Amharc na spéire! Skywatch IRL.

[BIG FAT HOOR]

View: https://youtu.be/s1A9J4DQOWo?si=thh72m87ldVH7MKk



Check the sky, as clear as could be

Lovely video my aunt had a wooden house on the grounds of Yale similar to some of the wooden houses in your video her house was 160 years old with its original wood intact .
our climate would have rotted it for sure .
you learn a lot from your videos and would you say the neighbourhood was medium middle class or well off or ordinary .
it looks like a nice place to live .

 

[Declan]

Yes. I will video them the next time it is bad

 

[Declan]

The houses in the forst 2 minutes would be from about 1800. I live in the better side of Dedham, on the Westwood line, East Dedham on the Boston line is not as nice. The video today is in Westwood. Real nice. Those houses are in the millions

 

[clarke-connolly]

^^
He cut off a Racoon's penis but I'm not 100% sure if that was to do with geoengineering.

It seems that RFK junior likes everything but pork chops ! ! !

 

[Mad as Fish]

Yes. I will video them the next time it is bad

So are there days when there are lots of trails and others when there are not?

 

[Diarmuid]

yes

 

[Mad as Fish]

yes

Then that strongly suggests it is atmospheric conditions that form the trails rather than toxic sprays.

 

[Diarmuid]

No. On a day with trails, some planes can be seen not making trails. If it was atmospherics, they should also be making trails.

Also, just beacuse I don't notice trails on any particular day, it doesn't mean they didn't happen. On a cloudy day, you cannot tell if there are trails above that.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Sadly, I struggle to come on board with the idea of toxic sprays.

Has it been calculated just how much fluid has to used to produce the effect, i.e. what is the application rate? Once we have that figure we can consider the practicalty of hoisting it all into the air and jettonsing it over land and sea.

 

[Diarmuid]

The sprays are not necessarily always toxic.

Dane Wigginton over at geoengineering watch.com has very detailed info on this issue.

The fact that - on the same day, with the same weather - some planes leave long trails and other planes leave none is what makes me question the official narrative.

Plus, they often boast about their ability to create rain or snow. They don't hide what they are doing.

 

[Mad as Fish]

The sprays are not necessarily always toxic.

Dane Wigginton over at geoengineering watch.com has very detailed info on this issue.

The fact that - on the same day, with the same weather - some planes leave long trails and other planes leave none is what makes me question the official narrative.

Plus, they often boast about their ability to create rain or snow. They don't hide what they are doing.

Clouds form at different heights, planes fly at different heights, so we can only expect vapour trails (a form of cloud) to form, or not, at different heights.

 

[Diarmuid]

Clouds form at different heights, planes fly at different heights, so we can only expect vapour trails (a form of cloud) to form, or not, at different heights.

Modern jet engines have been designed to minimise condensation trails. It is very rare they will produce them. Geoengineeringwatch. com has detailed info on this.

You can confirm this yourself by looking at all the planes that don't leave any trails.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Modern jet engines have been designed to minimise condensation trails. It is very rare they will produce them. Geoengineeringwatch. com has detailed info on this.

You can confirm this yourself by looking at all the planes that don't leave any trails.

It is not the engines that cause them, it is the drop in pressure as the air passes over the wing.

Wings produce lift by dividing the air flow, the top of the wing is curved meaning that the air has to travel further than that passing underneat, this causes the wing to be sucked upwards, a secondary effect is the condensation of any moisture in the air in the region of low pressure, giving us the trails.

It will depend on the relative humidity of the air, at lower altitudes it will be less meaning that lower flying planes are less likely to produce them.

 

[Hermit]

UK scientists to launch outdoor geoengineering experiments

Blocking sunlight could temporarily slow the climate crisis but the technologies remain highly controversial

www.theguardian.com

 

[Diarmuid]

It will depend on the relative humidity of the air, at lower altitudes it will be less meaning that lower flying planes are less likely to produce them.

Simiul.

There is less relative humidity in the air at lower altitudes?

I saw two planes in close convoy the other day. One producing full trail, the other a much weaker and intermittent trail. Does relative air humdity explain that difference?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Simiul.

There is less relative humidity in the air at lower altitudes?

I saw two planes in close convoy the other day. One producing full trail, the other a much weaker and intermittent trail. Does relative air humdity explain that difference?

They would be flying at different heights, commercial flights are kept well apart by air traffic control.

The atmosphere is not homogenous, it mixes and swirls which is why we get turbulence, but it also means that conditions are not the same throughout its depth

 

[Diarmuid]

They would be flying at different heights, commercial flights are kept well apart by air traffic control.

Who said they were commercial? They were flying convoy. Do commercial flights do that? They were very close and going the same way.

Is there really that much difference in air humidity in two planes flying that close?

Two very long trails this afternoon, close, paralell. One trail was much stronger than the other. Air humidity again?

Is air humidity higher the higher up you go?

Have you any suggestion on how to distinguish between a trail caused by air humidity levels and a trail caused by something else, like the weather modification the Guardian reported on?

 

[Mad as Fish]

Who said they were commercial? They were flying convoy. Do commercial flights do that? They were very close and going the same way.

Is there really that much difference in air humidity in two planes flying that close?

Two very long trails this afternoon, close, paralell. One trail was much stronger than the other. Air humidity again?

Is air humidity higher the higher up you go?

Have you any suggestion on how to distinguish between a trail caused by air humidity levels and a trail caused by something else, like the weather modification the Guardian reported on?

If the planes were flying at the normal cruising attitude for jets then they were 5 - 6 miles above you, it would be impossible to tell by the naked eye as to any difference in altitude of a few thousand feet.

Military planes will fly in formation, that is not directly in line with each other, unless refuelling.

A heavier plane will require a more nose up attitude to maintain height, causing a greater pressure drop over the wing to provide the extra lift and so on.

We can go round and round in circles on this, but until evidence is provided of various liquids being secretly loaded on board planes and images of the application system, along with details of application rates I shall remain sceptical.

 

[BIG FAT HOOR]

If the planes were flying at the normal cruising attitude for jets then they were 5 - 6 miles above you, it would be impossible to tell by the naked eye as to any difference in altitude of a few thousand feet.

Military planes will fly in formation, that is not directly in line with each other, unless refuelling.

A heavier plane will require a more nose up attitude to maintain height, causing a greater pressure drop over the wing to provide the extra lift and so on.

We can go round and round in circles on this, but until evidence is provided of various liquids being secretly loaded on board planes and images of the application system, along with details of application rates I shall remain sceptical.

you are good have you flown.

 

[BIG FAT HOOR]

Who said they were commercial? They were flying convoy. Do commercial flights do that? They were very close and going the same way.

Is there really that much difference in air humidity in two planes flying that close?

Two very long trails this afternoon, close, paralell. One trail was much stronger than the other. Air humidity again?

Is air humidity higher the higher up you go?

Have you any suggestion on how to distinguish between a trail caused by air humidity levels and a trail caused by something else, like the weather modification the Guardian reported on?

what is interesting is flight radar website .
when you study the images initially you think they are just tiny little wing shaped images of anything --not so they are astonishing accurate and telling when you get used to it and you can spot the difference between a military and commercial flight quickly and each jet is presented very well and when you get used to it you see which is 747 cargo and 747 passenger and which is airbus 380 and so on as the tiny variation is still visible such as 4 propellers on a fat large aircraft can ONLY MEAN A C17 MILITARY.
M as a Fish knows his stuff and the separation between aircraft is immense both in terms of distance and height .
pilots are not permitted to fly the aircraft --they are only permitted to land and take off as the scheduled take off time is the purchased airspace for that aircraft to get for example from dublin to london at a certain time at a certain elevation only .
this is filed as the flight plan and all computers in europe and the airlines and the aircraft makers computers monitor this and up to 10 computers constantly monitor that the aircraft is flying on its pre planned and pre purchased time slot in european airspace as the system would collapse if PEOPLE WERE ALLOWED TO FLY FROM A TO B as they wished .
if you look at your weather charts they state currently high pressure over ireland but low pressure will move in and sometimes we have red dust from the sahara in the mix .
there must be info from our weather service about chemtrails as the analysis of cloud is their multimillion business and each weather service is independent of each other .
there are also multimillion satellite surveillance of every foot of our planet --what do these say.
if one told the truth all would be forced to tell the truth as aircraft spewing out a chemtrail don't stick to one country as they travel.
somebody knows the truth .

 

[Diarmuid]

until evidence is provided of various liquids being secretly loaded on board planes and images of the application system, along with details of application rates I shall remain sceptical.

Thanks for the info. It is good to have a disagreement without being disagreeable.

I definitely don't want to believe that they are spraying us, as I have enough to worry about already. Can you elaborate on air humidity as a cause of trails?


There are photos claiming to show planes fitted out for spraying, with tanks, nozzles. etc. But photos are so easy to fake this proves nothing. There is an interview with a pilot. Again, actors are easy to find, so this proves nothing either.

I am interested in your opinion of the site geoengineeringwatch .com


BFH, what flight radar site do you suggest? Have you ever noticed it telling lies to you? You see a plane, but the radar says it is not there.

 

[Mad as Fish]

you are good have you flown.

Always had an interest but never followed it up. TBH, I haven't the self discipline to be a pilot and as an airline pilot friend of mine once said, the view from the office may be good, but after a while it can become just another job.

 

[Mad as Fish]

Thanks for the info. It is good to have a disagreement without being disagreeable.

I definitely don't want to believe that they are spraying us, as I have enough to worry about already. Can you elaborate on air humidity as a cause of trails?


There are photos claiming to show planes fitted out for spraying, with tanks, nozzles. etc. But photos are so easy to fake this proves nothing. There is an interview with a pilot. Again, actors are easy to find, so this proves nothing either.

I am interested in your opinion of the site geoengineeringwatch .com


BFH, what flight radar site do you suggest? Have you ever noticed it telling lies to you? You see a plane, but the radar says it is not there.

Indeed, interested discussion is the best way forward, but might I come back to later as work beckons presently.

 

[BIG FAT HOOR]

Thanks for the info. It is good to have a disagreement without being disagreeable.

I definitely don't want to believe that they are spraying us, as I have enough to worry about already. Can you elaborate on air humidity as a cause of trails?


There are photos claiming to show planes fitted out for spraying, with tanks, nozzles. etc. But photos are so easy to fake this proves nothing. There is an interview with a pilot. Again, actors are easy to find, so this proves nothing either.

I am interested in your opinion of the site geoengineeringwatch .com


BFH, what flight radar site do you suggest? Have you ever noticed it telling lies to you? You see a plane, but the radar says it is not there.

they are not allowed to inform you of everything -- our government gulfstream is rarely visible and an odd occasion the Pilates trainers from baldonnel are visible but not every day .

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

DÍarmuid I think you should just give it up. Fish has you well beaten on this one.

 

[Diarmuid]

DÍarmuid I think you should just give it up. Fish has you well beaten on this one.

It is not a fight. It is an inquiry into truth.

 

[Diarmuid]

Two planes trailing opposite directions in a North/South line, quite close to each other. Very, very, very unusual to see any flights going North South in this area. Are they heading for Derry or for the North Pole?

Ten minutes later, two planes trailing E/W in opposite directions. That's more normal.

 

[Mad as Fish]

It is not a fight. It is an inquiry into truth.

Re modern engines as you mentioned above, the latest geared turbofans are absolute marvels of engineering, hats off to Rolls Royce and General Electric who have developed them.

 

[Diarmuid]

It can be observed:
1. Most planes leave no trail.
2. Some leave tiny, middling or huge trails.

Possible explanations:
1. Condensation from engines.
2. Condensation from airflow around wings.
3. Condensation from the morning dews spraying us for our own or the planet's good.

It is a good faith discussion about possible explanations for observed events.