- Joined
- Feb 3, 2022
- Messages
- 8,706
- Reaction score
- 6,706
DeclastradamusAre ye not paying attention to this famous expert
DeclastradamusAre ye not paying attention to this famous expert
I thought Kim and Don were mates?Yes absolutely, you know a complicating factor is that North Korea has said it will bomb the US if the US bombs Iran. That is a country we shouldn't forget about either...
Have you ever come across the "Godmother of Settlers" Danielle Weiss before Sir?the crucial part of your video which was very honest was your use of the words THE YOU KNOW WHOS .
Why did @Perry think this astute observation was funnyDeclastradamus
I feel those ladies had a point."Hitler has not attacked us. Why attack Hitler?" NYC protest, July 7, 1941.
And just how is America to be obliterated?Again you are talking shythe. I have spiken to generals, admirals, captains and nuclear sub commanders.
All insist, that there would be no hesitation at all on pushing the button because the US could be about to be obliterated.
Instant push.
You should have foreseen my reaction oh wise oneWhy did @Perry think this astute observation was funny
For example. I asked the sub commander. Retired.And just how is America to be obliterated?
does the thought not occur to you that hitler thought the atom bomb was a monsterous idea as did iran's leader/pope who the USA just executed on behalf of your slavemaster israel .For example. I asked the sub commander. Retired.
He said.
I would fire those missiles immediately because the people above have access to info that he does not down below. The country could be about to be obliterated
Earlier I had asked about his firepower. And he is just one sub. He said, that is classified and he cant discuss. I said would 24 missiles with 16 warheads of a 100 kilotons be in the ballpark. He said , I cant comment but you must have done some research.
So he had 386 warheads. He alone could obliterate Russia. One sub. The Russians have 5000 nukes, 1 megaton being normal. A single one dropped on Boston, would kill me in Dedham. 13 miles away.
5 nukes would obliterate the US much less 5000
But who would be obliterating America?For example. I asked the sub commander. Retired.
He said.
I would fire those missiles immediately because the people above have access to info that he does not down below. The country could be about to be obliterated
Earlier I had asked about his firepower. And he is just one sub. He said, that is classified and he cant discuss. I said would 24 missiles with 16 warheads of a 100 kilotons be in the ballpark. He said , I cant comment but you must have done some research.
So he had 386 warheads. He alone could obliterate Russia. One sub. The Russians have 5000 nukes, 1 megaton being normal. A single one dropped on Boston, would kill me in Dedham. 13 miles away.
5 nukes would obliterate the US much less 5000
I also wonder have the power of nukes been exaggerated.. Look at the hysteria around covid...wasn't that mild cold meant to destroy mankind? Only thing tho, in favor of the power of nukes is detterant, look at North Korea, would have been invaded by the US by now, but for the fear of a nuke retaliation strike.Netanyahu was recording saying that when they have sucked all America's wealth out the Israelis will discard the US like an empty husk.
Perhaps he meant "nuke" instead of "discard"?
Are we really sure that nukes work as advertized? Horoshima and Nagasaki could have been destroyed by standard bombing raids.
Also, if nukes work as advertized and if Israel has hundreds of nukes for the last fifty years, how come they have resisted the temptation to use them and kill 6 million Palestinians - or 4 miilion Irish? It seems very un-jewish.
Not in a million years ago, where did you get that idea. Hitler was beaten to the bombdoes the thought not occur to you that hitler thought the atom bomb was a monsterous idea
Either the Russians or the ChineseBut who would be obliterating America?
But the Cold War is so yesterday.Either the Russians or the Chinese
Pretty sure that process has already begun.Netanyahu was recording saying that when they have sucked all America's wealth out the Israelis will discard the US like an empty husk.
Indeed, as I pointed out above, nuclear weapons are not just bigger bang bangs but are hugely destructive with an effect that spreads far beyond the drop zone, global in fact. A nuclear exchange anywhere will totally screw civilisation as we have become so dependent upon electronics and the net, these will be wiped within moments and may never recover. Forget taking photos of pretty fireballs on the mobile for social media, both will be junked.Modern-day nuclear weapons are not atomic bombs. As I've said before, atomic bombs are merely the detonator for thermonuclear weapons.
To you maybe, not to the retired Commander and his sub crewBut the Cold War is so yesterday.
That does not gel with the fact that the US are withdrawing from all the surrounding countries.Somewhere in this thread Tank got all clever clever at the suggestion that the Straits of Hormuz would become redundant over the next few years. Pulling its knickers all the way up to its belly button he scoffed at the very idea and in between the usual infantile name calling assured us all that he knew best and it would always be a choke point.
However, it seems that the US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, is of the firm opinion that the original assertion was right -
Interviewer: There’s some who’ve speculated the straight will never go back to being the way it was before. What would you say?
Bessent: I would say, I would take, I think they’re saying that in a doomsday sort of way. I would put it in another way. The Strait is never going back to the way it was, because the Iranians have tried to use it as a choke point. We are going to see over the next two years, the Strait’s going to become irrelevant. It is going to just become another body of water. And I would say that more than 50 or 70 percent. Of the energy that moves through the strait now is going to go through underground pipelines.
That is why he is retired.To you maybe, not to the retired Commander and his sub crew
And using 'a few nukes' is not a turning point?That does not gel with the fact that the US are withdrawing from all the surrounding countries.
A historic turning point. Unless the ground invasion by mercs and a few nukes are deployed
He retired after 40 years, he was aged out.That is why he is retired.