Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

[The Equalizer]

View: https://t.me/markacollett/20685

^ Baha! @Roc. is very upset.

Every time he posts his Venn diagram, horseshoe shit etc. I'm going to refer him to this thread. Every Single. Time.

 

[Roc.]

Here's an article from seven years ago even talking about the central point of this thread (that that moron Collett is pretending he only just discovered):

We are now way past the time when it was possible to say that the far right is the sole source of threat to American Jews. There’s been an ongoing string of attacks against Jews in New York City whose perpetrators are not white supremacists. Some attackers seem to have been influenced by the rhetoric of Louis Farrakhan, showing — as if we still needed proof of that! — a direct link between anti-Semitic words and actions.

And then there is another uncomfortable fact: appreciation that some anti-Semitic far-right figures heap on far-left “anti-Zionists.” Holocaust denier David Irving famously referred to the UK Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn as “impressive” and “a fine man” in the context of a discussion about the Party’s crisis over anti-Semitism. For the “resistance to ZOG” (Zionist occupied government, a far-right conspiracy theory), white supremacist David Duke called Omar the most important member of US Congress.

What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides. Once it’s out, particularly when expressed by a high-profile political figure, it isn’t confined to some clearly defined space. It resonates across the entire spectrum. And when there is no push back, it loosens taboos against anti-Semitism throughout the entire society.

True, thus far the deadly synagogue shootings have been executed by white supremacists. But who is to say that the New York Times cartoon, published right on the eve of the Poway Chabad shooting, didn’t play into the shooter’s mindset? And who is to say that the Latuff cartoon Omar and Tlaib circulated isn’t going to contribute to a future mass shooter’s decision to take action?

When it comes to anti-Semitism, it is time for the left to do some serious soul-searching. Pointing to the right as a worse offender is hardly a convincing strategy; surely, the left has better benchmarks than that.

https://forward.com/opinion/429787/the-left-can-no-longer-excuse-its-anti-semitism/

 

[Roc.]

View: https://x.com/PoliticalJewTT/status/2073183222637236359

"... Democratic Socialists couch “Zionist” power and evil in the language of anti-imperialism and liberation for the oppressed. The right evokes the same imagery under the banner of patriotism and religious conviction. But the underlying message is the same: It reduces complex political realities to a single, all-explaining narrative driven by an omnipotent, corrupting global force of international Jewry..."

 

[The Equalizer]

@Roc., answer the question, you f*cking coward. You've seen the actual scene from the movie because I posted it here.

Who do you think made this "meme"? -


View: https://streamable.com/zrupqp

Was it:

A) An 'Islamist' (Muslim)
B) A communist (far-left)
C) A nationalist (far-right)

 

[Roc.]

Jambo, if there's one thing that radical ideology saturated morons of all hues have in common it's antisemitism.

And if there are slight differences in variety it amounts to the same thing. As I posted for you above: "... What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides...".

So the answer again is any radicalised antisemitic moron could have got their AI to do that video.

The really interesting question though is what is it in someone that they would spend their time making something like that so as to inflame hatred and the tropes that people use to rationalise their hatred?

In this regard I think this Muslim reformist puts his finger on it:

"... I believe that the arts, especially music, make the soul more humanistic. The arts are a means of shielding our sons against the ideology of extremism, because music makes you love life. All forms of art make you love people, love life. They make you more humane, more tolerant. If you manage to instill this within the minds of the youth, you shield them from ideological fanaticism. Fanaticism takes control over people who hate life, whose hearts are empty..."

Qatari Professor Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: Terrorism Is Not a Reaction to Political Injustices

Commenting on what he called the "culture of hatred," Prof. Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, former Dean of Islamic Law at Qatar ...

web.archive.org

Actually in the same interview he points out like I'm pointing out to you:

"... Like National Socialism and Communism, Islamism is a modern ideology too, and often conflated with other things... Radicalization is accompanied by a specific, narrowed, and detailed take on the key issues of violence, hatred, loyalty, and the view of outsiders expressed in the language of religion [including secular political religions]. This religious worldview is what we call in Arabic “Aqeeda,” which one Islamist website describes as “those matters which are believed in, with certainty and conviction, in one’s heart and soul. They are not tainted with any doubt or uncertainty..."

Sound familiar Jambo? So again - my answer to you if you actually missed it before is that the person who made that video has something in his soul that all your three options have in their soul. And in fact you do too, and a number of others on here.