Such a long video that it deserves the tldr treatment. sorry Myles.
I know it's April 1st, and this has such
synchronicity that it seems like the machinations of someone in
8chan, but I have spent hours listening to this because I cannot see lying in her and I've been sticking around to catch some. Don't let the wimmin see it, it'd be too convincing for them - they'd be better off watching to
The View.. There are a lot of bizarre phenomena that have emerged over the past couple of decades that seem to have been pre-figured in this interview.
This appears to be pre-AI, it just goes to show how complicating AI will be for online content once it exceeds human cognitive recognition. I don't think that it is AI generated, and if it is a plant then it's Mozartian in accomplishment. Very heavy on the Kabbalahist references to be comfortable to watch though. Remember, it's from 1998, so pre WoT and back when Star Trek TNG felt like the most likely prospect for humanity.
I actually saw a black helicopter buzz treetops height down the country well over a decade ago and took it to be an invitation to get submerged in the conspiracy theory zeitgeist in order to turn me a bit mad. So, I'm wary about all that sort of thing as it can very easily become confusing and debilitating. AI will be an excellent tool to exacerbate this and fabulate what is common criminal activity. My other reaction to this flyby was the same as one would have to vermin on one's land - as long as the vermin stays in the ditch at the back of the field then there's not much reward in pursuing them but if they start invading the sheds or garden then a determined effort has to be made. Since this type of vermin is 80% psychological then the principal countermeasures are in whitehat counter-coding, thus the engagement with internet fora, and putting oneself into lonesome scenarios so one can tell them to bring it or shut up.
Griggs' account aligns with what Alex Jones has been saying. Jones was also apparently from one of these families - though from line rather than staff. It's very gossipy and she's clearly a bright woman with the recall of a thinking person whose mind isn't addled by drink or drugs. That said, she is not without bourgeois airs.
Griggs hasn't been inconsistent over the course of multiple interviews and she's an example of the wives club that used to be available to females before they became "hegemonic" and normalised to pre-maritial sex work.
Very much the sort of old services family member that would have belonged to the class of "Roman Citizen Women" in classical times. This would explain her access - she's from inside the walls.
You might recognise her as an Old Tory Local Committee Member when the Conservative Party of P. Hitchens' lore was current, if you were British. There's certainly more than a pinch of the Ye Olde Virginian Antebellum Stalwart about her.
Now, the reason why she's giving this interview is
for protection - first unload all the information she has so there's nothing left to incentivise dramatic action against her and make her known so her disappearance would arise suspicion and confirm her otherwise rather alarming (to the point of being incredible) account.
There's a guy called
Steven Fishman that gave a similar inside account of Scientology (in this case) that is of the same sort, although he would have been of her husband's type. He is still in prison for wire fraud but seemed to be honest enough in this interview (if you want to hear more pre-internet whistleblowing).
Griggs was going through a nasty divorce and recounts battery by her alcholic husband so that's a caution. She also enjoys the attention - note her delight when she's corrected on a Tolstoy-Trotsky confusion (it meant they were listening to her).
Still, there are plenty of moments when she adds details that seem extraneous to someone unfamiliar with the situation (such as an inability for "them" to understand her value system) that are very convincing. The interivewer also seems to be a capable type. If you want to get some background on the Alex Jones scene (and you have a lot of time) then this is something to watch. There's no other information on her that I can find - for example did she have a heart attack like
Bezmenov or only pass away during COVID? It could be all a fabrication by the industrial conspiracy industry but it is interesting and beyond my power to detect dishonesty in.
Been looking up bits that I didn't know to see if they checked out. Here's one, Louisiana doesn't use Common Law for its state courts.
'Napoleon. The legal system in Louisiana—unlike that of any other state—derives from the Civil Code established by the French emperor in 1804. Four years before Louisiana became a state in 1812, the former French and Spanish colony adopted a version of the Napoleonic Code. (Some people say it’s wrong to call Louisiana’s legal system “Napoleonic,” since the state Civil Code was also influenced by Spanish law. Historians still argue over the extent of this Spanish influence.) The resulting system of “civil law” in the state differs from the other 49 states’ “common-law” traditions in terms of methodology. Rulings in the French-influenced system derive from direct interpretation of the law; rulings in the common-law system give greater authority to legal precedent.
In theory, a judge in Louisiana decides a case based on her own interpretation of the code, not those of prior courts. In the other states, judges are supposed to make decisions based exclusively on previous rulings. But in practice, the two systems often work the same. Louisiana judges have the benefit of 200 years of case history, even if case law isn’t used as the fundamental basis for their rulings. And judges in other states can stray from a legal precedent if they deem it grossly unjust.'
Louisiana’s Napoleon Complex - Slate Magazine
Aaaaah, so that's where the conflict about originalist and activist interpretations of the US Constitution comes from - Napleonism and Parliamentarianism.
Something else, and maybe the most important point. Do you see how important intimacy with women is for men? The idea that they are breeding drudges is a gross fallacy. Place a woman in a man's bed and she will have access to his deepest thoughts. Have to be careful about the woman you chose. Faithfulness is not only about sexual exclusivity.