Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism

It will always be about racism <only white people can be racist> for blacks.
Jesus H. Christ. Just listen to this total fool now. I would say that even the racists and halfwits on here bad as they are would have to admit that Jambo is nothing only a grade A prime exhibit for this <white on black racism> that he is going on about here - its existence, its pervasiveness, and very much for this "circus of vultures" who feed off stuff like this.
 
IMG_20260810_172945_645.jpg
 
For anyone interested in the actual science, there's an excellent thread here on the race-IQ lobby including Charles Murray, written by a real, published, statistical geneticist (not by an inept charlatan like Charles Murray, who basically first decided that African Americans were inferior, then decided to go and find statistical methods to justify that point of view, while being pretty much ignorant of any form of statistical knowledge).


View: https://x.com/SashaGusevPosts/status/1921406362803716538
 
For anyone interested in the actual science, there's an excellent thread here on the race-IQ lobby including Charles Murray, written by a real, published, statistical geneticist (not by an inept charlatan like Charles Murray, who basically first decided that African Americans were inferior, then decided to go and find statistical methods to justify that point of view, while being pretty much ignorant of any form of statistical knowledge).


View: https://x.com/SashaGusevPosts/status/1921406362803716538

What category of race denier are you today, roc?

Are you denying that there are average IQ differences between the races?
 
Are you denying that there are average IQ differences between the races?
Jambo there are a few related points I put forward in this argument, which I've explained over and over to you before.

The first point is that you and Godsdog are prime exhibits that demonstrate that IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but one of unintelligence (mental deficits).

Second, the theories of IQ are on very shaky statistical grounds (which show the idea up as basically a fake construct. This stuff I have found before is waay beyond you, so leave that one there).

Third, it is Christianity that is the bedrock of western European identity (not "whiteness") which held up all equal in the eyes of God. But after the enlightenment, coupled with an earlier naive growth of “science”, started finding statistical differences in the particular abilities of people of different "races" (leading to ideas about “evolutionary” differences not just between species, but within species, etc.) a new ideology grew. And we saw exactly what it grew into in the twentieth century..

Fourth, of course these halfwit ideas inevitably lead to notions of eugenics, and can also justify slavery, etc.

Of course you're so stupid you can never grasp such nuance in any argument. You only have your stupid catchcries. But yet, apparently you claim to have a "high IQ"? That's QED for point one, Jambo, we don't even need to get into the rest of it.
 
Jambo there are a few related points I put forward in this argument, which I've explained over and over to you before.

The first point is that you and Godsdog are prime exhibits that demonstrate that IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but one of unintelligence (mental deficits).

Second, the theories of IQ are on very shaky statistical grounds (which show the idea up as basically a fake construct. This stuff I have found before is waay beyond you, so leave that one there).

Third, it is Christianity that is the bedrock of western European identity (not "whiteness") which held up all equal in the eyes of God. But after the enlightenment, coupled with an earlier naive growth of “science”, started finding statistical differences in the particular abilities of people of different "races" (leading to ideas about “evolutionary” differences not just between species, but within species, etc.) a new ideology grew. And we saw exactly what it grew into in the twentieth century..

Fourth, of course these halfwit ideas inevitably lead to notions of eugenics, and can can also justify slavery, etc.

Of course you're so stupid you can never grasp such nuance in any argument. But yet, apparently you claim to have a "high IQ"? That's QED for point one, Jambo, we don't even need to get into the rest of it.
This has nothing to do with "Jambo" (as it never does), or Doggy.

Are you DENYING THAT THERE ARE AVERAGE IQ DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE RACES, YES OR NO?
 
This has nothing to do with "Jambo" (as it never does)

Yes, it has everything to do with "Jambo".

"Jambo" is the online persona that reflects the real James Dawson.

For instance:

Think of how grotesque it is that white people have to take the blame and be vilified for the (innate) characteristics of black people..

Hi James.

or Doggy.

Doggy was once addicted to this forum going around crowing about conspiracy theories and Jews and his high IQ.

He finally got into Mensa (one can only imagine the training he put himself through completing one IQ test workbook after the other and studying chess pattern brochures) and he slunk away never to be seen again.

He admitted that it was the only social outlet he could find (have you seen the photos of the Mensa "social" outings).

I.e. He is a grade A example of how IQ is a metric for lack of social and emotional intelligence, and more so for how good someone is at playing chess or taking "tests" designed by unsophisticated nerds.

As Taleb astutely points out, IQ is more a metric for "... learning disabilities, and ends up selecting for exam-takers, paper shufflers, obedient IYIs (intellectuals yet idiots), who are ill adapted for “real life”...".

Are you DENYING THAT THERE ARE AVERAGE IQ DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE RACES, YES OR NO?

Jambo, are you DENYING that in France for instance, Protestants & Jews who are 1% of population have a much greater share of Nobels & wealth?

Are French Protestants a different race?!

That's before we disentangle the meaning of "average" in statistics and its bearing on individuals.

I.e. You're putting a DISHONEST LOADED question. Even if you are unwitting in doing so.

Disentangling genes from culture is impossible.

The Soapbox Dunce is utterly shameless in his intellectual dishonesty

Jambo, I'm not the one here trying to re-brand and re-package the old neo-Nazi "scientific" racism with the newer hopefully more acceptable "race realism" terminology, am I?

Your thesis that some races are "genetically inferior" is suspect in all manner of ways that you have demonstrated you are unable to even grasp.

Or, you re-post bald-faced fabricators like Charles Murray, and this is "honest" because you're too stupid to tell or suspect?

Get up the garden with you, Jambo.
 

You'll notice the same <not an> argument Clownshow Bob employs as @Roc_ does with race realism (and everything else).

Mark says - you're embarrassing yourself and here's why..

Clownshow Bob engages in ad hom.

Every post @Roc_ makes is full of Jambo this, Jambo that.. It's not about me. Anti-racists <is a code word for anti-whites> can't debate.. they don't even think that they have to.
 
... It's not about me...

Yes,it is certainly about you, Jambo, can you not grasp that either, ffs?

What - do you really think that you stand outside all of these things you represent on here?

Is that why you rarely make any argument yourself, only re-post or "channel" other neo-Nazi fuckwits you find on the internet?

No, Jambo. When you stand up and speak publicly, even if you are only bleating Mark Collett or some other fuckwit, it then becomes about YOU.

That's how it works. That's how it has always worked, even in the case of a scientist engaged in unmistakeably physical science when he presents his thought.

So if it is well accepted that all hard physical scientific knowledge is inherently personal knowledge shaped by the active participation of the human mind, then what does that say about those sciences that only borrow the veneer of the physical sciences?

And another level again is your resurrected pseudo-scientific discarded "scientific" racism that you package up as "race realism".

Logos, ethos, pathos.

You can weave a "logic" about anything, Jambo. But there is more involved in its judgement than just how it might hold together under certain "objective" tests.

Of course you are on here presenting a logic of racist thought. The personal involvement of the "knower" and presenter of these theories whether you like it or not Jambo is absolutely to the fore.

... can't debate...

I give you all the rope you require to hang yourself Jambo.

And if I was "debating" say the likes of Peter Thatchell presenting his theories, tackling the "taboo topic" of "child realism" or whatever, well I'd have the same approach.
 
Last edited:
You are an absolute f*cking deluded moron.

Doggy is no more a member of Mensa than you are and, like you, is so stupid he pretended that he could play chess.

And I've told you, my immeasurable 200+ (plus) IQ (because the IQ test I took only went to 200) is a f*cking joke.
 
Jambo there are a few related points I put forward in this argument, which I've explained over and over to you before.

The first point is that you and Godsdog are prime exhibits that demonstrate that IQ is not a measure of intelligence, but one of unintelligence (mental deficits).

Second, the theories of IQ are on very shaky statistical grounds (which show the idea up as basically a fake construct. This stuff I have found before is waay beyond you, so leave that one there).
Third, it is Christianity that is the bedrock of western European identity (not "whiteness") which held up all equal in the eyes of God.
Would any of the site's Catholics/Christians like to comment on this?

Do you think that roc loves you guys or hates you.. because your "antisemitic"?

But after the enlightenment, coupled with an earlier naive growth of “science”, started finding statistical differences in the particular abilities of people of different "races" (leading to ideas about “evolutionary” differences not just between species, but within species, etc.) a new ideology grew. And we saw exactly what it grew into in the twentieth century..
Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis, Nazis...

Fourth, of course these halfwit ideas inevitably lead to notions of eugenics, and can also justify slavery, etc.
What? Race realism does not include any of your ('woke') hysteria

Of course you're so stupid you can never grasp such nuance in any argument. You only have your stupid catchcries. But yet, apparently you claim to have a "high IQ"? That's QED for point one, Jambo, we don't even need to get into the rest of it.
 
Would any of the site's Catholics/Christians like to comment on this?

Do you think that roc loves you guys or hates you.. because your "antisemitic"?

It reminds of Tommy Robinson's new found Christian Nationalism with a particular fondness for Continuing Anglicanism.

The question I am curious about is to whether he respects Christians like Plunkett and Emanuel Hirsh more than he does ones like David Quinn or not? It could well be a case that he hates Christians who try to be "not antisemitic" or "against antisemitism" more than he hates others because he has contempt for their sniveling mental gymnastics.
 
It reminds of Tommy Robinson's new found Christian Nationalism with a particular fondness for Continuing Anglicanism.

The question I am curious about is to whether he respects Christians like Plunkett and Emanuel Hirsh more than he does ones like David Quinn or not? It could well be a case that he hates Christians who try to be "not antisemitic" or "against antisemitism" more than he hates others because he has contempt for their sniveling mental gymnastics.
The Christianity thing is just a grift with Tommy, like everything else is..
 
Yes, it has everything to do with "Jambo".

"Jambo" is the online persona that reflects the real James Dawson.

For instance:



Hi James.



Doggy was once addicted to this forum going around crowing about conspiracy theories and Jews and his high IQ.

He finally got into Mensa (one can only imagine the training he put himself through completing one IQ test workbook after the other and studying chess pattern brochures) and he slunk away never to be seen again.

He admitted that it was the only social outlet he could find (have you seen the photos of the Mensa "social" outings).
I.e. He is a grade A example of how IQ is a metric for lack of social and emotional intelligence, and more so for how good someone is at playing chess or taking "tests" designed by unsophisticated nerds.
You're a grade A example of a lack of intelligence. You're one of the stupidest, waffling cunts alive, and completely detached from reality (AKA insane).

As Taleb astutely points out, IQ is more a metric for "... learning disabilities,
Okay, let's go with your Taleb moron..

IQ is a measure of "unintelligence". So, you admit that African average IQ indicates that sub-saharan Africans are "unintelligent", correct?

and ends up selecting for exam-takers, paper shufflers, obedient IYIs (intellectuals yet idiots), who are ill adapted for “real life”...".
Jambo, are you DENYING that in France for instance, Protestants & Jews who are 1% of population have a much greater share of Nobels & wealth?
All French people are of the same race, regardless of their religion.

Are French Protestants a different race?!
To whom, themselves?

They're not Jews, if that's what you're asking me. White people aren't Jews.

That's before we disentangle the meaning of "average" in statistics and its bearing on individuals.
Average has no bearing on an individual.

What kind of a f*cking moron are you?

I.e. You're putting a DISHONEST LOADED question. Even if you are unwitting in doing so.
Disentangling genes from culture is impossible.
Disentangling you from waffle is impossible.

Jambo, I'm not the one here trying to re-brand and re-package the old neo-Nazi "scientific" racism with the newer hopefully more acceptable "race realism" terminology, am I?
Race realism has absolutely nothing to do with Nazis.

Your thesis that some races are "genetically inferior" is suspect in all manner of ways that you have demonstrated you are unable to even grasp.
My thesis is that races are different and that difference is more than skin deep.

Shut up, idiot.

Or, you re-post bald-faced fabricators like Charles Murray, and this is "honest" because you're too stupid to tell or suspect?

Get up the garden with you, Jambo.
 
This is literally Jambo talking about climate change "race realism" and how we have to act save the world and the white race from the Jews and the Blacks. You bastards, do you just not understand!

jambo.gif
 
This is not simply an academic exercise, or what you would call "racism" <only white people can be racist>

I have repeatedly said that race denialism is not just a lie, it is an anti-white lie. I'm pro-white.
 
My "cult".
Agreed. When I say your cult it should probably be termed as something like your adopted cult.

As I said in a reply to @Agobard Admirer the other day when I was referring to your goyim politics, you'd think that you would be centre right (they're all Zionist).

But no, you can't help yourself, your goyim politics has to be maximally anti-white. Therefore your adopted cult is woke progressive.

So claims the racist moron who spent the week re-posting memes from other cult racists, putting the boot into Arday with the rest of his cult - a gloating participant in "the circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday". E.g.



The same moron who scoffed on here at a warning directed at his cult that this might happen:

"... The circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday are either going to kill him or get him killed. For what? Not Plagiarism he’s cleared for. Accusations of lies/errors/inconsistencies? This isn’t accountability - it’s a public execution. A relentless onslaught for over 2 wks... Racists are gleeful with joy that Arday is a perfect poster boy for their agenda to destroy DEI...".

This is not to say that Cambridge university should not be held accountable for the grotesque racism unleashed. Of course they share some blame.

But the motive for this so called "race realist" who gathered together all of the black academic work he could find, and fed it all into plagiarism software - was to try and find "evidence" of his racist theories.

Now as I've regularly pointed out, that is not how any scientist of merit goes about proving their theories. Never.

Rather any scientist of merit attempts to falsify their own theory.

Of course these "race realist" theories can't stand up to that, so you get the above. I.e. Anecdotal evidence and the like.

Well other thick so called "race realist" racist chumps were only delighted at this "evidence".

And so started the internet trend of Arday being pursued viciously by people like Jambo - not only delighted at this "evidence", but also utterly gleeful to see a black man fail like this.

Only above we see "the yin" are now pointing at "the yang", saying the blame is solely theirs?!

FFS. You're only a racist moron, Jambo. Your knuckles literally drag the ground.

Arday for all his chicanery was still miles above you. And I bet that hurts.
 
My "cult".

So claims the racist moron who spent the week re-posting memes from other cult racists, putting the boot into Arday with the rest of his cult - a gloating participant in "the circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday". E.g.
Arday knew well enough to stroke that dumb anti-white's ego -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d_OXDV0vOBs&t=19m45s

Are you deaf, dumb and blind? The person I was "putting the boot into" there is one of your (adopted) cult's leaders, gurus.. James O'Brien.

And they all seem to be like that on LBC. Look at this disgusting, crawling creature -

Post in thread 'Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.com/threads/mass-migration-to-ireland-europe.252/post-169590

The same moron who scoffed on here at a warning directed at his cult that this might happen:

"... The circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday are either going to kill him or get him killed. For what? Not Plagiarism he’s cleared for. Accusations of lies/errors/inconsistencies? This isn’t accountability - it’s a public execution. A relentless onslaught for over 2 wks... Racists are gleeful with joy that Arday is a perfect poster boy for their agenda to destroy DEI...".

This is not to say that Cambridge university should not be held accountable for the grotesque racism unleashed. Of course they share some blame.

But the motive for this so called "race realist" who gathered together all of the black academic work he could find, and fed it all into plagiarism software - was to try and find "evidence" of his racist theories.

Now as I've regularly pointed out, that is not how any scientist of merit goes about proving their theories. Never.

Rather any scientist of merit attempts to falsify their own theory.

Of course these "race realist" theories can't stand up to that, so you get the above. I.e. Anecdotal evidence and the like.

Well other thick so called "race realist" racist chumps were only delighted at this "evidence".

And so started the internet trend of Arday being pursued viciously by people like Jambo - not only delighted at this "evidence", but also utterly gleeful to see a black man fail like this.

Only above we see "the yin" are now pointing at "the yang", saying the blame is solely theirs?!

FFS. You're only a racist moron, Jambo. Your knuckles literally drag the ground.

Arday for all his chicanery was still miles above you. And I bet that hurts.
 
My "cult".

So claims the racist moron who spent the week re-posting memes from other cult racists, putting the boot into Arday with the rest of his cult - a gloating participant in "the circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday". E.g.
The same moron who scoffed on here at a warning directed at his cultthat this might happen:


"... The circus of vultures feasting off Jason Arday are either going to kill him or get him killed. For what? Not Plagiarism he’s cleared for. Accusations of lies/errors/inconsistencies? This isn’t accountability - it’s a public execution. A relentless onslaught for over 2 wks... Racists are gleeful with joy that Arday is a perfect poster boy for their agenda to destroy DEI...".
Are you talking about this? -

Post in thread 'Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-taboo-topic-of-race-realism.1152/post-169238

Dr. Shola Mos-Shogbamimumu is just another anti-white, black race hustler elevated by academia in the mold of Dr. Ebuns Joseph.

This is not to say that Cambridge university should not be held accountable for the grotesque racism unleashed. Of course they share some blame.
lol Walk us through that one roc, you f*cking peabrain 🤣

But the motive for this so called "race realist" who gathered together all of the black academic work he could find, and fed it all into plagiarism software - was to try and find "evidence" of his racist theories.

Now as I've regularly pointed out, that is not how any scientist of merit goes about proving their theories. Never.

Rather any scientist of merit attempts to falsify their own theory.

Of course these "race realist" theories can't stand up to that, so you get the above. I.e. Anecdotal evidence and the like.

Well other thick so called "race realist" racist chumps were only delighted at this "evidence".

And so started the internet trend of Arday being pursued viciously by people like Jambo - not only delighted at this "evidence", but also utterly gleeful to see a black man fail like this.

Only above we see "the yin" are now pointing at "the yang", saying the blame is solely theirs?!

FFS. You're only a racist moron, Jambo. Your knuckles literally drag the ground.

Arday for all his chicanery was still miles above you. And I bet that hurts
 
You'll notice that I moved @Roc_'s stupid post from the Dead Pool thread to here to reply to it.

So far, I've made three replies to it and there's been zero response from the Soapbox Dunce.
 
Also:

IMG_20260817_144622_949.jpg


So, what we know about Richard C. Lewontin (the originator of what the race deniers think is their superweapon)..

Marxist ✅
Jewish ✅
Political activist ✅
Scientist ❌
 
Agreed. When I say your cult it should probably be termed as something like your adopted cult.

As I said in a reply to @Agobard Admirer the other day when I was referring to your goyim politics, you'd think that you would be centre right (they're all Zionist).

But no, you can't help yourself, your goyim politics has to be maximally anti-white. Therefore your adopted cult is woke progressive.

I think the whole "Counter-Jihad" thing carries with it much more dangers of backfiring on Jews than Nathan Cofnas style "Dark Enlightenment" stuff (which includes what is termed by some "Race Realism").
 
I think the whole "Counter-Jihad" thing carries with it much more dangers of backfiring on Jews than Nathan Cofnas style "Dark Enlightenment" stuff (which includes what is termed by some "Race Realism").
I think Nathan Cofnas takes a certain amount of glee (as does Andrew Gold) thinking that Ashkenazi Jews are top of the totem pole but race realism isn't Jewish, nor is it a reason not to be a race realist.

If you were to reject anything on the grounds of it being Jewish, it would be the counter-Jihad and race denialism (you'll note that @Roc_ is a purveyor of both)
 
Last edited:
I think Nathan Cofnas takes a certain amount of glee (as does Andrew Gold) thinking that Ashkenazi Jews are top of the totem pole but race realism isn't Jewish, nor is it a reason not to be a race realist.

If you were to reject anything on the grounds of it being Jewish, it would be the counter-Jihad and race denialism (you'll note that @Roc_ is a purveyor of both)

No I don't think anything should be rejected on the grounds that it is Jewish though it is difficult for me when characters like Mr Roc argue for anything not to immediately begin to wonder what harmful angle do they have here. Some people do argue that we should reject both Freudianism and Marxism on the grounds of them being Jewish and you should know while as I do not think that either should be swallowed whole I believe that there is a lot of value in both.

I think it is very possible that Mr Roc accepts "Race Realism" but believes that it should be kept as an esoteric truth because otherwise it might lead the masses into thinking about Jews as biologically distinct group and than leaping from that to assuming Jewish hostility- would he be being rational here though? I don't think so.

It is not only Cofnas and Gold but also more significant figures like Bret Stephens and Rabbi David Bar Hayim who take the position that Jewish IQ legitimates Jewish Power (over others). I don't see the logical pipeline between "Race Realism" and what Andrew Joyce would call "Counter-Semitism" the way I do between "Counter-Jihadism" and that (particularly when it comes to people from historically Christian European stock).
 
No I don't think anything should be rejected on the grounds that it is Jewish though it is difficult for me when characters like Mr Roc argue for anything not to immediately begin to wonder what harmful angle do they have here. Some people do argue that we should reject both Freudianism and Marxism on the grounds of them being Jewish and you should know while as I do not think that either should be swallowed whole I believe that there is a lot of value in both.

I think it is very possible that Mr Roc accepts "Race Realism" but believes that it should be kept as an esoteric truth because otherwise it might lead the masses into thinking about Jews as biologically distinct group and than leaping from that to assuming Jewish hostility- would he be being rational here though? I don't think so.

It is not only Cofnas and Gold but also more significant figures like Bret Stephens and Rabbi David Bar Hayim who take the position that Jewish IQ legitimates Jewish Power (over others). I don't see the logical pipeline between "Race Realism" and what Andrew Joyce would call "Counter-Semitism" the way I do between "Counter-Jihadism" and that (particularly when it comes to people from historically Christian European stock).
Are you a race realist?
 
You wallies talking internet in group coded shite at each other again, eh, what’s new. You take the prize for complete gobshitery again. Racist real gob shiites
 

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom