Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 135185" data-attributes="member: 353">Tank, your comprehension skills are as poor as James's. Like James, you post videos with no proper commentary, presuming that everyone will interpret them in the same mangled way that your brain has digested them. That's why 90% of James's posts are completely incoherent. Sarsfields answer to ‘Dumb and Dumber’.He was talking about multiverses (more than one Universe).The word “Universes” in the title was your first clue, friend. Plurality implies multiplicity. This is not esoteric code—it’s basic grammar. When Penrose speaks of a succession of cosmic “aeons,” each birthed from the thermal death of the last, he is speaking plainly of multiple universes—not arranged side-by-side, but in an eternal procession, each replacing the previous like pages in a cosmic ledger. That’s literally a chicken-and-egg cosmology - with one universe giving birth to another in an infinite regress with no absolute beginning.This isn’t some fresh empirical revelation; it’s a repackaged form of Pythagorean metaphysics—a mythology with equations in place of gods. And like all occult systems cloaked in scientific respectability, it pushes origins further into abstraction so as to evade the obvious: something must explain the whole.Penrose calls this theory “conformal cyclic cosmology.” Sounds impressive. But what is it in substance? An infinite regress of universes without origin or cause. It’s cosmogenesis without God, dressed in geometric jargon and served with the implicit demand: “Don’t question the high priests of physics.” But question we must.The man admits his model is hard to swallow—and for good reason. A universe that stretches, dies, and somehow reboots itself into a fresh cosmos (with all entropy reset and clocks wound to zero) is just another creation myth, minus the courage to name the Creator.So no, I’m not “whining,” nor am I “disavowing” Penrose. I am exposing the quiet fraud of pretending that his proposal is not a form of multiverse theory—when that is precisely what it is. Whether your universes are stacked vertically across time or horizontally across dimensions, you’re still multiplying cosmoses to dodge the singularity of creation.This is not science in the noble sense. It is high-order obfuscation—a Gnostic flight from metaphysical responsibility, disguised as rational progress. It has no empirical ballast. It’s pure fantasy.</blockquote>

Name

Verification: Does Doxxie know his real father.

Latest Threads

How Dangerous is Israel?
- Started by Anderson
- Today at 4:04 AM
- Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
- Started by Anderson
- Yesterday at 3:29 PM
- Replies: 92
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
- Started by Jay Homer Simpson
- Yesterday at 12:30 PM
- Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
- Started by BelfastRatepayer
- Saturday at 12:59 PM
- Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
- Started by Anderson
- Friday at 3:46 AM
- Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics

Popular Threads

Ukraine.
- Started by Declan
- Feb 21, 2022
- Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
- Started by jpc
- Nov 7, 2022
- Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
- Started by Anderson
- Feb 26, 2023
- Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
- Started by Charlene
- Sep 14, 2021
- Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
- Started by Declan
- Dec 30, 2024
- Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
- Started by Anderson
- Jul 29, 2022
- Replies: 2K
Climate Change