Donald Trump.


Since I still haven't passed the pre-moderation stage, I can't post screenshots. However I asked chatgpt if what you've posted should be taken seriously, and I got the following response:

"
Bottom line

➡️ No, it is not confirmed that there is a verified, factual affidavit under oath showing Trump threatened a minor as described in that Reddit post.
➡️ There is no credible news reporting confirming the claim as true, and the DOJ has warned the files include unverified or false allegations.
➡️ Being mentioned or named in these files is not evidence of wrongdoing by itself.

If you see this claim repeated elsewhere, treat it with caution unless corroborated by trustworthy news reports or official statements.
"
 
Since I still haven't passed the pre-moderation stage, I can't post screenshots. However I asked chatgpt
For the love of god.... :rolleyes::D

if what you've posted should be taken seriously, and I got the following response:
What does the computer tell us then?
"
Bottom line

➡️ No, it is not confirmed that there is a verified, factual affidavit under oath showing Trump threatened a minor as described in that Reddit post.
See below.
➡️ There is no credible news reporting confirming the claim as true, and the DOJ
Trump's DOJ that is, that has had no credibility since they tried to shut down the investigation.

has warned the files include unverified or false allegations.
➡️ Being mentioned or named in these files is not evidence of wrongdoing by itself.

Whoa! We would have to apply that to EVERYONE mentioned the files then. Right?
What is needed is an actual investigation, yeah? :D :D :D

If you see this claim repeated elsewhere, treat it with caution unless corroborated by trustworthy news reports or official statements.
"
LOL. Now you want the MSM?


The file in question was taken down by the DOJ but it was originally found here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA01250883.pdf

The full document is now here: https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
 
Last edited:
Again.
Why didn't Pedophile Joe Biden's DOJ release the Epstein files during the four years he was POTUS?
What possible reason could there be?
Could it be the Degenerate Party is ran by and populated by a massive child sexual abuse ring?:unsure:

On a related note, isn't AI a great thing?:ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Since AI is getting the vote of approval from the posters here I thought Id ask Chatgpt about democrats in the Epstein files:

Short answer: public Epstein-related files mention a few prominent Democrats (most notably Bill Clinton) but do not contain verified evidence that top Democratic leaders committed crimes related to Epstein. Reporting and court records show associations, travel, or witness claims for some individuals, but many mentions are ambiguous, disputed, or unproven.

Key points (concise):

- Bill Clinton — Appears in Epstein flight logs and associated travel records. Clinton’s office says the trips were for Clinton Foundation work; Clinton has denied traveling to Epstein’s island and denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. No criminal charges against Clinton related to Epstein appear in public DOJ/FBI files.
- Other Democratic figures — A small number of people who have been identified in media reporting or public documents are donors, staffers, or acquaintances who are/ were Democrats. In most cases the records show meetings, phone contacts, or social interactions rather than allegations of criminal activity.
- Victim depositions and civil suits — Some victims named many associates of Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell; those depositions include broad lists of people witnesses said they saw or heard about. Witness statements vary in specificity and reliability; being named in a deposition does not equal an accusation of criminal conduct.
- Flight logs and black book — These documents list many names across parties. Inclusion in logs or the address book shows interaction or travel but is not proof of wrongdoing.
- Unsealed DOJ/FBI documents and reporting — The unsealed documents focus mainly on Epstein’s conduct, his associates’ roles in facilitating abuse, and investigative details. They led to prosecutions of some of Epstein’s associates (e.g., Ghislaine Maxwell) but did not produce public indictments of major political figures based solely on those files.



Well, thats the end of that, isnt it?

Then I wondered, why didnt Biden release the files....

Here’s a clear, factual explanation of why President Joe Biden didn’t publicly release the so-called “Epstein files” while he was in office — and it’s more about law and procedure than something a president can just decide on:

🔐 1. Most Epstein files were legally sealed

A lot of the documents connected to the Jeffrey Epstein cases were sealed by court order — meaning a judge, not the president, controls whether they can be unsealed. Judges keep material sealed to protect fair trials, privacy, and due process. A president can’t override these court orders on their own.

⚖️ 2. Legal restrictions on grand jury material

Much of the material from a federal investigation — especially grand jury evidence — is protected by law. These restrictions are meant to prevent defamation or causing harm to people who were never charged with a crime. A president doesn’t have authority to release that material unilaterally without a judge’s approval.

🔎 3. Ongoing investigations and appeals

During Biden’s presidency, some aspects of the Epstein investigation — including legal appeals and related cases — were still active. Law enforcement generally can’t and shouldn’t release evidence tied to active probes because that could jeopardize legal processes. That’s a normal part of how the justice system works, not necessarily a political decision.

💼 4. Justice Department independence

Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris said the administration didn’t push to release files because they believed in keeping the Justice Department independent of political influence. They publicly stated they didn’t want to direct DOJ actions for political reasons.

🗂️ 5. Some documents have been released later

After Biden’s presidency ended, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act (later law requiring the DOJ to publish many of the documents). Under that law, large sets of files — though still with redactions for privacy and legal reasons — were released in early 2026.


So, the simple summary

Biden didn’t release the Epstein files because:

  • Most were under court seals and protected by law — a president can’t just make them public.
  • Many were tied up in ongoing legal matters.
  • The DOJ operates independently and had to follow legal rules about evidence and privacy.
This isn’t about political motives alone — it’s mainly about legal restrictions and judicial control of sensitive court records.


So there you have it folks!
 
For the love of god.... :rolleyes::D


What does the computer tell us then?

See below.

Trump's DOJ that is, that has had no credibility since they tried to shut down the investigation.



Whoa! We would have to apply that to EVERYONE mentioned the files then. Right?
What is needed is an actual investigation, yeah? :D :D :D


LOL. Now you want the MSM?


The file in question was taken down by the DOJ but it was originally found here: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA01250883.pdf

The full document is now here: https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf
So what you posted was unverified bullshit from a libtard echo chamber, thanks.

You need help. Urgently.
 
Last edited:
More like HDS methinks :whistle:😆
 
Last edited:
LOL, the fantasy of Perverts.😄

In the other: Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) posts a complaint from a three-time psychiatric patient who says that in 1995 she witnessed a rape-and-murder torture ring run by Ghislaine Maxwell and attended by Epstein, Donald Trump and then-President Bill Clinton at Trump’s Rancho Palos Verdes golf course — though Trump didn’t even acquire the course until 2002, among other easily-checked facts.

 
Jaysus, Boris Nikolic, one of Bill Gates closest friends and chief advisor has been named in the Epstein files too.

The Degenerate jigsaw is coming together nicely now.
Sick bastards.

"Nikolic is a physician who completed postdoctoral training at Harvard Medical School, where he also served as an assistant professor. He previously served as chief advisor for science and technology to Bill Gates."


Great find by capital P.(y)
 
Last edited:
Trumps cronies are implicated of course.


"Among the Trump associates in the latest Epstein tranche are former adviser Steve Bannon, friend and former DOGE head Elon Musk and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who each exchanged friendly emails with Epstein for years after his initial arrest and conviction."

"Other names of prominent men in Trump's orbit include director Brett Ratner, who led first lady Melania Trump's newly released documentary, and Kevin Warsh, Trump's new pick to lead the Federal Reserve.

Ratner is mentioned in several emails, including one in 2018 in which it seems his and Epstein's assistants or acquaintances are trying to connect them.

Warsh and his wife Jane Lauder appear in a list shared with Epstein titled "St. Barth's Christmas 2010," among other guests who were planning to attend a party on the island."

:sick:
 
Seemingly, according to left wing Perverts and going by their standards, being mentioned in an email is somehow proof of one being a nonce/pedophile.
Projection 101.

On a side note, I wonder will fellow nonces Bill and Hilary do an auld suicide pact or be found 'suicided' in the next week or two?:unsure:
 
Seemingly, according to left wing Perverts and going by their standards, being mentioned in an email is somehow proof of one being a nonce/pedophile.
Projection 101.

On a side note, I wonder will fellow nonces Bill and Hilary do an auld suicide pact or be found 'suicided' in the next week or two?:unsure:
Well if anyone can arrange it, Hillary can
 
Seemingly, according to left wing Perverts and going by their standards, being mentioned in an email is somehow proof of one being a nonce/pedophile.
...the same Left who said pedo codewords in emails is not proof of pedo activity. The only reason they care about these Epstein files is because of Trump's possible involvement. When John Podesta's (chairman of Hilary Clinton's presidential campaign) emails were leaked in 2016, they dismissed it as conspiracy theory and never witch-hunted Podesta or Clinton like they are now doing with Trump.


map.jpg

email.png
 
...the same Left who said pedo codewords in emails is not proof of pedo activity. The only reason they care about these Epstein files is because of Trump's possible involvement. When John Podesta's (chairman of Hilary Clinton's presidential campaign) emails were leaked in 2016, they dismissed it as conspiracy theory and never witch-hunted Podesta or Clinton like they are now doing with Trump.


View attachment 8723
View attachment 8724
Remind me again, why did Hilary 'The Deviant Pervert' Clinton delete over 35,000 emails from her personal accounts that time?:unsure:
 
Herr Starmer is in the shitter.
It'll be just delicious when we see these Far Left authoritarian scumbags having to fall on their sword because of their sick, Perverted infatuation with Trump and his release of the Epstein files, something Pedophile Joe wouldn't do!!!
:cool:

 
It's as plain as the nose on yer face. Western Perverts and Pedophiles are everywhere and covering for each other.
Jew kiddy love projection. :sick:

‘Pure hell’ – Moscow on Epstein files​

The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman has accused the Western authorities of covering up global child trafficking linked to the late sex offender
‘Pure hell’ – Moscow on Epstein files

FILE PHOTO: Jeffrey Epstein in images released by the US State Department. © Getty Images / US Justice Department/Anadolu

The Western authorities shielded Jeffrey Epstein’s child trafficking scheme, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said, calling newly unsealed US Justice Department files “pure hell.”

The DOJ published the final tranche of Epstein files last week, including 3,000 personal emails, tapes, photographs, and documents seized from his estate.

Among the documents was a diary belonging to one of Epstein’s victims, a teenage girl who alleged that he used her as a “human incubator” to have his child.

According to the diary, the girl gave birth around 2002, aged 16 or 17. She claimed that Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, now serving a 20-year sentence, oversaw the birth, after which the newborn was taken, never to be seen again. Other files suggest Epstein may have fathered multiple children with his victims. Media reports previously claimed that he hoped to seed the human race with his DNA to create a “superior gene pool.”

“I’m reading the Epstein files every day with incredible effort. It’s pure hell,”
Zakharova wrote on Telegram on Friday, noting that the teen’s diary particularly shocked her.

“Why did his accomplice [Maxwell] only get 20 years?!!!! Why wasn’t an international investigation launched, given the international trafficking of children?”

Zakharova said Washington should have pursued Epstein more aggressively from the outset, including by alerting Interpol and Europol given “the scale of this hell.”

She also questioned why no criminal charges have been brought against Epstein’s clients, including former UK Prince Andrew. He was stripped of his royal titles last year amid scrutiny over his ties to Epstein and allegations by Virginia Giuffre, who claimed she was trafficked to him by Epstein. Giuffre died by suicide last April.

The Epstein files name several other high-profile figures, including US President Donald Trump, former US President Bill Clinton, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, and Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk. None has been charged, and all deny wrongdoing.


Zakharova said the handling of the case exposes the hypocrisy of the Western justice system, which she said shields elites from accountability.

“It’s becoming clear: From the Kennedy assassination to the Nord Stream sabotage, nothing in the West is investigated when it implicates ‘global elites,’” she wrote. “Ironically, their crimes are now captured in photos and videos – and yet they claim ‘it’s not all that clear.’”
 
They ate saying Trump is a racist for tweeting this video.
 
They ate saying Trump is a racist for tweeting this video.
How is Trump the racist here? Surely its the AI engine? The AI when met with two black faces attached them to the bodies of primate. Rather its an example of truth from the mouth of an innocent.
 
Great stuff.(y)

US to fund free speech activists in Europe – FT​

Washington is reportedly building a network of influencers to counter Brussels’ censorship machine
US to fund free speech activists in Europe – FT

A protester wears a "Make Europe Great Again" hat at an anti immigration rally in Warsaw, Poland, May 10, 2025 © Getty Images / Omar Marques


The US State Department will fund “MAGA-aligned think-tanks and charities” in Europe as Washington steps up its fight against censorship in the EU and UK, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

State Department official Sarah Rogers discussed the plan with members of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party during a visit to London last year, three anonymous sources told the newspaper. Rogers, a vocal critic of European “hate speech” legislation, is spearheading the operation and will focus on supporting MAGA-friendly organizations in London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, one source said.

Rogers has been in contact with “free speech” activists in the EU and UK, and is targeting the UK’s Online Safety Act and the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), they added. Republicans in Washington have accused Brussels of using the DSA to stifle free speech and censor American social media users.

The plan mirrors decades-long initiatives by the US to fund liberal political, media, and civil society organizations in Europe. Many of these initiatives were shut down when US President Donald Trump cut almost all funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) last year.

A State Department spokesperson described the latest funding plan as “a transparent, lawful use of resources to advance US interests and values abroad.” However, the Financial Times noted that it is “likely to cause consternation” among center-left governments in Europe, who fear that the US may actively work to undermine their power.

The inverse of this scenario played out in 2024, when Britain’s center-left Labour government sent activists to the US to campaign against Trump for then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump’s most senior officials have repeatedly criticized the EU and UK over censorship laws such as the Online Safety Act and DSA. Speaking at last year’s Munich Security Conference, Vice President J.D. Vance warned that future US support for Europe would depend on whether governments actually uphold freedom of speech.

The Trump administration’s national security strategy went further, warning that mass immigration, censorship, and single-minded commitment to funding the Ukraine conflict have left the continent at risk of “civilizational erasure.”

Accordingly, “cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations” is a key foreign policy goal of the Trump administration, it states.
 
Great stuff.(y)

US to fund free speech activists in Europe – FT​

Washington is reportedly building a network of influencers to counter Brussels’ censorship machine
US to fund free speech activists in Europe – FT

A protester wears a "Make Europe Great Again" hat at an anti immigration rally in Warsaw, Poland, May 10, 2025 © Getty Images / Omar Marques


The US State Department will fund “MAGA-aligned think-tanks and charities” in Europe as Washington steps up its fight against censorship in the EU and UK, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

State Department official Sarah Rogers discussed the plan with members of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party during a visit to London last year, three anonymous sources told the newspaper. Rogers, a vocal critic of European “hate speech” legislation, is spearheading the operation and will focus on supporting MAGA-friendly organizations in London, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels, one source said.

Rogers has been in contact with “free speech” activists in the EU and UK, and is targeting the UK’s Online Safety Act and the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), they added. Republicans in Washington have accused Brussels of using the DSA to stifle free speech and censor American social media users.

The plan mirrors decades-long initiatives by the US to fund liberal political, media, and civil society organizations in Europe. Many of these initiatives were shut down when US President Donald Trump cut almost all funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) last year.

A State Department spokesperson described the latest funding plan as “a transparent, lawful use of resources to advance US interests and values abroad.” However, the Financial Times noted that it is “likely to cause consternation” among center-left governments in Europe, who fear that the US may actively work to undermine their power.

The inverse of this scenario played out in 2024, when Britain’s center-left Labour government sent activists to the US to campaign against Trump for then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

Trump’s most senior officials have repeatedly criticized the EU and UK over censorship laws such as the Online Safety Act and DSA. Speaking at last year’s Munich Security Conference, Vice President J.D. Vance warned that future US support for Europe would depend on whether governments actually uphold freedom of speech.

The Trump administration’s national security strategy went further, warning that mass immigration, censorship, and single-minded commitment to funding the Ukraine conflict have left the continent at risk of “civilizational erasure.”

Accordingly, “cultivating resistance to Europe’s current trajectory within European nations” is a key foreign policy goal of the Trump administration, it states.
The Epstein classes funding opposition groups is the kiss of death.
 
How is Trump the racist here? Surely its the AI engine? The AI when met with two black faces attached them to the bodies of primate. Rather its an example of truth from the mouth of an innocent.
You have to tell the AI engine directly what you want via a prompt.

Its deliberate and its another distraction from the Epstein files.

But also, its gonna feature on 100s of Democrat campaign ads.
 
How is Trump the racist here? Surely its the AI engine? The AI when met with two black faces attached them to the bodies of primate. Rather its an example of truth from the mouth of an innocent.
This very nicely illustrates the fallacy of AI actually being intelligent. It has no notion of context, it has not the conscious thought process that would have alerted it to the political sensitivity of putting two and two together and making four, which to it was the obvious decision to mate dark skinned people with darkly pigmented animals that share a similar body form to humans.

It should be argued instead that the product of the AI was not edited or verified as it should of been, and it alerts us to the danger that if major political organisations are not checking AI output for sensitivity then what does that say of other companies and organizations which are using it, can we trust what they say?
 
Surely Perverts need a distraction from the Epstein files?
Like, it's mostly Degenerate Party pedophiles who are coming to the fore.
 
Surely Perverts need a distraction from the Epstein files?
Like, it's mostly Degenerate Party pedophiles who are coming to the fore.
The Epstein files have become the new 'thing', displacing the disaster that has been the Western response to Ukraine, about which we hear very little of nowadays.
 
The Epstein files have become the new 'thing',
They finally exposed some of the depth of of a real "deep state" pedo ring and the current POTUS wants it swept under the carpet.

You are fucking sick in the head.

displacing the disaster that has been the Western response to Ukraine, about which we hear very little of nowadays.
Russia is now talking directly to Ukraine. Putin really has no choices.
 
The Epstein files have become the new 'thing', displacing the disaster that has been the Western response to Ukraine, about which we hear very little of nowadays.
I'd say the Epstein files current thing will be over within two weeks.....or something....😆
It took the re-election of Donald Trump to get those files released after Pedophile Joe Biden kept them hidden.👍
 
ROTFL! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Jeffrey Epstein's BROTHER accused President Donald Trump of being involved in the late convicted sex offender’s death in a tip sent to the FBI, according to a bombshell email revealed in the Department of Justice’s release of Epstein files.
 
Good man The Donald, you have the Perverts driven insane. That TDS thing is a killer! :ROFLMAO:

"To be fair, credit must also be given to President Trump.

His personality and policies have infected many Dems with Trump Derangement Syndrome, a disease that compels them to irrationally resist him, no matter the facts or shared interest."

 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom