Is the Left the only resistance against the Jews?

[The Equalizer]

View: https://t.me/markacollett/20685

^ Baha! @Roc. is very upset.

Every time he posts his Venn diagram, horseshoe shit etc. I'm going to refer him to this thread. Every Single. Time.

 

[Roc_]

Here's an article from seven years ago even talking about the central point of this thread (that that moron Collett is pretending he only just discovered):

We are now way past the time when it was possible to say that the far right is the sole source of threat to American Jews. There’s been an ongoing string of attacks against Jews in New York City whose perpetrators are not white supremacists. Some attackers seem to have been influenced by the rhetoric of Louis Farrakhan, showing — as if we still needed proof of that! — a direct link between anti-Semitic words and actions.

And then there is another uncomfortable fact: appreciation that some anti-Semitic far-right figures heap on far-left “anti-Zionists.” Holocaust denier David Irving famously referred to the UK Labour Party Leader Jeremy Corbyn as “impressive” and “a fine man” in the context of a discussion about the Party’s crisis over anti-Semitism. For the “resistance to ZOG” (Zionist occupied government, a far-right conspiracy theory), white supremacist David Duke called Omar the most important member of US Congress.

What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides. Once it’s out, particularly when expressed by a high-profile political figure, it isn’t confined to some clearly defined space. It resonates across the entire spectrum. And when there is no push back, it loosens taboos against anti-Semitism throughout the entire society.

True, thus far the deadly synagogue shootings have been executed by white supremacists. But who is to say that the New York Times cartoon, published right on the eve of the Poway Chabad shooting, didn’t play into the shooter’s mindset? And who is to say that the Latuff cartoon Omar and Tlaib circulated isn’t going to contribute to a future mass shooter’s decision to take action?

When it comes to anti-Semitism, it is time for the left to do some serious soul-searching. Pointing to the right as a worse offender is hardly a convincing strategy; surely, the left has better benchmarks than that.

https://forward.com/opinion/429787/the-left-can-no-longer-excuse-its-anti-semitism/

 

[Roc_]

View: https://x.com/PoliticalJewTT/status/2073183222637236359

"... Democratic Socialists couch “Zionist” power and evil in the language of anti-imperialism and liberation for the oppressed. The right evokes the same imagery under the banner of patriotism and religious conviction. But the underlying message is the same: It reduces complex political realities to a single, all-explaining narrative driven by an omnipotent, corrupting global force of international Jewry..."

 

[The Equalizer]

@Roc., answer the question, you f*cking coward. You've seen the actual scene from the movie because I posted it here.

Who do you think made this "meme"? -


View: https://streamable.com/zrupqp

Was it:

A) An 'Islamist' (Muslim)
B) A communist (far-left)
C) A nationalist (far-right)

 

[Roc_]

Jambo, if there's one thing that radical ideology saturated morons of all hues have in common it's antisemitism.

And if there are slight differences in variety it amounts to the same thing. As I posted for you above: "... What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides...".

So the answer again is any radicalised antisemitic moron could have got their AI to do that video.

The really interesting question though is what is it in someone that they would spend their time making something like that so as to inflame hatred and the tropes that people use to rationalise their hatred?

In this regard I think this Muslim reformist puts his finger on it:

"... I believe that the arts, especially music, make the soul more humanistic. The arts are a means of shielding our sons against the ideology of extremism, because music makes you love life. All forms of art make you love people, love life. They make you more humane, more tolerant. If you manage to instill this within the minds of the youth, you shield them from ideological fanaticism. Fanaticism takes control over people who hate life, whose hearts are empty..."

Qatari Professor Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: Terrorism Is Not a Reaction to Political Injustices

Commenting on what he called the "culture of hatred," Prof. Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, former Dean of Islamic Law at Qatar ...

web.archive.org

Actually in the same interview he points out like I'm pointing out to you:

"... Like National Socialism and Communism, Islamism is a modern ideology too, and often conflated with other things... Radicalization is accompanied by a specific, narrowed, and detailed take on the key issues of violence, hatred, loyalty, and the view of outsiders expressed in the language of religion [including secular political religions]. This religious worldview is what we call in Arabic “Aqeeda,” which one Islamist website describes as “those matters which are believed in, with certainty and conviction, in one’s heart and soul. They are not tainted with any doubt or uncertainty..."

