Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

Here we have @Haven screaming at us that the Left have learned literally nothing from this.

It will always be about "racism".
 
Here we have @Haven screaming at us that the Left have learned literally nothing from this.

It will always be about "racism".
I'm rather civil actually.

You should watch those videos. I'm sure the White Race will survive for those few hours.
 
What would you expect from an idiot who thinks race is a "skin colour" other than this -

"Many individuals may be more GENETICALLY similar to members of other IDEAS than to some members of their own IDEA." - Haven
 
What would you expect from an idiot who thinks race is a "skin colour" other than this -

"Many individuals may be more GENETICALLY similar to members of other IDEAS than to some members of their own IDEA." - Haven
Where did I say that? Looks like a made up quote.

You are not so desperate as to make up quotes now, are you, Jimbo?
 
Where did I say that? Looks like a made up quote.

You are not so desperate as to make up quotes now, are you, Jimbo?
I've told you a thousand times. That is your quote, but instead of idea, you wrote race.

As someone who claims such a thing doesn't exist, I asked you how are you defining race then, you said an idea.
 
That is your quote, but instead of idea you wrote race.


Oh My God Reaction GIF


So...its not my quote.
 
Yes, of course it sounds ridiculous. And it's completely accurate. You're so unbelievably stupid, you don't realise that you can't say that race doesn't exist with an argument implying that it does.

You are an apex race denier, the dumbest of them all.
 
Yes, of course it sounds ridiculous. And it's completely accurate. You're so unbelievably stupid, you don't realise that you can't say that race doesn't exist with an argument implying that it does.

You are an apex race denier, the dumbest of them all.
I win again.
 
"White people, too."
That was for you Jimbo. Race is a categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally viewed as distinct within a given society.[1] The term came into common usage during the 16th century, when it was used to refer to groups of various kinds, including those characterized by close kinship relations.[2] By the 17th century, the term began to refer to physical (phenotypical) traits, and then later national affiliations or perceived ancestry. Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society.[3][4][5] While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning.[1][6][7] The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.
 
Modern science regards race as a social construct, an identity which is assigned based on rules made by society.[3][4][5] While partly based on physical similarities within groups, race does not have an inherent physical or biological meaning.[1][6][7] The concept of race is foundational to racism, the belief that humans can be divided based on the superiority of one race over another.
Don't forget folks, Haven posted a video himself of Dawkins saying that that's "nonsense" 😆

I honestly think that he's our stupidest poster, meaning stupider than @Roc_
 
Probably of how it went down.

Did he commit academic fraud? Probably. Theres a process for that and it should have been followed.

But the usual suspects looked at his skin colour and went to town on DEI blah blah blah, trying to bring anything else non-White academics do, into disrespute.

Academic fraud happens all the time. Famous examples (if you follow this kind of thing):



But no one attacked them on the colour of their skin, on "race", for a right wing agenda.

Yes tragically academic fraud is becoming more and more common. The notion of academia that we have now or had yesterday at least grew out of Nordic-Latin Christendom (just look into the origins of Oxford and Harvard) and with the death of that it is hardly surprising when you think about it that academia as we knew it dies to though it appears that something very similar will survive in Russia, Iran and China.

Arday at least showed some shame unlike some other people-


He was appointed with great fanfare during the "Great aWOKEning"- and that more than his skin colour as such (though I suspect that was important to Cofnas) explains sections of the media such as "The Spectator" going on and on and on and on about it. The British Right has very much it's own DEI thing going on as you we witness with Kemi Badenoch, Rishi Sunak, Ed Husain and Zia Yusuf.
 
Far beyond Arday who, to be honest, none of us knew anything about before now.

I had not heard about Arday before all this, or if I had I quickly forgot. However not just Myles but also other members of the general knew who he was before this drama blew up. I did know who Nathan Cofnas was though.
 
Yes tragically academic fraud is becoming more and more common. The notion of academia that we have now or had yesterday at least grew out of Nordic-Latin Christendom (just look into the origins of Oxford and Harvard) and with the death of that it is hardly surprising when you think about it that academia as we knew it dies to though it appears that something very similar will survive in Russia, Iran and China.
Arday at least showed some shame unlike some other people-
He reported people who were exposing him to the police for "racism".


He was appointed with great fanfare during the "Great aWOKEning"- and that more than his skin colour as such (though I suspect that was important to Cofnas) explains sections of the media such as "The Spectator" going on and on and on and on about it. The British Right has very much it's own DEI thing going on as you we witness with Kemi Badenoch, Rishi Sunak, Ed Husain and Zia Yusuf.
 
Yes tragically academic fraud is becoming more and more common. The notion of academia that we have now or had yesterday at least grew out of Nordic-Latin Christendom (just look into the origins of Oxford and Harvard) and with the death of that it is hardly surprising when you think about it that academia as we knew it dies to though it appears that something very similar will survive in Russia, Iran and China.

Arday at least showed some shame unlike some other people-


He was appointed with great fanfare during the "Great aWOKEning"- and that more than his skin colour as such (though I suspect that was important to Cofnas) explains sections of the media such as "The Spectator" going on and on and on and on about it. The British Right has very much it's own DEI thing going on as you we witness with Kemi Badenoch, Rishi Sunak, Ed Husain and Zia Yusuf.

Lots of frauds have great initial fanfare.

Another example.


What if he was black? I think we all know the answer.
 
Last edited:
It couldn't be clearer.. the issue, which is DEI, disappears into the void with leftists, and is replaced by "racism".

We can't live with these retards.
 
Problem: Racism

Arday wasn't a Cambridge professor because Problem.

DEI (which isn't Problem) "fixes" Problem.

Arday is exposed as unqualified to be a Cambridge professor.

Conclusion: Problem.

- The Left
 
Also obviously seriously autistic.

I’d say verging on Jambo and Rain Man levels.

Anyone noticing a pattern here?

whistle-emoji.gif
 
Never heard of him
Neither did I, but the article says he's just a random civilian who in fairness did some worthy deeds during Pearl Harbour and probably deserved his Navy Cross - he was the first black man to achieve this, so that's their angle for naming the ship after him. But if they wanted to name it after a black man for DEI reasons, they surely could've found a more worthy black man and one who actually won a Medal of Honor or was a President, for example Barrack Obama who has no naval ships named after him.

Destroyers are often named after Medal of Honor recipients, but aircraft carriers are usually named after presidents.
 
Neither did I, but the article says he's just a random civilian who in fairness did some worthy deeds during Pearl Harbour and probably deserved his Navy Cross - he was the first black man to achieve this, so that's their angle for naming the ship after him. But if they wanted to name it after a black man for DEI reasons, they surely could've found a more worthy black man and one who actually won a Medal of Honor or was a President, for example Barrack Obama who has no naval ships named after him.
Barack Obama isn't black, though. His mother was a mud shark.
 

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom