🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉

[Kangal]

No link?

Of course not. You just decided to post a screenshot and called it a win. Incredible really.

And I found the link.

Association between face mask use and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Cross-sectional study | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core

Association between face mask use and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Cross-sectional study - Volume 151

www.cambridge.org

People who didn't or wouldn't wear face masks, didnt report getting covid.

Of course. They didn't believe it existed.

"Our findings may be explained by several factors. A major limitation of our study is the nonrandomized, cross-sectional study design. It may be that mask wearers were more prone to wear masks to protect others from their own infection. This reverse causality may explain the positive association between risk of infection and mask usage, and could be supported by the finding that participants reporting to wear masks also were more likely to test themselves for COVID-19. "

You are a grade A moron, @Tiger

Still, it's an implicit admission by you that covid existed. So it's not all bad.

 

[Tiger]

And I found the link.

Association between face mask use and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Cross-sectional study | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core

Association between face mask use and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Cross-sectional study - Volume 151

www.cambridge.org

People who didn't or wouldn't wear face masks, didnt report getting covid.

Of course. They didn't believe it existed.

"Our findings may be explained by several factors. A major limitation of our study is the nonrandomized, cross-sectional study design. It may be that mask wearers were more prone to wear masks to protect others from their own infection. This reverse causality may explain the positive association between risk of infection and mask usage, and could be supported by the finding that participants reporting to wear masks also were more likely to test themselves for COVID-19. "

You are a grade A moron, @Tiger

Still, it's an implicit admission by you that covid existed. So it's not all bad.

The next time you are changing your name, why need pick ‘Cherry Picker’ as that would be more nominatively determined.

You left out this sentence:

“Our findings suggest that wearing a mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection”

Nobody is interested in the caveats. We can presume the authors probably spent much of the pandemic with face nappies on and probably feel stupid now after their data study.

 

[Mad as Fish]

The next time you are changing your name, why need pick ‘Cherry Picker’ as that would be more nominatively determined.

You left out this sentence:

“Our findings suggest that wearing a mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection”

Nobody is interested in the caveats. We can presume the authors probably spent much of the pandemic with face nappies on and probably feel stupid now after their data study.

'Sniveling Little Creep' would be just as accurate a moniker as he bends and twists, lies and omits his way through the establishment narrative in a bid to justify it.

 

[Kangal]

You left out this sentence:

“Our findings suggest that wearing a mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection”

Nobody is interested in the caveats.

I was wondering if you'd be this stupid to quote this alone and think you could get away with it.

"Our findings suggest that wearing a face mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection. However, it is important to note that this association may be due to unobservable and non-adjustable differences between those wearing and not wearing a mask. Therefore, caution is imperative when interpreting the results from this and other observational studies on the relationship between mask wearing and infection risk."

Yes, you are that stupid.

Why do you call attention to what ends up destroying your argument? It's incredible.

You can't ignore the parts of the study that you don't like. Of course the caveats matter. What an incredibly stupid thing to say.

 

[Wolf]

'Sniveling Little Creep' would be just as accurate a moniker as he bends and twists, lies and omits his way through the establishment narrative in a bid to justify it.

It's not getting the attention it craves on the Uki thread, being banned and all that, so it's shit posting here instead.
What a needy idiot.

 

[Tiger]

I was wondering if you'd be this stupid to quote this alone and think you could get away with it.

"Our findings suggest that wearing a face mask may be associated with an increased risk of infection. However, it is important to note that this association may be due to unobservable and non-adjustable differences between those wearing and not wearing a mask. Therefore, caution is imperative when interpreting the results from this and other observational studies on the relationship between mask wearing and infection risk."

Yes, you are that stupid.

Why do you call attention to what ends up destroying your argument? It's incredible.

The caveat (as already explained) is because the authors are obviously cowards who went along with everything in the pandemic.

Nobody is interested in their caveats, just what their data shows, which is that you and every other tit that pushed masks as a prophylactic were wrong, in fact worse than wrong as it had a negative effect.

 

[Kangal]

It's not getting the attention it craves on the Uki thread, being banned and all that, so it's shit posting here instead.
What a needy idiot.

I'm not banned from it Wolf. Wrong again.

 

[Kangal]

The caveat (as already explained) is because the authors are obviously cowards who went along with everything in the pandemic

Then the data in the study can't be trusted, can it?

Jesus H Christ, please shut the fuck up now. This is excruciating.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Then the data in the study can't be trusted, can it?

Jesus H Christ, please shut the fuck up now. This is excruciating.

So what data in which studies can be trusted, just that which supports the establishment's cause? It seems to be the level to which scientists have let their calling sink.

 

[Kangal]

So what data in which studies can be trusted, just that which supports the establishment's cause? It seems to be the level to which scientists have let their calling sink.

It's important to view the results under the constraints the data was collected. Self reporting studies like the one Tiger so egregiously failed to understand have obvious flaws in that they rely on....self-reporting. In this case, the other control group (non-mask wearers) are clearly not going to test themselves for covid to the same extent as the mask wearing cohort, for reasons we are all aware of.

An honest study will acknowledge problems in the data like this, and the study can still have value if the results are replicated with other more controlled studies.

So far, the evidence in the vast majority of studies, conducted in different ways and looking at different aspects, have all confirmed that wearing mask cut down on covid infection rates.

 

[Mad as Fish]

It's important to view the results under the constraints the data was collected. Self reporting studies like the one Tiger so egregiously failed to understand have obvious flaws in that they rely on....self-reporting. In this case, the other control group (non-mask wearers) are clearly not going to test themselves for covid to the same extent as the mask wearing cohort, for reasons we are all aware of.

An honest study will acknowledge problems in the data like this, and the study can still have value if the results are replicated with other more controlled studies.

So far, the evidence in the vast majority of studies, conducted in different ways and looking at different aspects, have all confirmed that wearing mask cut down on covid infection rates.

99% of the establishment backed covid science presented to us as fact would instantly fail your new found enthusiasm for proper methodology.

 

[Wolf]

Anyone with a brain knows the reaction to a cold virus in 2020 was a complete overreaction and that pfizer's poison did nothing to stop the spread of 'the virus'.
The criminals in Pfizer have admitted the latter already.
Only total arseholes like Comical Jarry continue to believe in their voodoo science because the truth ends the sick lies it pushed for years on here and on politicalirish.com.

 

[Coal Gas and peat]

Anyone with a brain knows the reaction to a cold virus in 2020 was a complete overreaction and that pfizer's poison did nothing to stop the spread of 'the virus'.
The criminals in Pfizer have admitted the latter already.
Only total arseholes like Comical Jarry continue to believe in their voodoo science because the truth ends the sick lies it pushed for years on here and on politicalirish.com.

Damn Rick for sinking political Irish data base .....the stuff godsdog and Charlottesweb were pumping out should be still there as evidence , even Andy lost his shit at one point but did regain composure later

 

[Wolf]

LOL, it even denies being banned from the main Uki thread.........despite being actually banned from the thread........
It'll be back on it tomorrow for a while until @Declan deletes its 2,000 shitposts..........again!

 

[Kangal]

LOL, it even denies being banned from the main Uki thread.........despite being actually banned from the thread........

Hi @Wolf

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

View: https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1728698178646487059

 

[Kangal]

View: https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1728698178646487059

Please tell me this is just a joke. Is PG seriously posting the same screenshot that I just destroyed in the preceding posts? OMG!!!

Are you all just copy'n'pasting from the same Telegram channels? FFS!

 

[Mad as Fish]

Please tell me this is just a joke. Is PG seriously posting the same screenshot that I just destroyed in the preceding posts? OMG!!!

Are you all just copy'n'pasting from the same Telegram channels? FFS!

Scared you lads shitless hasn't it?

 

[Kangal]

Scared you lads shitless hasn't it?

Yep. I didn't quite realise you were all such easy marks.

 

[Wolf]

Next in the pedophile's fantasy world it'll claim it was never banned from the Uki thread and didn't shitpost its own Uki thread for 2 days because of that.
What a total idiot.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Please tell me this is just a joke. Is PG seriously posting the same screenshot that I just destroyed in the preceding posts? OMG!!!

Are you all just copy'n'pasting from the same Telegram channels? FFS!

they only thing you've ever destroyed is your own rear passage. from all the ghey

 

[Kangal]

Next in the pedophile's fantasy world it'll claim it was never banned from the Uki thread and didn't shitpost its own Uki thread for 2 days because of that.

Nope. I certainly was banned for a little joke at Declans expense. I actually said this on the thread. Don't you remember?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Yep. I didn't quite realise you were all such easy marks.

?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Kangal's gob has run out of words now that it has been shown up as mindless sop for the establishment - again.

 

[Kangal]

Kangal's gob has run out of words now that it has been shown up as mindless sop for the establishment - again.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Told ya!

 

[Kangal]

Told ya!

I'll say it again. I didn't quite realise you were all such easy marks. It's a bit frightening.

 

[Wolf]

Kangal's gob has run out of words now that it has been shown up as mindless sop for the establishment - again.

It's jurt a common troll.
Reading it's shitposts today just proves that beyond doubt.
A 24/7 shitpost specialist.
We knew it on politicalirish and we know it here.
@Declan just keeps it around like a pet, it helps with the hits.

 

[Kangal]

jurt

 

[Wolf]

It can even spot a typo and post a childish GIF in response.
Wow, so clever.
Idiot.

 

[Tiger]

https://battleplan.news/watch?id=65650b6b629330ac22c1ad03

 

[Mad as Fish]

I'll say it again. I didn't quite realise you were all such easy marks. It's a bit frightening.

Still makes no sense, but that's normal for you.

 

[Wolf]

Still makes no sense, but that's normal for you.

Declan let it back on the Ukraine thread so that'll keep it busy.

 

[Tiger]

Still makes no sense, but that's normal for you.

We all know the playbook.

When he’s wrong he doubles down. Goes out all guns blazing. Concedes nothing.

 

[Professor]

Concedes nothing.

That's for certain. He has always failed to acknowledge Adversity or Immunity (chief concerns of vaccination) - They being fundamental themes on which NonVaxxed fail to acknowledge any benefits from being Jabbed, understandably.

 

[Wolf]

We all know the playbook.

When he’s wrong he doubles down. Goes out all guns blazing. Concedes nothing.

It's an attention seeking clown.

 

[jpc]

We did say....

Repeatedly!

 

[Professor]

An absolute must-read

. . . .What we found is truly horrifying.


Click to Enlarge
Source

The unvaccinated accounted for the least amount of COVID-19 deaths in every single month up to May 2023, barely even getting into triple figures in most months.


Whereas the vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths every single month, hitting four figures in every month except for May.


But what’s curious about the figures is that it’s not the one-dose, or double-vaccinated population who accounted for the majority of COVID-19 deaths since the beginning of 2023.


It’s instead the triple and quadruple-vaccinated population that have accounted for the majority of COVID-19 deaths.


With the most deaths occurring among the quadruple-vaccinated by a significant margin.


The following chart shows the total number of COVID-19 deaths by vaccinated status throughout the entire year and reveals the true extent of the shocking statistics –


Click to Enlarge
Source

The unvaccinated didn’t even reach four figures, with just 436 deaths between January and May 2023.


But the vaccinated population almost hit five figures with 8,330 COVID-19 deaths, 1,032 of which were among the triple vaccinated, and 6,902 of which were shockingly among the quadruple vaccinated.


This means, as is shown in the following chart, that the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 95% of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for just 5%.

DEADLY SECRETS: Unvaccinated account for just 5% of COVID-19 Deaths since beginning of 2023 but 3 & 4x Vaccinated account for Shocking 95% - The Expose

A report quietly published by the UK Government confirms the COVID-19 injections are far from effective because the unvaccinated population has accounted for just 5% of COVID-19 deaths in England since the beginning of 2023, while the 3 and 4 times vaccinated population has accounted for 95% of...

expose-news.com

@Kangal This time the figures are sourced directly from the UK ONS

 

[Wolf]

An absolute must-read

. . . .What we found is truly horrifying.


Click to Enlarge
Source

The unvaccinated accounted for the least amount of COVID-19 deaths in every single month up to May 2023, barely even getting into triple figures in most months.


Whereas the vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths every single month, hitting four figures in every month except for May.


But what’s curious about the figures is that it’s not the one-dose, or double-vaccinated population who accounted for the majority of COVID-19 deaths since the beginning of 2023.


It’s instead the triple and quadruple-vaccinated population that have accounted for the majority of COVID-19 deaths.


With the most deaths occurring among the quadruple-vaccinated by a significant margin.


The following chart shows the total number of COVID-19 deaths by vaccinated status throughout the entire year and reveals the true extent of the shocking statistics –


Click to Enlarge
Source

The unvaccinated didn’t even reach four figures, with just 436 deaths between January and May 2023.


But the vaccinated population almost hit five figures with 8,330 COVID-19 deaths, 1,032 of which were among the triple vaccinated, and 6,902 of which were shockingly among the quadruple vaccinated.


This means, as is shown in the following chart, that the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 95% of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023, while the unvaccinated population accounted for just 5%.

DEADLY SECRETS: Unvaccinated account for just 5% of COVID-19 Deaths since beginning of 2023 but 3 & 4x Vaccinated account for Shocking 95% - The Expose

A report quietly published by the UK Government confirms the COVID-19 injections are far from effective because the unvaccinated population has accounted for just 5% of COVID-19 deaths in England since the beginning of 2023, while the 3 and 4 times vaccinated population has accounted for 95% of...

expose-news.com

@Kangal This time the figures are sourced directly from the UK ONS

But wait...didn't Charlottesweb/Comical Jarry tell us for years that the 'vaccine' was safe and that once taken it would stop people from spreading or catching the glorified cold virus?
Indeed the pervert even went as far as to state that the vaccinated would not die from ConVid......

 

[Professor]

But wait...didn't Charlottesweb/Comical Jarry tell us for years that the 'vaccine' was safe and that once taken it would stop people from spreading or catching the glorified cold virus?
Indeed the pervert even went as far as to state that the vaccinated would not die from ConVid......

Oh, sure he presented a flurry of studies claiming to show viral DNA and specific covid viruses in situ but when asked to select the crucial sections from the many many studies to show and explain how mrna covid vaccines functioned to provide efficacy & safety against his viruses . . .

well, I cannot remember any such instance of revelation or disclosure - When pressed he just spammed another 3 or 4 abstract model science studies per post which upon close examination were mostly hot air research showing very little of any relevance to the simple questions we posed.

Oh , he was totally scathing of any contrary data, and was determined to push the line that Unvaccinated were dying more and dying from covid only because of being unvaxxed.

Anything flipping Fauci and his CDC endorsed TTauri pushed until . . . Fauci actually started to back track when he stated the reduced efficacy time & time again till even fauci looked hopelessly into the camera and mooted that Vaccines do help to recover quicker and not get so sick at best which proved totally untrue for many who ended up in hospital in a critical condition - when fauci himseld quietly climbed off from the pedestal and shlinked away in defeat TTauri then started to go into overdrive to keep it up - It's great gas