Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

[The Equalizer]

Do you think people are stupid, your "race realism" is obviously a modern rebrand of scientific racism.

Race realism is the truth about race.

The only overlap with scientific racism is race denialism, race realism being the opposite.

Race realism has nothing to do with the Nazis or any policy forthcoming.

Your "race realism" relies on the same fundamental premises that underpinned the Nazi era of scientific racism, i.e. biological determinism, claiming that human "races" are fixed, biologically distinct sub-species.

You both put these "races" in hierarchical ranking, claimimg that genetic differences dictate disparities in intelligence, behaviour, and civilization-building capabilities, etc.

True or false?

Of course it's true. How else can you explain it?

 

[Roc_]

Yes, the measure of your "truth" being "science", just the same as Nazis claimed the same. I.e. It was (pseudo) "science" that "proved" it for them.

In other news, that David Miller stuff is old news, he's doing a circuit, getting paid for "lawfare". E.g. The below from October 2024.

Anti-Zionist beliefs ‘worthy of respect’, UK tribunal finds

Judges say unfairly dismissed academic David Miller’s views on Israel should be protected by antidiscrimination laws

www.theguardian.com

Granted here again we see the UK state leading the way, corroborating a guy who dresses up antisemitism as "scholarship" for pay - paid by the very same people who also paid a man to slice a knife through Salman Rushdie's throat. A mediocrity whose academic forte is dressing up classic antisemitic conspiracy tropes as critical research and academic sociology and getting paid for it.

Ask yourself who this is really a win for. Is it a win for the UK and the values they once upheld?

"The truth" etc. etc.

 

[The Equalizer]

Yes, the measure of your "truth" being "science", just the same as Nazis claimed the same. I.e. It was (pseudo) "science" that "proved" it for them.

Race as a biological reality is science. And that is obviously based on genetic difference.

Are you saying that someone like Richard Dawkins is a pseudoscientist?

In other news, that David Miller stuff is old news, he's doing a circuit, getting paid for "lawfare". E.g. The below from October 2024.

Anti-Zionist beliefs ‘worthy of respect’, UK tribunal finds

Judges say unfairly dismissed academic David Miller’s views on Israel should be protected by antidiscrimination laws

www.theguardian.com

Granted here again we see the UK state leading the way, corroborating a guy who dresses up antisemitism as "scholarship" for pay - paid by the very same people who also paid a man to slice a knife through Salman Rushdie's throat. A mediocrity whose academic forte is dressing up classic antisemitic conspiracy tropes as critical research and academic sociology and getting paid for it.

Ask yourself who this is really a win for. Is it a win for the UK and the values they once upheld?

"The truth" etc. etc.

 

[Roc_]

Are you saying that someone like Richard Dawkins is a pseudoscientist?

Again, Jambo, read this slowly this time, Richard Dawkins does not posit racial categories as useful proxies for genetic diversity. He continually strives to communicate to the layman the fact that racial categories are extremely weak proxies for genetic diversity in humans.

Have you not heard him say for instance that when you move from visual differences to biological differences that you are moving from a defensible proxy to dealing with a very weak proxy?

Can you not grasp with that tiny binary mind of yours that the fact genetic differences between races are swamped by an order of magnitude by the genetic diversity that occurs within races, sounds the death knell for your rebranded theory?

 

[The Equalizer]

Again, Jambo, read this slowly this time, Richard Dawkins does not posit racial categories as useful proxies for genetic diversity. He continually strives to communicate to the layman the fact that racial categories are extremely weak proxies for genetic diversity in humans.

Have you not heard him say for instance that when you move from visual differences to biological differences that you are moving from a defensible proxy to dealing with a very weak proxy?

Can you not grasp with that tiny binary mind of yours that the fact genetic differences between races are swamped by an order of magnitude by the genetic diversity that occurs within races, sounds the death knell for your rebranded theory?

Good God, you're so tiresome..

Dawkins says that race is a biological reality -

Post in thread 'Andrew Gold Tackles The Taboo Topic Of Race Realism' https://www.sarsfieldsvirtualpub.co...-taboo-topic-of-race-realism.1152/post-167563

And that reality can only be based on genetic difference.

 

[Roc_]

FFS. Yes it is tiresome, Jambo.

How about a picture, maybe that would help?

POPULATION A (e.g., European) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
POPULATION B (e.g., East Asian) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
POPULATION C (e.g., African) └───■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■───┘
..................................................◄───────────────────────────►
..................................................Total Human Genetic Space