Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
Health
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A Man Called Charolais" data-source="post: 75102"><p>Well, it goes into the suppression of discussion and dissent. </p><p></p><p>Back the C17th and C18th there was a lot of criticism of the Académie des Sciences (the French institution set up by Louis XVI) for this reason by continental enlightenment thinkers. This is why the English model of the Royal Society was often used as a positive contrast to a somewhat staid and posturing absolutist institution (this was before later reforms). So there is a parallel in history.</p><p></p><p>The key argument in the article is the lack of complex analysis. It points to the board examinations of doctors to illustrate this:</p><p></p><p></p><p>'One of its foundational concepts are<strong> first order vs. second order vs. third order questions</strong>. In first order questions, you simply have to recall a testable factoid (e.g., which of the following is a side effect of ciprofloxacin), while in second order questions, you need to be able to link two memorized facts together (which of the following would be an expected side effect of the first line antibiotic to treat this infection), while in third order questions, you need to link three chains of memorized facts together (e.g., based on the patients symptoms, for the condition those symptoms suggest [with the condition not being stated in the question], what is the most common side effect of the drug that would be used to treat it).</p><p></p><p>Initially medical students receive more first order questions. Then, later in their training as they have more medical knowledge (e.g., they can instantly identify the infection being described by the question stem) their examinations test a great proportion of second or third order questions (you have to pass quite a few to get a medical license).</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-deadly-rise-of-scientism" target="_blank">In the previous article</a>, I argued that the main reason the vaccine propagandists won’t ever agree to public debate is because much of what they espouse has a high enough discordance with reality that it instantly falls apart under cross examination and second order thinking.'</p><p></p><p>(just a note here that doctors have to navigate extraordinarily difficult training and deserve our admiration)</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is quite difficult material to understand but I think it refers to context mapping. Like layers in a map - as the training of a doctor progresses they become more familiar with the context of the route they are choosing to navigate. </p><p>So, first of all they may just see a line of a road, then they see features like towns and forests, and then they may be able to view the topography (changes in elevation). </p><p></p><p>As their knowledge improves through more advanced training and experience, they have an improved ability to navigate to the destination. If they only have first order knowledge, they may miss important obstacles or hazards that will frustrate their treatment (I'm sure a doctor would be able to phrase this better).</p><p></p><p>What this article is arguing is that the bio-medical establishment is hamstringing second and third order analysis in order to force their solution. So, for example, vitamin supplements and repurposed drugs that may reinforce innate immune systems and dissipate virulence are rubbished. The solution they propose is an amelioration of symptoms rather than a cure - which goes with the view that it's in the interest of the medical industrial complex to keep people sick rather than cure them.</p><p></p><p>Thus areas outside the expertise of biological researchers are also not imputed into their analysis. The impacts on education, social life, the economy etc. are disregarded and narrow decisions are made that cause third degree burns to public health - and this is a critical blind spot in their ability to issue broad directives. This is something the conceit of a coterie of specialised experts conceals from them - they can't reckon the effects beyond their compartment.</p><p></p><p>I've seen the observation that practising doctors are under such workload pressure that they do not have the resources to question the information presented by the scientific infrastructure, which would explain why what was issued was largely unquestioningly implemented. Imagine if a doctor has to scrutinise the validity of every new medication or issue? It would be a terrible strain on confidence and practice. There's a heavy enough burden already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A Man Called Charolais, post: 75102"] Well, it goes into the suppression of discussion and dissent. Back the C17th and C18th there was a lot of criticism of the Académie des Sciences (the French institution set up by Louis XVI) for this reason by continental enlightenment thinkers. This is why the English model of the Royal Society was often used as a positive contrast to a somewhat staid and posturing absolutist institution (this was before later reforms). So there is a parallel in history. The key argument in the article is the lack of complex analysis. It points to the board examinations of doctors to illustrate this: 'One of its foundational concepts are[B] first order vs. second order vs. third order questions[/B]. In first order questions, you simply have to recall a testable factoid (e.g., which of the following is a side effect of ciprofloxacin), while in second order questions, you need to be able to link two memorized facts together (which of the following would be an expected side effect of the first line antibiotic to treat this infection), while in third order questions, you need to link three chains of memorized facts together (e.g., based on the patients symptoms, for the condition those symptoms suggest [with the condition not being stated in the question], what is the most common side effect of the drug that would be used to treat it). Initially medical students receive more first order questions. Then, later in their training as they have more medical knowledge (e.g., they can instantly identify the infection being described by the question stem) their examinations test a great proportion of second or third order questions (you have to pass quite a few to get a medical license). [URL='https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-deadly-rise-of-scientism']In the previous article[/URL], I argued that the main reason the vaccine propagandists won’t ever agree to public debate is because much of what they espouse has a high enough discordance with reality that it instantly falls apart under cross examination and second order thinking.' (just a note here that doctors have to navigate extraordinarily difficult training and deserve our admiration) This is quite difficult material to understand but I think it refers to context mapping. Like layers in a map - as the training of a doctor progresses they become more familiar with the context of the route they are choosing to navigate. So, first of all they may just see a line of a road, then they see features like towns and forests, and then they may be able to view the topography (changes in elevation). As their knowledge improves through more advanced training and experience, they have an improved ability to navigate to the destination. If they only have first order knowledge, they may miss important obstacles or hazards that will frustrate their treatment (I'm sure a doctor would be able to phrase this better). What this article is arguing is that the bio-medical establishment is hamstringing second and third order analysis in order to force their solution. So, for example, vitamin supplements and repurposed drugs that may reinforce innate immune systems and dissipate virulence are rubbished. The solution they propose is an amelioration of symptoms rather than a cure - which goes with the view that it's in the interest of the medical industrial complex to keep people sick rather than cure them. Thus areas outside the expertise of biological researchers are also not imputed into their analysis. The impacts on education, social life, the economy etc. are disregarded and narrow decisions are made that cause third degree burns to public health - and this is a critical blind spot in their ability to issue broad directives. This is something the conceit of a coterie of specialised experts conceals from them - they can't reckon the effects beyond their compartment. I've seen the observation that practising doctors are under such workload pressure that they do not have the resources to question the information presented by the scientific infrastructure, which would explain why what was issued was largely unquestioningly implemented. Imagine if a doctor has to scrutinise the validity of every new medication or issue? It would be a terrible strain on confidence and practice. There's a heavy enough burden already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
What day comes after Saturday
Post reply
Latest Threads
Registrations now Open
Started by Declan
Yesterday at 9:18 PM
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
The Co-Op Has Been Formed.
Started by Declan
Tuesday at 7:29 PM
Replies: 3
Public Chat and Announcements
Fastway gone bust
Started by Anderson
Tuesday at 5:29 PM
Replies: 6
Economy
J
The Aisling O'Loughlin thread
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Monday at 5:55 AM
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
Origins Thread (Uncensored)
Started by AN2
Saturday at 4:01 PM
Replies: 9
Science
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
Health
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Top
Bottom
