Myles' LGBTQIA+ thread

Wolf said:

Leaked emails reveal horrific mistruth at the heart of Enoch Burke case​

Niall Feiritear

Leaked emails in the Enoch Burke case reveal the principal of Wilson's Hospital School said she had parental consent to change a schoolchild's pronouns but this was not true.

As far as anyone with a brain is concerned, this is where this case should begin and end. Let's just repeat ourselves here for the slow ones at the back : the former principal of the school told an untruth that she had parental consent to use 'they/them' pronouns with one of her pupils.

It doesn't matter if the child wanted this nonsense to occur, the parents were unaware and uninformed of what was taking place.

This vindicates Enoch Burke for anyone except the extremely mentally redundant.

Let's break this stupid case down once and for all. The Gender Recognition Act of 2015 states that:

For individuals aged 16 and 17 in Ireland, legal gender recognition, which includes updating official documents like birth certificates to reflect a preferred gender, requires parental or guardian consent and a court order

For younger children (under 16), it is not currently possible to legally change their gender in a way that is recognized by the State [1]. This implies that any formal recognition of a child's gender identity, including potentially through pronoun usage in schools, would likely fall under the purview of parental decision-making

The law doesn't specify that a school must have parental permission to change specific gender pronouns for a child but perhaps the law now needs an update?

On the 9 th May 2022, staff at the school received an e-mail from the principal of the school, informing them a third year student would be making a "social transition" in their gender identity from the next day and stating that from then the student would become known by a different name and that “ they” should be used in place of the gender-specific pronoun that had been used up to the point.

Enoch Burke immediately objected to the principal's instruction. He emailed the principal the very next day stating:
“Can you confirm to me that parents of students in the school have been informed that their children will be told that one of their classmates is to be referred to as “they” instead of [pronoun] and they must now approve this by referring to the student in this manner? Has the chaplain agreed to this?I am shocked that students in this school are being forced to accept this position.”

The principal replied:
“All due care has been taken.There is no ‘agreement’ required from Chaplain.There is no suggestion of “force” by or for anyone involved.If you are not willing to include [child's name] in your classroom going further, please make an appointment to see me at our mutual convenience.”

Enoch replied to say:
“It is wrong that this belief system would be forced upon students and I will be taking this further.It is an abuse of children and their constitutional rights.”

On 27 th May, the principal emailed Enoch stating:
“I am writing to you following on from the meeting last week (Wednesday 19 th May) regarding the request by a student and the student's parents that the student be addressed as [name] rather than [name] and that the identifying pronoun of they/their be used going forward.I wish to clarify the approach of Wilson's Hospital to such request. The ethos of our school is inclusive and ensuring the welfare of students is paramount.......
I edited out some boring crap here-
......While I recognise that it may be challenging for you in light of your own religious beliefs, in view of the ethos of the school and the school's obligations under the Equal Status Act 2000, I expect that you will communicate with this student in accordance with the wishes of the student and the student's parents.”
Enoch replied on the 27 th May:
“On Monday 9 May you emailed all staff requesting that they address a student with a new name and refer to the student using ‘they’ rather than the [pronoun] used up that point. You also told us that the same demand would be made of all classmates of the student.In the staff meeting the next day on Tuesday 10 May and also the meeting you requested last week on Wednesday 19 May I explained to you clearly where I stand on the matter.”

Now let's jump forward to 17th March 2023 and an article in the Irish Independent by Shane Phelan which states that the parents never gave their consent.

Mr Phelan writes:

"In an email to the school's principal in January, the parent said they only learned "the child in question is my child" after reading a court judgment which outlined what year the unidentified student was in.

"'The school did not inform me.'

"The parent also said their child had never requested they be called by the "they/them pronoun".

So that's it, really, nothing else matters.

Apparently Enoch Burke became upset after these events and raised his voice or broke up a couple of meetings or whatever, but none of that really matters.

Formal consent from parents, in any society, should be the minimum we expect for changes to our children's pronouns.

Burke was just unlucky that he was subordinate.

Power tends to win out in these stupid work environment situations. No matter how pissed off Burke got with his superior, that was righteous anger with someone who he thought had gotten parental consent. Imagine he knew that was not true!

If some teacher ever tried to use different gender pronouns with my kid, without my consent, I can tell you I would become violently angry.

In an affidavit, the school's chairman, John Rogers, said a meeting did take place between the student, their parents and the principal at which the then principal was advised the student wanted to "transition" and to be addressed by a new name and pronoun .

However, the parent said in the email to Mr Milling they wished to be clear that the purpose of the meeting was to "re-engage [their child] back to school". The parent also said that while the child had requested to go by a new name,

"the they/them pronoun came from Wilson's" .

Burke is clearly innocent. It doesn't matter how angry/disruptive whatever he got after this, he is not the one in the wrong here, clearly.

Get him out of prison, give him back his life and his money.

Enoch Burke is doing bird now over 500 days.

For society to function, peace is not merely the absence of tension; it is the presence of justice.
Click to expand...
thank you for that this is a rare very rare accurate telling of the events and i believe Enoch will be vindicated -- but from outside this ideology ruled country.
 
willows68 said:
I just read that Ammi and Martina Burke were sent to prison for two weeks. For some bs. I reckon that's to stop them travelling to Washington.
Click to expand...
They deserve it, in my opinion. They knew full well their shouting was in contempt of court but they did it anyway. Like Enoch, they want to be locked up, for the attention, and so they can perpetuate their imagined persecution. I cannot stand people who think they can get what they want by being hyper aggressive and shouting over people. Just because they are against the use of LGBT pronouns does not mean we should automatically support them - especially when they do not support Irish nationalism.
 
Shouting during court hearings is prohibited so that the courts can operate properly. The rule applies to everyone. The Burkes think they are special and that the rules that apply to us do not apply to them.
shouting.png
 
clarke-connolly said:
Fair enough the Burkes could handle themselves " Cute-er "

But on the basics of this Trans-Lunacy, the Burkes are correct ! ! !
Click to expand...
I wonder do the Jew-loving Burkes know that trans lunacy was started by Jews.

Lads, the Burke family support the very people responsible for LGBT and the replacement of Irish people in our own country. As supporters of Jews, they also oppose the first group of people (Nazis) who tried to stop the trans lunacy and deal with the Jewish problem. They do not care about our fight. They care about their family, religion and Israel/Jews; not Ireland, not Irish people, not you. Ye can simp for them if ye want, but they don't give two fucks about Irish people being replaced by foreigners, and they wouldn't give a fuck if you were in prison for hate speech - and if your hate speech was against Jews, they would likely support you being locked up for it.
 
Hermit said:
I wonder do the Jew-loving Burkes know that trans lunacy was started by Jews.

Lads, the Burke family support the very people responsible for LGBT and the replacement of Irish people in our own country. As supporters of Jews, they also oppose the first group of people (Nazis) who tried to stop the trans lunacy and deal with the Jewish problem. They do not care about our fight. They care about their family, religion and Israel/Jews; not Ireland, not Irish people, not you. Ye can simp for them if ye want, but they don't give two fucks about Irish people being replaced by foreigners, and they wouldn't give a fuck if you were in prison for hate speech - and if your hate speech was against Jews, they would likely support you being locked up for it.
Click to expand...
Let's put aside Jews, mass immigration, national socialists etc for the moment.

And let's look at the facts of this case. Here you have a very well educated, intelligent, thoughtful young man who has worked hard and earned a position teaching at a prodigious school, earning a decent salary. He is by all accounts popular among his students.

This same teacher is instructed by some progressive ideologue of a principal (a woman, of course, who has subsequently fled to another school) to butcher the English language in order to appease some young impressionable idiot caught up in a dangerous fad. He admirably refuses and calls out the ideologues for the utter cretins they are.

He's then suspended. He's lost his livelihood. How should he react?

I say the Burkes' firebrand, no nonsense bollocking of the Irish establishment (particularly the judiciary) is long overdue and necessary in such bizarre times. They're making a stand, and pulling no punches. We can all tut tut at the obnoxious behaviour but it's the only way they can make their point.

