Former DUP leader is rapist pedo

It is entirely possible to have low empathy for a specific victim while completely abhorring the crime committed against them.

These two responses are processed by different parts of our psychological and moral frameworks - that is, if you have them.

Abhorring a crime stems from your core values, ethical code, and societal conditioning. It is a logical and moral evaluation of an act as universally wrong, unjust, or harmful.

Empathy, in this case emotional (affective) empathy is an emotional response. It can be hindered by a variety of personal, social, or psychological factors.

This is generally known and observed psychological reactions. If this does not make sense to you, if you cannot understand it or process it, congratulations! You have narrowed yourself down to either autism, alexithymia, or psychopathic or sociopathic tendencies.
Cool AI.(y)
 
At least we know you use AI and Google for every answer.
I would love to accuse you of the same but you have not contributed anything of substance on the forum - other than low grade insults, and servile agreement.

So you are safe for now.
 
I would love to accuse you of the same but you have not contributed anything of substance on the forum - other than low grade insults, and servile agreement.

So you are safe for now.
You're a funny little man.
Looks like nobody on this site takes you seriously.😂
 
You're a funny little man.
Looks like nobody on this site takes you seriously.😂

If that was the case, why do so many posters respond and argue with me?

Your general comprehension appears lacking in many respects.
 
If that was the case, why do so many posters respond and argue with me?

Your general comprehension appears lacking in many respects.
Mostly calling you a khunt, hardly taking you seriously, but your obvious insecurity drives you to seek attention of any sort.
 
Mostly calling you a khunt, hardly taking you seriously, but your obvious insecurity drives you to seek attention of any sort.
That will be news to James and Tiger.

You should see how many times James has tagged me in a post, trying to elict a reply.

Its a bit sad really.
 
That will be news to James and Tiger.

You should see how many times James has tagged me in a post, trying to elict a reply.

Its a bit sad really.
I think it's actually common courtesy to "tag" someone if you're referring to them @Haven, you normally just refer to me as "James".
 
If that was the case, why do so many posters respond and argue with me?

Your general comprehension appears lacking in many respects.
Reckon you were a proper little teachers pet in school, the class lickarse.
You have finished school, haven't you?
Your behavior on this site comes across as just childish attention seeking.
 
Reckon you were a proper little teachers pet in school, the class lickarse.
You have finished school, haven't you?
Your behavior on this site comes across as just childish attention seeking.

You know what I really need AI to do?

I need it to flag your posts on the rare occasion you say something interesting.
 
I think it's actually common courtesy to "tag" someone if you're referring to them @Haven, you normally just refer to me as "James".

Yeah when I reply to you, and when I talk about you.

You however are always trying to get my attention.

Just stop tagging me.
 
Yeah when I reply to you, and when I talk about you.

You however are always trying to get my attention.

Just stop tagging me.
I won't always or necessarily know when you talk/lie about me, which you do plenty

Therefore, it's common courtesy to "tag" someone if you're going to do that.

Gosh, you're stupid
 
roc/haven by definition.

I would say there is a lot of Narcissistic Personality Dis-Order around these days.

Back in the day when People had a lot of brothers and Sisters ~ ~ The Brothers and Sisters would soon let you know that they were every bit as important as you ! ! !

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I won't always or necessarily know when you talk/lie about me, which you do plenty

Therefore, it's common courtesy to "tag" someone if you're going to do that.

Gosh, you're stupid

James, I don't give two fucking shits about how you feel.

There you go, thats a definite lack of empathy!

But wait....I still feel a thin thread of pity, seeing you waste your life and potential. We only get one shot at life, and yours is basically over.

I guess thats something?
 
You either give a shit about how I utterly destroyed you in this thread or you're too stupid to realise that I did.

Sadly, for you, I think it's the latter.
 
@Haven, i will give you the final word.

Tell us why you think that the white people didn't riot.

Write it here -


______________________________________________
 
@Haven, i will give you the final word.

Tell us why you think that the white people didn't riot.

Write it here -


______________________________________________
Loyalists didn"t riot because Jeffrey is one of them at the end of the day, who tried for a hard border during Brexit and to stop the growing All-Ireland cross border economy, seen as a basis for a united Ireland.

Thats more important to them than the two victims.
 
Loyalists didn"t riot because Jeffrey is one of them at the end of the day.
So it has nothing to do with racism when whites riot, or don't. Good, I'm glad that's settled.
 
So it has nothing to do with racism when whites riot, or don't. Good, I'm glad that's settled.
You were only arguing with yourself on that. And you won!

The Loyalists only decided to riot last time because it suited the Unionist agenda.
 
You were only arguing with yourself on that. And you won!

The Loyalists only decided to riot last time because it suited the Unionist agenda.
Please unpack this "Unionist agenda" for us..
 
So, @Haven is now saying that whites rioting after a Sudanese illegal immigrant attempts to behead (not a common cultural practice of ours) a white man in Belfast.. and not rioting after a former politician is found guilty of child abuse.. is a "Unionist agenda" 🤔

Is anyone convinced with the absolute shite this guy is coming out with? 🤣
 
So, @Haven is now saying that whites rioting after a Sudanese illegal immigrant attempts to behead (not a common cultural practice of ours) a white man in Belfast.. and not rioting after a former politician is found guilty of child abuse.. is a "Unionist agenda" 🤔

Is anyone convinced with the absolute shite this guy is coming out with? 🤣
So...you asked me what the "Unionist agenda" is....and then immediatly answer your own question. You win another round with yourself! Well done!
 
So...you asked me what the "Unionist agenda" is....and then immediatly answer your own question. You win another round with yourself! Well done!
You truly are every bit as imbecilic as @Roc. is
 
You truly are every bit as imbecilic as @Roc. is

You seem totally unaware of NI politics. Its bizzare to be asked to "unpack" the Unionist agenda. The big clue is the word "Unionist".

Perhaps you would like a primer on Irish history from John Redmond to the late 60s, Civil Rights marches, Unionist violence, the burning out of Bombay St, etc? You heard of Ian Paisley?

Let me know how I can help you.
 
You seem totally unaware of NI politics.
Of course I amn't.

Again, just the stupidest strawman imaginable.

When I ask you about a "Unionist agenda", you're supposed to answer in context.
But you don't do that, because you're mentally retarded, you won't even know why I'm saying that to you now 🤣

Its bizzare to be asked to "unpack" the Unionist agenda. The big clue is the word "Unionist".

Perhaps you would like a primer on Irish history from John Redmond to the late 60s, Civil Rights marches, Unionist violence, the burning out of Bombay St, etc? You heard of Ian Paisley?

Let me know how I can help you.
 

Latest Threads

Popular Threads

Back
Top Bottom