Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nationalist
World at War
Ukraine.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A Man Called Charolais" data-source="post: 82922"><p>These would be relatively inexpensive aircraft that would be guided onto the target by air control, it would require skill alright but they could probably swing it. The debris question was undoubtedly an issue when propeller driver aircraft were the standard fare and I'm not sure that it's not a red herring given the numerous dogfights in those days. The significant problem with the jet aircraft is that they're moving so fast that they zip through the debris field - a Harrier or Sky Warden wouldn't have that problem as they could loiter at lower speeds.</p><p></p><p>Running a few attack helicopters near large urban areas would be cheaper than expending patriot missiles on drones; propeller driven aircraft could be used further out to reduce numbers of incoming. It's about running an effective air defense on a tight budget. I realise that there's a lot of graft involved so there's pressure to run it like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_Heat_Incentive_scandal" target="_blank">the RHI scheme</a> but needs must given constraints. An alternative is to shrug their shoulders and let them through.</p><p></p><p>It would also keep some Ukrainian pilots alive and doing something useful. There's a habit in Eastern Europe of needing the fill the numbers of killed and injured for the monthly report that might be diverted into a more constructive management of field assets.</p><p></p><p>I take your point about the Sparrow (Fox 1) but the aircraft has to keep its radar on and directed at the target so it plays an indispensable role. It essentially guides the missile onto the target like a laser designator for smart munitions. This makes it a less desirable armament on the contemporary battlefield for engagements other than those relating to the shooting down of crippled or soft targets. The Americans also have a lot of these in storage and I'm pretty certain that, if they're within 10 miles, they have a firm lock on them. One USMC pilot managed to get seven intercepts so it must be feasible.</p><p></p><p>In any case, there still is a Ukrainian air force and, given the pressure they're under to make irrational decisions to maximise the skim for the "bosses" (in the same manner that operates in the Russian forces) they've done very well. The more I elaborate on this subject, the more likely I am to propose something that would be evidently ridiculous to them. I'll leave it to them to figure out. The only benefit I could make is to coax the politicals to take a more creative approach and it's unlikely that this conversation is going to be picked up by the international press so it's more of an exercise in curiosity than anything else.</p><p></p><p>As for the "<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tj_R8e0SiQ" target="_blank">firing rockets from power stations in Kiev</a>" line - is that something like <a href="https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-agitprop-definition/" target="_blank">the bridge you have for sale</a>?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A Man Called Charolais, post: 82922"] These would be relatively inexpensive aircraft that would be guided onto the target by air control, it would require skill alright but they could probably swing it. The debris question was undoubtedly an issue when propeller driver aircraft were the standard fare and I'm not sure that it's not a red herring given the numerous dogfights in those days. The significant problem with the jet aircraft is that they're moving so fast that they zip through the debris field - a Harrier or Sky Warden wouldn't have that problem as they could loiter at lower speeds. Running a few attack helicopters near large urban areas would be cheaper than expending patriot missiles on drones; propeller driven aircraft could be used further out to reduce numbers of incoming. It's about running an effective air defense on a tight budget. I realise that there's a lot of graft involved so there's pressure to run it like [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renewable_Heat_Incentive_scandal']the RHI scheme[/URL] but needs must given constraints. An alternative is to shrug their shoulders and let them through. It would also keep some Ukrainian pilots alive and doing something useful. There's a habit in Eastern Europe of needing the fill the numbers of killed and injured for the monthly report that might be diverted into a more constructive management of field assets. I take your point about the Sparrow (Fox 1) but the aircraft has to keep its radar on and directed at the target so it plays an indispensable role. It essentially guides the missile onto the target like a laser designator for smart munitions. This makes it a less desirable armament on the contemporary battlefield for engagements other than those relating to the shooting down of crippled or soft targets. The Americans also have a lot of these in storage and I'm pretty certain that, if they're within 10 miles, they have a firm lock on them. One USMC pilot managed to get seven intercepts so it must be feasible. In any case, there still is a Ukrainian air force and, given the pressure they're under to make irrational decisions to maximise the skim for the "bosses" (in the same manner that operates in the Russian forces) they've done very well. The more I elaborate on this subject, the more likely I am to propose something that would be evidently ridiculous to them. I'll leave it to them to figure out. The only benefit I could make is to coax the politicals to take a more creative approach and it's unlikely that this conversation is going to be picked up by the international press so it's more of an exercise in curiosity than anything else. As for the "[URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tj_R8e0SiQ']firing rockets from power stations in Kiev[/URL]" line - is that something like [URL='https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-agitprop-definition/']the bridge you have for sale[/URL]? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
A Million Views.
Started by Declan
Saturday at 10:54 PM
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
An Open Letter to SwordOfStZip
Started by AN2
Oct 11, 2025
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
C
athletics
Started by céline
Oct 8, 2025
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
S
The real agenda in this Presidential Election?
Started by scolairebocht
Oct 6, 2025
Replies: 11
Scholairebochts Blog.
J
Varadkar "confronted by far right" while walking down street inDublin
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Oct 2, 2025
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Nationalist
World at War
Ukraine.
Top
Bottom