answer to it all is. Charles Bukowski didn't either, and he had more experience with more varieties of them than I ever will:

By God, I don't know what to do.
They're nice to have around.
They have a way of playing with the balls,
looking at the penis seriously.

They soften a man,
and leave him listening to the rain.

Sometimes, having been forced to unblock the sink p-trap, clogged as it is with peroxided hair and mascara and Christ knows what other feminine beauty products, some of them no doubt extracted from the glands of endangered animals, or animals that ought to be endangered, I've looked through the bathroom door,fingers covered in a rancid and congestive sludge to watch her sitting on the couch blissfully eating ice cream and thought "How much, really?"

How much do I really need you for anything?

My grandfather's voice enters my head: "Son, let me tell you something for nothing; if they didn't have that fucken'thing between their legs, you;d throw fucken' rocks at em'".

I do nothing, say nothing apart from "It's fixed". The reply I get is "Ok, Good".

Then I take a seat beside her on the couch, in front of the TV, which is playing more or less the film you describe, and then this article happens:

Wife Unaware That Movie Will Answer All Her Questions If She Just Pays Attention

SANDUSKY, CO—Steve and Leslie Hendrickson were having movie night last week but the experience was diminished by Leslie's constant question-asking, reports Steve.

babylonbee.com

 

[willows68]

Bukowski was really a romantic at heart. Should have left the debauchery to the side and elevated his soul.
These men/ women things really happen to all sides. I have always found my vows a source of strength in hard times.
Sadly even those are lessened in these heathen times for the young ones.

 

[AN2]

I don't know M'Lady. With the type of women ( or children) the lads on here say they're attracted to

Who are you talking about?

 

[Wolf]

Who are you talking about?

All members here know who the ones are who are attracted to kids.
No names are required.
No posts need to be deleted and no bans are required.

 

[AN2]

All members here know who the ones are who are attracted to kids.
No names are required.

I don't

Why don't you tell us who they are?

 

[AN2]

Idiot.

Who here is attracted to children?

 

[AN2]

All members here know who the ones are who are attracted to kids.
No names are required.
No posts need to be deleted and no bans are required.

R u deleting your own posts again?

Like you deleted your flounce post 5 minutes after you made it?

 

[AN2]

De Gaulle brought it in to prevent the PCF becoming the largest Party in the French Parliament. Actually Edith Nesbit the brilliant English children's writer and Socialist was strongly opposed to women's sufferage in England because women would tend to vote for the Conservatives- actually she was right in that for the second half of the 20 th in the UK you would have had solid Labour governments if there had not been women's sufferage. Now though there is data that we have seen a shift where women now tend to the Left- or if not the Left as such Kamala Harris type characters-more than men do.

Interesting, what happened? Did womenfolk stop listening to their menfolk?

No I think it most definitely is the case. Remember the hounding that your one Tara McCarty got?

You'd have to remind me

A lot of these lads see White women as as much more their enemies than they do Blacks or Jews.

I wouldn't go that far

Also you did not have any "White Nationalism 1.0" versions of Andrew Anglin did you? Just like you do not have any "White Nationalism 2.O" versions of Katja Lane. This though seems to be more of a North American phenomena though- it does not seem effect the National Party and CnE or Patriotic Alternative in all justice.

Possibly though the types of break down in the good relations between the genders that you see in the American occupied part of Korea is indeed Ireland's future.

Umm, Andrew Anglin, Katja Lane, CnE..

I kinda don't know what any of that stuff is, tbh

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Who here is attracted to children?

Would the real Slim Shady please stand up
please stand up please stand up
Would the real Slim Shady please stand up
please stand up please stand up

 

[AN2]

Would the real Slim Shady please stand up
please stand up please stand up
Would the real Slim Shady please stand up
please stand up please stand up

Are you saying that I am attracted to children, that I'm a paedophile?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

I'm Slim Shady, yes, I'm the real Shady
All you other Slim Shady's are just imitating

 

[AN2]

I'm Slim Shady, yes, I'm the real Shady
All you other Slim Shady's are just imitating

Clearly @Myles O'Reilly and @Wolf are attempting to circumvent site rules (and shitting over threads as they always do), I see absolutely no reason why they shouldn't be thread banned

@SwordOfStZip, @Declan

 

[clarke-connolly]

I seem to have, sort of stumbled on to an interesting question.

So many interesting responses. Very entertaining, as I have just come back to the internet after being busy at something else for a good while today.

Tis an interesting topic alright ~ And something that doesn't get talked about, much / enough ! !

If you delve in to it, you can see some of the, Pressures on Women / Their Hopes / Their Desires / Their Reactions to things Not going as they want ! ! !

Ya can also begin to see, maybe ~ ~ Why Women are so Damn Complicated and Maybe Not So Damn Complicated ! !

 

[Wolf]

Clearly @Myles O'Reilly and @Wolf are attempting to circumvent site rules (and shitting over threads as they always do), I see absolutely no reason why they shouldn't be thread banned

@SwordOfStZip, @Declan

I'd say you're not far from another siteban at this stage.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

Interesting, what happened? Did womenfolk stop listening to their menfolk?


You'd have to remind me


I wouldn't go that far


Umm, Andrew Anglin, Katja Lane, CnE..

I kinda don't know what any of that stuff is, tbh

Well if the men were tending to actual Socialism and the women were tending to be vote Conservative they were not listening to their menfolk as regards politics back than either, at least in a lot of cases. I am think of England and France here though. Were women more likely to vote Fine Gael than Fianna Fail or Labour in the past? I don't know. It would be interesting to see if you could find out. It does annoy me when you have larping Feminists here claiming that women were so oppressed in the South in the past.

Tara McCarty was an Alt-Right youtuber with a show called "Reality Bites". She got swamped by angry actual woman haters claiming that women had no place on the "Altright". And yea a lot of them did say and I believe that Andrew Anglin has said that White women are as big enemies of White men as Blacks and Jews in their opinion. She was defended by both Millenial Woes and Greg Johnson.

Andrew Anglin has a website called "Daily Stormer" and a column on UNZ. There has been stuff about him even in the mainstream media as you can see below. He really does hate women and Jews but some of his commentary on stuff can be not unintelligent.

Andrew Anglin

News about Andrew Anglin. Commentary and archival information about Andrew Anglin from The New York Times.

www.nytimes.com

Katja Lane was a big figure "White Nationalism 1.O" and CnE is Barrett's group.

 

[SwordOfStZip]

I'd say you're not far from another siteban at this stage.

Are you going to constantly go after AN2 now in the way that you constantly went after the obsessive pro-Ukrainian until you had driven him off the forum?

 

[SwordOfStZip]

I seem to have, sort of stumbled on to an interesting question.

So many interesting responses. Very entertaining, as I have just come back to the internet after being busy at something else for a good while today.

Tis an interesting topic alright ~ And something that doesn't get talked about, much / enough ! !

If you delve in to it, you can see some of the, Pressures on Women / Their Hopes / Their Desires / Their Reactions to things Not going as they want ! ! !

Ya can also begin to see, maybe ~ ~ Why Women are so Damn Complicated and Maybe Not So Damn Complicated ! !

I think there has been a general decay of thought and character in the West- but I also think you are much more likely to notice it this when it comes to the opposite sex.

I think also that a lot of women do you have a drive in us to find a man who we can look up to, one that we can really see as being superior basically ("my hero", etc)- but Feminists would say that this has been hot wired into us by Patriarchy and Social Darwinists would say that it is an evolutionary impulse. I do not think it is a recent thing anyway.