Sound familiar Jambo? So again - my answer to you if you actually missed it before is that the person who made that video has something in his soul that all your three options have in their soul. And in fact you do too, and a number of others on here.

 

[The Equalizer]

Jambo, if there's one thing that radical ideology saturated morons of all hues have in common it's antisemitism.

And if there are slight differences in variety it amounts to the same thing. As I posted for you above: "... What this shows us — as if we still needed proof of that too! — is that anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, no matter where on the political spectrum it resides...".

So the answer again is any radicalised antisemitic moron could have got their AI to do that video.

Bzzzt.. Wrong!

Incorrect.

The correct answer is -

A) An 'Islamist' (Muslim)
B) A communist (far-left)
C) A nationalist (far-right)

And the whole point of this exercise was to show that your Venn diagram, horseshoe shit is nonsense.

The really interesting question though is what is it in someone that they would spend their time making something like that so as to inflame hatred and the tropes that people use to rationalise their hatred?

In this regard I think this Muslim reformist puts his finger on it:

"... I believe that the arts, especially music, make the soul more humanistic. The arts are a means of shielding our sons against the ideology of extremism, because music makes you love life. All forms of art make you love people, love life. They make you more humane, more tolerant. If you manage to instill this within the minds of the youth, you shield them from ideological fanaticism. Fanaticism takes control over people who hate life, whose hearts are empty..."

No one cares what your high priests and gurus think.

Anyway, here's a choon, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, by Oasis -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kff9AhBE6ZY

Qatari Professor Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari: Terrorism Is Not a Reaction to Political Injustices

Commenting on what he called the "culture of hatred," Prof. Abd Al-Hamid Al-Ansari, former Dean of Islamic Law at Qatar ...

web.archive.org

Actually in the same interview he points out like I'm pointing out to you:

"... Like National Socialism and Communism, Islamism is a modern ideology too, and often conflated with other things... Radicalization is accompanied by a specific, narrowed, and detailed take on the key issues of violence, hatred, loyalty, and the view of outsiders expressed in the language of religion [including secular political religions]. This religious worldview is what we call in Arabic “Aqeeda,” which one Islamist website describes as “those matters which are believed in, with certainty and conviction, in one’s heart and soul. They are not tainted with any doubt or uncertainty..."

Sound familiar Jambo?

Nope. Nothing ever sounds familiar coming from you because it's always a load of rubbish.

So again - my answer to you if you actually missed it before is that the person who made that video has something in his soul that all your three options have in their soul. And in fact you do too, and a number of others on here.

 

[Roc_]

Yiz all sound the same. There's fuck all difference.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1yz1mZkdcU

Even the "normies" gathered around the "Occupied territories" bill in this country are now repeating many of the same things.

 

[Roc_]

PS I'm just twigging this venn diagram you're going on about was supposed to be something I came up with. Whereas I don't even know who the fuck Dave Rubin is. And I thought you posted it to make your own stupid point. Of course you never even noticed I made a post scathing of it as a stupid simplification. Fucking idiot.

 

[Roc_]

Oasis was always a band for musical philistines.

 

[The Equalizer]

Yiz all sound the same. There's fuck all difference.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1yz1mZkdcU

View: https://t.me/markacollett/18052

Even the "normies" gathered around the "Occupied territories" bill in this country are now repeating many of the same things.

 

[The Equalizer]

Oasis was always a band for musical philistines.

It was either that song or Kumbaya. No one cares what your high priests & gurus (in that case a "fixed" Muslim) have to say..

 

[The Equalizer]

PS I'm just twigging this venn diagram you're going on about was supposed to be something I came up with. Whereas I don't even know who the fuck Dave Rubin is.

I told you who he is. One of yours. A Jew.

And I thought you posted it to make your own stupid point. Of course you never even noticed I made a post scathing of it as a stupid simplification. Fucking idiot.

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

Yiz all sound the same. There's fuck all difference.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1yz1mZkdcU

Even the "normies" gathered around the "Occupied territories" bill in this country are now repeating many of the same things.

They are funded by the same sources, why would they sound different?

 

[clarke-connolly]

Yiz all sound the same. There's fuck all difference.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1yz1mZkdcU

Even the "normies" gathered around the "Occupied territories" bill in this country are now repeating many of the same things.

It's as if , The American, Deep-State / Dark-State, is controlling ( and writing the scripts ) for those two ! ! !

It has to be said that, The American, Deep-State / Dark-State, works in very mysterious ways ! ! !

Confuse / Divide / Stir / Murk /etc = = But, Conquer and Rule ! !

Just a variation of Good-Bad Cop = = Which for some reason works so well on the human pscyche.

 

[Roc_]

Or David Duke.

 

[Roc_]

Or David Duke.

Well really while he is a central figure currently in promoting these tropes through internet carriers like Fuentes, Collet or Kasparian, he didn't come up with them. You could probably go back to the 60s and 70s and what researchers have called the “paranoid, proto-racist, conspiratorial Manichean” anti-Zionism the USSR was mass-producing at the time.

Everything the present day cult intone was in there. I.e. Zionism was presented as a global conspiracy—imperialist, colonialist, Nazi-like, racist, and genocidal, where Zionists were depicted as both subhuman and all-powerful - as parasitic, predatory perpetrators of atrocities, violent vermin who nonetheless possessed the ability to control the world and hold Western societies in their grip.

Plus ca change, c'est la meme chose.

 

[Roc_]

And again, the undertstanding that conspiracist anti-Zionism can cut both ways, radicalising people both on the left and on the right through its conspiratorial framework, is I think crucial to understanding the current historical moment.

 

[clarke-connolly]

They are funded by the same sources, why would they sound different?

The same sources being ~ ~ The American Deep-State / Dark-State = = One Way or Another ! !

 

[The Equalizer]

Ffs, you hardly take dumb propaganda that @Roc. posts seriously, do ye?

That's a video by a Zionist outfit called Canary Mission. Here is Kasparian talking about them -


View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fOeYIDjQOVI

 

[Roc_]

"Ana Kasparian's awakening is almost complete."

It's essentially apocalyptic (e.g. "white genocide").
It operates by exploiting a time of change and confusion.
It promises a restoration of a prior ideal time and culture (subject position of blacks to whites).
It has 'prophets' and 'priests' (Collet, Duke, Morgoth, Woods, etc.).
Its prophets and priests promise their acolytes that thet can create a world that will once agai nmake "sense".
It has its prophets and priests also making demands on their followers, giving them direction and purpose, they have to actively participate (e.g. "Bugs").
It promises a "cargo"
It recruits and proselytizes.
It not only recruits and proselytize, it generates an opposition. It excludes.
It generates opposition because the state of feeling and the hostility is valuable to it.
Its new entrants usually go though a ritual scepticism - they're encouraged to profess scepticism and have this overcome.
It is based on a kind of magical thinking.
It inspires a high degree of devotion in its accolytes, etc.

 

[The Equalizer]

It's essentially apocalyptic (e.g. "white genocide").

Good, I'm glad you brought that up.

Now show me a clip of Ana talking about white genocide and linking it to the Juice.

It operates by exploiting a time of change and confusion.
It promises a restoration of a prior ideal time and culture (subject position of blacks to whites).
It has 'prophets' and 'priests' (Collet, Duke, Morgoth, Woods, etc.).
Its prophets and priests promise their acolytes that thet can create a world that will once agai nmake "sense".
It has its prophets and priests also making demands on their followers, giving them direction and purpose, they have to actively participate (e.g. "Bugs").
It promises a "cargo"
It recruits and proselytizes.
It not only recruits and proselytize, it generates an opposition. It excludes.
It generates opposition because the state of feeling and the hostility is valuable to it.
Its new entrants usually go though a ritual scepticism - they're encouraged to profess scepticism and have this overcome.
It is based on a kind of magical thinking.
It inspires a high degree of devotion in its accolytes, etc.

 

[The Equalizer]

Yiz all sound the same. There's fuck all difference.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1yz1mZkdcU

^ This is really quite pathetic when you think about it, btw. Sad, bully-boy, doxxing jewholes trawling through hours of footage so that they can quote mine anti-seemites on the "left" and the "right" saying the same thing.

Spoiler

It's all true.

Even the "normies" gathered around the "Occupied territories" bill in this country are now repeating many of the same things.

 

[Roc_]

The above was just a copy and paste of the characteristics of a cult.

To point out the claim of "awakening" that is characteristic of cults.

Obviously she has not been recruited to your whole white supremacist/nationalist cult.

But she has been recruited to a sub sect of it (as we have seen it is a sub-sect of both the far right and far left.)

I.e The sub-sect of “paranoid, proto-racist, conspiratorial Manichean” anti-Zionism - where Zionism was presented as a global conspiracy—imperialist, colonialist, Nazi-like, racist, and genocidal, where Zionists were depicted as both subhuman and all-powerful - as parasitic, predatory perpetrators of atrocities, violent vermin who nonetheless possessed the ability to control the world and hold Western societies in their grip.

Obviously she is repeating the dogma and doctrine verbatim at this point, as the video clearly shows.

 

[The Equalizer]

I'd imagine the Canary Mission HQ looks something like this -

 

[The Equalizer]

The above was just a copy and paste of the characteristics of a cult.

To point out the claim of "awakening" that is characteristic of cults.

Obviously she has not been recruited to your whole white supremacist/nationalist cult.

But she has been recruited to a sub sect of it (as we have seen it is a sub-sect of both the far right and far left.)

I.e The sub-sect of “paranoid, proto-racist, conspiratorial Manichean” anti-Zionism - where Zionism was presented as a global conspiracy—imperialist, colonialist, Nazi-like, racist, and genocidal, where Zionists were depicted as both subhuman and all-powerful - as parasitic, predatory perpetrators of atrocities, violent vermin who nonetheless possessed the ability to control the world and hold Western societies in their grip.

Obviously she is repeating the dogma and doctrine verbatim at this point, as the video clearly shows.

Everything you talk about is meta. And because you're an imbecile and, quite frankly, a Jewish imbecile, you don't realise that, in the words of Stefan Molyneux, that's not an argument.

 

[Roc_]

It's all true.

Of course it is, you tragic fucking idiot.

The truth never changes and the Church is there to broadcast the truth

And you thought you were better than the god botherers, didn't you, Jambo.

You are the same. Just your replacement creed is by probably orders of magnitude even more frightful.

 

[The Equalizer]

Of course it is, you tragic fucking idiot.

Well then tell us what isn't true, and why.

Instead of endlessly blathering about "cults" etc. etc.

Kasparian talks about the genocide perpetrated by the Israelis in Gaza, ZOG and so on but she doesn't go all the way to far-right talking points and you can't show that she does.

And you thought you were better than the god botherers, didn't you, Jambo.

You are the same. Just your replacement creed is by probably orders of magnitude even more frightful.

Why are you quoting @scolairebocht and replying to me?

 

[Roc_]

They are funded by the same sources, why would they sound different?

Do you mean the more unscrupulous lefties are taking up this kind of antisemitic hate rhetoric to get in on the grift?

The far right is raking in millions online with pay-for-hate | Opinion

Nick Fuentes isn't the only one profiting from extremist views. There are plenty of grifters making a fortune from being bigots.

eu.usatoday.com

He spreads hate online — and fans pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars | The far-right influencer Nick Fuentes has pocketed roughly $900,000 from “fanatical” donors since the start of 2025. Some superfans see him as part of their families.

