Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
USA
Pentagon orders rare, urgent meeting of hundreds of generals, admiral
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haven" data-source="post: 144636" data-attributes="member: 5537"><p>The problem with that is that there is no way for anyone to keep it limited. Once nukes are used, a rubicon is crossed. Whats to stop gradual escalation? In that case you might as well escalate right away to all out war and try to destroy your opponent outright.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.apln.network/news/member_activities/dissecting-the-idea-of-limited-nuclear-war[/URL]</p><p></p><p>"Indeed, the adversary can never know or be sure that the intent is to keep the nuclear use limited and that the first volley will not be followed by more, especially since the first user would also be signalling readiness for more attacks to deter the adversary’s retaliation. If the adversary chooses a more elaborate response than had been envisioned by the first user, could this then remain a limited exchange?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haven, post: 144636, member: 5537"] The problem with that is that there is no way for anyone to keep it limited. Once nukes are used, a rubicon is crossed. Whats to stop gradual escalation? In that case you might as well escalate right away to all out war and try to destroy your opponent outright. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.apln.network/news/member_activities/dissecting-the-idea-of-limited-nuclear-war[/URL] "Indeed, the adversary can never know or be sure that the intent is to keep the nuclear use limited and that the first volley will not be followed by more, especially since the first user would also be signalling readiness for more attacks to deter the adversary’s retaliation. If the adversary chooses a more elaborate response than had been envisioned by the first user, could this then remain a limited exchange?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
Pentagon orders rare, urgent meeting of hundreds of generals, admiral
Started by Anderson
Today at 10:47 AM
Replies: 36
USA
Retailers and communities on the 'chaos' of anti-social behaviour
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:36 AM
Replies: 5
Ireland
Is Irish Literature inherently Left-Wing?
Started by céline
Sunday at 1:58 PM
Replies: 2
Ireland
Ideas to broaden the appeal of Sarsfields and get it noticed.
Started by Anderson
Sep 18, 2025
Replies: 14
Public Chat and Announcements
The Tiger Challenge
Started by AN2
Sep 17, 2025
Replies: 53
Public Chat and Announcements
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
USA
Pentagon orders rare, urgent meeting of hundreds of generals, admiral
Top
Bottom