Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
Nationalist Politics
Does Nationalism Need National Socialism?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fishalt" data-source="post: 129985" data-attributes="member: 228"><p>I think on your first point, though accurate, this is simply a consequence of media and tech bias. In fact I'm sure it is. You have to accept that the internet is essentially governed by a few major entities (such as alphabet) and these are all American, and Silicon Valley based. This is an extremely progressive region, with an extremely progressive culture. Thusly the cultural and philosophical MO they pipe literally everywhere around the world has hard progressive bias. This<em> is</em> the current orthodoxy. They have the power to deplatform sites if they don't tow the line, and control and manipulate search results to promote media and information germaine to their agenda. Can you really blame the members here for creating a pocket free of it, and for not wanting to host more of it?</p><p></p><p>Ireland's environmental record and the current state of the environment therein is appalling. I've been looking into this lately, and less than 1% of tree cover is remnant forestry. 11% is forestry of any kind, and the vast majority of this is monoculture, which is only slightly better than nothing. There are many reasons for this, but fracturization is probably the main issue.</p><p></p><p> Although Australia is much better, we're still pretty bad here environmentally. The only reason Australia isn't as cleared as Ireland is that we don't have Ireland's history. We don't have thousands of years of tree felling for structure-building and heating, and we weren't at the epicentre of the industrial revolution. Most of the deforestation happened in the mid 1800's to about 1940, with the best timber being sent back to England.</p><p></p><p> But you'd be amazed at the scale of the destruction which occurred in that time--and the amount of death that accompanied it. Go to any one of the old graveyards around Brisbane. You'll see a lot of headstones with celtic knots on them, loggers who died in their late teens and twenties trying to cut down thousand-year-old trees with crosscut saws and sping boards.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, apparently 66% of Ireland is farmland, but farming only accounts for about 1% of GDP. There's your problem right there. Although Ireland is far, far better suited to the grazing of ruminant animals such as cattle and sheep (in Australia these utterly destroy the soil profile BTW) you can't have forests and grazing pastures. At one point, nearly 100% of Ireland would have been covered in temperate rainforest.</p><p></p><p>There's a lot that could be done to make sure the farmers and the environment wins, but I suppose like here, there isn't the social and political capital to do anything. Having looked at some zoning maps, it looks like a lot of Ireland's high country is pretty crap for grazing anyway. That's where you'd start revegetating and buying out/compensating the farmers. In Australia, we call these "Corridors". Basically, you create large, interconnected swathes of forestry between native land. It's been very effective for bringing back species on the verge of extinction, and for creating biodiversity. I see no reason why this couldn't happen in the old country.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fishalt, post: 129985, member: 228"] I think on your first point, though accurate, this is simply a consequence of media and tech bias. In fact I'm sure it is. You have to accept that the internet is essentially governed by a few major entities (such as alphabet) and these are all American, and Silicon Valley based. This is an extremely progressive region, with an extremely progressive culture. Thusly the cultural and philosophical MO they pipe literally everywhere around the world has hard progressive bias. This[I] is[/I] the current orthodoxy. They have the power to deplatform sites if they don't tow the line, and control and manipulate search results to promote media and information germaine to their agenda. Can you really blame the members here for creating a pocket free of it, and for not wanting to host more of it? Ireland's environmental record and the current state of the environment therein is appalling. I've been looking into this lately, and less than 1% of tree cover is remnant forestry. 11% is forestry of any kind, and the vast majority of this is monoculture, which is only slightly better than nothing. There are many reasons for this, but fracturization is probably the main issue. Although Australia is much better, we're still pretty bad here environmentally. The only reason Australia isn't as cleared as Ireland is that we don't have Ireland's history. We don't have thousands of years of tree felling for structure-building and heating, and we weren't at the epicentre of the industrial revolution. Most of the deforestation happened in the mid 1800's to about 1940, with the best timber being sent back to England. But you'd be amazed at the scale of the destruction which occurred in that time--and the amount of death that accompanied it. Go to any one of the old graveyards around Brisbane. You'll see a lot of headstones with celtic knots on them, loggers who died in their late teens and twenties trying to cut down thousand-year-old trees with crosscut saws and sping boards. Anyway, apparently 66% of Ireland is farmland, but farming only accounts for about 1% of GDP. There's your problem right there. Although Ireland is far, far better suited to the grazing of ruminant animals such as cattle and sheep (in Australia these utterly destroy the soil profile BTW) you can't have forests and grazing pastures. At one point, nearly 100% of Ireland would have been covered in temperate rainforest. There's a lot that could be done to make sure the farmers and the environment wins, but I suppose like here, there isn't the social and political capital to do anything. Having looked at some zoning maps, it looks like a lot of Ireland's high country is pretty crap for grazing anyway. That's where you'd start revegetating and buying out/compensating the farmers. In Australia, we call these "Corridors". Basically, you create large, interconnected swathes of forestry between native land. It's been very effective for bringing back species on the verge of extinction, and for creating biodiversity. I see no reason why this couldn't happen in the old country. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
What day comes after Saturday
Post reply
Latest Threads
Registrations now Open
Started by Declan
Yesterday at 9:18 PM
Replies: 2
Public Chat and Announcements
The Co-Op Has Been Formed.
Started by Declan
Tuesday at 7:29 PM
Replies: 3
Public Chat and Announcements
Fastway gone bust
Started by Anderson
Tuesday at 5:29 PM
Replies: 6
Economy
J
The Aisling O'Loughlin thread
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Monday at 5:55 AM
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
Origins Thread (Uncensored)
Started by AN2
Saturday at 4:01 PM
Replies: 9
Science
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
Nationalist Politics
Does Nationalism Need National Socialism?
Top
Bottom