Search results for query: *

I have also edited it in the past. I've grown very wary of Wikipedia over the years but it should be easy enough to show where he sits in the house of commons. I'm also aware that nods, winks and the old boys club in establishment circles carries as much influence as anything written down in...

Wikipedia has a slightly different take on the Remebrancer, noting that he sits at the far end of the chamber and is not privy to public bills affecting the corporation of London until the government publishes them. The present incumbent is a fellow by the name of Paul Double who is a barrister...

And it just so happens that Britain is mad for the war in Ukraine to continue, and for the ICE To be displaced by battery cars.

Yep, there is just so much there and he just keeps hitting you between the eyes with information and facts that go to explain so much, especially the covid event. Something has changed in the world over the last few years, and it's a major change, it has become increasingly clear that...

View: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8syoyk Absolutely explains what the deep/dark state is all about. Half way through now and had to take break. Basically states are at war with their citizens.

An excellent article, he lays clear the difference between heavyweight considered thought and the lightweight shallow 'reaction' thinking of the MSM.

yep, something not quite right with the event that's for sure.

I agree entirely, but to me he seemed a little lost and was out of his depth when confronted by Putin, which is probably a reflection on the spineless US politicians he normally deals with as much as anything else.

I to was disappointed, I just wasn't impressed by Tucker on this one. Reading out a carefully crafted script in front of the camera and actually challenging an intelligent world leader are two different birds altogether.

When Klaus and Tedros get into bed together there can only be trouble ahead.

So that's 205m views that we know about. There needs to be added to that all the other platforms from which it could be viewed, the Kremlin's own website had it I believe and then there are all the sources in India, Asia, South America etc. The western media can scream and sulk as much as it...

And I think that was one of the main reasons behind the monologue. Lord knows how many millions have watched that video and picked up upon exactly what you mention.

Couldn't colour coordinate her lipstick and coat colour, an essential prerequisite of female (usually) politicians elsewhere.

They must be thinking twice now. An audience of 200,000,000 is not to be sneezed at.

Now that's better than the Tucker in Moscow.

The Daily Express had a circulation of 176,000 last January. The Putin interview must have had around 200,000,000 views by now. If I were the UK establishment I know which figure I'd be taking most note of.

Verging on misinformation almost, and that's very naughty, apparently.

He might just be judging Putin by western expectations.

All you say is true, but I rather think he carried an arrogance about him in this interview. Yes, he is an experienced journalist with a full grasp of American politics, but there was an air about him that suggested Putin should know his place in front of an American. I am sometimes accused of...

I was watching another interview of his the other day with a very intelligent biologist who was talking about the Darrion gap in Panama, he was laying out his arguments in a cool and thoughtful manner , a proper scientist who could be respected. Yet Carlson was butting in like a nine year old...