Search results for query: *

Have you ever watched a film? The production budget for the film Gravity was €100m. NASA gets $60m per day. They use augmented/mixed reality and CGI to create that water magic trick. Hadfield is looking at a monitor off-screen that shows him what we see (that he doesn't see in reality). Watch...

LOL. Did you have a specific figure in mind that would fit your criteria for "sudden and dramatic change"? We don't feel any movement because there is none. That's the moon's orbit around earth, not earth's orbit around the sun, so I don't know what point you're trying to make here. But...

https://interestingengineering.com/science/earth-is-suddenly-rotating-faster-and-the-shortest-day-just-recorded https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/greatmomentsinscience/earth-is-accelerating-pt1/101315026 https://van.physics.illinois.edu/ask/listing/20831...

https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2024/0216/1432576-tridentinosaurus-ancient-alpine-reptile-fossil-forgery/

I never said that, liar.

Using your fallacious reasoning, would you agree that earth has rings because Saturn has rings, or earth is silver because the moon is silver, or that life exists on earth therefore there is life on the planets? Whether planets are round, spherical or whatever, it does not logically follow that...

I mean the supreme entity or whatever it is that created everything in existence, as opposed to the God of the Bible with all the attached stories and mythology. I know a creator of some kind must exist because the flat earth couldn't have been formed via bang bang random chance. I believe and...

I don't follow any religion. Earth is observed, measured and practically used as flat. The surface of water at rest is level. Gas pressure requires a container. Nothing to do with religion.

Whether earth is flat or ball isn't by itself important. But it matters because (1) the main reason why people don't believe in God/Creator is because of space and the Big Bang. When one understands that the earth is flat, he will understand that it could have only come into existence via a...

Psychology does not follow the scientific method, so to call it science makes it pseudoscience. While psychology does aim to be scientific in its approach, it's not empirical like natural science. There is a debate about what is and isn't science known as the demarcation problem...

Not really, kinda, it depends. If you asked a Western, Chinese and Indian astrologer the same question about a chart, they may or may not give similar answers/conclusions. The different astrological systems have different stories, metaphysics, archetypes. The signs have slightly different...

It can't read a full chart and synthesise everything into a proper reading, but you can ask it questions about all the placements in a chart. For example, you could ask it to "explain Mars in Pisces natal chart astrology" and it would give a few paragraphs explaining what that means. It's okay...

Just because something is pseudoscience does not necessarily mean it's untrue. For example, psychology is pseudoscience but it still has some truth to it. Get ChatGPT to read your astrological birth chart and you might be surprised how accurately it describes you and your life. Take it whatever...

I agree. It wasn't an insult, it was a factual statement.

Astrology is not science and I never claimed it was. You know nothing about astrology.

Everyone who thinks astrology is nonsense is because they don't know what astrology actually is. Anyone who studies their own birth chart and the charts of people they know will quickly realise the truth in astrology.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs0M0FJbKI4

@Professor Astrology is geocentric. As for celestial navigation, you may be interested in another device that is geocentric, the Antikythera Mechanism. This device was designed to represent the perfect clockwork movement of the stars and planets as they move through the zodiac. View...

https://today.ucsd.edu/index_redis_default_site.php?/story/a-new-replication-crisis-research-that-is-less-likely-be-true-is-cited-more&/pressrelease/a-new-replication-crisis-research-that-is-less-likely-be-true-is-cited-more