Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 130822" data-attributes="member: 353">I get it perfectly—you’re just recycling outdated dogma and mistaking it for discovery.Your reply is a marvel of modern scientistic superstition—dressed in lab-coat jargon and seasoned with smugness, but at its core, it’s still the same old pagan fable of chaos birthing order. You repeat, with the earnestness of a novitiate in the Darwinian cult, that ‘mutations write DNA’—as if a typographical error somehow authors a novel. That’s not science, friend, that’s metaphysics for materialists. Or more precisely: mythology for men who fancy themselves too rational for Genesis but still believe in miracles—just so long as the miracles are random and purposeless.Yes, mutations alter DNA. But this is like saying vandalism alters architecture. It’s trivially true—and scientifically useless. The central question isn’t whether mutations happen, but whether they generate new, coordinated biological systems. Can they build eyes, wings, or the molecular machinery of intracellular transport? No. What you’re defending isn’t biology—it’s biological alchemy: the transmutation of gibberish into genetic gold by the blind forces of time and chance, sanctified by peer review.You declare, with great confidence and little comprehension, that nature 'creates new traits.' What you fail to understand—or perhaps hope your audience doesn’t—is that creation implies coding, coordination, and purpose. These are not the fruit of entropy. No matter how you dress it up, natural selection is not a creative force—it’s an editor, not an author. It can kill off the unfit, but it cannot invent fitness. It’s a winnowing fork, not a wand.You sneer about creationists as if you’re wielding a scalpel. But it’s a dull one. In your worldview, intelligence is an illusion, morality is a fluke, and consciousness is an evolutionary hiccup—yet you speak as if reason itself is on your side. That’s the real comedy here: a man denying design while using his rational mind (which he insists is the product of irrational processes) to argue against rational design.</blockquote>

Name

Verification: Does Doxxie know his real father.

Latest Threads

S
Is the State trying to bankrupt the Irish Catholic Church?
- Started by scolairebocht
- Friday at 9:15 AM
- Replies: 4
Scholairebochts Blog.
How Dangerous is Israel?
- Started by Anderson
- Thursday at 4:04 AM
- Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
- Started by Anderson
- Wednesday at 3:29 PM
- Replies: 217
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
- Started by Jay Homer Simpson
- Wednesday at 12:30 PM
- Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
- Started by BelfastRatepayer
- Sep 6, 2025
- Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics

Popular Threads

Ukraine.
- Started by Declan
- Feb 21, 2022
- Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
- Started by jpc
- Nov 7, 2022
- Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
- Started by Anderson
- Feb 26, 2023
- Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
- Started by Charlene
- Sep 14, 2021
- Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
- Started by Declan
- Dec 30, 2024
- Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
- Started by Anderson
- Jul 29, 2022
- Replies: 2K
Climate Change