- Joined
- Mar 13, 2023
- Messages
- 2,419
- Reaction score
- 2,692
Nothing ever happens
Nothing ever happens
I feel like nobody is talking about the main issue here, and that's the reason why the bombers were vulnerable in the first place. The reason being that Russia signed a treaty with the US signed in 2010. Under that agreement, strategic bombers must be kept in open air bases and be visible, at least at some depots. These happen to be some of the depots that were attacked by the drone swarm. Russia was given a guarantee that the US and its friends and allies would never take advantage of this arrangement and use the data gained thereby to attack these bases.
Assume thats true. Only the US has the capacity to cover all Russian airfields by satellite, at the same time. Note the Russians moved bombers just days before. Only the US could reliably provide that specific, time sensitive, information.So while the attacks are a loss for Russia, they're also another loss for the US' reputation. Predictably, the usual spooks and warhawks and spooks on the US side are going to whine about Russia breaking the treat first or something akin to that, but the fact remains that NATO doubtless gave the intel to AFU.
Pretty much on the nail wrt the reality of Europe.Western Europe has lost the plot – but still plays with fire
Macron speaks, Merz contradicts, and the EU drifts into irrelevance
By Timofey Bordachev, Program Director of the Valdai Club
![]()
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, left, walks with French President Emmanuel Macron. © Ludovic Marin / Pool via AP
Modern Western Europe is quickly becoming a real-world demonstration of Hegel’s famous dictum – that history repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. In the past, the missteps of its leaders could be seen as awkward but forgivable moments against the backdrop of a still-coherent West. Today, farce is becoming the default operating mode for the region’s political elite.
Whether the antics come from small states like Estonia or from former heavyweights like Germany, France, and Britain, the effect is the same: Europe, or more precisely the European Union and its close NATO-aligned partners in the West, is no longer behaving like a serious geopolitical actor. What was once merely weakness has become a lifestyle – a self-parodying style of politics defined by empty declarations, theatrical gestures, and media spectacle.
The reasons are not difficult to identify. Western Europe has lost its strategic compass. What we’re witnessing now, unfolding near Russia’s borders, is a crisis of direction with no clear destination. Recent developments, in fact, would have seemed unimaginable even a few years ago.
In the space of just a few weeks, the leaders of the EU’s most prominent countries issued ultimatums to Russia – with no thought as to what they might do if Moscow ignored them. Unsurprisingly, the efforts of the four most vocal backers of Ukraine – Britain, Germany, France, and Poland – collapsed into rhetorical theater with no follow-through.
Estonia, never one to miss a moment for posturing, saw a group of its sailors attempt to seize a foreign ship en route to St. Petersburg. The move, swiftly rebuffed by the Russian military, triggered a political scandal back in Tallinn – though perhaps not the kind they’d hoped for.
In Paris, President Emmanuel Macron continues to rely on dramatic pronouncements to remain in the spotlight. In Berlin, newly appointed Chancellor Friedrich Merz declared that Ukrainian forces were permitted to strike Russian cities with Western missiles – only to be contradicted hours later by his own finance minister. As for the long-touted “peacekeeper deployment plan” pushed by Paris and London, European media finally admitted what had been obvious for months: the plan is dead, lacking support from Washington.
Some of this, admittedly, stems from a media environment that has grown dangerously overheated. Western news outlets now thrive on alarmism, churning out a steady stream of war talk and pushing politicians to match the rhetoric. Since the launch of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine, media across the Atlantic and in Brussels have played the role of propagandist, not watchdog.
But the problem runs deeper than headlines. Europe’s political class has drifted into a world of abstraction, where politics has become an intellectual game – untethered from real capabilities or consequences. In some cases, the farce is provincial, as with Estonia’s attempted maritime stunt. In others, it is cloaked in academic posturing, such as the wordy performances Macron delivers with the help of philosophically literate aides.
In all cases, one truth emerges: the European Union and its near partners are no longer serious actors in world affairs. They are still loud, still self-important, but no longer decisive. Their actions do not shift the global balance. The only real questions now are how long this detachment from reality can persist, and what the next stage of decline will look like.
This is not a matter of personalities or party lines. Whether globalist liberals or national conservatives take charge in Europe, the result is increasingly similar. Right-wing governments that replace the establishment often prove just as erratic and symbolic in their behavior.
What makes this transformation even more surreal is that Europe still has the ability to turn its politics into a spectacle. Many of its politicians – or at least their speechwriters – are highly educated. Macron’s speeches, rich in historical and philosophical references, are products of minds trained at the best institutions. Once, such intelligence was used to shape policy and outplay rivals like Russia. Now, it produces only clever phrasing for empty statements
Macron, of course, helped set the tone when he declared NATO “brain dead” back in 2019 – a remark that was amusing at the time. But after the laughter faded, Western Europe began churning out similarly dramatic slogans, each more detached than the last. The British followed suit. Now the Germans are joining the script.
More troubling than the words, though, is the lack of accountability for them. European leaders say much and do little – and when they do act, it is often misguided. Worse, they seem genuinely unaware of how their provocations are perceived outside their own echo chamber. What looks absurd in Moscow, Beijing, or even some quarters of Washington, is seen in Brussels or Berlin as noble posturing. These leaders are living in a different dimension, but the rest of us still have to engage with their declarations, however disconnected from reality.
And while it is tempting to dismiss this as just another European drama, the risks are real. Britain and France still possess nuclear capabilities. The EU’s economy, while faltering, retains global influence. Even the smallest states – like Estonia – can trigger crises that draw in larger powers. The Baltic naval stunt may have been primitive theater, but under the wrong conditions, even small acts of political play-acting can spiral into genuine danger.
No one seriously believes the United States is prepared to defend its European satellites at the cost of war with Russia. But given the destructive power of both Russian and American arsenals, even the faintest chance of escalation must be treated seriously – even if Western Europe itself has lost the ability to understand the consequences of its actions.
Ironically, Poland – once one of the most loudly anti-Russian voices in Europe – now appears almost restrained compared to the behavior of France, Germany, or Britain. In recent years, Warsaw has moved toward a more conservative, if still adversarial, stance – offering a rare glimpse of something resembling balance.
In the last century, Western Europe unleashed two of the most devastating wars in human history. Today, it plays at war once again – but with less awareness, less responsibility, and far less capacity. The danger lies not in its strength, but in its delusions. This is not Liechtenstein brandishing a sabre. These are nations with real armies, real missiles, and an increasingly fragile grasp on reality.
If there is to be stability in Europe’s future, it must start with accepting the truth of the present. The continent is no longer the center of world politics. The logical next step is to strip Western Europe of the destructive capabilities it no longer knows how to wield. Demilitarization is not humiliation. It is realism – and the only way to bring Europe’s role back in line with its actual relevance.
Only if you believe western MSM propaganda.....And here is some deranged thinking from Moscow..,
![]()
Putin urged to attack 3 European countries imminently - 'We must destroy them'
Vladimir Solovyov says three countries in Europe should be destroyed by Russia before they arm themselves further.www.express.co.uk
The UK has sent most of its weapons to Zitler who in turn has sold them on the black market to scum in Africa etc.So the UK is on a war footing, building factories, building up their army size. Are we heading towards WW3?
The English press has used this propaganda tack since the Crimea war in the 1850s.And here is some deranged thinking from Moscow..,
![]()
Putin urged to attack 3 European countries imminently - 'We must destroy them'
Vladimir Solovyov says three countries in Europe should be destroyed by Russia before they arm themselves further.www.express.co.uk
Another kraut with grand daddy issues.Another wannabee Nazi piping up as Germany commits economic suicide.
Germany should expel all Russian diplomats – senior MP
The Russian House – a cultural and linguistic center in Berlin – should also be shut down, Roderich Kiesewetter has stated
![]()
FILE PHOTO: German MP Roderich Kiesewetter. © Global Look Press / IMAGO / Tanel Meos
A senior German lawmaker has called on Berlin to effectively cut diplomatic ties with Moscow to combat the “hybrid” threats he claims come from Russia.
“We should expel any remaining… diplomats,” Roderich Kiesewetter, known for his hardline anti-Russian stance, told Handelsblatt on Tuesday. He argued that doing so would help reduce Moscow’s influence in Germany.
According to Kiesewetter, Germany is currently “inadequately protected against cyberattacks,” which he claims “primarily” originate from Russia. He specifically accused Moscow of attempting to “change public opinion in Germany” through such actions. He also accused China, North Korea, and Iran of launching “hacking attacks.”
The list of countermeasures suggested by the MP includes establishing a special government agency to refute disinformation or combat it “through hybrid activities,” banning Russian tourists and journalists from entering Germany, shutting down “propaganda portals,” and deleting any social media accounts deemed suspicious by the authorities.
The lawmaker also called for the closure of the Russian House – a center in Berlin run by the Russian government agency Rossotrudnichestvo that holds cultural events and offers language courses – labeling it a network of Russian “influence.”
Moscow has warned that the expulsion of diplomats would be met with a tit-for-tat response. “Berlin must have been missing the German diplomats,” Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told Lenta.ru.
Rossotrudnichestvo blasted Kiesewetter’s words as “absurd.” They “have nothing to do with reality,” the agency’s spokesman said, adding that the MP “knows nothing about the activities of the Russian House in Berlin and has never been there.”
The head of the Russian House also told TASS that such rhetoric “does not foster international dialogue” and only “strengthens the atmosphere of distrust, incites hatred and animosity.”
Last year, Kiesewetter caused a stir in Germany by stating that Berlin should “take the war to Russia” and “do everything possible to enable Ukraine to destroy… ministries, command posts” on Russian territory. He is also an active supporter of supplying Kiev with Taurus missiles, which have a range of 500km and could reach Moscow.
