Donald Trump.

Haven said:

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1qu77e4/massively_breaking_news_dataset_9_of_epstein/
Click to expand...

Since I still haven't passed the pre-moderation stage, I can't post screenshots. However I asked chatgpt if what you've posted should be taken seriously, and I got the following response:

"
Bottom line

➡️ No, it is not confirmed that there is a verified, factual affidavit under oath showing Trump threatened a minor as described in that Reddit post.
➡️ There is no credible news reporting confirming the claim as true, and the DOJ has warned the files include unverified or false allegations.
➡️ Being mentioned or named in these files is not evidence of wrongdoing by itself.

If you see this claim repeated elsewhere, treat it with caution unless corroborated by trustworthy news reports or official statements.
"
 
Aldo3 said:
Since I still haven't passed the pre-moderation stage, I can't post screenshots. However I asked chatgpt
Click to expand...
For the love of god.... :rolleyes::D

Aldo3 said:
if what you've posted should be taken seriously, and I got the following response:
Click to expand...
What does the computer tell us then?
Aldo3 said:
"
Bottom line

➡️ No, it is not confirmed that there is a verified, factual affidavit under oath showing Trump threatened a minor as described in that Reddit post.
Click to expand...
See below.
Aldo3 said:
➡️ There is no credible news reporting confirming the claim as true, and the DOJ
Click to expand...
Trump's DOJ that is, that has had no credibility since they tried to shut down the investigation.

Aldo3 said:
has warned the files include unverified or false allegations.
➡️ Being mentioned or named in these files is not evidence of wrongdoing by itself.
Click to expand...

Whoa! We would have to apply that to EVERYONE mentioned the files then. Right?
What is needed is an actual investigation, yeah? :D :D :D

Aldo3 said:
If you see this claim repeated elsewhere, treat it with caution unless corroborated by trustworthy news reports or official statements.
"
Click to expand...
LOL. Now you want the MSM?


The file in question was taken down by the DOJ but it was originally found here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA01250883.pdf

The full document is now here: https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
 
Last edited:
Again.
Why didn't Pedophile Joe Biden's DOJ release the Epstein files during the four years he was POTUS?
What possible reason could there be?
Could it be the Degenerate Party is ran by and populated by a massive child sexual abuse ring?:unsure:

On a related note, isn't AI a great thing?:ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Since AI is getting the vote of approval from the posters here I thought Id ask Chatgpt about democrats in the Epstein files:

Short answer: public Epstein-related files mention a few prominent Democrats (most notably Bill Clinton) but do not contain verified evidence that top Democratic leaders committed crimes related to Epstein. Reporting and court records show associations, travel, or witness claims for some individuals, but many mentions are ambiguous, disputed, or unproven.

Key points (concise):

- Bill Clinton — Appears in Epstein flight logs and associated travel records. Clinton’s office says the trips were for Clinton Foundation work; Clinton has denied traveling to Epstein’s island and denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. No criminal charges against Clinton related to Epstein appear in public DOJ/FBI files.
- Other Democratic figures — A small number of people who have been identified in media reporting or public documents are donors, staffers, or acquaintances who are/ were Democrats. In most cases the records show meetings, phone contacts, or social interactions rather than allegations of criminal activity.
- Victim depositions and civil suits — Some victims named many associates of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell; those depositions include broad lists of people witnesses said they saw or heard about. Witness statements vary in specificity and reliability; being named in a deposition does not equal an accusation of criminal conduct.
- Flight logs and black book — These documents list many names across parties. Inclusion in logs or the address book shows interaction or travel but is not proof of wrongdoing.
- Unsealed DOJ/FBI documents and reporting — The unsealed documents focus mainly on Epstein’s conduct, his associates’ roles in facilitating abuse, and investigative details. They led to prosecutions of some of Epstein’s associates (e.g., Ghislaine Maxwell) but did not produce public indictments of major political figures based solely on those files.


Well, thats the end of that, isnt it?

Then I wondered, why didnt Biden release the files....

Here’s a clear, factual explanation of why President Joe Biden didn’t publicly release the so-called “Epstein files” while he was in office — and it’s more about law and procedure than something a president can just decide on:

🔐 1. Most Epstein files were legally sealed​

A lot of the documents connected to the Jeffrey Epstein cases were sealed by court order — meaning a judge, not the president, controls whether they can be unsealed. Judges keep material sealed to protect fair trials, privacy, and due process. A president can’t override these court orders on their own.

⚖️ 2. Legal restrictions on grand jury material​

Much of the material from a federal investigation — especially grand jury evidence — is protected by law. These restrictions are meant to prevent defamation or causing harm to people who were never charged with a crime. A president doesn’t have authority to release that material unilaterally without a judge’s approval.

🔎 3. Ongoing investigations and appeals​

During Biden’s presidency, some aspects of the Epstein investigation — including legal appeals and related cases — were still active. Law enforcement generally can’t and shouldn’t release evidence tied to active probes because that could jeopardize legal processes. That’s a normal part of how the justice system works, not necessarily a political decision.

💼 4. Justice Department independence​

Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris said the administration didn’t push to release files because they believed in keeping the Justice Department independent of political influence. They publicly stated they didn’t want to direct DOJ actions for political reasons.

🗂️ 5. Some documents have been released later​

After Biden’s presidency ended, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (later law requiring the DOJ to publish many of the documents). Under that law, large sets of files — though still with redactions for privacy and legal reasons — were released in early 2026.

So, the simple summary​

Biden didn’t release the Epstein files because:

  • Most were under court seals and protected by law — a president can’t just make them public.
  • Many were tied up in ongoing legal matters.
  • The DOJ operates independently and had to follow legal rules about evidence and privacy.
This isn’t about political motives alone — it’s mainly about legal restrictions and judicial control of sensitive court records.


So there you have it folks!
 
Haven said:
For the love of god.... :rolleyes::D


What does the computer tell us then?

See below.

Trump's DOJ that is, that has had no credibility since they tried to shut down the investigation.



Whoa! We would have to apply that to EVERYONE mentioned the files then. Right?
What is needed is an actual investigation, yeah? :D :D :D


LOL. Now you want the MSM?


The file in question was taken down by the DOJ but it was originally found here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA01250883.pdf

The full document is now here: https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
Click to expand...
So what you posted was unverified bullshit from a libtard echo chamber, thanks.

You need help. Urgently.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
LOL, the fantasy of Perverts.😄

In the other: Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) posts a complaint from a three-time psychiatric patient who says that in 1995 she witnessed a rape-and-murder torture ring run by Ghislaine Maxwell and attended by Epstein, Donald Trump and then-President Bill Clinton at Trump’s Rancho Palos Verdes golf course — though Trump didn’t even acquire the course until 2002, among other easily-checked facts.

nypost.com

The biggest ‘hidden secret’ exposed in the Epstein doc dump

Cross your fingers that the latest vast dump of Jeffrey Epstein documents marks the beginning of the end of the overhyped hysteria.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom