Reasons to suspect widespread vote fraud in this 2024 Irish General Election

[Declan]

His trademark line was

I graduated Darndale High.

They thought it was someplace like The Phillips Academy where the Bushes went

 

[scolairebocht]

Just a few notes I was writing on facebook on the Anti-mass Migration march of 24th April 2025 in Dublin, and for which i was asked to post them elsewhere as well.

I would definitely be at the high end of those estimates for the Nationalist turnout. I have been at countless protests coming down that street from the corner of Parnell Square to the Gate theatre and while sometimes you can have the crowd wall to wall across the street just at the corner, they are not like that as they pass down the street. For it to be jammed both sides like that makes this a huge crowd, in the 60,000 to 100,000 definitely.

For the record I believe there have been four protests in Dublin of that size in recent memory: Two pro-life marches were of that size actually, c.2018, then the very first anti-mask one in 2020 which met at the Customs House (all the later ones were not nearly as big) then last year, I think thats May or June, one only, of the anti-mass migration ones, was of that huge dimension. And now this one.

Anyway the real story of this is the huge push that the other side made for it. You can see in the attached pic how many large and important organisations threw their weight behind it. That they really did go all out you can see from the recent statement by Cllr Patrick Quinlan that "multiple TDs from West Dublin were spotted" at the counter protest yesterday. And yet by any estimate that anybody's making, they got together from 1/50th to 1/100th of the Nationalist crowd.

The latter meanwhile had the support of no member of the approximately 200 members of the Oireachtas, and only about 3 Councillors of the approx. 1,000 in the Republic of Ireland. It had the support of no organisation as such, apart from some micro Nationalist parties that are in turmoil with internal coup type situations scrapping their leader (Nationalist Party and Ireland First), or are about to according to most reports (Irish Freedom Party). If you were to talk about any coherent and active recent group in that space, which you might suppose would be the organisers, you would say maybe Anthony Casey's Sinne Na Daoine and Justin Barrett's Clann na hÉireann. But the former leader asked his group not to attend, and if they insisted on doing so he told them not to wear the party insignia, and the latter group had a separate protest on Saturday, in the Phoenix Park, they are not included in the main Nationalist crowd anyway.

And yet look at the Nationalist crowd that gathered? There is no earthly way that that support corresponds to the borderline one percent tally we got in the recent elections, although it does mimic, very interestingly, the earlier Referenda of about this time last year. The Taoiseach meanwhile parades this clearly corrupt electoral performance as the only rock on which the current Irish State stands, as he was asked yesterday:

"...Irish Nationalists is growing...?"
"Well again, we have just had a General Election. We had a Local Election before that, and I think the ballots boxes is the key metric, the key determinant, sorry, of the organisation of society: who gets elected into government, who gets elected into local councils. And I think it has to be based on ideas and policies We believe we have a stronger set of ideas than perhaps those who articulated yesterday."

This State is in big trouble, and I think they know it!

 

[scolairebocht]

I am sure there are people reading this who are suffering from deja vu, in the sense that many were very disappointed after the Abortion Referendum results came in, a campaign that, as pointed out, also attracted these mega rallies. There was talk that the result couldn't be accurate when you saw the size of the opposition to abortion then.

Fair enough, but this is totally different. 723,000 people voted against abortion then, so yes its surprising that that would be the result when you had two rallies of about 100,000 each, but its not an earth shattering figure. Obviously the numbers who turned out was still a smallish fraction of the resulting electorate.

Now compare that with what happened on Saturday. Proper estimates of the Nationalist vote in the recent General Election are hard to calculate, but most would put it at less that 1% or under 1.5% at any rate. For example one report notes that the National Alliance (which contained pretty much all the Nationalist Parties outside the IFP):

"...received less than 20,000 votes nationwide and subsequently disbanded this week over internal disagreements. The Irish Freedom Party itself received 0.6% of the vote nationwide, or less than 15,000 first preferences."
(https://dublinpeople.com/.../2025/02/28/moore-ifp-resign/ .)

Throw in a few Independents outside the above parties and maybe you might push it to 40,000 people, but are we then saying that every single one of them, and more besides, walked through Dublin on Saturday?

Thats how crazy the General Election figures are, Saturday's events should prove for all that they are totally unbelievable.

 

[Nyob]

I think this voter fraud argument is a little bit silly

Most people vote for the main parties - FFGSF

Spiteful mutants for the likes of PBP, Greens, Labour

But that doesn't mean that most people aren't concerned with immigration, in fact, that's what a spiteful mutant would say

 

[Diarmuid]

Only just read this article. Great summary of the situation. Excellent and informative comments. How do we stop the bastards from doing it in Dublin Central and Galway West in six months time?

 

[Declan]

By breaking a stupid law. Photographing your ballot

 

[Diarmuid]

By breaking a stupid law. Photographing your ballot

It's a good idea. So say there's 10,000 photos of remigration ballots in Dublin west. You can publish them here - you are working off US rules. But when the ballots are officially counted there are only 3,000 remigration ballots: Malachy's 1,600 plus the same again for Fitzwilliam or Maria Steen or Quinlan or Justin.

They will just ignore the evidence of vote rigging. We can apply to court for an injunction and we can report to the local Garda Superintendent the crime of vote fraud.

If we took this action in a small group, they would just beat us up and throw us out of the courtroom or garda stations. Not to black pill, but it is possible they might just beat us to death in public. They get away with stuff like that all the time. If we did it in a bigger group they might go through the formalities of investigating our complaints and then rule that everything is fine and there's nothing to worry about.

But if all 200,000 vote enhancers were present outside the count centres, at the same time, we would outnumber the Garda Siochana by ten to one. Even with their bombs and their guns and their dog squad and their horse squad and their water cannon and their pepper spray and tasers we would wipe the floor with them, were they so foolish to attempt to use illegal force on us.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.

 

[Diarmuid]

Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.

Partly disagree. It is certainly madness to give the vote to murderers and rapists and thieves and fraudsters and the mentally retarded and anyone taking "mental health medication". Half the adult population are popping perfectly legal mental health pills. They should be struck off the voter's list until they have been clean at six months.

 

[PlunkettsGhost]

Partly disagree. It is certainly madness to give the vote to murderers and rapists and thieves and fraudsters and the mentally retarded and anyone taking "mental health medication". Half the adult population are popping perfectly legal mental health pills. They should be struck off the voter's list until they have been clean at six months.

At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.

 

[Declan]

Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.

Post of the week.

And the bigger con job is the he fact that it is secret , so they can tell you whatever they want.

 

[Diarmuid]

At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.

90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.

 

[clarke-connolly]

90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.

A = = Blame everything on Men ( Especially White Men ) Dáil.

All Blame = = No Solutions ( Bar killing all Men, especially White Men)

 

[clarke-connolly]

At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.

I suggest that members of the Military should be able to nominate People to Vote.

Lets say in a Country there was 25,000 in the military, and 2 million voters ( these numbers are just an example )

Then divide the 2 million by 25,000 and allow each military person to nominate up to that number of voters each. Have a minimum number of voters that each military person has to nominate ~ Say at least 50% of the maximum number of Voters that the military person could nominate.

It would make serving in the military very attractive and hopefully encourage a very Nationalistic Electorate !

 

[Mad as Fish]

90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.

What exactly is meant by IQ?

 

[Diarmuid]

What exactly is meant by IQ?

Good question. A result from a series of tests, i suppose.

But we're getting off topic: Matter a damn who gets to vote if they are rigging the elections, which they seem to be.

How can we force the bastards to count the votes properly?

I think we need HUGE crowds. With walking sticks of stout wood. Blackthorn is best, but lets not be snobby. Willow is very light but you can do great work with it. You can still get hazel sticks at Croagh Patrick for four euro. Where else would you get it?

And for the Christians among us, why not bring whips? It's part of our culture, innit?

 

[AN2]

What exactly is meant by IQ?

Is that a trick question?

Intelligence Quotient

 

[Diarmuid]

Ten ways to rig an election

1. Information control.

2. Keep dead or missing voters ón the list.

3. Restrict nominations

4. Allow invalid voters

5. Give extra ballot papers to certain voters

6. Staff can fill in ballot papers and add them to the box

7. At the end of the day, the staff can count the ballots and eliminate some.

8. On the journey from polling station to count centre, the ballots can be switched.

9. Overnight at the count centre, gardai could facilitate vote switching.

10. On counting day, staff can lose votes, add totals incorrectly.



Any other ways to rig the election?

Any ways to stop the rig?

I note that people stopping posting here on Dec 12 last year. Any particular reason - did some other big event happen?

 

[Diarmuid]

The Deep State Routinely Rigs Elections​

May 12, 2018

Another ultra-left cultural Marxist, Michael D. Higgins, won the 2011 Irish presidential election by a landslide, even though he was 19 points - yes 19 points! - behind in opinion polls conducted two days before the vote. Even more surprisingly, the RTE Teletext service, Eirtel, mistakenly published the exact margin of his victory before counting had begun. Seen with Bernie Sanders who had the 2016 Democratic nomination stolen from him in the primaries.


The uncanny ability of corporate media outlets to predict the precise outcome of elections and referendums before counting - or in some cases, even before voting - starts, recurs again and again.



"Somehow, when push comes to shove, the popular populist never proves quite popular enough: In the end, David Duke bombed in 1992, just as Pat Buchanan bombed in 1996. Ditto Jean Marie Le Pen in 2002, Ron Paul in 2012, Nigel Farage in 2015, Gert Wilders in 2016, Marine Le Pen in 2017, Bernie Sanders in the Democrat primaries, and Roy Moore in the Alabama special election. Beginning to spot a pattern yet?"
(See the mind blowing First Comment by Kevin Boyle below the article.)
by Jude Duffy
(henrymakow.com)

Dublin- Elections are rigged. Don't take my word for it: listen to U.S. presidents and presidential candidates, past and present.
In 2013 Jimmy Carter said America was no longer a functioning democracy (1). More than 50 years earlier JFK told Gore Vidal that Zionist mobsters stole the 1948 Presidential election for Freemason Harry S Truman ( 2) Donald Trump, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and John McCain have all said fraud is widespread and game-changing in US elections (3).
When asked if he believed Presidential elections were above board, Rudy Giuliani put the matter succinctly: "Only a moron would say that." (4).
It's not just candidates who believe the deck is stacked: Donna Brazile, the former head of the Democratic National Committee admitted that the Dems rigged the 2016 primaries in order to shaft Bernie Sanders, and Democrat Senator, Elizabeth Warren agreed (5).
According to Robert F Kennedy Jr: "They [the Republicans] stole it [the Presidential election] in 2000 and they stole it in 2004" (6).
OUTSIDE AMERIKA

And it's not just Americans: Nigel Farage insisted that his party's defeat in a crucial 2015 UK by-election had been achieved through fraud (7), a view given credence by a British High Court Judge's statement that Britain's voting system would "shame a banana republic" (8).
And it's not just the losers: Former Afghan President Hamid Karzai accused the BBC and the UN of rigging the 2009 presidential vote in his country (9). Sour grapes on his part? Not quite - he won the election!
Hard proof of election rigging abounds. The UK sovereignty campaigners Brian Gerrish and Mike Robinson spotted blatant evidence of ballot stuffing in an English count center during the British general election of 2010. When they brought it to the attention of the authorities, they were threatened with arrest (10).
In the 2009 Irish European parliament elections, a chance recount of votes revealed that an anti-globalist candidate had 3,000 votes stolen from him and given to another candidate (11). In the context of a small country like Ireland, 3, OOO is a lot of votes.
Yes, the skeptics will retort, but a few examples don't prove the whole system is rigged. Maybe not, but the non-reaction of the state and media surely does. The media and the Irish police completely ignored the recount story, a clear indication that they themselves collude in the rigging of Irish elections and referendums (ibid.). In any case, such examples could be multiplied a hundredfold - from Ireland, from the UK, from the US, and from just about every other western nation.
Sticking for the moment with Ireland, when lifelong Rothschild agent and radical lesbian feminist, Mary Robinson, supposedly won a surprise victory in the 1990 Irish presidential election, RTE, the Irish state TV network, reported that ballot boxes in rural and deeply conservative areas of the Irish midlands contained no votes for candidates other than Robinson - about as likely a scenario as David Duke topping the poll in Tel Aviv mayoral elections.
Another ultra-left cultural Marxist, Michael D. Higgins, won the 2011 Irish presidential election by a landslide, even though he was 19 points - yes 19 points! - behind in opinion polls conducted two days before the vote. Even more surprisingly, the RTE Teletext service, Eirtel, mistakenly published the exact margin of his victory before counting had begun.
Likewise, Reuters reported the exact margin of victory in a 2012 Irish referendum on a fiscal treaty imposed on the country by the global bankers - again before counting had begun (12).
This uncanny ability of corporate media outlets to predict the precise outcome of elections and referendums before counting - or in some cases, even before voting - starts, recurs again and again. The American vote fraud investigator Jim Condit Jr. has documented just how often the American TV networks accidentally broadcast the correct results of elections prior to polls closing, and sometimes even days in advance of the vote taking place (13).
Such eerie predictive powers often dovetail with an even eerier uniformity of official voting outcomes. Obama - who has admitted that both big parties in the US rig wholesale (14) - gained a whopping 100 percent of the votes in 59 districts in Philadelphia in the 2012 election (15). In the 2009 second Irish Lisbon EU referendum, there was a uniform 20 per cent swing to the pro-EU side in every single constituency.

 

[Mad as Fish]

I guess we needn't ask about Lisbon 2.

 

[Diarmuid]

I guess we needn't ask about Lisbon 2.

He makes the astonishing claim that there was an identical 20% swing to Lisbon in every single constituency . Not 20% in Dublin, 19% in Donegal. Precisely the same 20% swing everywhere.

Can that be true??? How come I didn't notice it at the time?

Must be a cohencidence.

 

[scolairebocht]

Just on the UK: Andrew Bridgen has described that in the 2024 General Election in North West Leicestershire the Returning Officer announced some mysterious and very unusual delay (which is important because in the UK they count the votes straight after the polls close) and then he got just 1,568 votes, 3.2%. In 2019 he got 33,811 votes, 62.8%, and in the 2024 election he had a huge army of canvassers, because he was very popular for highlighting things like the Post Office scandal.

 

[Declan]

Really n Paul did not bomb, he had not got the votes. But it was a miracle he got as many people to awake is the amazing thing. He actually won a Caucus in the heel of the hunt.


You can’t rig a Caucus

 

[Diarmuid]

Just on the UK: Andrew Bridgen has described that in the 2024 General Election in North West Leicestershire the Returning Officer announced some mysterious and very unusual delay

Very blatant. Shows how simple it is to rig the election, if you control the counting. Did he make a complaint or take court action? If we know or suspect that they will rig the election, what can we do? Take a court injunction against them, instructing them not to rig the election? Ha!

 

[scolairebocht]

Ok well just on the suggestion by Diarmuid of what might be done to counteract the vote fraud, as are queried on other threads too:

1) As was pointed out elsewhere, try and follow the vans that are collecting the votes from the polling stations. They will probable just go to the count centres, where the fraud might continue there during the night and you won't be let in, but still it might reveal something. And try and find out who those drivers are, who employs them and were they used for previous elections.

2) Is it possible to add some kind of trackers into a ballot box, which, hopefully, might not be illegal since its supposed to be a transparent process? It would be especially interesting if they were able to record sound as well, if the boxes were opened before the official count it would be extremely interesting to know.

3) At the count centres it would be important to keep a close eye and properly report on:
- ballot papers that lack the polling station stamp.
- ballot papers that have double digit numbers as a preference, with seemingly different inks and maybe a different handwriting for each of the two numbers (as described above).
- If possible, it would be great if election count observers at the count centre were given the right to check the number of ballots coming out of a box with the number of ballots issued at that station. These numbers are recorded at the polling station certainly (they know who votes but not how they vote) and I believe are then sent to the count centres but I never heard of independents, or small party candidates, actually checking those numbers. Obviously if they found a discrepancy they could see where votes had been discarded or added in.
- Watch to see if votes have been 'discovered' at some point during the count, and properly report and record that. You hear this all the time at Irish counts, 5,000 votes were discovered etc but its hard to understand how they get 'lost' during a count in the first place.

4) Organise an exit poll, or an opinion poll a few days after the vote, asking people how they voted and then seeing if the poll results match the official results. Its better if you can match this to accurate tallies of the votes in a given area, because that would be more exact again. Meaning: if at the count you find out that the result from the Ballymagash count was 25% for so and so and 12% for someone else etc, i.e. the exact result from a given village or town, not the overall national or constituency one, then you can go into that village and conduct the exit poll and see is the exact result reflected there. This can be done, and was done by this observer with the help of some others in a referendum a while ago: https://brianhere.tripod.com/stats.pdf .

Anyway its probably hopeless trying to get honest elections in Ireland now, but, as I say, just a few suggestions.

 

[Diarmuid]

Some great suggestions there. GRMA.

If we organise an opinion poll before the election, that might make it more difficult to rig the election.

One quibble:

"Anyway its probably hopeless trying to get honest elections in Ireland now"

Isn't despair one of the seven deadly sins?

Could we organise public prayer rallies to pray for an honest election? Not to pray for a particular result, just for a honest count.

 

[scolairebocht]

Point taken, and maybe the prayers might help! I am not pessimistuc at all that Irish peopl can fight back here, just about the electoral process.

You know what gives me greatest hope is this new Catholic revival that is very small yet, but is nonetheless definitely happening. If that happens it will change peoples outlook and value systems and will make people much more rebellious I'd say.

 

[Declan]

Take a picture, end of story

 

[Diarmuid]

You know what gives me greatest hope is this new Catholic revival that is very small yet, but is nonetheless definitely happening. If that happens it will change peoples outlook and value systems and will make people much more rebellious I'd say.

Yeah, ach caithfaidh muid failte a cuir ar ar comharsanai Protastunach freisin. Enoch's a Trad Prod and there are tens of thousand more just as stubborn as him. We need some kind of trad Christian Front. Whether you believe in God or not, the God element adds strength and determination and zing.

How about the Pagano-Christian Society of King Tairdelbach? He was the Irishman who did the fastest remigration of Jews in human history.

The idea of tracking devices in the ballot box is excellent, and probably not illegal.

We can also put miraculous medals and insulting messages on paper into the ballot boxes. It won't stop the rig, but it will be good psychological warfare.

Photos of ballots are a good idea, but on its own, they will just laugh at us.

I'm optimistic because of the 200,000+ who spoiled their vote in the Presidential. If they gave a couple of hours of their time on the next election day, we would have enough observers to stop the steal.

If we encourage people not to vote until 8:00pm, just two hours before the polls close and hold rallies, with food and balloons and children, we could have a crowd outside each polling station.

 

[Diarmuid]

The most supicious thing I noticed about the 2024 elections was the bád attitude shown by election workers and Gardai.



Bad attitude is not really proof that they were involved in a switcheroo. But if the count was clean, why the bad attitude?



1. Election workers eating their dinner ón the same table where our sacred ballot papers were. This shows contempt for our ballot papers.



2. Three election workers, including a Garda called Charlie, boasting that the counting process was deliberately extended by half a day to give more overtime pay to the counters. In the Euro/Local elections, they made us put both votes into the same box, instead of two separate boxes. This meant that they spent half a day just separating the two votes, before they even started counting. This is fraud, pure and simple.



3. Threats to arrest by Gardai. When I went to the count centre to observe the votes being delivered from the polling stations, they twice threatened to arrest mé, and were extremely aggressive and unpleasant.



4. Physical attack by security man Patrick Davy ón the day of the count. I approached with my tickets in my hand, respectably dressed, sober, sweet smelling, not shouting or cursing. He roared at mé: Out the fuck! I said: I have the tickets. Another security man urged Davy to let mé in.



Out the fuck! roared Davy again. He placed his two hands ón mé and pushed mé out the door. Garda Superintendent Tom Colsh is aware of this incident, but he feels there is nó need to prosecute. Go scuabann an diabhal iad!