Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 64769" data-attributes="member: 353"><p>Tank, we all know your posting style (frenetic googling to find confirmation bias based information) and how little effort you go into trying to stand your ground on stuff you’ve posted. Can I ask that you refrain from that here and try to give some consideration to what you post and be prepared to back it up.</p><p></p><p>For example you jumped in underpants first with your Smithsonian article on the fossil record for human evolution thinking that you had a home run.</p><p></p><p>Then, when I started to challenge it, my guess is that you googled it again and realised you may not be on the solid ground you thought you were on and quickly changed tact and deflected with a ‘oh look how complicated it is’ article. An article glued together with speculation and not backed up by concrete evidence.</p><p></p><p>The article states that conditions under which HomoSapiens originated in Africa involved interconnected subgroups and this played a role in adaptability. This presented as fact but with no supporting evidence. It’s storytelling.</p><p></p><p>The article did acknowledge ‘gaps in our understanding’, especially behind the development of humans having large brains.</p><p></p><p>In the pursuit of a more accurate understanding of our past, it’s crucial to maintain a distinction between established facts, informed speculation and good old fashioned speculation.</p><p></p><p>The article also talked about interbreeding with other ‘hominid species’. There is no available evidence for this speculation. The article portrays it as established fact.</p><p></p><p>In addition to that you brought dog breeding and a magic telescope that can see into the distant past into the mix as evidence for your belief in evolution.</p><p></p><p>All in all, not a good day for you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 64769, member: 353"] Tank, we all know your posting style (frenetic googling to find confirmation bias based information) and how little effort you go into trying to stand your ground on stuff you’ve posted. Can I ask that you refrain from that here and try to give some consideration to what you post and be prepared to back it up. For example you jumped in underpants first with your Smithsonian article on the fossil record for human evolution thinking that you had a home run. Then, when I started to challenge it, my guess is that you googled it again and realised you may not be on the solid ground you thought you were on and quickly changed tact and deflected with a ‘oh look how complicated it is’ article. An article glued together with speculation and not backed up by concrete evidence. The article states that conditions under which HomoSapiens originated in Africa involved interconnected subgroups and this played a role in adaptability. This presented as fact but with no supporting evidence. It’s storytelling. The article did acknowledge ‘gaps in our understanding’, especially behind the development of humans having large brains. In the pursuit of a more accurate understanding of our past, it’s crucial to maintain a distinction between established facts, informed speculation and good old fashioned speculation. The article also talked about interbreeding with other ‘hominid species’. There is no available evidence for this speculation. The article portrays it as established fact. In addition to that you brought dog breeding and a magic telescope that can see into the distant past into the mix as evidence for your belief in evolution. All in all, not a good day for you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 112
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Tiger Blog
Origins Thread
Top
Bottom