That's putting aside the inconsistencies in the case. Why did the principal resign? Why have two members of the appeal Board resigned? Why was it revealed afterwards that the school had bypassed the child's parents in acceding to her demands to be called "they".
 
Aldo3 said:
Let's put aside Jews, mass immigration, national socialists etc for the moment.

And let's look at the facts of this case. Here you have a very well educated, intelligent, thoughtful young man who has worked hard and earned a position teaching at a prodigious school, earning a decent salary. He is by all accounts popular among his students.

This same teacher is instructed by some progressive ideologue of a principal (a woman, of course, who has subsequently fled to another school) to butcher the English language in order to appease some young impressionable idiot caught up in a dangerous fad. He admirably refuses and calls out the ideologues for the utter cretins they are.

He's then suspended. He's lost his livelihood. How should he react?

I say the Burkes' firebrand, no nonsense bollocking of the Irish establishment (particularly the judiciary) is long overdue and necessary in such bizarre times. They're making a stand, and pulling no punches. We can all tut tut at the obnoxious behaviour but it's the only way they can make their point.

That's putting aside the inconsistencies in the case. Why did the principal resign? Why have two members of the appeal Board resigned? Why was it revealed afterwards that the school had bypassed the child's parents in acceding to her demands to be called "they".
Click to expand...
Excellent Post.
 
Aldo3 said:
Let's put aside Jews, mass immigration, national socialists etc for the moment.

And let's look at the facts of this case. Here you have a very well educated, intelligent, thoughtful young man who has worked hard and earned a position teaching at a prodigious school, earning a decent salary. He is by all accounts popular among his students.

This same teacher is instructed by some progressive ideologue of a principal (a woman, of course, who has subsequently fled to another school) to butcher the English language in order to appease some young impressionable idiot caught up in a dangerous fad. He admirably refuses and calls out the ideologues for the utter cretins they are.

He's then suspended. He's lost his livelihood. How should he react?
Click to expand...
That's not what happened. The principal asked him to use pronouns for a student; he refused. That could have been the matter, but Enoch decided to confront the teacher at a function outside the school for students, teachers & parents. He could have discussed the matter with the principal and the board, but he chimped out, so the school board decided to suspend him based on that behaviour, not for refusing to use pronouns. Any employee in any other job who did what Enoch did would be either suspended or sacked. Imagine if your boss asked you to do something, you tell him no, then you absolutely berate him in public. You wouldn't be suspended, you'd be sacked immediately.

Enoch chimped out again by going to the school during his suspension, standing outside and even going inside the building. The school then decided to get the courts to prohibit him doing that. He was jailed for contempt of court for breach of that order. He has continued to break the court ruling by visiting the school and that's why he's still in prison. He makes his court hearings and appeals all the more difficult by his own behaviour, supported by his mother and siblings who joined in the chimp-outs, making court proceedings impossible.

How should he react? By choosing diplomacy and conflict resolution over chimping out. By not showing up at the school after being ordered by the court not to. He was suspended and then sacked for his actions which he decided upon knowing the consequences. He could have tackled the pronoun request by itself, and still could, but he chooses to get himself imprisoned for contempt of court. He could obey the court, so he would not be in prison, and he would be better able to campaign against the trans lunacy.

Aldo3 said:
That's putting aside the inconsistencies in the case. Why did the principal resign? Why have two members of the appeal Board resigned? Why was it revealed afterwards that the school had bypassed the child's parents in acceding to her demands to be called "they".
Click to expand...
The principal was in the wrong to ask him to use pronouns. I have no issue with Enoch objecting to that. If he was sacked for refusing to use pronouns, I would support him. I don't know why they have resigned, maybe they are tired of this whole saga. Enoch was supposedly well-liked by his students, so where are they, and their parents? Why are they not publicly supporting Enoch? Have the child's parents spoke about this publicly?
 
Aldo3 said:
Let's put aside Jews, mass immigration, national socialists etc for the moment.

And let's look at the facts of this case. Here you have a very well educated, intelligent, thoughtful young man who has worked hard and earned a position teaching at a prodigious school, earning a decent salary. He is by all accounts popular among his students.

This same teacher is instructed by some progressive ideologue of a principal (a woman, of course, who has subsequently fled to another school) to butcher the English language in order to appease some young impressionable idiot caught up in a dangerous fad. He admirably refuses and calls out the ideologues for the utter cretins they are.

He's then suspended. He's lost his livelihood. How should he react?

I say the Burkes' firebrand, no nonsense bollocking of the Irish establishment (particularly the judiciary) is long overdue and necessary in such bizarre times. They're making a stand, and pulling no punches. We can all tut tut at the obnoxious behaviour but it's the only way they can make their point.

That's putting aside the inconsistencies in the case. Why did the principal resign? Why have two members of the appeal Board resigned? Why was it revealed afterwards that the school had bypassed the child's parents in acceding to her demands to be called "they".
Click to expand...
Great post.
The haters of whistleblowers won't like that one bit and will hide behind whatever shit Brian Creegan fires at them....🙄

An interesting character.

Brian Cregan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Hermit said:
That's not what happened. The principal asked him to use pronouns for a student; he refused. That could have been the matter, but Enoch decided to confront the teacher at a function outside the school for students, teachers & parents. He could have discussed the matter with the principal and the board, but he chimped out, so the school board decided to suspend him based on that behaviour, not for refusing to use pronouns. Any employee in any other job who did what Enoch did would be either suspended or sacked. Imagine if your boss asked you to do something, you tell him no, then you absolutely berate him in public. You wouldn't be suspended, you'd be sacked immediately.

Enoch chimped out again by going to the school during his suspension, standing outside and even going inside the building. The school then decided to get the courts to prohibit him doing that. He was jailed for contempt of court for breach of that order. He has continued to break the court ruling by visiting the school and that's why he's still in prison. He makes his court hearings and appeals all the more difficult by his own behaviour, supported by his mother and siblings who joined in the chimp-outs, making court proceedings impossible.

How should he react? By choosing diplomacy and conflict resolution over chimping out. By not showing up at the school after being ordered by the court not to. He was suspended and then sacked for his actions which he decided upon knowing the consequences. He could have tackled the pronoun request by itself, and still could, but he chooses to get himself imprisoned for contempt of court. He could obey the court, so he would not be in prison, and he would be better able to campaign against the trans lunacy.


The principal was in the wrong to ask him to use pronouns. I have no issue with Enoch objecting to that. If he was sacked for refusing to use pronouns, I would support him. I don't know why they have resigned, maybe they are tired of this whole saga. Enoch was supposedly well-liked by his students, so where are they, and their parents? Why are they not publicly supporting Enoch? Have the child's parents spoke about this publicly?
Click to expand...
Was he given a choice as to whether he had to use pronouns? I thought teachers had to use the preferred pronouns of the student, which is obviously insane. This, the schools thought was the official policy of the department of education, which we now know was false.
 
Hermit said:
That's not what happened. The principal asked him to use pronouns for a student; he refused. That could have been the matter, but Enoch decided to confront the teacher at a function outside the school for students, teachers & parents. He could have discussed the matter with the principal and the board, but he chimped out, so the school board decided to suspend him based on that behaviour, not for refusing to use pronouns. Any employee in any other job who did what Enoch did would be either suspended or sacked. Imagine if your boss asked you to do something, you tell him no, then you absolutely berate him in public. You wouldn't be suspended, you'd be sacked immediately.

Enoch chimped out again by going to the school during his suspension, standing outside and even going inside the building. The school then decided to get the courts to prohibit him doing that. He was jailed for contempt of court for breach of that order. He has continued to break the court ruling by visiting the school and that's why he's still in prison. He makes his court hearings and appeals all the more difficult by his own behaviour, supported by his mother and siblings who joined in the chimp-outs, making court proceedings impossible.

How should he react? By choosing diplomacy and conflict resolution over chimping out. By not showing up at the school after being ordered by the court not to. He was suspended and then sacked for his actions which he decided upon knowing the consequences. He could have tackled the pronoun request by itself, and still could, but he chooses to get himself imprisoned for contempt of court. He could obey the court, so he would not be in prison, and he would be better able to campaign against the trans lunacy.


The principal was in the wrong to ask him to use pronouns. I have no issue with Enoch objecting to that. If he was sacked for refusing to use pronouns, I would support him. I don't know why they have resigned, maybe they are tired of this whole saga. Enoch was supposedly well-liked by his students, so where are they, and their parents? Why are they not publicly supporting Enoch? Have the child's parents spoke about this publicly?
Click to expand...
Do you think it's wrong to stand up to bullies and groomers targeting stupid, impressionable children? Do you think it was a polite request from this yolk?

download (1).jpeg


Do you think she would have left it there if he simply refused? The teaching profession is absolutely stuffed with these progressive ideologues, and Burke stood no chance against them. I imagine he was disgusted to think that a student of his was being groomed and decided to make a stand.

LIkewise the judiciary, that Cregan Kunt, can get fked as well. I read he was pontificating from the bench about how Ireland is a country where the rule of law prevails and justice is meted out when required bla bla bla.

Don't make me laugh.

He and his colleagues have reduced the judiciary and legal system to a complete laughing stock. Burke is an easy target but when it comes to genuine criminals they apply the kid gloves.

Did this man and his family get justice? The perpatrator laughing and winking as he walked out of court?

www.rte.ie

Man jailed for six years for fatal one-punch attack

A 31-year-old man has been sentenced to six years in prison for killing another man in an unprovoked one-punch attack near his home in Whitehall in Dublin two and a half years ago.
www.rte.ie www.rte.ie

I say all power to Burke and his family. I hope they continue to stand up to bullies and establishment Stooges.
 
Last edited:
Perry said:
Was he given a choice as to whether he had to use pronouns?
Click to expand...
Aldo3 said:
Do you think it was a polite request from this yolk?
Click to expand...
Aldo3 said:
Do you think she would have left it there if he simply refused?
Click to expand...
As far as I understand, she did not order him to use pronouns or intimidate him in any way to use them. I have not seen any testimony from Enoch that he was being bullied to use pronouns. Apparently he was asked to use the pronouns, not ordered to. He refused. The principal didn't then punish him or bully him. Instead of leaving it at that, Enoch went scorched earth mode and attacked the principal which forced the school board's hand to take disciplinary action and suspend him. He could have made a complaint to the school board or Teachers Union and gone down that road, but he overreacted and burned his bridges.

Aldo3 said:
I say all power to Burke and his family. I hope they continue to stand up to bullies and establishment Stooges.
Click to expand...
I'm all for fighting the establishment and trans ideology, but they are not doing that. They are fighting a contempt of court case. If Enoch simply stays away from the school, he will no longer be in contempt of court, then he would be out of prison and he could campaign then specifically about the trans grooming problem in the education system. The Burkes can stand up to the establishment without turning the courtroom into a circus where all the focus is on them and not on the trans issue.
 
Something that has escaped this thread's attention so far is the Dublin Zoo advert for Mothers Day featuring a drag queen.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41808266.html

I guess the management had this notion that the world is as terminally woke as they, good to hear that it provoked a backlash on social media, I'm told that Dublin Zoo found the reaction 'Disappointing'.
 
Mad as Fish said:
Something that has escaped this thread's attention so far is the Dublin Zoo advert for Mothers Day featuring a drag queen.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41808266.html

I guess the management had this notion that the world is as terminally woke as they, good to hear that it provoked a backlash on social media, I'm told that Dublin Zoo found the reaction 'Disappointing'.
Click to expand...
Imagine a Zoo ~ Not being able to work out the difference between a Female Mammal and a Male Mammal ! ! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Mad as Fish said:
Something that has escaped this thread's attention so far is the Dublin Zoo advert for Mothers Day featuring a drag queen.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41808266.html

I guess the management had this notion that the world is as terminally woke as they, good to hear that it provoked a backlash on social media, I'm told that Dublin Zoo found the reaction 'Disappointing'.
Click to expand...
dublin zoo like a lot of irish organisations will only employ GRADUATES to run their affairs .
this policy excludes those who worked their way up the ladder with their feet on the ground .
instead you get airy fairy deranged radicals who are still in students union mode being asked to regulate the real world of which they have little or no knowledge of .
and their huge huge huge sense of entitlement means they think its ok to use their mad ideology in their work environment /new students union.
it has backfired in the bud light ad and you would think when every marketing department watched this ad campaign being shot down in flames and landing on the brewery and destroying it ---you would think it would register .
this is an environment for children and they have shown that these children may be confronted at some stage either with this transgender person or an image of same .
you also have the existence of most mass shootings of children in the usa now involve a transgender person.
what screaming lunatic was permitted to use this image in an environment where many small children would gather .
this is where ideology meets the road surface and it looks mad as shit as what will happen now is the crazies see the zoo as their battlefield now as the ad is going TO BE PUNISHED and they will want their revenge --the zoo was not a target before but now it is due to the insane linking of it with transgenderism.
 
Mad as Fish said:
Something that has escaped this thread's attention so far is the Dublin Zoo advert for Mothers Day featuring a drag queen.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41808266.html

I guess the management had this notion that the world is as terminally woke as they, good to hear that it provoked a backlash on social media, I'm told that Dublin Zoo found the reaction 'Disappointing'.
Click to expand...
The author of the piece is confirmation, if any was needed, that granting women suffrage was a terrible mistake.
 
BIG FAT HOOR said:
dublin zoo like a lot of irish organisations will only employ GRADUATES to run their affairs .
this policy excludes those who worked their way up the ladder with their feet on the ground .
instead you get airy fairy deranged radicals who are still in students union mode being asked to regulate the real world of which they have little or no knowledge of .
and their huge huge huge sense of entitlement means they think its ok to use their mad ideology in their work environment /new students union.
it has backfired in the bud light ad and you would think when every marketing department watched this ad campaign being shot down in flames and landing on the brewery and destroying it ---you would think it would register .
this is an environment for children and they have shown that these children may be confronted at some stage either with this transgender person or an image of same .
you also have the existence of most mass shootings of children in the usa now involve a transgender person.
what screaming lunatic was permitted to use this image in an environment where many small children would gather .
this is where ideology meets the road surface and it looks mad as shit as what will happen now is the crazies see the zoo as their battlefield now as the ad is going TO BE PUNISHED and they will want their revenge --the zoo was not a target before but now it is due to the insane linking of it with transgenderism.
Click to expand...

It may be worse than that, it may be that they feel they need to impress upon a younger generation their wokish values, for hasn't the left always done that, insist that people need 'educating' and they are the only ones worthy of setting the curriculum?
 
Last edited:
Mad as Fish said:
Something that has escaped this thread's attention so far is the Dublin Zoo advert for Mothers Day featuring a drag queen.

https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-41808266.html

I guess the management had this notion that the world is as terminally woke as they, good to hear that it provoked a backlash on social media, I'm told that Dublin Zoo found the reaction 'Disappointing'.
Click to expand...
Men dressing up as women is not funny even when it's done a for comedy sketch and not drag/trans. I don't understand what non-faggot normies think is so hilarious about a man dressing up as a woman. I always hated those sketches in all those British sitcoms and TV shows. Maybe it was funny in the 70s & 80s but it's not original anymore, just a really lame outdated joke. And now it's more about promoting the LGBT agenda than for comedy.
 
Hermit said:
Men dressing up as women is not funny even when it's done a for comedy sketch and not drag/trans. I don't understand what non-faggot normies think is so hilarious about a man dressing up as a woman. I always hated those sketches in all those British sitcoms and TV shows. Maybe it was funny in the 70s & 80s but it's not original anymore, just a really lame outdated joke. And now it's more about promoting the LGBT agenda than for comedy.
Click to expand...
It was actually more of thing for Gay Mens Clubs ~ ~ Gay Men always had their own " scene " and a lot of it, was / is seedy ( just look at Varadkar cottaging about in that Gay Club )

In the past, it was sketches making fun of the ridiculous-ness of it ~ ~ Now these Clowns in Woman-Face expect to be taken seriously ! ! !
 
Aldo3 said:
The author of the piece is confirmation, if any was needed, that granting women suffrage was a terrible mistake.
Click to expand...
How do you separate the Crazy Women out from the Sane Women ? !

Did having Children make some of the Crazy Women Sane, back when Women did have more Children.

We need Willow and Nobody knows I am a Dog to give their insights here !

For balance = = There is a lot of Crazy Men as well ! !
 
clarke-connolly said:
How do you separate the Crazy Women out from the Sane Women ? !

Did having Children make some of the Crazy Women Sane, back when Women did have more Children.

We need Willow and Nobody knows I am a Dog to give their insights here !

For balance = = There is a lot of Crazy Men as well ! !
Click to expand...
There are a lot a crazy men for sure but they aren't allowed to march through our institutions unchallenged for fear of upsetting them
 
clarke-connolly said:
How do you separate the Crazy Women out from the Sane Women ? !

Did having Children make some of the Crazy Women Sane, back when Women did have more Children.

We need Willow and Nobody knows I am a Dog to give their insights here !

For balance = = There is a lot of Crazy Men as well ! !
Click to expand...
I must sadly agree with Aldo re general suffrage. This includes a lot of men. But then I have long since felt that a benign dictator would be preferable to our current ridiculous system...
The Frankfurt School brainwashing of women with feminism and wokeism is an essential step in disintegrating Western Christian societies to rubble as it destroys the family unit. I fear this is an unstoppable freight train of general destruction that can no longer be halted, especially considering the current geopolitical developments.
 
willows68 said:
I must sadly agree with Aldo re general suffrage. This includes a lot of men. But then I have long since felt that a benign dictator would be preferable to our current ridiculous system...
The Frankfurt School brainwashing of women with feminism and wokeism is an essential step in disintegrating Western Christian societies to rubble as it destroys the family unit. I fear this is an unstoppable freight train of general destruction that can no longer be halted, especially considering the current geopolitical developments.
Click to expand...
you are spot on -- they look at society like a snake and they assess the energy points which exist no matter who or what you are .
due to modern medicine we now have a thousand times more autism than 20 years ago.
this segment of the population are DISAFFECTED like women who are paid less than a man or who insist on being a female soldier or security guard or blacksmith or blocklayer .
these professions demand a great deal of upper body strength and other attributes which women do not have -not through any fault of theirs but god has ordered that males fight it out for the females and most females are happy enough to be fought over in the animal kingdom by animals twice their size.
autism means the person is suffering and if presented with an escape route will take it even though it is a disastrous move --
any solution is better than the shitty existence they have to endure --
therefore this disaffection is a weapon to be used against society and they can be steered easily as they are so desperate to fit in to recover their sanity which is the most precious thing they desire .
harness these energies in a society and you can destroy it using not an army which has to be fed supplied and paid for --but one of many armies contained within society available to these snakes to direct for free .
yesterday i brought my wife to the Crucible in the gaiety for mother's day as she loves the theatre and is in many productions herself --- the play shows how the intense religious fervour and religious fascism of the early colonists was HARNESSED to arrest hundreds of innocent people and 30 of them were executed for witchcraft is salem mass .
this mass hysteria was built on the evidence of a few young girls who admitted later they fabricated the evidence .
this pressure point /energy point in society was availible to those who were described as whores as they desired one farmer and they got rid of his wife to pursue this man and another farmer arranged for his neighbour who had 1500 acres adjoining his land to be arrested and charged -- if he said nothing he would die if he admitted a crime he would live but his family would be disinherited of his land -- he remained silent and the land passed to his sons .
where you have israel which engages in horrendous evil on a daily basis by using all the pressure points and blackmail to manipulate and destroy america -- using the black community / floyd riots/transgenderism /school shootings /assassinations.
feminism/ anti-Semitism / democrat -republican warfare .
zionist christians versus america -- the media used to confuse and radicalise americans .
the snakes do not tire of their warfare against the common people by using the common people to destroy themselves .
MALCOLM X --you never teach us to be jews -how to make money like jews - how to fight like jews -- you do not let us into your gambling joints in atlantic city but you make us fight on your day -- we fight those you pick us to fight and where you pick for us to fight -- but you never show us how to be jews -- why is that.
they killed him later that week .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom