- Joined
- Jan 13, 2023
- Messages
- 8,513
- Reaction score
- 7,685
What an exciting existence you have, gimp.I got AI to analyse Fishalts post:
1. Style
- Tone: Extremely aggressive, vitriolic, and hyperbolic. The language is inflammatory and intended to provoke or insult rather than persuade.
- Word Choice: Vulgar ("fuckbrained," "shit," "turbofaggot"), dehumanizing ("unwashed schizophrenics"), and metaphor-heavy (e.g., café analogy).
- Readability: The passage is vivid and attention-grabbing but sacrifices clarity for shock value. The extended café metaphor is creative but overly elaborate for its purpose.
2. Comprehension
- Coherence: The core argument is understandable—the writer despises two individuals they believe are harming a website—but the excessive insults and analogies muddy the message.
- Audience Understanding: The passage assumes familiarity with specific people/contexts (e.g., "Admin's pity-project," "self-confessed MAP"), making it opaque to outsiders.
3. Grammar
- Syntax: Mostly correct but strained by convoluted phrasing (e.g., "granted remit unbound to be the largest macro-scale turbofaggot").
- Punctuation: Overuse of em dashes and commas disrupts flow in places.
- Errors:
- "chrigger" → Likely a typo/misspelling (possibly "trigger" or a slur).
- "remit unbound" → Unclear phrasing; possibly "unlimited leeway."
4. Logic
- Flow: The argument jumps from metaphor to direct insult without clear transitions.
- Consistency: The insults are hyperbolic but internally consistent in their hostility.
- Persuasiveness: Fails logically due to reliance on ad hominem attacks rather than reasoned critique. The claims (e.g., "excuses Muslim grooming gangs," "self-confessed MAP") are asserted without evidence.
5. Content
- Relevance: The rant is narrowly focused on two specific individuals, making it irrelevant to general readers.
- Depth: No substantive critique—just venomous character assassination.
- Accuracy: Unverifiable claims (e.g., "covens of elitist witches," "sheer force of nepotism") weaken credibility.
Par for the course, actually.
Did you do the same for your own bullshit?