You are a paedophile
You're a paedophile
You're a paedophile
You're a paedophile
Where's the bit about woke programmers feeding it crap and not permitting it to change accordingly?Quick intro as to how AI works. The chart breaks down the process and gives some insight as to how it arrives at the results it does.
View attachment 4472
There's been a very significant lawsuit brought by Elon Musk against Altman et al about a breach of the mission of OpenAI due to its sequestering and monetization.
Basically, the lawsuit proposes that Altman and Microsoft have essentially stolen OpenAI through the subversion of its corporate governance, presumably with the belief (because they're "systemically important") that it will be overlooked.
There is also a claim, due to information and belief (reasonable inference from available information), that general artificial intelligence has already been achieved through a product called Q* (pronounced Q Star). That's a big deal as it will displace a large proportion of the developed world's workforce.
This lawsuit will lift the veil as testimony and cross examination plays out.
We'll see what happens but just a note here to indicate that this will be part of the news cycle in the coming months and years. The below video is an introduction to it so you know broadly what's happening. It may seem a bit tedious but it's worth a watch if you want to keep abreast.
Lost the thread of the arguments about half way through, but I am not sure that AI will replace humans. Musk and Altman might like to think that they have created a new species that will come to dominate the earth but they focus only on its intelligence, not its ability to maintain or service itself. For comparison, nature only developed intelligence, as we recognise it, in the latter stages of evolution (as far as we know). Up until then it was all about maintaining a state of living rather than conscious thought.
In other words I think they are taking a very black and white mechanistic view, and that is not how the world works.
A sociologist's take on Google's AI snafu. It's good for 15 minutes anyway.
Joe Rogan is back to full podcasts on YouTube, which I welcome. He hasn't petered out and, in fact, has gotten stronger. A champ through and through. I think Jamie from Ohio is great too. Did you notice the undercurrent in the exchange between Haidt and Rogan as they discuss current nihilistic yet wistful mood? Called it way back.
I think Kurzweil has shot his bolt ~ ~ Knocking on Heavens Door if he believes in that !His interview with Ray Kurzweil the other day was interesting. Kurzweil came across as a dithering idiot
Could it be his attempt to say GobnaitI can't make out the spelling of her name from the way he pronounces it ~ ~ Does anybody know her name ? !
His interview with Ray Kurzweil the other day was interesting. Kurzweil came across as a dithering idiot
With a bunch of Woke Lefties " " Teaching / Feeding / Programming " AI = = Shite In = = Shite Out ! !A US army chiefs is less than enthused about AI on the battlefield -
Even as the Pentagon makes big bets on big data and artificial intelligence, the Army’s software acquisition chief is raising a new warning that adversaries could “poison” the well of data from which AI drinks, subtly sabotaging algorithms the US will use in future conflicts.
![]()
'Poisoned' data could wreck AIs in wartime, warns Army software acquisition chief - Breaking Defense
“Any commercial LLM that is out there, that is learning from the internet, is poisoned today,” Jennifer Swanson said, “but our main concern [is] those algorithms that are going to be informing battlefield decisions.”breakingdefense.com
An academic fellow I follow on Linkedin adds that the more he and his research students look at AI the less convinced they become about its abilities and general usefulness to the world.