Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 130858" data-attributes="member: 353"><p>Is it that 'time of the month' Fishy? You seem very emotional. </p><p></p><p>What a screed, all heat and no light. </p><p></p><p>You’ve mistaken invective for intellect, and in doing so, exposed far more about yourself than you intended. What you’ve written isn’t a rebuttal — it’s a meltdown. A tempest of sneering adjectives and psychiatric projections — ‘rabble,’ ‘fanatical midwit,’ ‘Catholic caliphate’ — as if frothing contempt could disguise the vacuum where your scientific argument was supposed to be.</p><p></p><p>You parade terms like ‘natural systems’ and ‘ecology’ as though invoking the sacred liturgy of Darwinian orthodoxy exempts you from presenting evidence. It does not. The crux remains: mutations do not write blueprints. They corrupt them. Variation within kinds is not evidence for the genesis of kinds. The spectrum of eyes across species is not proof of blind craftsmanship — it’s the fingerprint of purposeful variation within design, not chaotic ascent from blindness. You’re mistaking cataloguing for causation.</p><p></p><p>You accuse me of being disinterested in the natural world, and yet it is I — not you — who defends the inherent meaning, beauty, and intelligibility of that world. You would have us believe the entire symphony of life was conducted by a deaf, drunk orchestra with no conductor, no sheet music, and no audience. You call that science. I call it the myth of the machine — a mechanistic cosmogony passed off as reason, but kept alive only by repression of the metaphysical and denial of the obvious.</p><p></p><p>And then, your mask slips completely: you reveal that what truly bothers you is not biology, but <em>Catholicism</em>. Not mutations, but Tradition. Your screed against 'Catholics like me' is the language of ideological control. You don't want truth — you want compliance. You want a domesticated religion, one that apologizes for its creeds and genuflects before your liberal sensibilities. That, sir, is not Christianity — it is cultural Marxism in a cassock.</p><p></p><p>Your final eh....blow — 'Nobody’s listening to you' — is not an argument, it is a marketing memo. You mistake popularity for truth, and consensus for authority. That’s the mindset of every regime that ever burned a heretic, banned a book, or silenced a dissenter. And you stand with them — not with the truth, but with the mob. </p><p></p><p>You’re not defending science. You’re defending the official mythology of the modern West — and like all state-approved myths, it cannot withstand real scrutiny. That’s why you resort to mockery instead of logic, derision instead of data. Because once the spell breaks, everyone can see the emperor has no genes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 130858, member: 353"] Is it that 'time of the month' Fishy? You seem very emotional. What a screed, all heat and no light. You’ve mistaken invective for intellect, and in doing so, exposed far more about yourself than you intended. What you’ve written isn’t a rebuttal — it’s a meltdown. A tempest of sneering adjectives and psychiatric projections — ‘rabble,’ ‘fanatical midwit,’ ‘Catholic caliphate’ — as if frothing contempt could disguise the vacuum where your scientific argument was supposed to be. You parade terms like ‘natural systems’ and ‘ecology’ as though invoking the sacred liturgy of Darwinian orthodoxy exempts you from presenting evidence. It does not. The crux remains: mutations do not write blueprints. They corrupt them. Variation within kinds is not evidence for the genesis of kinds. The spectrum of eyes across species is not proof of blind craftsmanship — it’s the fingerprint of purposeful variation within design, not chaotic ascent from blindness. You’re mistaking cataloguing for causation. You accuse me of being disinterested in the natural world, and yet it is I — not you — who defends the inherent meaning, beauty, and intelligibility of that world. You would have us believe the entire symphony of life was conducted by a deaf, drunk orchestra with no conductor, no sheet music, and no audience. You call that science. I call it the myth of the machine — a mechanistic cosmogony passed off as reason, but kept alive only by repression of the metaphysical and denial of the obvious. And then, your mask slips completely: you reveal that what truly bothers you is not biology, but [I]Catholicism[/I]. Not mutations, but Tradition. Your screed against 'Catholics like me' is the language of ideological control. You don't want truth — you want compliance. You want a domesticated religion, one that apologizes for its creeds and genuflects before your liberal sensibilities. That, sir, is not Christianity — it is cultural Marxism in a cassock. Your final eh....blow — 'Nobody’s listening to you' — is not an argument, it is a marketing memo. You mistake popularity for truth, and consensus for authority. That’s the mindset of every regime that ever burned a heretic, banned a book, or silenced a dissenter. And you stand with them — not with the truth, but with the mob. You’re not defending science. You’re defending the official mythology of the modern West — and like all state-approved myths, it cannot withstand real scrutiny. That’s why you resort to mockery instead of logic, derision instead of data. Because once the spell breaks, everyone can see the emperor has no genes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
S
Is the State trying to bankrupt the Irish Catholic Church?
Started by scolairebocht
Friday at 9:15 AM
Replies: 4
Scholairebochts Blog.
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Thursday at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Wednesday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 217
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Wednesday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Sep 6, 2025
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
Top
Bottom