- Joined
- Jun 14, 2023
- Messages
- 1,343
- Reaction score
- 1,448
This is amusing
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ed-images-of-people-after-ethnicity-criticism
Dan Milmo Global technology editor
Thu 22 Feb 2024 13.26 CET
Share
Google has put a temporary block on its new artificial intelligence model producing images of people after it portrayed German second world war soldiers and Vikings as people of colour.
The tech company said it would stop its Gemini model generating images of people after social media users posted examples of images generated by the tool that depicted some historical figures – including popes and the founding fathers of the US – in a variety of ethnicities and genders.
“We’re already working to address recent issues with Gemini’s image generation feature. While we do this, we’re going to pause the image generation of people and will rerelease an improved version soon,” Google said in a statement.
Google did not refer to specific images in its statement, but examples of Gemini image results were widely available on X, accompanied by commentary on AI’s issues with accuracy and bias, with one former Google employee saying it was “hard to get Google Gemini to acknowledge that white people exist”.
View image in fullscreen
Gemini illustrations of 1943 German soldiers. Photograph: Gemini AI/Google
Jack Krawczyk, a senior director on Google’s Gemini team, had admitted on Wednesday that the model’s image generator – which is not available in the UK and Europe – needed adjustment.
“We’re working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately,” he said. “Gemini’s AI image generation does generate a wide range of people. And that’s generally a good thing because people around the world use it. But it’s missing the mark here.”
Krawczyk added in a statement on X that Google’s AI principles committed its image generation tools to “reflect our global user base”. He added that Google would continue to do this for “open ended” image requests such as “a person walking a dog” but acknowledged that the response prompts with a historical slant needed further work.
“Historical contexts have more nuance to them and we will further tune to accommodate that,” he said.
Coverage of bias in AI has shown numerous examples of a negative impact on people of colour. A Washington Post investigation last yearshowed multiple examples of image generators showing bias against people of colour, as well as sexism. It found that the image generator Stable Diffusion XL showed recipients of food stamps as being primarily non-white or darker-skinned despite 63% of the recipients of food stamps in the US being white. A request for an image of a person “at social services” produced similar results.
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...ed-images-of-people-after-ethnicity-criticism
Google pauses AI-generated images of people after ethnicity criticism
Company says it will adjust its Gemini model after criticism of ethnically diverse Vikings and second world war German soldiersDan Milmo Global technology editor
Thu 22 Feb 2024 13.26 CET
Share
Google has put a temporary block on its new artificial intelligence model producing images of people after it portrayed German second world war soldiers and Vikings as people of colour.
The tech company said it would stop its Gemini model generating images of people after social media users posted examples of images generated by the tool that depicted some historical figures – including popes and the founding fathers of the US – in a variety of ethnicities and genders.
“We’re already working to address recent issues with Gemini’s image generation feature. While we do this, we’re going to pause the image generation of people and will rerelease an improved version soon,” Google said in a statement.
Google did not refer to specific images in its statement, but examples of Gemini image results were widely available on X, accompanied by commentary on AI’s issues with accuracy and bias, with one former Google employee saying it was “hard to get Google Gemini to acknowledge that white people exist”.
Gemini illustrations of 1943 German soldiers. Photograph: Gemini AI/Google
Jack Krawczyk, a senior director on Google’s Gemini team, had admitted on Wednesday that the model’s image generator – which is not available in the UK and Europe – needed adjustment.
“We’re working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately,” he said. “Gemini’s AI image generation does generate a wide range of people. And that’s generally a good thing because people around the world use it. But it’s missing the mark here.”
Krawczyk added in a statement on X that Google’s AI principles committed its image generation tools to “reflect our global user base”. He added that Google would continue to do this for “open ended” image requests such as “a person walking a dog” but acknowledged that the response prompts with a historical slant needed further work.
“Historical contexts have more nuance to them and we will further tune to accommodate that,” he said.
Coverage of bias in AI has shown numerous examples of a negative impact on people of colour. A Washington Post investigation last yearshowed multiple examples of image generators showing bias against people of colour, as well as sexism. It found that the image generator Stable Diffusion XL showed recipients of food stamps as being primarily non-white or darker-skinned despite 63% of the recipients of food stamps in the US being white. A request for an image of a person “at social services” produced similar results.
