The Climate Change scam

[Myles O'Reilly]

"Nature" is not the thing that feeds the worlds population though.

I beg your pardon?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

What's a flerf Sir?

 

[Professor]

What's a flerf Sir?

What about the Groomed Kids? Have you forgotten so soon, again Myles, or are you just turning a blind eye - Surely not Sir??

 

[Mad as Fish]

A scientifically illiterate goofball

There is a jumped up geography teacher doing the media merry go round here in Ireland who is clueless when it comes to science, but the lovies can't get enough of him.

 

[Professor]

Oh Goodness - Dear God. It's a mad old world at times

 

[Mad as Fish]

I don't know who you're talking about but while I have your attention.. Could you tell me why a flerf would cite/endorse an astrophysicist (literally talking about the Sun and Moon)? That's comical to me.

You will need to talk to the one you accuse about that.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Do you find it comical, too?

There are bigger things to worry about.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Eh, yeah, I'm sure there are.

Do you ever give a straight answer to a straight question that you don't like?

Not from you, no, whether I like it or not.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Is it just me?

Maybe.

 

[Mad as Fish]

You don't know?

Perhaps not.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Why do you not answer questions by me?

Maybe I can't be bothered, or perhaps I just love winding you up, on the other hand I might just detest your bossy superior attitude. Who knows?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Might as well put this here -

Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk say human population not nearly big enough: ‘If we had a trillion humans, we would have at any given time a thousand Mozarts’​

Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk say human population not nearly big enough: ‘If we had a trillion humans, we would have at any given time a thousand Mozarts’

“I think in a lot of these endeavors we're very like-minded,” Bezos said of himself and Musk regarding getting humans into space.

finance.yahoo.com

 

[Mad as Fish]

I tend to drift towards the idea that you are an insecure pillock who demands that everyone jump to attention when you are out and about, but then again.....

 

[Mad as Fish]

You tend to drift towards ad hominem in every reply to your superiors

Oh I don't think so, not today anyway.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Oh I don't think so, not today anyway.

Sir did you ever hear the word flerf before?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Sir did you ever hear the word flerf before?

I'd seen it mentioned on here but I must admit that I had to go look it up earlier.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

So did I. Unfortunately David wouldn't explain what it meant when asked.

 

[Kangal]

I beg your pardon?

"Nature" does not feed us anymore, Myles. We stopped being hunter-gatherers 1000s of years ago, and moved to agriculture.
It's great that there may be more trees and greenery than before, its nice to look at for sure, but that stuff doesn't feed the world.

Land Use

How is humanity using the Earth’s land? And how can we decrease our land use so that more land is left for wildlife?

ourworldindata.org

A singular focus on CO2 and photosynthesis misses all the other parts that go into ensuring we have harvests year after year. Adequate rainfall is essential for example.

We are dependent for only a few crops for the majority of our calories.

8 Crops Endangered by Climate Change | Action Against Hunger

www.actionagainsthunger.org

So it's great that trees might be growing a big bigger and faster than usual. But you can't eat that you know.

 

[Professor]

So did I. Unfortunately David wouldn't explain what it meant when asked.

So did I. Unfortunately Myles wouldn't explain what he meant when asked 1/2 a dozen times, which is funny because it's his fascination and interest.
Nowt so queer as folk, eh?

 

[Mad as Fish]

"Nature" does not feed us anymore, Myles. We stopped being hunter-gatherers 1000s of years ago, and moved to agriculture.
It's great that there may be more trees and greenery than before, its nice to look at for sure, but that stuff doesn't feed the world.

Land Use

How is humanity using the Earth’s land? And how can we decrease our land use so that more land is left for wildlife?

ourworldindata.org

A singular focus on CO2 and photosynthesis misses all the other parts that go into ensuring we have harvests year after year. Adequate rainfall is essential for example.

We are dependent for only a few crops for the majority of our calories.

8 Crops Endangered by Climate Change | Action Against Hunger

www.actionagainsthunger.org

So it's great that trees might be growing a big bigger and faster than usual. But you can't eat that you know.

Unfortunately the world is full of idiots like you who pronounce on agriculture, and the worlds food supply in general without a single clue as to what they are on about, but that doesn't stop them lecturing to one and all.

The climate change nutters have been doing nothing but focus on CO2, but when it doesn't suit the narrative then suddenly everyone else is at fault for doing so!

I'll try and make this easy for you. Carbon is the building block of life, we are a carbon based life form, all life on earth is, so there is a carbon cycle.

That carbon cycle has photosynthesis on one side and respiration on the other. Basically, plants take carbon from the air and use sunlight to build sugar, starch, protein etc while animals eat those products, extract the energy and expire carbon back as CO2.

