Reasons to suspect widespread vote fraud in this 2024 Irish General Election

His trademark line was

I graduated Darndale High.

They thought it was someplace like The Phillips Academy where the Bushes went
 
Just a few notes I was writing on facebook on the Anti-mass Migration march of 24th April 2025 in Dublin, and for which i was asked to post them elsewhere as well.

I would definitely be at the high end of those estimates for the Nationalist turnout. I have been at countless protests coming down that street from the corner of Parnell Square to the Gate theatre and while sometimes you can have the crowd wall to wall across the street just at the corner, they are not like that as they pass down the street. For it to be jammed both sides like that makes this a huge crowd, in the 60,000 to 100,000 definitely.

For the record I believe there have been four protests in Dublin of that size in recent memory: Two pro-life marches were of that size actually, c.2018, then the very first anti-mask one in 2020 which met at the Customs House (all the later ones were not nearly as big) then last year, I think thats May or June, one only, of the anti-mass migration ones, was of that huge dimension. And now this one.

Anyway the real story of this is the huge push that the other side made for it. You can see in the attached pic how many large and important organisations threw their weight behind it. That they really did go all out you can see from the recent statement by Cllr Patrick Quinlan that "multiple TDs from West Dublin were spotted" at the counter protest yesterday. And yet by any estimate that anybody's making, they got together from 1/50th to 1/100th of the Nationalist crowd.

The latter meanwhile had the support of no member of the approximately 200 members of the Oireachtas, and only about 3 Councillors of the approx. 1,000 in the Republic of Ireland. It had the support of no organisation as such, apart from some micro Nationalist parties that are in turmoil with internal coup type situations scrapping their leader (Nationalist Party and Ireland First), or are about to according to most reports (Irish Freedom Party). If you were to talk about any coherent and active recent group in that space, which you might suppose would be the organisers, you would say maybe Anthony Casey's Sinne Na Daoine and Justin Barrett's Clann na hÉireann. But the former leader asked his group not to attend, and if they insisted on doing so he told them not to wear the party insignia, and the latter group had a separate protest on Saturday, in the Phoenix Park, they are not included in the main Nationalist crowd anyway.

And yet look at the Nationalist crowd that gathered? There is no earthly way that that support corresponds to the borderline one percent tally we got in the recent elections, although it does mimic, very interestingly, the earlier Referenda of about this time last year. The Taoiseach meanwhile parades this clearly corrupt electoral performance as the only rock on which the current Irish State stands, as he was asked yesterday:
"...Irish Nationalists is growing...?"
"Well again, we have just had a General Election. We had a Local Election before that, and I think the ballots boxes is the key metric, the key determinant, sorry, of the organisation of society: who gets elected into government, who gets elected into local councils. And I think it has to be based on ideas and policies We believe we have a stronger set of ideas than perhaps those who articulated yesterday."

This State is in big trouble, and I think they know it!



counter demo.png
 
26 april 2025 Customs House doubled.jpg

I am sure there are people reading this who are suffering from deja vu, in the sense that many were very disappointed after the Abortion Referendum results came in, a campaign that, as pointed out, also attracted these mega rallies. There was talk that the result couldn't be accurate when you saw the size of the opposition to abortion then.

Fair enough, but this is totally different. 723,000 people voted against abortion then, so yes its surprising that that would be the result when you had two rallies of about 100,000 each, but its not an earth shattering figure. Obviously the numbers who turned out was still a smallish fraction of the resulting electorate.

Now compare that with what happened on Saturday. Proper estimates of the Nationalist vote in the recent General Election are hard to calculate, but most would put it at less that 1% or under 1.5% at any rate. For example one report notes that the National Alliance (which contained pretty much all the Nationalist Parties outside the IFP):
"...received less than 20,000 votes nationwide and subsequently disbanded this week over internal disagreements. The Irish Freedom Party itself received 0.6% of the vote nationwide, or less than 15,000 first preferences."
(https://dublinpeople.com/.../2025/02/28/moore-ifp-resign/ .)
Throw in a few Independents outside the above parties and maybe you might push it to 40,000 people, but are we then saying that every single one of them, and more besides, walked through Dublin on Saturday?

Thats how crazy the General Election figures are, Saturday's events should prove for all that they are totally unbelievable.
 
I think this voter fraud argument is a little bit silly

Most people vote for the main parties - FFGSF

Spiteful mutants for the likes of PBP, Greens, Labour

But that doesn't mean that most people aren't concerned with immigration, in fact, that's what a spiteful mutant would say
 
Only just read this article. Great summary of the situation. Excellent and informative comments. How do we stop the bastards from doing it in Dublin Central and Galway West in six months time?
 
By breaking a stupid law. Photographing your ballot
It's a good idea. So say there's 10,000 photos of remigration ballots in Dublin west. You can publish them here - you are working off US rules. But when the ballots are officially counted there are only 3,000 remigration ballots: Malachy's 1,600 plus the same again for Fitzwilliam or Maria Steen or Quinlan or Justin.

They will just ignore the evidence of vote rigging. We can apply to court for an injunction and we can report to the local Garda Superintendent the crime of vote fraud.

If we took this action in a small group, they would just beat us up and throw us out of the courtroom or garda stations. Not to black pill, but it is possible they might just beat us to death in public. They get away with stuff like that all the time. If we did it in a bigger group they might go through the formalities of investigating our complaints and then rule that everything is fine and there's nothing to worry about.

But if all 200,000 vote enhancers were present outside the count centres, at the same time, we would outnumber the Garda Siochana by ten to one. Even with their bombs and their guns and their dog squad and their horse squad and their water cannon and their pepper spray and tasers we would wipe the floor with them, were they so foolish to attempt to use illegal force on us.
 
Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.
 
Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.
Partly disagree. It is certainly madness to give the vote to murderers and rapists and thieves and fraudsters and the mentally retarded and anyone taking "mental health medication". Half the adult population are popping perfectly legal mental health pills. They should be struck off the voter's list until they have been clean at six months.
 
Partly disagree. It is certainly madness to give the vote to murderers and rapists and thieves and fraudsters and the mentally retarded and anyone taking "mental health medication". Half the adult population are popping perfectly legal mental health pills. They should be struck off the voter's list until they have been clean at six months.
At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.
 
Let's be honest. Democracy itself is a fraud. The idea that most people are clever enough to be able to decide how they want to be governed, is absurd. Most people are idiots. Paddy should never have been allowed the vote.
Post of the week.

And the bigger con job is the he fact that it is secret , so they can tell you whatever they want.
 
At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.
90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.
 
90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.
A = = Blame everything on Men ( Especially White Men ) Dáil.

All Blame = = No Solutions ( Bar killing all Men, especially White Men)
 
At best, there needs to be a civics exam and IQ test. Anyone under 110 IQ can't vote.
I suggest that members of the Military should be able to nominate People to Vote.

Lets say in a Country there was 25,000 in the military, and 2 million voters ( these numbers are just an example )

Then divide the 2 million by 25,000 and allow each military person to nominate up to that number of voters each. Have a minimum number of voters that each military person has to nominate ~ Say at least 50% of the maximum number of Voters that the military person could nominate.

It would make serving in the military very attractive and hopefully encourage a very Nationalistic Electorate !
 
90 IQ is plenty to vote. All you need to do is make the friend/enemy distinction. 90 IQ people can do that no problem.

Women should have the vote, but they should vote only for women and have an entirely separate women's Dail. They won't get anything done, of course, but they will have a great time chatting to each other.
What exactly is meant by IQ?
 
What exactly is meant by IQ?
Good question. A result from a series of tests, i suppose.

But we're getting off topic: Matter a damn who gets to vote if they are rigging the elections, which they seem to be.

How can we force the bastards to count the votes properly?

I think we need HUGE crowds. With walking sticks of stout wood. Blackthorn is best, but lets not be snobby. Willow is very light but you can do great work with it. You can still get hazel sticks at Croagh Patrick for four euro. Where else would you get it?

And for the Christians among us, why not bring whips? It's part of our culture, innit?
 
Ten ways to rig an election

1. Information control.

2. Keep dead or missing voters ón the list.

3. Restrict nominations

4. Allow invalid voters

5. Give extra ballot papers to certain voters

6. Staff can fill in ballot papers and add them to the box

7. At the end of the day, the staff can count the ballots and eliminate some.

8. On the journey from polling station to count centre, the ballots can be switched.

9. Overnight at the count centre, gardai could facilitate vote switching.

10. On counting day, staff can lose votes, add totals incorrectly.



Any other ways to rig the election?

Any ways to stop the rig?

I note that people stopping posting here on Dec 12 last year. Any particular reason - did some other big event happen?
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom