Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 133897" data-attributes="member: 353"><p>Your answer shows exactly how shallow your position is. You've given it no thought whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>You're asserting that morality — empathy in this case — emerged from reciprocal survival strategies ("you scratch my back...") and became "hardwired." That’s a popular evolutionary psychology narrative, <strong>but it’s not science </strong>— it’s <strong>speculative storytelling</strong> dressed up in Darwinian terminology. There is no empirical evidence showing <strong>how</strong> selfless empathy — especially at great personal cost — could have evolved from blind natural selection. If natural selection favors reproductive success, why do we lionize people who die for strangers?</p><p></p><p>Moreover, if morality is just "what helped us survive," then by that logic, <strong>rape, infanticide, and tribal genocide</strong> — all of which occur in nature and human history — are just as "evolved." Are they therefore morally good? If not, you’ve got a problem: <strong>you’re trying to get “ought” from “is,”</strong> and that move has been philosophically bankrupt since David Hume identified the fallacy 300 years ago.</p><p></p><p>You also claimed empathy became “hardwired.” <strong>How, precisely?</strong> Show me the genes for empathy. Demonstrate the molecular mechanism by which “you scratch my back” mutates into weeping over a starving child in a documentary. That leap — from chemical incentive to abstract moral sentiment —<strong> isn’t explained by biology</strong>. It’s merely assumed. That’s not science. That’s mythology — a <em>materialist creation myth</em>.</p><p></p><p>And then you close with a swipe at God — claiming He "forgot" the psychopaths. But in your own view, <strong>psychopathy isn’t a defect</strong>, it's just another evolutionary variant. Why shouldn’t the psychopath rule, lie, and kill if it gets him ahead? Your system has no authority to say he’s wrong — only that he’s maladaptive <em>according to your preferences</em>.</p><p></p><p>So let’s be clear:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You have no science showing how moral awareness evolves.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You offer no grounding for why empathy is good or binding.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You assume evolution gave us “morality,” but dismiss the millions of evolutionary behaviors we now condemn.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">You mock theism, but then borrow its framework to claim moral judgments that only make sense <strong>if</strong> humans are more than meat.</li> </ul><p>If your worldview were true, we'd still be in caves — not arguing about ethics online.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 133897, member: 353"] Your answer shows exactly how shallow your position is. You've given it no thought whatsoever. You're asserting that morality — empathy in this case — emerged from reciprocal survival strategies ("you scratch my back...") and became "hardwired." That’s a popular evolutionary psychology narrative, [B]but it’s not science [/B]— it’s [B]speculative storytelling[/B] dressed up in Darwinian terminology. There is no empirical evidence showing [B]how[/B] selfless empathy — especially at great personal cost — could have evolved from blind natural selection. If natural selection favors reproductive success, why do we lionize people who die for strangers? Moreover, if morality is just "what helped us survive," then by that logic, [B]rape, infanticide, and tribal genocide[/B] — all of which occur in nature and human history — are just as "evolved." Are they therefore morally good? If not, you’ve got a problem: [B]you’re trying to get “ought” from “is,”[/B] and that move has been philosophically bankrupt since David Hume identified the fallacy 300 years ago. You also claimed empathy became “hardwired.” [B]How, precisely?[/B] Show me the genes for empathy. Demonstrate the molecular mechanism by which “you scratch my back” mutates into weeping over a starving child in a documentary. That leap — from chemical incentive to abstract moral sentiment —[B] isn’t explained by biology[/B]. It’s merely assumed. That’s not science. That’s mythology — a [I]materialist creation myth[/I]. And then you close with a swipe at God — claiming He "forgot" the psychopaths. But in your own view, [B]psychopathy isn’t a defect[/B], it's just another evolutionary variant. Why shouldn’t the psychopath rule, lie, and kill if it gets him ahead? Your system has no authority to say he’s wrong — only that he’s maladaptive [I]according to your preferences[/I]. So let’s be clear: [LIST] [*]You have no science showing how moral awareness evolves. [*]You offer no grounding for why empathy is good or binding. [*]You assume evolution gave us “morality,” but dismiss the millions of evolutionary behaviors we now condemn. [*]You mock theism, but then borrow its framework to claim moral judgments that only make sense [B]if[/B] humans are more than meat. [/LIST] If your worldview were true, we'd still be in caves — not arguing about ethics online. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
S
What will you write if you spoil your vote tomorrow?
Started by scolairebocht
Today at 7:31 PM
Replies: 1
Scholairebochts Blog.
S
Ongoing protests at the Citywest Hotel in Saggart Co. Dublin
Started by scolairebocht
Today at 6:27 PM
Replies: 2
Scholairebochts Blog.
S
The Anti-Mass Migration movement has to be at least partly about race, it is indeed Ireland for the Irish
Started by scolairebocht
Yesterday at 9:10 AM
Replies: 26
Scholairebochts Blog.
A Million Views.
Started by Declan
Saturday at 10:54 PM
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
An Open Letter to SwordOfStZip
Started by AN2
Oct 11, 2025
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
Top
Bottom