Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Members Blogs
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tiger" data-source="post: 137171" data-attributes="member: 353"><p><img src="https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTUzMTEyMDdkdG1wN2RlOWhmOGtwNXZtdWFjYXAwa3F5eW85d2szMXM2Z200cTNldyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/hw8BtYaH9MHXMhkCyd/200.gif" alt="Oh No Omg GIF by The Steve Wilkos Show" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Firstly, you invoked fairytales to try and prove your point about what existed before time. Your argument was demolished and then you tried to backtrack and disown it.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, what we are talking about here today is your claim that some YouTube videos that you posted have “exposed” Lennox’s position. Now you are backing away from that. </p><p></p><p>You haven’t identified a single demonstrable falsehood from John Lennox—only interpretations you happen to disagree with.</p><p> </p><p>Lennox points to the Big Bang's implication of a space-time origin as support for a created universe. That’s a defensible position grounded in mainstream cosmology, not a "lie." If you want to refute it, do so by quoting an actual factual error—not by hurling insults or misrepresenting intent. Dismissing him as a “creationist carnie” isn’t a rebuttal—it’s just noise.</p><p></p><p>As for invoking Roger Penrose’s Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) to sidestep the beginning of the universe—come on. That model has no empirical support, violates the second law of thermodynamics, and lacks a clear physical mechanism for its proposed cycles.</p><p></p><p>Even Penrose himself has acknowledged the lack of observational confirmation and describes it as “hard to swallow”.</p><p></p><p>You're substituting a data-backed model (Big Bang with inflation) for a mathematically elegant speculation that predicts nothing and explains little. So no, CCC doesn’t refute Lennox—it’s just wishful thinking.</p><p></p><p>You communicate with emoji’s and ‘lol’s’ and child-like sneers. You have no degree James.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tiger, post: 137171, member: 353"] [IMG alt="Oh No Omg GIF by The Steve Wilkos Show"]https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTUzMTEyMDdkdG1wN2RlOWhmOGtwNXZtdWFjYXAwa3F5eW85d2szMXM2Z200cTNldyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/hw8BtYaH9MHXMhkCyd/200.gif[/IMG] Firstly, you invoked fairytales to try and prove your point about what existed before time. Your argument was demolished and then you tried to backtrack and disown it. Secondly, what we are talking about here today is your claim that some YouTube videos that you posted have “exposed” Lennox’s position. Now you are backing away from that. You haven’t identified a single demonstrable falsehood from John Lennox—only interpretations you happen to disagree with. Lennox points to the Big Bang's implication of a space-time origin as support for a created universe. That’s a defensible position grounded in mainstream cosmology, not a "lie." If you want to refute it, do so by quoting an actual factual error—not by hurling insults or misrepresenting intent. Dismissing him as a “creationist carnie” isn’t a rebuttal—it’s just noise. As for invoking Roger Penrose’s Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) to sidestep the beginning of the universe—come on. That model has no empirical support, violates the second law of thermodynamics, and lacks a clear physical mechanism for its proposed cycles. Even Penrose himself has acknowledged the lack of observational confirmation and describes it as “hard to swallow”. You're substituting a data-backed model (Big Bang with inflation) for a mathematically elegant speculation that predicts nothing and explains little. So no, CCC doesn’t refute Lennox—it’s just wishful thinking. You communicate with emoji’s and ‘lol’s’ and child-like sneers. You have no degree James. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Does Doxxie know his real father.
Post reply
Latest Threads
How Dangerous is Israel?
Started by Anderson
Today at 4:04 AM
Replies: 1
Nationalist Politics
Charlie Kirk Shot Dead ~ RIP
Started by Anderson
Yesterday at 3:29 PM
Replies: 76
Nationalist Politics
J
Has anyone else kinda lost the will to live ?
Started by Jay Homer Simpson
Yesterday at 12:30 PM
Replies: 4
Public Chat and Announcements
The 2023 National Party Coup D'état or Split: My Understanding of it
Started by BelfastRatepayer
Saturday at 12:59 PM
Replies: 28
Nationalist Politics
RTE and Virgin - 2 Cheeks of the same.....
Started by Anderson
Friday at 3:46 AM
Replies: 11
Nationalist Politics
Popular Threads
Ukraine.
Started by Declan
Feb 21, 2022
Replies: 15K
World at War
US Politics.
Started by jpc
Nov 7, 2022
Replies: 6K
USA
Mass Migration to Ireland & Europe
Started by Anderson
Feb 26, 2023
Replies: 5K
Nationalist Politics
C
🦠 Covid 19 Vaccine Thread 💉
Started by Charlene
Sep 14, 2021
Replies: 3K
Health
General Chat in The Marcus Lounge.
Started by Declan
Dec 30, 2024
Replies: 2K
Public Chat and Announcements
The Climate Change scam
Started by Anderson
Jul 29, 2022
Replies: 2K
Climate Change
Forums
Self Moderated Area
Scholairebochts Blog.
An Open Letter to Atheists
Top
Bottom