 

[Roc_]

Well then tell us what isn't true, and why.

You're an idiot Jambo, no real world experience with which to parse the "information environment" (experience alone teaches anything), susceptible as an autistic child, and teeming with personal problems that grifters easily exploit.

How far right uses video games and tech to lure and radicalise teenage recruits

After a 13-year-old was sentenced last week, a young victim of radicalisation talks about how white supremacists target children

www.theguardian.com

 

[The Equalizer]

You're an idiot Jambo, no real world experience with which to parse the "information environment" (experience alone teaches anything), susceptible as an autistic child, and teeming with personal problems that grifters easily exploit.

How far right uses video games and tech to lure and radicalise teenage recruits

After a 13-year-old was sentenced last week, a young victim of radicalisation talks about how white supremacists target children

www.theguardian.com

Your fake news media articles are as laughable as all of the other (more blatantly Jewish) shite you post.

Stop embarrassing yourself.

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

Do you mean the more unscrupulous lefties are taking up this kind of antisemitic hate rhetoric to get in on the grift?

The far right is raking in millions online with pay-for-hate | Opinion

Nick Fuentes isn't the only one profiting from extremist views. There are plenty of grifters making a fortune from being bigots.

eu.usatoday.com

He spreads hate online — and fans pay him hundreds of thousands of dollars | The far-right influencer Nick Fuentes has pocketed roughly $900,000 from “fanatical” donors since the start of 2025. Some superfans see him as part of their families.

Its probably pocket change to the money they get from their real funders

 

[The Equalizer]

Its probably pocket change to the money they get from their real funders

I don't think that anyone has a clue WTF you're talking about at this stage..

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

I don't think that anyone has a clue WTF you're talking about at this stage..

I dont think that a lot of these dissident right guys are surviving on the money they raise from subscribers. They more likely to have state level funding. A lot of these people were on the Trump train when he was touting peace between Russian and Ukraine and are off the Trump train since. They wanted no funding to Ukraine and no war with Iran etc etc. Which suits the Russia/China/Iran Axis just fine.

 

[The Equalizer]

I dont think that a lot of these dissident right guys are surviving on the money they raise from subscribers. They more likely to have state level funding. A lot of these people were on the Trump train when he was touting peace between Russian and Ukraine and are off the Trump train since. They wanted no funding to Ukraine and no war with Iran etc etc. Which suits the Russia/China/Iran Axis just fine.

Well, first of all, @Roc. asked you about lefties.

Anyway, I think you've gone off topic..

 

[Roc_]

No, I just wanted to know his thinking. I only put out my own idea about it as a part of a conversation (an alien concept to you no doubt.).

 

[Roc_]

I'd say it's on topic, too.

 

[Roc_]

There's an academic paper here looking into today's left-wing antizionist slogans and origins in Soviet propaganda, and the biographies of the right-wing Soviet ideologues that came up with it.

https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.26613/jca/5.1.97/html

 

[The Equalizer]

I'd say it's on topic, too.

No, the topic is you doing your horseshoe theory, Venn diagram shit..

 

[SeekTheFairLand]

No, the topic is you doing your horseshoe theory, Venn diagram shit..

Come on. If the Jews are as all powerful as you believe then they can weather a rising tide of the Outside Left and the Outside Right throwing shite at them. However it does suit the Anti West Axis to throw money at the likes of the Young Turks and the Dissident Right types if they can keep their talking points going. Anti Ukraine War and Anti Iran War messaging. And that creates division going within the West. Standard Dugin type strategy.

 

[Diarmuid]

If the Jews are as all powerful as you believe then they can weather a rising tide of the Outside Left and the Outside Right throwing shite at them

Perhaps not. They invest a lot in dividing us. If we united on an anti-Zionist rally, it would certainly scare them.And these types, although they show great confidence in public, often have an escape plan ready and are prepared to run for it if they notice the natives are getting cranky...