Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scolairebocht" data-source="post: 133830" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>I don't mean to cut across the debate here but it seems that Tiger has fallen into the cul de sac that many people do debating with atheists. What happens is that frequently the latter interpret their atheism as a kid of black hole of nothingness, and believing in, sometimes literally, nothing, so its impossible to have a debate, because the other side has actually no position. Sometimes they will invite you to give your interpretation of their position and then spend hours saying "I don't believe that"..."how dare you presume to know what I believe" etc etc. So I wonder would the atheists on here like to give a proper summary of what they actually believe, so that you could have a proper debate?</p><p></p><p>Take a specific issue as an example which then might make this point clearer. For thousands of years people accepted the story in the Bible, particularly about Our Lord, as a genuine true account of what happened, so hence its a pretty strong bulwark of the theist position. So presumably atheists argue back against that, they obviously have to because if you accept the Bible as true then they are sunk? So can I invite atheists on here to say what is there position on that, for example, presumably you take one or other of these positions:</p><p></p><p>a) That the Bible account is a later forgery, not written in Biblical times at all.</p><p>b) That the Four Evangelists were writing fiction which they themselves never believed to be true.</p><p>c) That these Four were misled, they thought what they said was true but it isn't.</p><p></p><p>Or some variation of all that? Because its only when you try to get straight in your mind what you think really happened, straight enough that you are prepared to say so, that maybe you can see clearly the problems in your position?</p><p></p><p>Anyway just a thought.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scolairebocht, post: 133830, member: 8"] I don't mean to cut across the debate here but it seems that Tiger has fallen into the cul de sac that many people do debating with atheists. What happens is that frequently the latter interpret their atheism as a kid of black hole of nothingness, and believing in, sometimes literally, nothing, so its impossible to have a debate, because the other side has actually no position. Sometimes they will invite you to give your interpretation of their position and then spend hours saying "I don't believe that"..."how dare you presume to know what I believe" etc etc. So I wonder would the atheists on here like to give a proper summary of what they actually believe, so that you could have a proper debate? Take a specific issue as an example which then might make this point clearer. For thousands of years people accepted the story in the Bible, particularly about Our Lord, as a genuine true account of what happened, so hence its a pretty strong bulwark of the theist position. So presumably atheists argue back against that, they obviously have to because if you accept the Bible as true then they are sunk? So can I invite atheists on here to say what is there position on that, for example, presumably you take one or other of these positions: a) That the Bible account is a later forgery, not written in Biblical times at all. b) That the Four Evangelists were writing fiction which they themselves never believed to be true. c) That these Four were misled, they thought what they said was true but it isn't. Or some variation of all that? Because its only when you try to get straight in your mind what you think really happened, straight enough that you are prepared to say so, that maybe you can see clearly the problems in your position? Anyway just a thought. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
A Million Views.
Started by Declan
Saturday at 10:54 PM
Replies: 8
Public Chat and Announcements
An Open Letter to SwordOfStZip
Started by AN2
Oct 11, 2025
Replies: 12
Public Chat and Announcements
athletics
Started by céline
Oct 8, 2025
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
S
The real agenda in this Presidential Election?
Started by scolairebocht
Oct 6, 2025
Replies: 11
Scholairebochts Blog.
J
Varadkar "confronted by far right" while walking down street inDublin
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Oct 2, 2025
Replies: 6
Public Chat and Announcements
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 3K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
Top
Bottom