New Chief of the General Staff of the UK Military warns of possible war with the Russian Federation in three years.

Well they are clearly going to be building themselves up big time.
I think they'll struggle. Who wants an service life nowadays other than the small percentage that have always sought the military experience? The Brits always had a good number of those but I am not sure that it will be enough to create a force strong enough to take on the Russians, who have a whole bundle of new allies now in the form of BRICS. What would they be fighting for anyway, Mr Tampax himself, King Charles?

The army is a very unwokeish environment, and if it isn't, then its probably not an army worth losing too much sleep over.

The other way of looking at this statement is that Roly is warning the politico's that they have pushed Putin far enough and they'd better take the foot of the gas.
 
Last edited:
I would not really believe that, the UK is terms of the economy is ranked sixth in the world. The State has plenty of funds for stuff it wants to spend it's cash on-

Simply put

The infrastructure is no longer there for large scale manufacturing of the components within the country.
And that is the case throughout Western economy's.
The introduction of drone warfare is rewriting the playbooks for conflicts.
But again the infrastructure for the components for the above are largely offshore.
 
This is a pretty big statement to make from someone in his position so I would not dismiss it the way I might if a politician said it.

money and politics have changed the British army and they no longer have equipment/personnel which functions in the modern world .
when you look at their equipment it was good for suppressing a revolt in Kenya or similar where nobody had a armored car or rifle bigger than 303 caliber .
their ferret armored cars has six cyl petrol jag car engines and axles off dump trucks --when nobody had similar or better technology it was fine nobody noticed .
this thinking has lasted and the wartime practice of making a zillion crap bedford lorries as they were going to be blown up any way and if they lasted a year that was enough --this practice and the thinking are suitable for the 1940s only.
today the Russians face the best western technology --abrambs tanks powered by an aircraft turbine kerosene guzzling engine of GALLONS PER MILE -technology and you need a vast shed full of diagnostic equipment and hundreds of highly trained specialists to keep this aircraft/tank bullshit going.
it has been a disaster as has the remainder of the equipment which will only work if the coordinates are inputted by a western army as when they sold the systems to foreign army's they would not relinquish control of them as they could be used against us forces otherwise --so the Russians now know each missile is fired and targeted by troops from the USA as nobody else is permitted the tech to fire them.
the brits do not possess more than one modern aircraft carrier and it has to be towed in an out of port due to its bullshit technology failing on a weekly basis .
it is an embarrassment and they do not possess modern bombers or fighter aircraft capable of taking on the Russians .
England if wise would seek to be a country which maintained a defensive army not a world power as previous technology allowed -- the people of Gaza used stones in slings and they would stab an Israeli when they could -- the Israelis used every technology on earth against them and they did not defeat them .
the Israelis can murder women and children but put them or the British up against Russians REAL TROOPS who are fighting for the survival of Russia.
who would fight paid mercenaries/conscripts taken from the bored and illiterate penniless layabouts of the shopping malls of America where it is admitted most of the recruits come from.
America does not have an army capable of fighting the Russians if you take out the airborne and the marines --the remainder are not an army .
they have polluted the ranks and made a mockery of their armed forces with high ranking transgender officers who brand the army as mentally ill misfits in skirts .
the first you would have to shoot would be your own if you were going to war today.
 
money and politics have changed the British army and they no longer have equipment/personnel which functions in the modern world .
when you look at their equipment it was good for suppressing a revolt in Kenya or similar where nobody had a armored car or rifle bigger than 303 caliber .
their ferret armored cars has six cyl petrol jag car engines and axles off dump trucks --when nobody had similar or better technology it was fine nobody noticed .
this thinking has lasted and the wartime practice of making a zillion crap bedford lorries as they were going to be blown up any way and if they lasted a year that was enough --this practice and the thinking are suitable for the 1940s only.
today the Russians face the best western technology --abrambs tanks powered by an aircraft turbine kerosene guzzling engine of GALLONS PER MILE -technology and you need a vast shed full of diagnostic equipment and hundreds of highly trained specialists to keep this aircraft/tank bullshit going.
it has been a disaster as has the remainder of the equipment which will only work if the coordinates are inputted by a western army as when they sold the systems to foreign army's they would not relinquish control of them as they could be used against us forces otherwise --so the Russians now know each missile is fired and targeted by troops from the USA as nobody else is permitted the tech to fire them.
the brits do not possess more than one modern aircraft carrier and it has to be towed in an out of port due to its bullshit technology failing on a weekly basis .
it is an embarrassment and they do not possess modern bombers or fighter aircraft capable of taking on the Russians .
England if wise would seek to be a country which maintained a defensive army not a world power as previous technology allowed -- the people of Gaza used stones in slings and they would stab an Israeli when they could -- the Israelis used every technology on earth against them and they did not defeat them .
the Israelis can murder women and children but put them or the British up against Russians REAL TROOPS who are fighting for the survival of Russia.
who would fight paid mercenaries/conscripts taken from the bored and illiterate penniless layabouts of the shopping malls of America where it is admitted most of the recruits come from.
America does not have an army capable of fighting the Russians if you take out the airborne and the marines --the remainder are not an army .
they have polluted the ranks and made a mockery of their armed forces with high ranking transgender officers who brand the army as mentally ill misfits in skirts .
the first you would have to shoot would be your own if you were going to war today.

You make strong points however I would not underestimate the capacity for irrationality of the UK Elites- especially when they can get a pat on the head from the Yanks for it. Plus Starmer seems very keen to prove just how "Patriotic" and "Loyal" the Labour Party is now.

Hatred of Russia is one of the things also that unites the likes of Douglas Murray and Boris Johnson on the Right and the likes of George Manibot and Paul Mason on the Left.
 
You make strong points however I would not underestimate the capacity for irrationality of the UK Elites- especially when they can get a pat on the head from the Yanks for it. Plus Starmer seems very keen to prove just how "Patriotic" and "Loyal" the Labour Party is now.

Hatred of Russia is one of the things also that unites the likes of Douglas Murray and Boris Johnson on the Right and the likes of George Manibot and Paul Mason on the Left.
There is no hatred of Russia amongst the Eton elite,
they are simply well paid mercenaries of those who really hate the Russians --.
the askenazi Russians who were confined to THE PALE OF SETTLEMENT for centuries as they were too dangerous to admit to general Russian society . they were confined to murdering and robbing each other for centuries,
and that is the only solution for them today as they destroy any society they are allowed into .
today they are known as the Zionists/ donors/Neo cons and they want revenge -
-they have already killed a 100 million Russians in 1917 ish and a further 11 million in the 1990s oligarch war -
-nothing will satisfy their blood lust -- nothing - not even another 100 million dead/starving Russians .
 
Last edited:
You make strong points however I would not underestimate the capacity for irrationality of the UK Elites- especially when they can get a pat on the head from the Yanks for it. Plus Starmer seems very keen to prove just how "Patriotic" and "Loyal" the Labour Party is now.

Hatred of Russia is one of the things also that unites the likes of Douglas Murray and Boris Johnson on the Right and the likes of George Manibot and Paul Mason on the Left.
I’m puzzled as to why the British establishment should hate the Russians, distrust yes, but I’m not sure that runs to any great passion.
 
I’m puzzled as to why the British establishment should hate the Russians, distrust yes, but I’m not sure that runs to any great passion.

With George Manibot and Paul Mason I suspect that it is weird Oedipal stuff that makes them associate Russian and Russianness with the a negative archetypal father image and with Douglas Murray it comes down to his militant homosexualism, the importance for politics in the contemporary West of the "Gay Liberation" movement's hatred of Eurasia in general and Russia in particular is underestimated- however with the likes of Boris Johnson I really don't know. Neither Enoch Powell or Maurice Cowling had any hatred of the Russians and in fact Enoch Powell was something of a Russophile.
 
With George Manibot and Paul Mason I suspect that it is weird Oedipal stuff that makes them associate Russian and Russianness with the a negative archetypal father image and with Douglas Murray it comes down to his militant homosexualism, the importance for politics in the contemporary West of the "Gay Liberation" movement's hatred of Eurasia in general and Russia in particular is underestimated- however with the likes of Boris Johnson I really don't know. Neither Enoch Powell or Maurice Cowling had any hatred of the Russians and in fact Enoch Powell was something of a Russophile.
Yet doesn’t Russia pay greater homage to the mother figure? Germany is all about the fatherland but the Volga is seen as nursing the country it flows through, or that is the way I understood it.

I see Russia as a big tough country where survival has more to do with ensuring the health of small rural communities than fussing over little darlings with delicate egos, that’s very much the preserve of the metropolis.

I think what we are agreeing on here is that there may not be a general consensus on how to view Russia, it is very much an individual’s choice and any antagonism that may be encouraged by the establishment has more to do with money and the interests of Zionism than it has a widely held detestation.
 
Yet doesn’t Russia pay greater homage to the mother figure? Germany is all about the fatherland but the Volga is seen as nursing the country it flows through, or that is the way I understood it.

I see Russia as a big tough country where survival has more to do with ensuring the health of small rural communities than fussing over little darlings with delicate egos, that’s very much the preserve of the metropolis.

True- and Russians can get very sentimental and emotional. This is not really though to do with Russians in and of themselves but how they are percieved by others.
 
Russia is a very strong, hugely resource rich predominantly Christian country that stands up to US warmongering, opposes woke LGBQT nonsense and doesn't let global financiers in to poison its politics and rape it of its wealth.

That's why the British establishment are instructed to hate it!
 
With George Manibot and Paul Mason I suspect that it is weird Oedipal stuff that makes them associate Russian and Russianness with the a negative archetypal father image and with Douglas Murray it comes down to his militant homosexualism, the importance for politics in the contemporary West of the "Gay Liberation" movement's hatred of Eurasia in general and Russia in particular is underestimated- however with the likes of Boris Johnson I really don't know. Neither Enoch Powell or Maurice Cowling had any hatred of the Russians and in fact Enoch Powell was something of a Russophile.
Tucker Carlson and colonel MC Gregor examined Boris johnstons intervention with peace talks which zelenksy had agreed in outline to,
but not signed.
and it was established that ""THE DONORS "" In the USA were the people who employed Johnston to visit zelenksy as it was judged that a figure prominent and immoral enough to do the bidding of the donors would show to zelenksy that the gravy train would continue to him personally and his senior staff/military everyone would get ga ga rich as it was the money of the poor of America which the donors had access to as they owned the congress and everyone in it except massey and owens .
they could promise and deliver all they needed was a prominent figure with no morals what so ever to explain it to zelenksy .
Zelenksys wife we are told spent 2 million last week buying a Bugatti and there is a video of a black girl which she had got fired from some famous usa store and this black girl recorded the outragous purchases of jewlerry .
this is the most corrupt country on earth and the donors have decided it is their to play with to see can they destabilise Russia and rob it using the billions of poor peoples money which the poor have no control over in the good old USA who are hitting 34 TRILLION DEBT THIS WEEK MOSTLY INCURRED FIGHTING WARS FOR THE DONORS/ISRAEL.
 
Yes SIR!

100.webp
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom