Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 134005" data-attributes="member: 353"><p>Your reply is less a counter-argument than a reflexive polemic — a kind of rhetorical flailing cloaked in the language of superiority. What’s striking is not your rejection of theism, but the breezy certainty with which you dismiss what you don’t appear to have seriously engaged.</p><p></p><p>Let’s clarify something fundamental: pointing out that we do not <em>fully</em> know why the universe exhibits rational order is not an argument against theistic inference — it is, in fact, a deep philosophical invitation. That the universe is <em>mathematically intelligible</em> to the human mind is not a trivial observation. It is, as Albert Einstein admitted, “a miracle that the universe is comprehensible at all.”</p><p></p><p>This is not a matter of spotting “patterns” and jumping to conclusions, but of confronting the foundational fact that physics — and by extension, all empirical science — presupposes an order that is not itself explained by physics. Why, in a universe allegedly born of chaos, should the structure of spacetime obey precise mathematical relationships? Why does the abstract language of mathematics, developed in the human mind, map so seamlessly onto the external world?</p><p></p><p>You may scoff at such questions, but many of the greatest scientific minds did not. Thinkers like Kurt Gödel, Roger Penrose, and Werner Heisenberg recognised the philosophical depth of these inquiries. Theism, at the very least, offers a coherent ontological ground: that rational order flows from rational source — from Logos.</p><p></p><p>Your own position, by contrast, seems to require that mind arises from matter, reason from randomness, and consciousness from brute unreason — a conceptual chain that, as yet, lacks even the semblance of an adequate explanation.</p><p></p><p>So no, this is not “the stupidest, laziest superstition.” It is an ancient philosophical tradition, intellectually robust enough to sustain millennia of dialogue. If you're going to dismiss it, do so with arguments, not with adolescent sneers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 134005, member: 353"] Your reply is less a counter-argument than a reflexive polemic — a kind of rhetorical flailing cloaked in the language of superiority. What’s striking is not your rejection of theism, but the breezy certainty with which you dismiss what you don’t appear to have seriously engaged. Let’s clarify something fundamental: pointing out that we do not [I]fully[/I] know why the universe exhibits rational order is not an argument against theistic inference — it is, in fact, a deep philosophical invitation. That the universe is [I]mathematically intelligible[/I] to the human mind is not a trivial observation. It is, as Albert Einstein admitted, “a miracle that the universe is comprehensible at all.” This is not a matter of spotting “patterns” and jumping to conclusions, but of confronting the foundational fact that physics — and by extension, all empirical science — presupposes an order that is not itself explained by physics. Why, in a universe allegedly born of chaos, should the structure of spacetime obey precise mathematical relationships? Why does the abstract language of mathematics, developed in the human mind, map so seamlessly onto the external world? You may scoff at such questions, but many of the greatest scientific minds did not. Thinkers like Kurt Gödel, Roger Penrose, and Werner Heisenberg recognised the philosophical depth of these inquiries. Theism, at the very least, offers a coherent ontological ground: that rational order flows from rational source — from Logos. Your own position, by contrast, seems to require that mind arises from matter, reason from randomness, and consciousness from brute unreason — a conceptual chain that, as yet, lacks even the semblance of an adequate explanation. So no, this is not “the stupidest, laziest superstition.” It is an ancient philosophical tradition, intellectually robust enough to sustain millennia of dialogue. If you're going to dismiss it, do so with arguments, not with adolescent sneers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 88
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
Top
Bottom