Deirdre Manifold and her book Towards World Government, New World Order

[scolairebocht]

I was privileged some years ago to meet and interview this lady, Deirdre Manifold, the author of this book. She was born as Bridget Courtney 6/3/1914 to John Joseph Courtney and his wife Margaret née Reilly, on a farm in Addergoole, in the Parish of Killererin, about three miles out the Dublin Road, South East, of Tuam Co. Galway. (Her father (1861-1934) was earlier married to Bridget née Donnellan who died in 1907, and hence she had step siblings.) John Joseph had been a stone mason in Cincinnati in the USA but had come home and bought that farm, near enough the homeplace in Omaun More (frequently spelt Immanemore) near Barnaderg. Both her parents were dead by the time she was 20 and so she went to work in Dublin, first with Iarnród Éireann and then the Civil Service.

Influenced it seems by people like Joe Hanley, from Barnaderg, she became very involved with the Legion of Mary and in fact knew Frank Duff. In Dublin she was for five years the recognised girlfriend of none other than Patrick Kavanagh, the poet, but fell out with him when he wouldn’t come to Lough Derg with her and instead she married William Manifold, who worked in the car business in Limerick, in 1955. In time they moved to Salthill in Galway running a car hire business and later a minibus for the handicapped.

She had always been something of a campaigner on what might be considered Catholic issues, for example opposing contraception in 1975 in Galway, against one Michael D. Higgins, but in 1982 she decided to go into writing as she explains in the foreword to her first book:

“On New Year’s Day, 1982, a friend and I were discussing the awful state of the world and why this era should seem to be like no other era in history. I asked him: “Do you accept the accidental theory of history, or do you believe in the insider-Conspiratorial theory of history?”
He looked at me and said: “What exactly do you mean by the accidental theory of history or the Conspiratorial theory of history?”
My reply was something like this: “Do you really believe that everything that has happened, in this century say, has happened by accident, say for instance the two great wars, the depression in between, all the local no-win wars ever since, and now the massive unemployment and the frightening inflation rate, do you really believe that mankind has no control over them, that like earthquakes they just happen and we have to make the best of them?”
His reply to that was “I’m afraid I never seriously gave it much thought, I just accept what the newspapers say.”
Then I asked him if he had ever heard what Disraeli had said that the world was ruled by very different people from what was imagined by those who were not behind the lines, much later Roosevelt was to say that whenever anything happened in politics you may bet it was planned that way. Then I went on to tell him that for a long time scholars had ignored as a serious subject for study what went on behind the scenes, but the events of this century, being like no other period in time, made them curious. They began to delve behind the scenes, to root out the evidence, and have now made the unchallengeable case that the world is ruled by a handful of men who can bring on wars, depressions, unemployment, inflation, anything they want.
My friend looked incredulous and naturally being a good man asked why anybody, or any body of men, would want to do such awful things. He then said who are these mysterious men you talk about and why should they want to bring so much suffering into the world?
“They are the world’s richest men, and their object is power.”
“I find that very hard to believe.”
“Fair enough, but do you believe that a man called Hitler once lived, that he wanted power and succeeded in getting an awful lot of it.”
“Yes, that is a fact of history.”
“As it happened, Hitler was a fool. He sat down and wrote down everything he intended to do. Now if Hitler were really clever he would have plotted in secret and taken the world by surprise, as the scholars have now proved the Insider/Conspirators have always done. How they must have rubbed their hands in glee when they read Hitler’s Mein Kampf and said to themselves: this is our puppet par excellence. He is made to order, all we need to do is set him up, finance him, keep other countries weak until he is ready to go to war. Nothing will help our plans for total world dictatorship like a good hot war, where we will control both sides as we have always done. Just now the peoples of the world are so sick of war it will take a Hitler to force them into it. In whatever way they said or thought this to themselves this is exactly what they did. This is the subject matter of Professor Anthony Sutton’s book Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, which, it has been said, makes every previous book on World War II obsolete. Oh, I’m sure you never heard of it. Books which tell too much of the truth get the silent treatment.”
“Yes, but you haven’t said who they are or how they acquired such power. What kind of tricks did they pull off to give them such power?”
“Despotic power had its roots in the Reformation, but after that there were two great turning points in history, namely the foundation of the Bank of England and the founding of a group known as the Illuminati by one Adam Weishaput in Bavaria in 1776. The former by sleight of hand got control of the coin of the realm into private hands for the first time in history and the latter used that control and all disparate revolutionary groups for the one purpose of total world slavery.”
“I still find that very hard to believe.”
“You don’t accept something so awful because you haven’t read the evidence. Would you know the Greek language if you had never studied Greek?”
“No.”
“Did you ever hear of the Message of Fatima, you may think it has nothing to do with what we are talking about, but it is very relevant?”
“Yes, but only in a vague way, I’d need to know more.”
“Well, in 1917, when Communism was but a word, the meaning of which very few people knew, Our Lady appeared to three small children ã Fatima in Portugal. There she told them during a number of visits everything that has happened in the world from that time up to this day. She appealed for prayers and penance and sacrifice by the faithful. Otherwise she said Russia would spread her errors throughout the world, many nations would be lost, and the Holy Father would have much to suffer.” “I have to agree all that has already happened, but go on....””

Anyway that book is Fatima and the Great Conspiracy, which she published herself in Galway and partly because of the fame of that book (which was translated into a number of languages) and partly because of her own diligent research, she built up many contacts internationally, including for example with Mel Gibson’s father. In any case this book here, Towards World Government: New World Order (Galway, 1993), the successor to the above, has a number of short chapters but the bulk of it consists of large quotations, or the full text in the case of the last one, from three books, starting with the:

Manual on Psychopolitics, with a forward by Lavrenty Beria, Director of the Soviet Secret Police

During the years of the Soviet Union it had very close relations with the Communist Party in the USA and some leaks around the 1950s, when a US Senate Committee was determinedly investigating their power in America, give us an insight into Communist tactics. As part of these leaks at that time we got this manual on ‘Psychopolitics’ which was the Communist name for a kind of overall psychological warfare on target peoples, particularly those of the West at the time, from which a few quotes:

“Psychopolitics is the art and science of asserting and maintaining dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals...and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of the enemy nations through “mental healing”.
...
The Communist agent skilled in economics has as his task...to create the maximum...chaos and the passing of laws adapted to our purposes.. The psychopolitical operator plays a...different role...The rich, the skilled in finance, the well informed in government are particular...targets for the psychopolitician. His is the role of [removing] those...who would halt or corrupt Communist economic progress. Thus, every rich man, every statesman, every person well informed and capable in government must have brought at his side as a trusted confidant a psychopolitical operator...
The normal health and wildness of a rich man’s son must be twisted and...assisted by... administration of drugs or violence, turned into criminality or insanity. This brings...someone in “mental healing” into confidential contact with the family, and...the very most must be made of that contact.
Communism could best succeed if at the side of every rich or influential man there could be placed a psychopolitical operator...[whose advice could] upset the economic [or other] policies of the country and, when the time comes to do away forever with the rich or influential man, to administer the proper drug or treatment to bring about his complete demise in an institution as a patient, or dead as a suicide...”

 

[scolairebocht]

Red Symphony

It might help to give a little history here to understand this text. According to this document itself, Trotsky was the main figure connected into the Globalists of the day, the Occultists that are the very powerful figures controlling events. Trotsky that is and Lenin’s wife, oddly enough, as opposed to Lenin himself or indeed Stalin.

So apparently they (or ‘They’ as this text often calls them) arranged the death of Lenin with a view to being succeeded by Trotsky. But Trotsky got ill at the critical moment and even though ‘they’ subsequently supported Stalin, nonetheless the latter purged most of his opponents in the late 1930s. This then included in 1938 some of the real internationalists or globalists in the Soviet Union, and in particular a close Trotsky ally, Christian Georgijewitsch Rakowski, a Bulgarian who among other distinctions had been the Soviet ambassador to France.

He then, arrested as part of the purges, and likely to be soon executed, sends a message to Stalin to send down an important person to speak to him. Stalin sent an agent he trusted, Gavriil Gavriilovitch Kus’min known as Gabriel, and the resulting interrogation by Gabriel of Rakowski is this text. Rakowski was quite the polyglot and so the actual questioning was in French, with the text smuggled later into Spain and translated there and later into English. It was also witnessed by a Dr Jose Landowsky, who secretly administered some drugs to Rakowski to help him talk freely. A few quotes might give a flavour here of this famous and important text, which was called ‘Red Symphony’ in its Spanish edition and the title has stuck since:

“R. ....let us see what sort of people personally are at work there.
The international essence of money is well known. From this fact emerges that the organization which owns them and accumulates them is a cosmopolitan organization. Finances in their apogee as an aim in themselves – the Financial International – deny and do not recognize anything national; they do not recognise the State; and therefore, it is anarchical, and would be absolutely anarchical, if it – the denier of any national State – were not itself, by necessity, a State in its own basic essence. The State as such is only power. And money is exclusively power.
This communistic super-state, which we [have been] creating already [for] a whole century, and the scheme of which is the International of Marx: analyze it, and you will see its essence, the scheme of the International and its prototype of the U.S.S.R. – that is also pure power. The basic similarity between the two creations is absolute...since the personalities of the authors of both were identical. The financier is just as international as the Communist. Both, with the help of differing pretexts and differing means, struggle with the national bourgeois State and deny it – Marxism in order to change it into a Communist State; from this [it] comes that the Marxist must be an internationalist. The financier denies the bourgeois national State and his denial ends in itself; in fact he does not manifest himself as an internationalist, but as a cosmopolitan anarchist...
Money is power. Money is today the centre of global gravity...
Historiographers and the masses, blinded by the shouts and the pomp of the French Revolution,...intoxicated by the fact that it had succeeded in taking all power from the King and the privileged classes, did not notice how a small group of mysterious, careful and insignificant people had taken possession of the real Royal power, the magical power, almost divine, which it obtained almost without knowing it. The masses did not notice that the power had been seized by others and that soon they had subjected them to a slavery more cruel than [that of] the King, since the latter, in view of his religious and moral prejudices, was incapable of taking advantage of such a power. So it came about that the real Royal power was taken over by persons whose moral, intellectual and cosmopolitan qualities did allow them to use it. It is clear that these were people who had never been Christians, but cosmopolitans.
...
Kerensky was to surrender the State fully to Communism, and he does it. Trotsky has the chance in an “unnoticed manner” to occupy the whole State apparatus...that is the reality of the much-praised October Revolution. The Bolsheviks took that which “They” gave them.
G. You dare to say that Kerensky was a collaborator of Lenin?
R. Of Lenin – no. Of Trotsky – yes; it is more correct to say – a collaborator of “Them.”
G. An absurdity!
R. You cannot understand...? It surprises me. If you were to be a spy and...you were to attain the position of commander of the enemy fortress, then would you not open the gates to the attacking forces in whose service you were?...Would you not have been in danger of death during the attack on the fortress if one of the attackers, not knowing that your uniform is only a mask would have taken you for an enemy? Believe me: despite the statues and the mausoleum – Communism is indebted to Kerensky much more than to Lenin.
G. You want to say that Kerensky was a conscious and voluntary defeatist?
R. Yes...Understand that I personally took part in all this. I shall tell you even more: Do you know who financed the October Revolution? “They” financed it, in particular through those same bankers who had financed Japan in 1905, i.e., Jacob Schiff and the brothers Warburg; that means through the great banking constellations, through one of the five banks who are members of the Federal Reserve, through the bank of Kuhn, Loeb and Co...also other American and European bankers, such as Guggenheim, Hanquer, Breitung, Aschber, the “Nye-Banken” of Stockholm. I was there “by chance,” there in Stockholm, and participated in the transmission of funds. Until Trotsky arrived, I was the only person who was an intermediary from the revolutionary side...But at last Trotsky came...the Allies had expelled him from France for being a defeatist...And the same Allies released him so that he could be a defeatist in allied Russia...“Another chance.” Who arranged it? The same people who saw to it that Lenin passed through Germany. Yes, “They” were able to get the defeatist Trotsky out of a Canadian camp to England and to send him on to Russia.
...
G. But surely Fascism is totally anti-Communist...and if the power which you ascribe to ‘Them’ is so great, how is that they were unable to avoid this?
R. Because it [was] precisely ‘They’ who gave Hitler the possibility of triumphing.
G. You exceed all the boundaries of absurdity.
R. ...Listen to me...‘They’ saw in the end that Stalin [could not] be overthrown by a coup d’etat, and their historical experience suggested to them the decision of a repetition (repris) with Stalin of that which had been done with the Tsar. There was here one difficulty, which seemed to us insuperable. In the whole of Europe there was not a single aggressor State...If there [were] no such country, then ‘They’ had to create it. Only Germany was suitable for an attack on the USSR and it was capable of defeating Stalin...On the horizon of a hungry Germany there sparkled the meteor of Hitler. A pair of penetrating eyes fixed their attention on it. The world was the witness to his lightning rise...In 1929, when the National Socia1ist Party began to experience a crisis of growth and it had insufficient financial resources, “They” sent their ambassador there...It was one of the Warburgs. In direct negotiations with Hitler they agreed as to the financing of the National Socialist Party, and the latter received in a couple of years millions of dollars, sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of marks from German financiers through Schacht. The upkeep of the S.A. and S.S. and also the financing of the elections which took place, which gave Hitler power, were done on the dollars and marks sent by “Them”...If it is true that “They” financed Hitler, then that does not mean that they disclosed to him their existence and their aims. The ambassador Warburg presented himself under a false name...He also lied regarding whose representative he was...our aim was to provoke a war...and Hitler was war. Do you now understand?
...[He gives approximately three reasons why they were planning for WWII (which had not yet happened of course), firstly because Hitler was creating his own money and they were nervous that this precedent would spread around the world]...
G. And the second motive?
R. ...the need for the destruction of nationalism...
G. You have set out one economic and one political reason. Which is the third?
R. ...a religious one. Communism cannot be the victor if it will not have suppressed the still-living Christianity...the permanent revolution required seventeen [sic] centuries in order to achieve its first partial victory – by means of the creation of the first split in Christendom. In reality, Christianity is our only real enemy, since all the political and economic phenomena in the bourgeois States are only its consequences. Christianity, controlling the individual, is capable of annulling the revolutionary projection of the neutral Soviet or atheistic State by choking it...”

 

[scolairebocht]

The New Age Movement: The Kingdom of Satan on Earth, by Cornelia R. Ferreira

One of the people Deirdre was in contact with internationally was Dr Ferreira here, of Toronto, who also published Deirdre’s book simultaneously in Canada incidentally. This is a well footnoted article by her detailing the Occult origins of the New Age Movement:

“The term -New Age” (NA) is shorthand for “New World Order,” one shorn of Judeo-Christianity and comprised of a “one-world religion” and “one world government.” Satan initiated this world order in Eden, as evident from the assertion that the “new world” is formed by eating the fruit of Eden’s Tree of Knowledge, Satan desires world rule and the worship of all, which God will allow one day; since Satan is worshipped through his religion of the occultism, at that time the world will be totally occult.
...
The Society aimed to make occult knowledge available to all, and to synthesize religion, philosophy, science (evolution and other spurious concepts) and psychology on a base of occultism. Blavatsky [the founder of the Theosophy Society, an important Illuminati body] also “sought to reconcile all religions under one system of truth, the wisdom of the ancients.” Obviously, she wished to establish Satan’s one-world religion, and she has nearly succeeded: the teachings of Blavatsky and successor Alice Bailey form the NA bible...Blavatsky, drawing on Eastern mythology, concocted a Hierarchy of Masters inhabiting Venus when not on earth.
...
NAM wants Luciferic initiation
This drivel has become a major world influence by serving Freemasonry. Masonry is also founded on “ancient wisdom,” atheism, Kabbalistic Gnosticism, occultism, Eastern religions, evolution and reincarnation. The Masons probably recruited Blavatsky. Believing that women corrupted by Masonry would be ideal to further their goals, Masons allowed women into mixed lodges. Blavatsky’s successor Annie Besant and several of the Society’s first officers were Masons. Blavatsky’s Masters were not spirits, but French Kabbalist Masons; the leadership of the TS is Masonic; and the alternate name for both the TS and Masonry is Universal Brotherhood, a brotherhood that involves the suppression of distinctions to produce one nation, Church and family.
...
Environmentalism is also a political platform, especially in Europe, where it seems to be replacing Communism. But, as seen, Communism is also pantheistic; further, Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, Engels, Stalin and Mao Tse Tung were Satanists, the first three also being theosophists. Stalin, Marx and Engels were Illuminati recruits. Communism is thus a Masonic instrument, having the same goal: the establishment of the kingdom of Satan or the “universal social republic” by the fomenting of revolutions. It is thus intrinsically part of the NAM, and, being a world force, crucial to the internationalist effort. Green parties are just the NA face of Communism.

Blavatsky, the mouthpiece of Masonic globalism, was Russian. Bailey stated, “The U.S.S.R. expresses the will,...to produce new conditions and a new order – planned and determined and foreseen.” Soviet American-British NA networking has involved President Gorbachev, who also promotes NA issues in his book Perestroika. Echoing the WFA in his 1988 speech to the UN, he stressed the Soviet goal of creating a ‘world community of states based on the rule of law.’ He desires a “world consultative council uniting the world’s intellectual elite” to “shape the future under UN auspices.”
...
Was it [Gulf War] orchestrated to move us towards world government? After hostilities commenced, President Bush repeatedly forecast their result: a new world order and the rule of law. Belonging to the Order of Skull & Bones, an elite secret society which, desiring the new order, has “created wars and revolutions,” he expected the war would help the “World community” “fulfil the long-held promise of a new world order” “more peaceful than any that we have known.” The Soviets have long forecast that “a [non-nuclear] third world war, if unleashed by Imperialism, would finish off the capitalist system for good, and this would spell global peace.” Was Iraq, reputedly not a nuclear threat, set up to provide the “imperialism” for the world-government-through-“safe”-war formula; to test a U.S. Senate resolution on making the UN into a “world government” “capable of enacting and enforcing world law” against aggression; and to warn those resisting the NWO? Interestingly, the Soviets, who “are trying to lay the foundations for a new international community” sans capitalism, accused Iraq of terrorism against “the emerging world order” (not Kuwait).”

You will notice in that the great emphasis on the ‘rule of law’. Thats what these Occultists are trying to do, replace in peoples minds the old concept of say the 10 commandments, as an ethical guide of right and wrong, with only the ‘law’, which in practice in countries like Ireland are the Globalists instructions and furthering only their ends.

In any case its tremendous the good work she did bringing forward these texts all the way from the 1980s/90s but of course in Communist Ireland she generally got the ‘silent treatment’, as she said herself, or was slandered as a ‘conspiracy theorist’.

by Brian Nugent, http://www.orwellianireland.com .


Footnote
Her earlier book is available for free online here: https://www.fatimaandthegreatconspiracy.com/download/fatimaandthegreatconspiracy.pdf . And Red Symphony is available at: https://archive.org/details/red-symphony/page/36/mode/2up .

 

[willows68]

What a font of knowledge you are, Sir.
Deeply appreciate your erudite postings My ignorance is lessened.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

She had always been something of a campaigner on what might be considered Catholic issues, for example opposing contraception.

Bocht do you believe its a sin for young lads to use condoms?

 

[scolairebocht]

Yes that's a sin in the Catholic faith, certainly.

 

[Tiger]

View attachment 8028
I was privileged some years ago to meet and interview this lady, Deirdre Manifold, the author of this book. She was born as Bridget Courtney 6/3/1914 to John Joseph Courtney and his wife Margaret née Reilly, on a farm in Addergoole, in the Parish of Killererin, about three miles out the Dublin Road, South East, of Tuam Co. Galway. (Her father (1861-1934) was earlier married to Bridget née Donnellan who died in 1907, and hence she had step siblings.) John Joseph had been a stone mason in Cincinnati in the USA but had come home and bought that farm, near enough the homeplace in Omaun More (frequently spelt Immanemore) near Barnaderg. Both her parents were dead by the time she was 20 and so she went to work in Dublin, first with Iarnród Éireann and then the Civil Service.

Influenced it seems by people like Joe Hanley, from Barnaderg, she became very involved with the Legion of Mary and in fact knew Frank Duff. In Dublin she was for five years the recognised girlfriend of none other than Patrick Kavanagh, the poet, but fell out with him when he wouldn’t come to Lough Derg with her and instead she married William Manifold, who worked in the car business in Limerick, in 1955. In time they moved to Salthill in Galway running a car hire business and later a minibus for the handicapped.

She had always been something of a campaigner on what might be considered Catholic issues, for example opposing contraception in 1975 in Galway, against one Michael D. Higgins, but in 1982 she decided to go into writing as she explains in the foreword to her first book:


View attachment 8029
Anyway that book is Fatima and the Great Conspiracy, which she published herself in Galway and partly because of the fame of that book (which was translated into a number of languages) and partly because of her own diligent research, she built up many contacts internationally, including for example with Mel Gibson’s father. In any case this book here, Towards World Government: New World Order (Galway, 1993), the successor to the above, has a number of short chapters but the bulk of it consists of large quotations, or the full text in the case of the last one, from three books, starting with the:

Manual on Psychopolitics, with a forward by Lavrenty Beria, Director of the Soviet Secret Police

During the years of the Soviet Union it had very close relations with the Communist Party in the USA and some leaks around the 1950s, when a US Senate Committee was determinedly investigating their power in America, give us an insight into Communist tactics. As part of these leaks at that time we got this manual on ‘Psychopolitics’ which was the Communist name for a kind of overall psychological warfare on target peoples, particularly those of the West at the time, from which a few quotes:

I met Don two occasions. Once on the Chartre’s Pilgrimage and once at her home in Galway. She was a force of nature. Very impressive and interesting to listen to.

I haven’t read her books in years (her book on Karl Marx is fascinating). I must dig them out for a re-read.

I believe one of Patrick Kavanagh’s poems is about her.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Yes that's a sin in the Catholic faith, certainly.

Do you and Tiger believe its something that could condemn someone to hell for eternity Sir?

 

[scolairebocht]

Yes I believe it could, but hopefully its a venial sin most of the time, that is one that of itself wouldn't condemn you to hell.

 

[scolairebocht]

Thats interesting Tiger. Her funeral mass was in Latin, done by an SSPX priest.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Yes I believe it could, but hopefully its a venial sin most of the time, that is one that of itself wouldn't condemn you to hell.

You guys are absolutely nuts

 

[scolairebocht]

But do you mind me asking, what is it you are bringing to the table as a reason for saying it is Ok?

The Catholic Church is bringing to this 2,000 years of a Magisterium, with philosophers theologians etc etc determining that the marital act must be open to human life. That ancient wisdom is encapsulated into the Papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, which was endorsed by none other than Padre Pio, whose genuine mystical gifts have been endorsed by thousands, many of them Irish people.

Again, where on the otherhand does your philosophy derive exactly? So much of modern liberal philosophy seems to derive from think tanks or authors that we find out a long time later were funded by the CIA or whomever.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

You're surrendering your own critical faculties to others (not to mention attributing magical powers to some of them). Think for yourself man for goodness sake.

It doesn't require me to be a philosopher to realise immediately that your beliefs are ridiculous.

The idea that an 18 year old who wraps a plastic film around his johnson because he doesn't want to get his girlfriend pregnant and could be subject to eternal torture when he dies is the product of a very imaginative and if I may say so, sick mind, my good friend.

 

[AN2]

But do you mind me asking, what is it you are bringing to the table as a reason for saying it is Ok?

The Catholic Church is bringing to this 2,000 years of a Magisterium, with philosophers theologians etc etc determining that the marital act must be open to human life.

Married man are you, scolairebocht?

That ancient wisdom is encapsulated into the Papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, which was endorsed by none other than Padre Pio, whose genuine mystical gifts have been endorsed by thousands, many of them Irish people.

Again, where on the otherhand does your philosophy derive exactly? So much of modern liberal philosophy seems to derive from think tanks or authors that we find out a long time later were funded by the CIA or whomever.

 

[AN2]

You're surrendering your own critical faculties to others (not to mention attributing magical powers to some of them). Think for yourself man for goodness sake.

It doesn't require me to be a philosopher to realise immediately that your beliefs are ridiculous.

The idea that an 18 year old who wraps a plastic film around his johnson because he doesn't want to get his girlfriend pregnant and could be subject to eternal torture when he dies is the product of a very imaginative and if I may say so, sick mind, my good friend.

Is it (Catholicism) a manual for life?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

I don't know Sir. But I get very angry with you when you piss all over Tommy and other patriots.

I can't be friendly toward you whilst you're behaving in such an egregious way.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Hey TIGER!!!

Have you ever placed a wee bit of plastic over your Meat Stick?

 

[BIG FAT HOOR]

But do you mind me asking, what is it you are bringing to the table as a reason for saying it is Ok?

The Catholic Church is bringing to this 2,000 years of a Magisterium, with philosophers theologians etc etc determining that the marital act must be open to human life. That ancient wisdom is encapsulated into the Papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, which was endorsed by none other than Padre Pio, whose genuine mystical gifts have been endorsed by thousands, many of them Irish people.

Again, where on the otherhand does your philosophy derive exactly? So much of modern liberal philosophy seems to derive from think tanks or authors that we find out a long time later were funded by the CIA or whomever.

Its not as simple as you say --the catholic church has many demands on its faithful which could be described as cultish .
and there is no escaping any of it they have you before you are born -they have you before you are conceived .
and when you are born and a mere 10 seconds old --you and the mother who has just screamed in pain at your delivery and the father who like myself is awestruck and overcome are guilty of hereditary depravity which is the theological name for original sin-- and that is just the start of it .
the manner of our birth is horrific for a baby and Sam Beckett said ""WE ARE ALL BORN MAD SOME REMAIN SO"" but we are born into a mad world and they are waiting down the hall to inject you with all kinds of mad shit and later you are christened in a very un Christlike way but much better off than the utterly insane Jewish practice of letting a depraved person suck and bite and chew part of the baby's penis and blood mixed with some wine as ""their reward"" --many babies are treated for sexual transmitted diseases before their first birthday .
religion is a perilous experience for some .
your conspiracy author was spot on in zeroing in on the Rothschild owned offices of Khune lobe and co of new York -- who funded the Russian Japanese war and the Bolshevik revolution and both max Warburg and Paul Warburg of this office signed the Versailles treaty for Germany and America incredibly as brothers .
nobody was told and the second world war was designed /created by the Versailles treaty .
its no wonder they turn out the way they are -- religion is not necessarily connected even remotely with Christ who would drown the catholic church with a millstone if given the chance for their hereditary depravity and ""churching "" and their obsession with vast wealth -- the Vatican would shock anyone -- what is it about except using art and architecture to imply these people are close to godlike and should therefore be treated as gods.
I looked for Christ's words there that god is within us all -- I did not see it.
I like all before me saw a wonderful 3 D version of heaven painted by Michelangelo above my head almost in the clouds and realised the builders of this bank/business require me to be awestruck--
and I was by the sheer intellectual enormity of the scam.

 

[nobody knows I'm a dog]

View attachment 8028
I was privileged some years ago to meet and interview this lady, Deirdre Manifold, the author of this book. She was born as Bridget Courtney 6/3/1914 to John Joseph Courtney and his wife Margaret née Reilly, on a farm in Addergoole, in the Parish of Killererin, about three miles out the Dublin Road, South East, of Tuam Co. Galway. (Her father (1861-1934) was earlier married to Bridget née Donnellan who died in 1907, and hence she had step siblings.) John Joseph had been a stone mason in Cincinnati in the USA but had come home and bought that farm, near enough the homeplace in Omaun More (frequently spelt Immanemore) near Barnaderg. Both her parents were dead by the time she was 20 and so she went to work in Dublin, first with Iarnród Éireann and then the Civil Service.

Influenced it seems by people like Joe Hanley, from Barnaderg, she became very involved with the Legion of Mary and in fact knew Frank Duff. In Dublin she was for five years the recognised girlfriend of none other than Patrick Kavanagh, the poet, but fell out with him when he wouldn’t come to Lough Derg with her and instead she married William Manifold, who worked in the car business in Limerick, in 1955. In time they moved to Salthill in Galway running a car hire business and later a minibus for the handicapped.

She had always been something of a campaigner on what might be considered Catholic issues, for example opposing contraception in 1975 in Galway, against one Michael D. Higgins, but in 1982 she decided to go into writing as she explains in the foreword to her first book:


View attachment 8029
Anyway that book is Fatima and the Great Conspiracy, which she published herself in Galway and partly because of the fame of that book (which was translated into a number of languages) and partly because of her own diligent research, she built up many contacts internationally, including for example with Mel Gibson’s father. In any case this book here, Towards World Government: New World Order (Galway, 1993), the successor to the above, has a number of short chapters but the bulk of it consists of large quotations, or the full text in the case of the last one, from three books, starting with the:

Manual on Psychopolitics, with a forward by Lavrenty Beria, Director of the Soviet Secret Police

During the years of the Soviet Union it had very close relations with the Communist Party in the USA and some leaks around the 1950s, when a US Senate Committee was determinedly investigating their power in America, give us an insight into Communist tactics. As part of these leaks at that time we got this manual on ‘Psychopolitics’ which was the Communist name for a kind of overall psychological warfare on target peoples, particularly those of the West at the time, from which a few quotes:

You wouldn't happen to have a copy of your interview with Mrs Manifold?

 

[scolairebocht]

No it wasn't good enough to broadcast. She was slipping just a bit at that time...

 

[Tiger]

Hey TIGER!!!

Have you ever placed a wee bit of plastic over your Meat Stick?

Myles, firstly - condoms are made of laytex, which is a form of rubber.

Secondly, why are there so many unemployed, middle aged, single, alcoholics with outlandish levels of immaturity contributing to this forum?

Do you converse like a 10 year old in real life, or do you save that for this forum only?

 

[AN2]

Hey TIGER!!!

Have you ever placed a wee bit of plastic over your Meat Stick?

It's interesting, isn't it. He claims to have children, or a child at least (he's a "successful married man" dontcha know) and he thinks that he'll burn in hellfire for eternity if he wears a johnny during the "marital act" (I'm assuming that extends to all forms of contraception)

Yeah, I'm guessing that he hasn't had a lot of it

 

[Tiger]

It's interesting, isn't it. He claims to have children, or a child at least (he's a "successful married man" dontchaknow) and he thinks that he'll burn in hellfire for eternity if he wears a johnny during the "marital act" (I'm assuming that extends to all forms of contraception)

Yeah, I'm guessing that he hasn't had a lot of it

Says the middle-aged, jobless, alcoholic, lonely, childless, single man who spends all day online due to having nothing happening in the real world.

Well done James. You’re literally one of life’s eternal losers. Your immature opinions are of no use to anyone, including yourself.

 

[AN2]

Says the middle-aged, jobless, alcoholic, lonely, childless, single man who spends all day online due to having nothing happening in the real world.

Well done James. You’re literally one of life’s eternal losers. Your immature opinions are of no use to anyone, including yourself.

I'm right, amn't I

 

[Tiger]

I'm right, amn't I

You’re never “right” about anything.

 

[AN2]

You’re never “right” about anything.

 

[AN2]

Are sexless relationships healthy?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Myles, firstly - condoms are made of laytex, which is a form of rubber. Secondly, why are there so many unemployed, middle aged, single, alcoholics with outlandish levels of immaturity contributing to this forum? Do you converse like a 10 year old in real life, or do you save that for this forum only?

If you've never used one you must have one hell of a big brood Sir!

 

[AN2]

If you've never used one you must have one hell of a big brood Sir!

lol Of course he doesn't, chap is like fourteen ffs, have you ever read his posts?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Lets say a lad who's 25 and won't wear a rubber, provided there's no medical issues, him and his missus would have 10 kids by the time they're 35!

 

[Tiger]

Lets say a lad who's 25 and won't wear a rubber, provided there's no medical issues, him and his missus would have 10 kids by the time they're 35!

Haha, two childless bum’s pontificating about fertility.

No, Myles it doesn’t work that way. You’ve clearly never tried to have a family and it shows. Your cartoonish belief in fertility exposes you as a bachelor of little knowledge of life.

 

[AN2]

Haha, two childless bum’s [sic] pontificating about fertility.

Who said anything about that? Are you infertile, or your wife, is that what you're saying? Is your kid adopted, or AI?

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Haha, two childless bum’s pontificating about fertility. No, Myles it doesn’t work that way. You’ve clearly never tried to have a family and it shows. Your cartoonish belief in fertility exposes you as a bachelor of little knowledge of life.

Of course it does. Your missus would be perpetually preggers. Don't mind fertility circles etc. Unless you find it difficult to get it up - which is a high possibility - your missus would end up looking like an auld worn out sow by the time she's 40!

(I have a family btw )

 

[Tiger]

Of course it does. Your missus would be perpetually preggers. Don't mind fertility circles etc. Unless you find it difficult to get it up - which is a high possibility - your missus would end up looking like an auld worn out sow by the time she's 40!

(I have a family btw )

You haven’t a clue about real life Myles. You’re a bum. A childless bum.

Only a slave of the modern cult could sneer that motherhood makes a woman a ‘sow’.

It is the contraceptive mentality, not children, that reduces her to an object of use - a sterile toy to be consumed and discarded. The woman who bears life is exalted. The woman made barren by chemicals and laytex is the true casualty of our age.

Children are not a burden that wear her down, they are her crown.

And as for your claim of ‘having a family’ - everything in your contemptuous words suggest the opposite: a man who mocks fertility speaks more like a lonely bachelor raging at what he does not possess ( i.e - James Dawson)

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Unfortunately for you I have. 3 girls.

I didn't say any woman who has children is a sow. I'm saying a woman who has children in the double digits would be worn to pieces.

The poor divils never had any time off from having kids when the Church ruled the roost here. It was very unfair.

Did you abstain from all sexual activity until you were married Sir?

 

[AN2]

You haven’t a clue about real life Myles. You’re a bum. A childless bum.

Only a slave of the modern cult could sneer that motherhood makes a woman a ‘sow’.

It is the contraceptive mentality, not children, that reduces her to an object of use - a sterile toy to be consumed and discarded. The woman who bears life is exalted. The woman made barren by chemicals and laytex is the true casualty of our age.

Children are not a burden that wear her down, they are her crown.

And as for your claim of ‘having a family’ - everything in your contemptuous words suggest the opposite: a man who mocks fertility speaks more like a lonely bachelor raging at what he does not possess ( i.e - James Dawson)

Jesus, would you ever shut your hole, you obnoxious cretin. You're being laughed at because you think you'll spend an eternity in a lake of fire if you wear a rubber when you're banging your wife

Your Catholic "fertility" astrology chart aside, if you're a "successful married man" (one child away from being childless) then you obviously can't get it up for an adult female human (woman) - which comes as a surprise to no one

 

[Tiger]

Jesus, would you ever shut your hole, you obnoxious cretin. You're being laughed at because you think you'll spend an eternity in a lake of fire if you wear a rubber when you're banging your wife

Your Catholic "fertility" astrology chart aside, if you're a "successful married man" (one child away from being childless) then you obviously can't get it up for an adult female human (woman) - which comes as a surprise to no one

Shut up you worthless bum.

 

[Tiger]

Unfortunately for you I have. 3 girls.

I didn't say any woman who has children is a sow. I'm saying a woman who has children in the double digits would be worn to pieces.

The poor divils never had any time off from having kids when the Church ruled the roost here. It was very unfair.

Did you abstain from all sexual activity until you were married Sir?

Haha, you boast of 3 daughters (which is bullshit) and yet you sneer at mothers with more, as if love were measured in quotas.

The ‘poor divils’ of old Ireland you pity gave us Saints, and strong families - while your so called enlightened age gives us broken homes (like your and Jambo’s) - fatherless children, and the lowest birth rate in history.

You’re a useless pair of anti- Irish twats. The Muslims and all other destructive immigrants love you and your ilk.

Fucking anti-Irish twats.

 

[Myles O'Reilly]

Women suffered greatly in old Ireland. What we have now is the other extreme. We need to incentivise young natives to have more children but they don't have to have a dozen each. The replacement level is 2.3 so if we can get a bit above that we're fine.

I'm not sneering at any women. I'm sneering at men like you bullying them with your bizarre beliefs.

To be honest, reading between the lines, I suspect you've a fertility problem yourself. You doth protest too much!

 

[Tiger]

Women suffered greatly in old Ireland. What we have now is the other extreme. We need to incentivise young natives to have more children but they don't have to have a dozen each. The replacement level is 2.3 so if we can get a bit above that we're fine.

I'm not sneering at any women. I'm sneering at men like you bullying them with your bizarre beliefs.

To be honest, reading between the lines, I suspect you've a fertility problem yourself. You doth protest too much!

The old Ireland you slander gave us a culture of faith, strength, and dignity, where large families were the backbone of our nation. Can you point to a particular period that is your personal favourite part of our history? Is it in recent years or decades past?

The suffering you speak of is fiction spread by the very regime that now imports strangers to replace the children that you and your ilk refuse to have and mock other people for having. You’re a useless and disgusting pig who is of no use to the nationalist movement. It’s because of your ineptitude that Ireland has no strong nationalist movement.

Reducing life to a statistic - 2.3 per couple - is the thinking of an atheistic accountant, not a man.

As for your schoolyard guess about ‘fertility’ the projection is telling. It is the small mickeyed contraceptive generation that suffers a collapse in fertility and manhood.

The largest families in modern Ireland are traditional Catholics.