The interview comes as Berlin has taken an even more hardline position on Russia under new Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Since taking office, Merz has lifted range restrictions on Ukrainian strikes with German-supplied missiles and hinted at the possibility of sending Taurus missiles to Kiev. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said in response that Berlin’s “direct involvement in the war is now obvious.”
And why would they let a few drone strikes behind the lines distract from their ground operations.It seems that the response has not been delivered yet so we must wait a few days more. But in the meantime, the reports everyday says the Russians have advanced on almost all places. They ate now moving west after crossing into Sumy oblast. Why would they ever give up this new territory
Zelensky is the kid in the playground pulling silly faces at the adults in the room.Kiev regime ‘not interested in peace,’ turning to terror, suffering ‘huge losses’ on battlefield: Key points from Putin’s speech
Ukraine’s leadership is derailing peace process in order to cling to power, according to the Russian president
![]()
Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the government via videoconference. © Sputnik / Gavriil Grigorov
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine’s leadership of carrying out terrorist attacks on Russian territory in order to derail peace efforts, which he said threaten the Kiev regime’s grip on power.
Speaking at a government meeting on Wednesday, Putin said the recent sabotage of railway infrastructure in Russia’s Bryansk and Kursk Regions was a deliberate strike on civilians intended to disrupt the negotiations.
Kiev’s backers have become “accomplices to terrorists”
Putin said the attacks were the result of decisions made by Ukraine’s top political leadership, calling them “undoubtedly a terrorist act.”
“This only confirms our concern that the already illegitimate regime in Kiev, which once seized power, is gradually turning into a terrorist organization, and its sponsors are becoming accomplices to terrorists,” he said.
The two incidents occurred on Saturday evening and Sunday morning. In Bryansk Region, a bridge collapsed in front of a moving passenger train. In Kursk Region, a freight train derailed when a railway bridge gave way. In total, seven people died and over 120 were injured.
“Under all international norms, such actions are called terrorism,” Putin said.
Ukraine’s battlefield losses
The Russian president accused Kiev and its Western backers of previously aiming to inflict a strategic defeat of Russia on the battlefield. Now, he said, the country’s leadership is shifting tactics amid mounting losses and as Ukrainian forces retreat along the front line.
“Today, amid heavy losses and retreating along the entire line of contact, the Kiev leadership has turned to organizing terrorist acts in an attempt to intimidate Russia,” Putin said.
He questioned the competence of Ukraine’s leadership, under whose orders the Ukrainian armed forces have suffered “senseless and enormous losses” – including during their now-repulsed incursion in Kursk Region – and continue to face defeat on the battlefield.
“What kind of authority can the leaders of a thoroughly rotten and completely corrupt regime possess?” Putin added.
Deliberate strikes to disrupt talks
Putin called Kiev’s railway sabotage an “intentional strike on the [Russian] civilian population.”
He said the “crimes” committed against Russian civilians – including women and children – were timed to disrupt the peace process.
Both attacks came shortly before the second round of Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul and amid a surge in Kiev’s drone raids into Russia, which Moscow says are aimed at derailing attempts to reach a settlement in the conflict.
Speaking about Kiev’s apparent attempts to undermine the peace efforts, Putin noted that Ukrainian officials simultaneously requested a ceasefire lasting 30 to 60 days, along with a top-level meeting.
“But how can such meetings be held under these conditions?” he said. “What is there to talk about? Who conducts negotiations with those who rely on terror – with terrorists?”
He warned that any pause would only allow the Ukrainian forces to regroup, receive more Western arms, and prepare for renewed hostilities.
Kiev regime not interested in peace
Ukraine has repeatedly rejected Russia’s proposals for a short-term ceasefire on humanitarian grounds, Putin said.
“It does not surprise us and only convinces us further that today’s Kiev regime does not want peace at all,” he stated. “For them, peace most likely means a loss of power.”
Putin emphasized that “power, for the [Kiev] regime, is apparently more important than peace, more important than human lives.”
Kiev’s lack of political culture
Putin also accused the Ukrainian leadership of lacking basic political culture, pointing to recent public remarks. This week, Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky referred to Russia’s negotiators as “idiots” after Moscow proposed a brief truce to recover fallen soldiers’ bodies.
“Apparently, we are dealing with people who not only have no real competence in anything but also lack even a basic political culture if they allow themselves to make certain statements – including direct insults – against those they claim to want to negotiate with,” Putin said.
Ukrainian losses I think would be considerably more. Probably around 350k dead.Russian losses are 250k killed
Its actually around 100k dead for Ukraine forces.Ukrainian losses I think would be considerably more. Probably around 350k dead.
Around 600k dead overall.
That's an absurdly low number and in no way realistic.Its actually around 100k dead for Ukraine forces.