The greater the CO2 concentration the quicker and bigger plants can grow, and that includes crop plants.

But here's a thing, plants have holes in their leaves called stomata. These holes open and close to ventilate the cells with CO2 within, unfortunately, when they do so they let out moisture so a plant will close them when it gets too dry.

The good news is that with a higher CO2 concentration the stomata don't have to stay open for so long and so the plant is less prone to drought stress, meaning it can grow in drier conditions, which is why the world is getting greener.

The overall result is all plants, including crop plants, will grow bigger and quicker resulting in higher yields, and they need less water to do so. It's a win win situation!

Another key to higher yielding crops is a healthy soil and simply throwing NPK at it is not going to help us much in the long term. But understanding how the soil works is a huge subject, the complexity and importance of which we are only just beginning to grasp. A bit of extra CO2 here and there pales into insignificance when compared to this aspect.

 

[Wolf]

Unfortunately the world is full of idiots like you who pronounce on agriculture, and the worlds food supply in general without a single clue as to what they are on about, but that doesn't stop them lecturing to one and all.

The climate change nutters have been doing nothing but focus on CO2, but when it doesn't suit the narrative then suddenly everyone else is at fault for doing so!

I'll try and make this easy for you. Carbon is the building block of life, we are a carbon based life form, all life on earth is, so there is a carbon cycle.

That carbon cycle has photosynthesis on one side and respiration on the other. Basically, plants take carbon from the air to build sugar, starch, protein etc while animals eat those products, extract the energy and expire carbon back as CO2.

The greater the CO2 concentration the quicker and bigger plants can grow, and that includes crop plants.

But here's a thing, plants have holes in their leaves called stomata. These holes open and close to ventilate the cells with CO2 within, unfortunately, when they do so they let out moisture so a plant will close them when it gets too dry.

The good news is that with a higher CO2 concentration the stomata don't have to stay open for so long and so the plant is less prone to drought stress, meaning it can grow in drier conditions!

The overall result is all plants, including crop plants, will grow bigger and quicker resulting in higher yields, and they need less water to do so. It's a win win situation!

Another key to higher yielding crops is a healthy soil and simply throwing NPK at it is not going to help us much in the long term. But understanding how the soil works is a huge subject, the complexity and importance of which we are only just beginning to grasp. A bit of extra CO2 here and there pales into insignificance when compared to this aspect.

The 'Climate Change' scam is the new current thing for retarded and brainwashed idiots to get excited about.
It follows on from lockdowns, BLM, experimental vaccines, war in Ukraine, war in Gaza etc etc etc.
Whatever is trending on Twatter will be what retarded and brainwashed idiots will be pontificating about.
Funny as fuck when ya take a step back and see the macro view of things but idiots like that are incapable of doing such a thing.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

You seem to have a strong desire to want to deny Muslim rape gangs in Ireland. Can I ask you why? Is it out of a sense of fairness?

Or, I have better question. Do you think that the propensity for the Muslim population to form rape gangs in Britain, trafficking and mass raping vulnerable white kids is not likely to happen here? I would ask you to bear in mind that our treacherous government and fake news media is as likely to cover it up as they are in Britain (thus enabling it).

Are "Irish" Muslims special?

Tusla themselves admitted its happening. They were careful not to use the word Muslim but said 'we need to have a grown up discussion about who's doing this'. In other words not be afraid of being called racist like the authorities in the UK were.

Gript covered it in an article which I provided to Buddy Love but he seems to have forgotten.

 

[Professor]

You seem to have a strong desire to want to deny Muslim rape gangs in Ireland.

Ah, you've decided to give me MylesX2. I've replied extensively to him out of courtesy for us all to understand whats happening so you can go over my posts in the last 10+ pages and see that I'll ask you the same.

What have you Got?

Or, I have better question. Do you think that the propensity for the Muslim population to form rape gangs in Britain, trafficking and mass raping vulnerable white kids is not likely to happen here?

I think it could be happening here, that's why I ask folk to show us some evidence, Myles and the Tomster should have more to show on the subject but perhaps since TR,SYL has made a big show of that particular Muslim culture in England then that has alerted and highlighted any Muslim gangs as suspect Pedo's and consequently they have changed their MO and are doing other things.

Our local men of Ireland are now so highly vigilant on the subject as are staff in care homes that if there was stuff going on, the Muslim perps would stand out like a sore thumb imo.

Are "Irish" Muslims special?

The are what they are, some are bad, most are good within Ireland - So far . . .

So updates please? We don't need RTE, Tusla or any other PC damage limitation body to inform us. . .

We need victims who are telling their story, we need staff at care homes who listen to those stories, staff who have been following the moves, we need people who know what's goiung on first hand to contact TRSYL, Myles, Yourself and anyone of the 1000's of men & women in this country who will do something about it.

Is that OK for you. It's your responsibility!!

 

[Mad as Fish]

The 'Climate Change' scam is the new current thing for retarded and brainwashed idiots to get excited about.
It follows on from lockdowns, BLM, experimental vaccines, war in Ukraine, war in Gaza etc etc etc.
Whatever is trending on Twatter will be what retarded and brainwashed idiots will be pontificating about.
Funny as fuck when ya take a step back and see the macro view of things but idiots like that are incapable of doing such a thing.

Farming has always suffered blithering idiots who think they know how to farm better than farmers themselves, as a general rule they could hardly grow a tray of cress seed, but hey, after a quick google of farms and stuff they know it all.

 

[Professor]

It's not my responsibility.. but why on Earth would you think that the Regime here would do anything about Muslims raping Irish girls?

Well now, You saw the reaction when a few foreigners got attacked outside an Irish school?
Irish men went crazy up and down the centre of town . . .

Now Imagine the reaction of Irish men like Yourself, Myles and TR-SYL and all the supporters and all the other people who are vigilantly waiting for any sign of noncing??

The towns will be set alight as will these messages boards so . . .

Expect measures have been put in place by various Authorities to ensure rape gangs do not proliferate.

Can you understand that?

 

[Professor]

Yeah I did.. by the government. Far right this and far right that..


You don't seem to understand how this works. The Muz can rape vulnerable white girls with impunity in Britain. Why do you think Ireland would be any different?

All you need is one witnessed report and some follow-up, Ask @Myles O'Reilly & Tomster - Where is it?

Can you imagine the fuss that will be kicked up to justifiably further your causes? So . . .

It's gold for the taking, you tell me it's out there . . .

Where is it?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Farming has always suffered blithering idiots who think they know how to farm better than farmers themselves, as a general rule they could hardly grow a tray of cress seed, but hey, after a quick google of farms and stuff they know it all.

When the Land Commission originally set out allocating land it quickly became apparent that their evenhanded notions of giving everyone a wee farm wasn't working. Half the lads who got land hadn't a clue what to do with it and it was fit for nothing in a short time.

They changed it so you had to prove you were able to farm before you got anything a'tall.

 

[Professor]

Myles I believe cited a (credible) source about abuse in care homes.

No, it was me who did.
He just got all pointy, same as you.

It's not my responsibility.

It is.

 

[Mad as Fish]

When the Land Commission originally set out allocating land it quickly became apparent that their evenhanded notions of giving everyone a wee farm wasn't working. Half the lads who got land hadn't a clue what to do with it and it was fit for nothing in a short time.

They changed it so you had to prove you were able to farm before you got anything a'tall.

The concept is still around today in that there are tax breaks for those inheriting land who have taken a level six or above, course in agri/horticulture. Well, that's a simple overview, with the Revenue being involved there are lots of ifs and buts to confuse the issue.

 

[A Man Called Charolais]

On the science.

​

 

[Kangal]

On the science.

​

What's the problem exactly though?

Science Isn’t Broken

If you follow the headlines, your confidence in science may have taken a hit lately. Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.

fivethirtyeight.com

The replication crisis shows science is checking and validating itself.

No other movement puts itself under this kind of scrutiny and self criticism. There is always going to be a Schön at some point, but they get uncovered eventually.

 

[Wolf]

 

[Mad as Fish]

What's the problem exactly though?

Science Isn’t Broken

If you follow the headlines, your confidence in science may have taken a hit lately. Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.

fivethirtyeight.com

The replication crisis shows science is checking and validating itself.

No other movement puts itself under this kind of scrutiny and self criticism. There is always going to be a Schön at some point, but they get uncovered eventually.

Bollux, 90% are in it for the money.

 

[Wolf]

Bollux, 90% are in it for the money.

And the decent ones who questioned the CoVidian Cultists during the Scamdemic were fired, disowned, deplatformed and even jailed.

 

[A Man Called Charolais]

What's the problem exactly though?

Science Isn’t Broken

If you follow the headlines, your confidence in science may have taken a hit lately. Peer review? More like self-review. An investigation in November uncovered a scam in which researchers were rubber-stamping their own work, circumventing peer review at five high-profile publishers.

fivethirtyeight.com

The replication crisis shows science is checking and validating itself.

No other movement puts itself under this kind of scrutiny and self criticism. There is always going to be a Schön at some point, but they get uncovered eventually.

Well, Wikipedia says it's an ongoing crisis. Since Wikipedia isn't far right I suppose you accept it as a credible source.



'The replication crisis (also called the replicability crisis and the reproducibility crisis) is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method,[2] such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call into question substantial parts of scientific knowledge.

The replication crisis is frequently discussed in relation to psychology and medicine, where considerable efforts have been undertaken to reinvestigate classic results, to determine whether they are reliable, and if they turn out not to be, the reasons for the failure.[3][4] Data strongly indicates that other natural and social sciences are affected as well.[5]

The phrase replication crisis was coined in the early 2010s[6] as part of a growing awareness of the problem. Considerations of causes and remedies have given rise to a new scientific discipline, metascience,[7] which uses methods of empirical research to examine empirical research practice.

Considerations about reproducibility fall into two categories. Reproducibility in the narrow sense refers to re-examining and validating the analysis of a given set of data. Replication refers to repeating the experiment or study to obtain new, independent data with the goal of reaching the same or similar conclusions.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis


From your link:

'P-hacking is generally thought of as cheating, but what if we made it compulsory instead? If the purpose of studies is to push the frontiers of knowledge, then perhaps playing around with different methods shouldn’t be thought of as a dirty trick, but encouraged as a way of exploring boundaries.'

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/

 

[Kangal]

Well, Wikipedia says it's an ongoing crisis. Since Wikipedia isn't far right I suppose you accept it as a credible source.



'The replication crisis (also called the replicability crisis and the reproducibility crisis) is an ongoing methodological crisis in which the results of many scientific studies are difficult or impossible to reproduce. Because the reproducibility of empirical results is an essential part of the scientific method,[2] such failures undermine the credibility of theories building on them and potentially call into question substantial parts of scientific knowledge.

The replication crisis is frequently discussed in relation to psychology and medicine, where considerable efforts have been undertaken to reinvestigate classic results, to determine whether they are reliable, and if they turn out not to be, the reasons for the failure.[3][4] Data strongly indicates that other natural and social sciences are affected as well.[5]

The phrase replication crisis was coined in the early 2010s[6] as part of a growing awareness of the problem. Considerations of causes and remedies have given rise to a new scientific discipline, metascience,[7] which uses methods of empirical research to examine empirical research practice.

Considerations about reproducibility fall into two categories. Reproducibility in the narrow sense refers to re-examining and validating the analysis of a given set of data. Replication refers to repeating the experiment or study to obtain new, independent data with the goal of reaching the same or similar conclusions.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis


From your link:

'P-hacking is generally thought of as cheating, but what if we made it compulsory instead? If the purpose of studies is to push the frontiers of knowledge, then perhaps playing around with different methods shouldn’t be thought of as a dirty trick, but encouraged as a way of exploring boundaries.'

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/

Yeah of course it's a problem. While it seems to be mostly confined to the social sciences I'm not going to pretend it's not a problem elsewhere.

But that's the point in a way....the scientific process has helped to shed light on this.

There is additional self correcting aspects - anything that has potential commercial applications will have an attempt at replication. Hence the comments on the video about cancer research.

The problem is that there really is nowhere enough money going into research, so they really only get one shot to run their research or experiment once.(I have a cousin who is a PhD researcher now in Australia, and she struggles with cost of living. She should have gone into investment banking).

If its interesting they publish. And why not? If its really interesting someone will attempt to replicate. If the result can't be replicated, that's the end of the road.

There's a definite distinction then between the soft and hard sciences. Hard science is really something that can be monetised and comes with risk, it's going to get checked at some point. Cos someone WILL pay if its badly wrong. And yes, sometimes it does.

The scientific method is nothing more than to try to put some fail safes around the fact we are human, with bias, limited resources, massive egos and prone to group think. It's value is always evident in the medium to long term.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

On the science.

I remember that arsehole telling everyone to get jabbed to the eyeballs.

Are you taking the piss Sir?

 

[Wolf]

Who's running the gimp's account for the weekend?
Because it's definitely not the same gimp who runs it during the week.

 

[Professor]

What's the problem exactly though?

Going Off-Topic on a Climate thread.

The replication crisis shows science is checking and validating itself.

Whatever that means?
In regard to the supposed Climate Crisis we see that Science is manipulating, cherry picking, obfuscating and ignoring the facts.
Not checking itself sufficiently and hence altogether invalidating itself in many important areas, Climate being one of those.

No other movement puts itself under this kind of scrutiny and self criticism. There is always going to be a Schön at some point, but they get uncovered eventually.

A pity that MSM is such a load of censored, edited nonsense though. - Now the general public haven't a clue what to believe - ClownWorld Science

 

[Kangal]

Going Off-Topic on a Climate thread.

Take it up with @tldr

His post is not off topic in the larger scale of things. We probably need a new thread for it.