Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 133945" data-attributes="member: 353"><p><strong>A) "It does. Not sure what you're driving at with this one."</strong></p><p></p><p>That DNA contains hierarchically structured, digitally encoded information <em>is the point</em>. Information is not a property of matter or chemistry alone — it points to <em>semantics</em>, not just syntax. You wouldn't look at a software codebase and say, “It just does that.” You’d ask: where did the code come from? What kind of mind encoded it? DNA functions <em>as</em> a language — complete with syntax, semantics, and rules — and unlike raw chemistry, it encodes functional instructions. That's a hallmark of engineering, not an accident of molecules. Hand-waving it away as “it just does” is sign of being inbred.</p><p></p><p><strong>B) "We don’t really know."</strong></p><p></p><p>Thank you for the honesty — but this admission is crucial. Origin-of-life research has failed to produce a remotely plausible unguided pathway from non-living chemicals to self-replicating, information-rich systems. Abiogenesis remains speculative at best. It is precisely <em>because</em> we don’t know — and because blind chemistry has never been observed to produce algorithmically functional information — that this question remains such a profound challenge to materialist frameworks. If science were consistent, this should raise at least <em>epistemic humility</em>, not silence.</p><p></p><p><strong>C) "It both does and doesn’t. This argument is basically sacred geometry. Also physics."</strong></p><p></p><p>This reply borders on incoherence. To say it “does and doesn’t” is like saying gravity both exists and doesn’t, depending on the day. The point is not “sacred geometry” — it’s that <em>reality is astonishingly intelligible</em>. Why should that be the case? Why should abstract human mathematics correspond so precisely to the structure and behavior of the physical world? As Einstein asked, “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.” Physics <em>uses</em> mathematics — it does not explain <em>why</em> the universe is mathematical to its bones.</p><p></p><p><strong>D) "Nobody really knows. Why the universe is ordered at any level at all is a mystery."</strong></p><p></p><p>Again, a confession of ignorance — and a significant one. Fine-tuning isn’t an illusion; it’s an observable feature of the cosmos. Physical constants must fall within razor-thin margins for life — or even stable atoms — to exist. The multiverse is the go-to speculative escape hatch, but by your own standard, you’re not invoking it — so what are you left with? If this fine-tuning is real and unexplainable through chance, then inference to design becomes more <em>reasonable</em>, not less</p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong>…</p><p></p><p>So what do we have? A universe embedded with information, ordered by math, tuned for life, and containing biological systems that no lab has ever replicated from non-life — and your response is a mix of “don’t know,” “not sure,” and “it just does.” That’s not skepticism; it’s resignation. These aren’t God-of-the-gaps arguments. They are engineering-based, information-theoretic, and philosophical inquiries about the <em>structure and intelligibility of reality</em> — which science relies on but cannot explain.</p><p></p><p>Surely a worldview with so much intellectual self-confidence should be able to do better than “we don’t really know.”</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 133945, member: 353"] [B]A) "It does. Not sure what you're driving at with this one."[/B] That DNA contains hierarchically structured, digitally encoded information [I]is the point[/I]. Information is not a property of matter or chemistry alone — it points to [I]semantics[/I], not just syntax. You wouldn't look at a software codebase and say, “It just does that.” You’d ask: where did the code come from? What kind of mind encoded it? DNA functions [I]as[/I] a language — complete with syntax, semantics, and rules — and unlike raw chemistry, it encodes functional instructions. That's a hallmark of engineering, not an accident of molecules. Hand-waving it away as “it just does” is sign of being inbred. [B]B) "We don’t really know."[/B] Thank you for the honesty — but this admission is crucial. Origin-of-life research has failed to produce a remotely plausible unguided pathway from non-living chemicals to self-replicating, information-rich systems. Abiogenesis remains speculative at best. It is precisely [I]because[/I] we don’t know — and because blind chemistry has never been observed to produce algorithmically functional information — that this question remains such a profound challenge to materialist frameworks. If science were consistent, this should raise at least [I]epistemic humility[/I], not silence. [B]C) "It both does and doesn’t. This argument is basically sacred geometry. Also physics."[/B] This reply borders on incoherence. To say it “does and doesn’t” is like saying gravity both exists and doesn’t, depending on the day. The point is not “sacred geometry” — it’s that [I]reality is astonishingly intelligible[/I]. Why should that be the case? Why should abstract human mathematics correspond so precisely to the structure and behavior of the physical world? As Einstein asked, “The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.” Physics [I]uses[/I] mathematics — it does not explain [I]why[/I] the universe is mathematical to its bones. [B]D) "Nobody really knows. Why the universe is ordered at any level at all is a mystery."[/B] Again, a confession of ignorance — and a significant one. Fine-tuning isn’t an illusion; it’s an observable feature of the cosmos. Physical constants must fall within razor-thin margins for life — or even stable atoms — to exist. The multiverse is the go-to speculative escape hatch, but by your own standard, you’re not invoking it — so what are you left with? If this fine-tuning is real and unexplainable through chance, then inference to design becomes more [I]reasonable[/I], not less [B]Conclusion[/B]… So what do we have? A universe embedded with information, ordered by math, tuned for life, and containing biological systems that no lab has ever replicated from non-life — and your response is a mix of “don’t know,” “not sure,” and “it just does.” That’s not skepticism; it’s resignation. These aren’t God-of-the-gaps arguments. They are engineering-based, information-theoretic, and philosophical inquiries about the [I]structure and intelligibility of reality[/I] — which science relies on but cannot explain. Surely a worldview with so much intellectual self-confidence should be able to do better than “we don’t really know.” [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 88
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
Top
Bottom